Re: [asterisk-users] Block Specific Number on Inbound
Check out the X Boy/Girl friend feature. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+extensions.conf Around the middle of the page. Stu -Original Message- From: Kevin Oravits korav...@rcolegal.com Reply-to: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Block Specific Number on Inbound Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:39:46 + Greetings, Is there a way to block a specific inbound number? I’ve found code online for blocking all nocallerid and all 800, etc. but nothing for a specific number. My company is wanting me to block a specific number. Is this possible in Asterisk 1.4 and 1.6 or do I need to go through my Service Provider? Thanks, Kevin Oravits Phone Sys Admin -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] FW: Under heavy attack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Here's my take on the attack... Sigh... http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/11/sip-brute-force-attacks-escalate-over-halloween-weekend/ Stu - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker Let me catch my breath -- Three Dog Night - Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMzxG7AAoJEFKVLITDJSGS+CMP/RvuM7AGLJZ25CXjKeN80K76 goVnHW4SwQMoIJI7uwBzFhaCdpsalJZ/HikUvMzguAna8qu27x1xtJhOO6TrhVYb 2bD/L/JSrnwKij+sGUyh2hQ50hsedOPxsBNivuyg8JlvTMrIrExSPlWpLRYzqa/X pvGV02OLjFzcHmQGxH1ZcU3ScPMEXic5QI8Fzancp7WS1Gk52eeY+iB42m3cGDbc pQylKUCqVaPwyfx3n7EkE3eZlq6eSBahD4THo6w8IKInpU8Woi7wgt66eKhH7J2m NCho2S8pfHIzUdft3glkRvJkJclUes02vxVqZ0kqwlSezBrBrDrHo9HOsctXTsVs r18ty+0TUpm5afpTSaNATks2d5IOPt7uAVNJTuFZBjCU7nIlSNRfv59ksjNHgvKG qkV2VHclbfu8uUua9zflmA0+zIML53KZK2v49jJSyiwLq+foceociQJjm1aepGMS jw+XM1Ip6i7qnFbBj4bVV+rN+deU8XK7mvbMFM4ZUC4tPeeYL7HeErlaBKhwSdej tBXaf0u9d9TMuzybWytH0ySsep+lE0kwMxha94d9kHSR9I4HHTsFU6NCFpzY/Q9n AdMfdVLvTWfnlVfqYlcdRKSF5qGGRParooWJFLF9Ac71rgPTKUCpjd5aJEm/A5wI U06woZnx7qPTczEXHuOM =vy+i -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Under heavy attack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 We are also seeing an increase in attacks. And yes, there is a benefit to blocking them. They tend to go away if you have them restricted, where if you let them go at it, they will sit on your host for sometimes hours. Stu On 10/30/2010 12:43 PM, Joel Maslak wrote: Is there really any benefit to blocking these, if you use good passwords? On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com mailto:wcse...@selbytech.com wrote: I'm experiencing this on one of my clients servers. The attack is ongoing. Thanks, --Warren Selby On Oct 30, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Zeeshan Zakaria zisha...@gmail.com mailto:zisha...@gmail.com wrote: My main asterisk server is under unusual heavy attack, and so far Fail2Ban has blocked about 30 IPs, from various different countries. At this time it is blocking about 1 IP address every few minutes. Just wondering if anybody else is also experiencing unusually increased hack attempts today? Zeeshan A Zakaria -- http://www.ilovetovoip.comwww.ilovetovoip.com http://www.ilovetovoip.com http://www.pbxforall.comwww.pbxforall.com http://www.pbxforall.com (beta) -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hellohttp://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usershttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMzHsdAAoJEFKVLITDJSGS2fwP/j7/Jkcza71zoEMPMdegh+K5 ASVOda6yPazRmY6LAjqrNTwMyASmmngr/LLZbBmqRNXdzjWqDJ5+CEmCK09/WlcB etoz09XTNd0mswMq8r2uVSdKE7PBTZRlNokIfwbwSvWFIL01qbdA3urHVIJuNDuI V2eN94K+lgX7m69TFHe4J209X7BXQS3HxDl0aQVcW+NnofWj9o6BXoLdQXrkS/sG C7npBqpUe1asoyl2Bo5qSpzzMGiebZOcMIjKAEEu0anESZKKuNIhcj4BX6uOCRk0 8//IlNmqMVKfJr8ttpqZVbbKI9AKjTWBHV77LzSNkPgcFjD6WeiOSnOMWW0UNAgE 