Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outgoing faxes with chan_capi?

2005-04-11 Thread Rmi Letot
Andrew Furey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi all,

 Does anyone know of a way to send faxes over CAPI?

capi4hylafax. With capi you can actually set up a hylafax server to
listen on some MSN or DID, and * for the rest. Both systems will
cooperate nicely.

I have this setup on two debian sarge servers, both of them working
real fine. No need to shutdown * to send or receive faxes, both
systems are configured to use only the MSN's they are attributed. 

couic

Cheers,
-- 
Rémi
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 4 x ISDN2 hardware...?

2005-04-11 Thread Rmi Letot
Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi,
  
 I've done some testing with asterisk and I must say I'm very impressed by
 all the features. Now I want to create a production environment and am
 looking into all the available ISDN cards. The cards I've found are:
  
 1. AVM C4 (1300 euro's)
 2. Eicon Diva with 4 ISDN2 ports (even more expensive)
 3. Junghanss card with 4 ISDN2 ports (600 euro's)
  
 Besides the voice part, I would also like to be able to receive and send
 faxes. Which card is best?
  
 If I understand it correctly, the junghanss card is a 4 port HFC card. I
 tested Asterisk with another 1 port HFC card and rxfax, but found out that
 not all faxes are received correctly. As my business is depending on faxes,
 I find it very important that the incoming faxes are received correctly.
  
 Does anybody have experience with receiving faxes with the AVM C4? I assume
 that it is fully supported by Asterisk and the analog modem to receive faxes
 as implemented in the hardware of the AVM C4?

I don't have the C4, but I have C2, B1, and Fritz out there, all
working flawlessly with chan_capi for * and capi4hylafax for
faxes. Capi makes it simple to share one device between multiple
applications, just configure the MSN's each app should manage, and it
just works. Haven't tried it with DDIs yet, but it shouldn't be more
difficult. 

couic

-- 
Rémi
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and software Raid

2004-08-21 Thread Rmi Letot
Lyle Giese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I used software raids and want to get away from them.  I really really like
 Microlite's BackupEdge tape backup software.  BackupEdge does not work with a
 software raid, only a hardware raid.

I have worked with software raid for several years, and to date have
not had any problem with that. Of course the machine is more prone to
reboots in case of drive failure (the hardware is not designed to
recover from such events), but it usually just reboots, array in
degraded mode, data intact, and ready to assume it's duties.
  
 The second kicker was that the Promise (or any other) hardware IDE raids are
 considered software raid to the Kernel.  And are NOT supported with the new
 2.6.x Kernels...

Promise and such are really low end raids adapters. For good ide
hardware raid, stick with 3ware. The price tag is much higer than
promise, but these are real professionnal raid adapters. They are seen
as scsi devices by linux, the driver is completely GPL, and has been
part of the official kernel tree for years. With these, it takes
really niche situations to ever need scsi raid again.
  
 My experience with IDE in raid arrays is less than stellar and will be
 trashing them as I rebuild servers.  I have had several instances where one
 drive fails and the entire array falls over as the kernel struggles to recover
 from the loss of a drive or the error messages.  I have seen this with Linux
 generated arrays and with the Promise IDE raid cards.  Besides the performance
 of the Promise parallel IDE raid sucks big time.

Promise are not real professionnal grade products, and software raid
can do nothing against hardware shortcomings. The only way to be
protected is with a real pro raid controler.

 With the excellent tape software above, I don't think I really need them
 anyway.  BackupEdge will generate a bootable CD-Rom that will install your
 last backup on bare metal after a major malfunction.

Backups are not subsitutes for raid, and vice versa.

couic

Back to *, I have only one * installation on software raid, so I can't
really make statistics, but it has no problem.

Bye,
-- 
Rémi
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hylafax integration

2004-03-15 Thread Rmi Letot
Alessio Focardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi,

 I have a working install of asterisk that I would like to integrate
 with Hylafax: an asterisk extention must be transfered to Hyla for fax
 receiving.

Sorry for the late answer, real life got in the way lately.

As you talk about isdn, I guess you are using kapejod's capi channel
with asterisk. If the fax extension is distinct from voice extensions,
just use capi4hylafax on the fax extension and chan_capi on voice
extensions. I use that at work and it works like a charm.

couic

-- 
Rémi aka hobbes
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hylafax

2004-03-15 Thread Rmi Letot
Ignace CARIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi,
 I'd like to install ON THE SAME Machine, Asterisk and Hylafax.

 On http://www.voip-info.org/, I've found this:

 If you have an ISDN card supporting CAPI, there is a driver that
 connects the Hylafax wiki-Hylafax fax server directly to an Asterisk
 ISDN connection.
 (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+and+faxes)

 Is somebody can help me to deploy both on the same machine (Asterisk
 is already running...impressive ;-) )

Don't know if it still applies, anyway here it is.

I have * and hylafax running on the same machine. One extension is
reserved for fax, the others are voice. I just configured chan_capi to
manage all voice extensions, and capi4hylafax on the fax extension.

Everything is fine, the capi layer isolates all those applications.

couic

-- 
Rémi aka hobbes
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream Source?

2003-09-19 Thread Rmi Letot
Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

couic

don't now and simply add What's a pyroflax? on it. Someone will
notice and explain what a pyroflax is...
 A what ? :-)
 Google ;-)

No way, even google is moot on that word. I guess you'll have to
explain :-)

couic

-- 
Rémi 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream Source?

2003-09-18 Thread Rmi Letot
Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

couic

 I realized the same and started a process to collect a lot of that
 information and build a knowledge base on http://www.voip-forum.org/

The link doesn't work :-(

couic

 don't now and simply add What's a pyroflax? on it. Someone will
 notice and explain what a pyroflax is...

A what ? :-)

couic

-- 
Rémi 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax

2003-09-08 Thread Rmi Letot
Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi all !

 Let's say you have about 6 small different companies sharing the same E1
 / Asterisk server, and every company needs its own fax number. Since
 they don't really need fax machines, what would be the most
 cost-effective way to handle this (keeping fax-privacy at its best) ?

 Is there a way to configure Hylafax or sth  one modem behind an ATA-186
 to email faxes to different adresses depending on the called number ?

 Or do we have to buy 3 Cisco ATA-186 and six fax-machines ?

Just wild thoughts here :

put two isdn capi cards in the server. One is used by * as outgoing
interface for fax traffic, the other as incomming device for
capi4hylafax. Then configure hylafax to dispose of the faxes depending
on the incomming msn.

The hylafax stuff is pretty straight, but I don't know if the * part
is doable as I quite a newbie there :-)

couic

-- 
Rémi
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie Question / ISDN

2003-08-21 Thread Rmi Letot
Peter Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I just found the draft of the handbook. The software is
 amazing 

 Does anyone use Asterisk in Germany on a BRI (S2M) interface ?

http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/page1.html

Driver to use * with a capi compliant isdn card. I currently use AVM
cards, and heard EICON makes good active cards too (although much more
expensive, but with hardware echo cancellation) 

couic

-- 
Rémi
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users