Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements
zlib was required, not glib Please take a look at line 54 of pbx_dundi.c This calls out an include of zlib.h The compile was failing on this file. Installing the zlib package fixed the problem. It appears (I am NOT a programmer) functions from the library are used on line 1371 and 1397. - Original Message - From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:38 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements Jay Brussels wrote: > The compile was failing for dindi. stated glib.h was missing. Installed the > glib package and the compile completed. Actually, that's not quite correct. The DUNDi support in Asterisk does not use glib. However, the GTK console (pbx_gtkconsole) does, so that's why I've never seen a need for glib on my systems; I don't build/run Asterisk on machines that have GUI environments installed. You must have done so, so that's why glib was needed. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements
The compile was failing for dindi. stated glib.h was missing. Installed the glib package and the compile completed. - Original Message - From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements Jay Brussels wrote: > p.s. I needed to install glib that I did not have for a previous version. Asterisk does not use glib; my systems running CVS HEAD as of the 20th don't have glib installed. What did you need it for? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements
I started out with the development branch then switched to the stable (as the entire company now runs on Asterisk). The stable branch (including 1.02) does not have the queue annoucements.I switched last night to the development branch (cvs just asterisk w/o any revision) and it now works perfect. p.s. I needed to install glib that I did not have for a previous version. - Original Message - From: "Brian C. Fertig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:04 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements Let me know if you find something out. I am having the same problem. I can get it to play to my agents but not the people on hold. I was debating on creating a AGI script to do all this but I remembered that it was supposed to do it automatically. If someone has a work around could you please share it? Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Brussels Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 11:34 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements On a pre 1.0 version I was running I patched queue.c to add estimated hold time announcements. Stable 1.0 (cvs checkout -rv1-0_stable asterisk) does not appear to of included this patch and of course patching the current queue.c with the patch I have fails. I looked at the Matis to see if an updated queue.c file is available or a patch for the current but I did not see anything - not too sure how these updates are included. Tried to pull the queue.c files w/ it's header files out of 1.02 but it would not properly compile. I also tried to compile the original queue.c file that was patched but it appears some header files it uses have been modified. Am I missing something here? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Queue Patch - estimated hold time announcements
On a pre 1.0 version I was running I patched queue.c to add estimated hold time announcements. Stable 1.0 (cvs checkout -rv1-0_stable asterisk) does not appear to of included this patch and of course patching the current queue.c with the patch I have fails. I looked at the Matis to see if an updated queue.c file is available or a patch for the current but I did not see anything - not too sure how these updates are included. Tried to pull the queue.c files w/ it's header files out of 1.02 but it would not properly compile. I also tried to compile the original queue.c file that was patched but it appears some header files it uses have been modified. Am I missing something here? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Fixed: "warning:implicit declaration of function`__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__"
Exactly correct Paul. Thank you! Jay - Original Message - From: "Paul Dugas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ANY DEVELOPERS HERE?"warning:implicit declaration of function`__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__" Jay Brussels said: > I did not intend to mix old with new. I ran "make clean". You still may be "mixing". I ran into the same a while back. The hitch for me was that the make files don't prefer to include from the source rather than from /usr/include. If you have a previous installation's files still in /usr/include/asterisk, they'll get used instead of the new ones in the source directory. I simply renamed (and removed later when deemed safe) /usr/include/asterisk before building the new version. Hope this helps, Paul -- Paul A. Dugas Dugas Enterprises, LLC email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]1711 Indian Ridge Drive phone: 404.932.1355 fax: 770.516-4841 Woodstock, GA 30189 USA [ onsite at the Georgia DOT's West Annex, 404.463.2860 x158 ] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] ANY DEVELOPERS HERE? "warning:implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__"
I did not intend to mix old with new. I ran "make clean". - Original Message - From: "Roger Schreiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 6:46 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ANY DEVELOPERS HERE? "warning:implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__" Jay Brussels schrieb: > ... > When trying to upgrade to 1.0.2, I get several compile warnings such as: > chan_zap.c:3515: warning: implicit declaration of function > `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__' Hi, I assume you mixed some parts of an older asterisk version with the new asterisk kernel. Did you recompile every module which should be loaded into the asterisk kernel? Maybe search for pthread_create in older source files and replace by ast_pthread_create! Check, whether the arguments remained the same ones and fix if necessary! Roger. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] ANY DEVELOPERS HERE? "warning: implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__"
I have been running a version of Asterisk that is 4-5 months old. When trying to upgrade to 1.0.2, I get several compile warnings such as: chan_zap.c:3515: warning: implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__' The channel modules will not load with the error: undefined symbol: __use_ast_pthread_create_instead__ I have removed the modules before compiling, make clean, make install, reinstalled them, did the modprobe stuff, etc. Do I have some type of missing library or function that is causing the ast_pthread errors? I got the Asterisk, Zaptel and Libpri off the CVS. It looks like my gcc is current. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] ZPHONE Channel Bank
Has anyone used the ZPHONE Hi-Z channel bank w/ Asterisk? Any comments? I am looking for a unit that does a great job in adjusting to changing line impedances to limit echo. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] warning: implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__'
I have been running a version of Asterisk that is 4-5 months old. When trying to upgrade to 1.0.2, I get several compile warnings such as: chan_zap.c:3515: warning: implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__' The channel modules will not load with the error: undefined symbol: __use_ast_pthread_create_instead__ I have removed the modules before compiling, make clean, make install, reinstalled them, did the modprobe stuff, etc. Do I have some type of missing library or function that is causing the ast_pthread errors? I got the Asterisk, Zaptel and Libpri off the CVS. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Channel Banks
We have an Asterisk Server with 5 X100's and a 4-port openline card we have been using for 6 months. My only complaint is echo. Some lines sound good, others echo all the time, some echo intermittantly or only when conferencing. I have tweeked the tx/rx gains and played with echo timing as much as possible. It is time to go to a channel bank (a PRI is still about $200/month more than POT's lines) . It appears the favorite channel banks are CAC and adtran. Am I missing anyone? Does one make or model perform better echo cancallation then the others? Are some channel banks still having problems with caller-id? Jay ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] warning: implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__'
I have been running a version of Asterisk that is 4-5 months old. When trying to upgrade to 1.0.2, I get several compile warnings such as: chan_zap.c:3515: warning: implicit declaration of function `__use_ast_pthread_create_instead__' The channel modules will not load with the error: undefined symbol: __use_ast_pthread_create_instead__ I have removed the modules before compiling, make clean, make install, reinstalled them, did the modprobe stuff, etc. Do I have some type of missing library or function that is causing the ast_pthread errors? I got the Asterisk, Zaptel and Libpri off the CVS. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Echo: X100P vs. Cisco FXO cards
I have started to test Asterisk and so far I am very impressed. My only problem right now is an unacceptable echo with a X100P card. I have read the previous posts regarding echo cancellation, tried echotraining, all the tap settings for echocancel (echocancel=256 sounds wild!!!) and I would like to know if anyone that has had a problem with echo has successfully overcome this with a Cisco Router with the FXO cards in place of the X100P? I have two 2620's not being used and I an thinking of buying FXO cards rather than buying a T-1 card and channel bank. Suggestions appreciated. Jay ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