3iaTCzXO9GwJLhRucdoezCI78qCkFdO8N0C6UZcrW/eP7bJdxa4Ab0of3EtG3V2U QjeKQYYpL7O0my3uwO4I1BY7qiDTqibTzQ6Gb7Y4No029R78cWff3xIueU5rNZeO Fr/2ODNFZE0Q1+KA7d29308jIKY0Ubz5s/QBKbAjWfQk80dQ4BE/6nqBUJmZWIAx CNL8dK+jv6uCIi5Ae2tMHGestkcy4Ol4fdKC6emVLgm4DbRYKAg259lkoAifT7qo 8/0LWfjuP8mXHaQ2x023wTKg+FyZCIwJmpr8UDaKwMdtFgwpLuZeQrYuRQiW8TCS xkBSL1xkLIoEy1b3NLDv =eqQ+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Under heavy attack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/30/2010 08:25 PM, Warren Selby wrote: To me it seems the real question is What is going on today?. I normally get eight to ten asterisk-related fail2ban alerts a day between a few client sites - today I've received at least 10 times that many attacks on just one site. These are all coming in from different ip addresses, a new one every few minutes. These addresses are located all across the globe. This seems like some kind of coordinated assault - maybe someone is activating a 'bot-net' for sip attacks? We are seeing the same thing... It could be a bot-net, but it is a very poorly organized attack. If is was a single bot-net, you would assume that the systems would each pick a group of addresses, not all attack the same addresses. It could be an attempt to get a large number of systems blacklisted. If someone was to spoof 1000s of addresses that cause operators to black-list those addresses, they could knock quite a few systems off the map. This could cause legitimate operators to get blocked, or, discredit the current method used to detect and block SIP brute force attacks. Just my two cents... Stuart Sheldon ACT USA -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMzO4ZAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSXtcP/iS2/U/Yq+5qFL+L7SHBhvxD NKgULJvYB/93pJspIF5GkX6Pknawa1hs2HLLErgZJkB0KRipSyauNMXiyPwwOpgt GoP6lwe7mJOLKqO4beOf4yhqABNp7hWLuYhi3QR7M7G54aqcuzXQB4pg86Gq5eC/ okhwUgoft6QjAUAiAmsX/r/yHPbDm4CgxQ3Yf0GHUQrfFtiu65F1jDUCLIbyNkyI qyC0XtLIjy+uZqC7Onuv2L3t8vKHpzItdWYPcke1wRKYTgBLLHh/9J6J1mSY0TBz YqYSkvqKi/ObiL8f8rTC055eE5kZAtqqqDTfSCZ64mEWeYkEUbY5n0T4P9t603Wu c4POUst2dsRkHbC9Ewb1e6zC83R0B/zJz5WvNSJ5JaaMSrUp9WzH9NCnVl74GnmW BiDRFm3UMDtB+zKPGPZBShP+JBbbo3fGEzD4xKel+Qm5dv6iAGP1u//UvwcQtGjj DeywFaMmaQKd9//3QT50W7MiYoGFFg+EkkIqleHxe8Uaj+kC7Zr3sbsTFmQ/i1D9 0JIcfO6kmHiIF18JHBz1KG+xSOMteVcwy61bwPa1lzQ2DlFS61dAOUVcV3G77WuI pFRJajMqjGXV9YBHilemA7ODaWvVgscTCyGwOcYHMV8kZEyqX2uhLSJerQW/05LG oL2jJzzdFRKfFX6pDQNV =FQwn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Randy R wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Fred Posner f...@teamforrest.com wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Gordon Henderson wrote: On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Frank Bulk wrote: Please take note of their posting: https://aws.amazon.com/security/ which discusses the issue and what they're doing to improve response. And is anyone on the list worthy of being considered a significant SIP provider to be honoured with the privilege of working with them? Gordon None of the carriers I deal with have been contacted. Of course, them only contacting significant providers... does that mean it's ok if the attacks happen to non-significant providers or end-points? ---fred http://qxork.com If it got to their BS/PR page/blog it means they're hearing about complaints on the net as well as people like you submitting. Everyone please keep posting where you can and sooner or later, someone big will pick up the story. Funny, I'd think the most worthy people to comment on this issue are on this list. That's the feedback they should be looking for and working on at Amazon EC2. /r We might me reading their PR wrong... Maybe there were large SIP providers that were compromised due