Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE110P + Asterisk

2004-12-02 Thread Jon Stockill
Leonardo Tramontina wrote:
-- Registered channel 22, PRI Signalling signalling
-- Registered channel 23, PRI Signalling signalling
Dec  2 11:07:15 ERROR[5209]: chan_zap.c:6447 mkintf: Channel 24 is reserved 
for D-channel.

I've tried many combinations on the channel parameter:
channel = 1-15,17-31
channel = 1-15,17-31
channel = 1-15;17-31
channel = 1-15;17-31
channel = 1-15
channel = 17-31
channel = 1-15
channel = 17-31
but it still is not working...
Could someone help me?
It looks like the card's jumpered for T1, but you're trying to configure 
it as E1.

--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: phone line roaming

2004-09-15 Thread Jon Stockill
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for idea, but this is not exactly what I need, assume:
one employee working in office (open-space cubes), when this
employee leave the work, on the same place come another employee so
that, I can't ring both lines and can't use bluetooth device :(
I thing to do some login to phone  asterisk and download
appropriate extension/phone line
according to e.g. username/login id, but how to configure/implement?
(we use cisco7940  7912)

make a simple web interface.. where user logs in..
interface tells a script on * server about users location/extension/device.
then your script will re-create TFTP files, sends
reboot to  7940/7792 and you are done...
Seems like overkill when you can just use the agent support in asterisk.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with E100P

2004-08-04 Thread Jon Stockill
Marcelo Rodriguez wrote:
Hi,
   I'm having trouble configuring and E1 link , I know the E1 is a PRI
and the switchtype is 5ess. The problem is that everytime I try to dial
I got and error saying that it was unable to open the zap channel .
Devices are created in the /dev/zap directory and I can open them with a
cat /dev/zap/1. I can also see the channels in /proc/zaptel/1.

cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 AMI/ RED
You've got a red alarm - looks like there's a connection problem somewhere.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voip in the EU

2004-02-17 Thread Jon Stockill
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Steve Kennedy wrote:

 Of course Oftel doesn't exist anymore, it's all Ofcom now ...

Except on a lot of their forms, which still say oftel.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Queues

2004-02-14 Thread Jon Stockill
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Jonathan Stanton @ Home wrote:

 Any ideas / sugestions welcome.

Having the queue calls delivered to an agent login would appear to be the
easiest way to do it - just log in the agent on any phone you like, and
calls will be diverted to that phone. As another poster noted, one
little gotcha is that if your announcement file is missing, the calls
will be disconnected when you try to answer them.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] More words for Allison

2004-01-12 Thread Jon Stockill
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A knot is a unit of linear measurement.

A nautical mile is (or was originally) defined as a minute of arc at the
equator.

1 knot it 1 nautical mile per hour.

The knot is a unit of speed.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] More words for Allison

2004-01-12 Thread Jon Stockill
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

  or better still...
 
  1 knot = 1 nautical mile per hour = 6076 feet per hour
   1 mph =1 mile per hour = 5280 feet per hour

 I might as well add to the offtopic thread...  why are natuical miles longer
 than regular miles?

Because of they way they're defined - it's a minute of arc at the equator.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk] GSM access

2003-11-24 Thread Jon Stockill
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Mathew Frank wrote:

 http://www.gnokii.org/ comes to mind, though it wont do the voice thing, to
 my knowledge.

Maybe bluetooth would be the answer - have the pc register with the phone
under a headset profile, and you'd have your audio. Use AT commands on a
comms profile to dial?

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] runing asterisk and apache

2003-10-06 Thread Jon Stockill
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, listas iPfone wrote:

 I´m thinking in install apache in my asterisk machine to host a litle site.

 Anybody knows about problems doing that?

I've got apache installed on my asterisk server - it's handy for setting
up calls (a cgi just drops a call file into the outgoing call directory
with the relevant details in). I've not seen any problems. I suppose it
would depend on the amount of traffic you were expecting the site to
getnerate.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Let's TALK ABOUT IT!!!

2003-10-05 Thread Jon Stockill
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, James Sharp wrote:

  Actually, if this was to be done, it might be an idea to do it with DNS, so
  client machines would just do
  Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/442071234567) and the DNS
  system would resolve which machine is the correct target - no cleverness at
  all required at the client end, so implementation would be portable across
  all the other gnophones etc.

 Yup. That would be the way to do it.  I'll contribute the DNS code for it.

Isn't that what e.164 was invented for?

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Answer on second ring - need it on first.

2003-10-05 Thread Jon Stockill
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:

 On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 12:02, Lists wrote:
  But would you then not be able to use caller id from the telco?

 CallerID on an analog line is sent between the first and second ring
 normally. So if the requester wants callerid and first ring answer, he
 will have to move to PRI.

 Some choices have drawbacks, of course PRI is usually just cost.

BRI gies the signalling advantages, but without the costs.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Google newsgroup or Forum setup.

2003-09-30 Thread Jon Stockill
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Keith O'Brien wrote:

 I think that you missed my point.  I am not proposing to establish a forum
 and abolish the maillist.

 The forum would get traffic as all posts sent to the maillist would
 automatically post to the forum.  Those that want to answer using the forum
 can do so and it would forward to the list.

I don't have a problem with you doing this *provided* you obscure/remove
email addresses - I get enough spam without my address being archived
where spam bots can pick it up.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users