to this attack... Maybe they are keeping that quiet at the request of those providers... It could also be that the aliens in hiding in Colorado are behind the whole thing! ... Oh no! I've said too much!!! LOL... It could actually be the case that this whole issue went beyond what we are seeing, and they are trying to protect one of their Whale customers... Needless to say, what about the SSH brute force attacks that originate from their network? What about the SPAM that flows like a fountain from their net blocks? This was nothing more then PR hype... Stu - -- For six long years I've been in trouble, no pleasure here on earth I found. For in this world I'm bound to ramble, I have no friends to help me now. -- The Soggy Bottom Boys - I am a man of constant sorrow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLzxhvAAoJEFKVLITDJSGS7boP/A00AIG02wKVejBPM+EZnqwE zc12a0RwjbS9j3LjxSbutfDUBb5LphJpknVHy1HF7pPj5Dm3LNooVhSUq8UU+vO+ iSGIGMDVij943dGKo2bInhhZmc9rCAyBmmrRn/AP/YvQ3ZxrcJPyirOQOeEpTMee m1ctlVsP2/O5M8Igv8Hm+eE4ZlDDsTSSDr3M0W80y1wMzUD/XLtEsOWexT3wVRUY WuErhbc7xZcySgEy7GsH3+O3BFhuV2JYwr0bkF+qVcdDbDL13aiBEqoJqWDOqhJI dcgY1JYra8wUU5aum/1awH+psxpx0WTsIUr34yDDUoRRCubmVjeDL4ZBVeT4O8E8 b2UvRalGhtFl8zm8FoaBCWmG5fNoorNasoyTnkyANsAnvdW72T9Wn5yWKAwVaYZe VlX7S9bcpBV880jgm6hV7rrDFizyy4Lo96f1eoSlwNy8e4LI/bp/dn5f54RBDj5k fpckpYFZFz0kAOwnAAlwKOmHgUr/jMqMMFL6ZyF/7fl7phwVKHm1DwspF0soLJkF GEAztCBRG02++eePNCpJWk/WdNzGSA6btveOSWbYy+BkZ8UTmr9IKXp2lOsBeXJa xrCv5vgB0s9TAd/QPoBRY8XLEp4BYEL9+cDzpclbMpi5ybVwviAGjjm9gNnx0Fd7 /8HHyve0W1uNIVIsHzDz =N7lH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Amazon EC2 SIP floods - you can help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Randy R wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Tzafrir Cohen tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote: It seems that at least Slashdot is responsive: http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/04/17/2059256/SIP-Attacks-From-Amazon-EC2-Going-Unaddressed Yes, there's a lot of talk here, some of it sympathetic, some less so, but at least there's discussion. I expect a response from Amazon at some point, but not until the visibility level becomes painful. One other person in the Slashdot posts threatens to stop buying things from Amazon. More of those will likely surface. I a related question, if the IP addresses were spoofed, how could a response be directed back? Don't the register attempts, because they need a response necessarily carry the correct source IP? /r Yes, If the IP addresses were spoofed, it would be simply a DoS attack. Stu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLyyd4AAoJEFKVLITDJSGSnZQQAJTR/VNudd6ZIsTYX3mxlGRC 0l85Z31Jh0ek0u+eNceuQc430yqFHWnK79Bvun/PK7Fz6RbiY5v+h3L5gkNMLpFy i21qTLJGua0MtbPPh3VktzHRle4r4Ph/darbMmwpUCtnBq38cjzTJvpDXIgtNwW/ yHhXIgEsQBhqs5xsPB9yZoPK7hBR3i9gmMi4aNbXg+mHIq7oYEe+ko1U0J/vjHXg 8zH78hzl6RZJfXFAoVb29htt+zII4A+SAH9fZAr72L3IOY4FCRYonT0ttktmTsMk V+wLXJyU2CnUb9w7v5DDG+EgdVrQFxdqN3pGuxfIXBvzu4bC6NAIRpfqqBV4yAAu TmR1+bCOCSbf5giBXJP77HobghzoOsRxhZVa7TMp5OKWuKa+v4zbpwY7YJRMDYOb vd42mSEWlOMr+he0SUnSNNusvqB0jmWIt/8lWEZl4/prpnyym0TWun7Z4Z0GjJLx +OHJLFEwo0T0f2Vf+og1wDBW9e/Tf2c1l2w6SrVHTL+0Hz3+2sh8pt389PPcQmuD PLqmG5mJC1ZuNhYhTknn1mT/NCtpgV4RrLJRcHM/46noEKAdy3DGs79Uwzw0jj3v XUaGRgEpGYz85YF0WaxMnOkSTMW1pgg8sTirHCGZttTcTHybJV2tDfEEEedx11Z5 jPjnd1SbFqhNG9KEsAGr =b2RY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Amazon EC2 SIP floods - you can help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Randy R wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Stuart Sheldon s...@actusa.net wrote: I a related question, if the IP addresses were spoofed, how could a response be directed back? Don't the register attempts, because they If the IP addresses were spoofed, it would be simply a DoS attack. This is what I thought, so when people say yeah, but they could be spoofed this isn't a valid argument. A huge number of requests going to your server with an originating EC2 IP needs to be shut down first, questions asked after. Only Amazon can fix this. They have not only the IP info but also full customer data, including banking info. What possible excuse can they provide? Is this why they are silent? There's no good excuse other than, it would cut into our profits. Maybe we could get GigaOm interested or some other high-visibility blog. /r For what it's worth, here is my Blog Article from the incident... http://www.stuartsheldon.org/blog/2010/04/sip-brute-force-attack-originating-from-amazon-ec2-hosts/ Stu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLyy0SAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSMaYQAKVTy6en4zsbekcjXTSjMo6z SSwBL95mSpgGRU6nAOKIjs5UUczFS8MtReag7hqW7e1ZtwwlXz88KP+c7yNZVw9+ 6HIjAf+PdaxRmDQ/bUpcXy+4Nnl6RRzVnE5oY33/ZWJrAjBfLb/eQCFQOqAdgxDr xsTGCPts/CJWeQrni6g4pdYFf3P4BvxsyoGw5vpF8rXipujaK1V0zxT6dE+XDNYZ aqrLlZtGvF7oTLtYCAt6g/C7VG7RJDNbuxGKG0q8GfHeU3xXEjYytH6jq26yiCSi FvP6vH0CzOInyYohPEXuxej2rLADf6c3JqXidadXX87l5XLb947pooMK+gmyRv8m AjsoOryMs43V48q5y1F25LVV8pnw83xEUZyxfa4/JNx4Fr4PvuMdVs0UDZbjWdCD ncf47IVQKztWfM3vcbyFXyfgDHrAnGUwZ/VxPpQ9/0VGsrC8V9rujQCI3UVk2/7v RHFK97ddmPvrAr8Gml+wnjTROSyY5n8ds762ZfyN3rel7e7w5gynpa+G9pcNqgSX MzdKRiC10hF4X6ZMXOski1UIXm+x7r+8uY8p+/8l6A4sdXohCUhXTcYLMnDBzgob fsmxb6WKKkaGTLv7jWLukfZVYcppk+B4M8hFgAvVqMWBRI3eZmZTKvmzDs9yjaqw kcF4NwJOpLXsG3w9vs7F =kLEJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 We reported abuse Saturday morning... As of yet, no change in traffic. I have sent requests upstream to filter all UDP/5060 traffic from EC-2 range to stop the DDOS that we are under, but have only gotten 2 of our 4 providers to comply. At this point, I guess well all just ride it out... Stu Tom Stordy-Allison wrote: Hi, This is exactly what I've just joined this mailing list about. Has anyone has any luck getting Amazon to stop the instances? I'm stuck with around 700Kbps of my 2.5Mbps inbound in use as my firewall blocks the requests as below. Cheers, Tom -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Norbert Zawodsky Sent: 11 April 2010 20:57 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ... Am 11.04.2010 17:05, schrieb Mark Smith: Same this end from 184.73.17.150. Use this little piece of iptables magic to block the whole of Amazon's EC2 ip- range. iptables -F iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 216.182.224.0-216.182.239.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 72.44.32.0-72.44.63.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 67.202.0.0-67.202.63.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 75.101.128.0-75.101.255.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 174.129.0.0-174.129.255.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 204.236.192.0-204.236.255.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 184.73.0.0-184.73.255.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 216.236.128.0-216.236.191.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 184.72.0.0-184.72.63.255 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 79.125.0.0-79.125.127.255 -j DROP service iptables save This sorts it out in the short-term until Amazon realise their service is being utilised by arseholes. Hi Mark! your little iptables magic is a very good idea! Implementation took 1 minute :-) I'll use it until a better idea comes up ... (which I don't expect within a short term) Thank you! Norbert -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLwi4rAAoJEFKVLITDJSGSrY4QAL1KGKvm1vZIskueMyV0Heau 3/IbbdHNYxWIj6xTm9bYH9b7DzQjiRx88Ox3vFppnXf3AR9+qD0hUSaaQwJBwNJp LJ33vCqXGURjbib9tJkjzNJo3pz7FUS6rzwffpoVrzXmobrPJRmHSFswB3gKmXO5 UD6UrbY/SHuq1oJZG07F4cTyA2Dssq/T7eQiNG9ZcH3w4BW7ZBurbELFDIzfjF81 5d5/n7+9f4fg8R95YjBM+qnZYK74Ht2JPr27XmFxn2XGOrCgPyWe605j4fGm9sr8 LIpnDx/KN9cLQpGyzauF7xuv9TZj1F81RVYFg3Gms6k8MsPj0B6tKguASiSb8efq d9goqG0lrQEcef/B2PLGD3yOjenpSDGFk9dLItWxnaJX3l0QhuK8nlNkuRiqTyrT Vp74ky5ewDb+YxoowA/gfosyWLx/YfaN9N6fizUXabJZPffzAI7PqAEChZje14r4 lobsN4BWFTt80IqfEdmwQUcMiyktXmtkTsN1YbS7GYKbAPeNdArpvCFar8yKSla6 JsbCFSUelmodj4mU85ZmgHBup6u5NTiq4Z5FVUQvFrL5P79J9IGr9ewiz+/DzyDK 2f2MA/6P9a3hoBauGdU+FBvSP4TMp75Ntho28IHyRIz2Zz3FHedAcuIPavO+AbHv EQ4ocAwQBX6fJvpYQwIm =I4n1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Enter Value and continue dialplan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Take a look at Read() Stu David Klaverstyn wrote: Hi, What function or application do I use to get people to type digits into the phone and store the value into a variable? The application WaitExten is not what I want that will jump to the new extension. I want users to enter a number into the phone and store it as a variable so I can use it later in the dial plan. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkKk5YACgkQK69Y+xPZrWYUOgCfR59WPrAzCUX321R/tXgMYHUO BOEAni3KIHrJl7pjUEtrertR9J4gFCSQ =e2MZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Bad Link on Website...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Not sure where to report this... http://www.asterisk.org/downloads Right hand download box, Asterisk 1.4.17 points to 1.4.1 Just a heads up. Stu - -- And all I can do is keep on telling you, I want you, I need you, But there aint no way Im ever gonna love you, Now dont be sad cause two out of three aint bad... -- Meatloaf - Two out of Three aint bad - Lyrics -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHfRvkK69Y+xPZrWYRAt4UAJ9B5qZNoJmlmhpr7CApXBa+nQ3wAQCfU98g 5RRLuX3dA2h41bE4llqqhFo= =FUbn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Help on strange problem...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I'm having problems with calls dropping after 15 - 20 seconds from a particular provider. The are using a NexTone gateway. Here are the details: Successful call: INVITE cseq 1 From NexTone 100 Trying cseq 1 From Asterisk 100 Trying cseq 1 From Asterisk 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone INVITE (G711U) cseq 2 From NexTone 100 Trying cseq 2 From Asterisk 200 OK cseq 2 From Asterisk ACK cseq 2 From NexTone 200 OK (711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone Call continues until one side hangs up... Failed Call: Call audio is fine and all seems well but after 15 to 20 sec the call drops... INVITE cseq 1 From NexTone 100 Trying cseq 1 From Asterisk 100 Trying cseq 1 From Asterisk 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk INVITE (G711U) cseq 2 From NexTone 100 Trying cseq 2 From Asterisk 491 Request Pending cseq 2 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone ACK cseq 2 From NexTone 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone 200 OK (G711U) cseq 1 From Asterisk ACK cseq 1 From NexTone BYE cseq 1 From NexTone 200 OK cseq 1 From Asterisk I see this in the console after the call disconnects: WARNING[24417]: chan_sip.c:1938 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission [EMAIL PROTECTED] for seqno 1 (Critical Response) This fails much more often then it is successful... Anyone have a clue on this??? Stu Sheldon Tech Committee Chairperson S.C.A.L.E. - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell of stale perfume And that cigarette you're smoking 'Bout scared me half to death Open up the window, sucker Let me catch my breath -- Three Dog Night - Mama Told Me Not to Come - Lyrics -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHPNmWK69Y+xPZrWYRAl+1AJ9131OcSgPiC1GBbZvEDrEZ9NcQ8gCgmGRE 98ZBHiZLGzroI1MP+vJj4wM= =e1fd -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.2 Requires Zaptel from 1.4 svn branch for zap_chan?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Looks like there is a requirement for a later Zaptel the the 1.4.0 release for the zap_chan driver to build... Stu - -- Randomly Generated Fortune Tag: They spell it da Vinci and pronounce it da Vinchy. Foreigners always spell better than they pronounce. -- Mark Twain -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGAWVeK69Y+xPZrWYRAvZHAJ41WUVjxtEyGFlyP2kxooiiYGnVAwCfRTEh WcpvdqJeWnY/R0moszmH98o= =HJuz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] SIP/Polycom Issue, Asterisk 1.2.16, calls dropped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are you using Answer() before VoiceMailMain()? Stu Timothy McKee wrote: I've been running the 8/1/2004 Head release up until a little over a week ago. I was forced to due to a card failure to upgrade to 1.2.16 without any advance preparation or testing (most of my connections are via satellite to all corners of the globe with high latency). Up until the upgrade I was running with very few issues. Since the upgrade I have been experiencing strange issues with my Polycom SP-601 phones. My customers attempt to get their voicemail and Asterisk drops their connection ~15 seconds after they dial VM. I have captured a SIP debug and included it (somewhat sanitized). I'm not a SIP guru, but I can see the 15 second timer being set and I see repeated INVITEs being sent without any acks. OPTIONs are being sent and acked. The remote SIP phone is 'eden-1000a' and the voicemail extension is 9990. *This worked just fine up until the upgrade.* Does this ring a bell with anyone out there??? Tim McKee tmckee at sdnglobal dot com SDN Global == pbx*CLI sip debug peer eden-1000a SIP Debugging Enabled for IP: 10.253.4.50:5060 pbx*CLI -- SIP read from 10.253.4.50:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.253.4.50;branch=z9hG4bK8ed5192B7E6AF From: eden-1000a sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=D4964260-95FB99E3 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone CSeq: 1 INVITE Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, INFO, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER User-Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_601-UA/2.0.3.0127 Supported: 100rel,replaces Allow-Events: talk,hold,conference Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 245 v=0 o=- 978307756 978307756 IN IP4 10.253.4.50 s=Polycom IP Phone c=IN IP4 10.253.4.50 t=0 0 m=audio 2228 RTP/AVP 0 18 8 101 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 --- (14 headers 11 lines) --- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.253.4.50 : 5060 (NAT) Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.253.4.50:5060: SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.253.4.50;branch=z9hG4bK8ed5192B7E6AF;received=10.253.4.50 From: eden-1000a sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=D4964260-95FB99E3 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;tag=as7f808f0f Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Proxy-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm=asterisk, nonce=2584558d Content-Length: 0 --- Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms Found user 'eden-1000a' pbx*CLI -- SIP read from 10.253.4.50:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.253.4.50;branch=z9hG4bK8ed5192B7E6AF From: eden-1000a sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=D4964260-95FB99E3 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone CSeq: 1 INVITE Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, INFO, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER User-Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_601-UA/2.0.3.0127 Supported: 100rel,replaces Allow-Events: talk,hold,conference Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 245 v=0 o=- 978307756 978307756 IN IP4 10.253.4.50 s=Polycom IP Phone c=IN IP4 10.253.4.50 t=0 0 m=audio 2228 RTP/AVP 0 18 8 101 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 --- (14 headers 11 lines) --- Ignoring this INVITE request pbx*CLI -- SIP read from 10.253.4.50:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.253.4.50;branch=z9hG4bK8ed5192B7E6AF From: eden-1000a sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=D4964260-95FB99E3 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;tag=as7f808f0f CSeq: 1 ACK Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, INFO, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER User-Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_601-UA/2.0.3.0127 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 --- (11 headers 0 lines) --- pbx*CLI -- SIP read from 10.253.4.50:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.253.4.50;branch=z9hG4bK82926abd205366FA From: eden-1000a sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=D4964260-95FB99E3 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone CSeq: 2 INVITE Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, INFO, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER User-Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_601-UA/2.0.3.0127 Supported: 100rel,replaces Allow-Events: talk,hold,conference Proxy-Authorization: Digest username=eden-1000a, realm=asterisk, nonce=2584558d,
[asterisk-users] Setting Sip Headers From Dial App?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This might sound strange, but is there anyway for Asterisk to set extra sip headers based on a sip phone returning a 302 in a dialplan? Example: PSTN = Asterisk = SIP-Phone, SIP-Phone returns 302 Redirect, Asterisk sets X-Something: Some_Value X-Somethingelse: Some_Other_Value, then sends the new invite with added headers. Stu Sheldon ACT USA - -- Randomly Generated Fortune Tag: Q: How do you catch a unique rabbit? A: Unique up on it! Q: How do you catch a tame rabbit? A: The tame way! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF7KIhK69Y+xPZrWYRAgmWAJ9FvL+BqRr5YzXSYlkn9vLu4mHq2ACfaKrc LJts0IptsnzfawJzMNWibnM= =Kjdf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] CDR Help...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm having a hard time tracing calls that go through the parking lot. I see the call placed from the original extension, and then it looks as if it is hung up, then I see another extension grabbing a call from the parking lot, but there are no fields in the parking lot call to tell me the origin of the call... I see the same problem with a call transfers... What am I missing here? Any help would be great! Stuart Sheldon - -- Randomly Generated Fortune Tag: Q: Why is it that the more accuracy you demand from an interpolation function, the more expensive it becomes to compute? A: That's the Law of Spline Demand. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFLYFrK69Y+xPZrWYRAvqvAJ4hZ4X9ZmTJY4Z89WpEeFs9GRZIwwCfXr2l 9aIpMDwfEC/zET4I1YPYFh4= =tdfk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Server : IDE HDD frequent crash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would look at ventilation if I were you. Drive failures at the rate
you are talking about can usually be traced back to thermal failures.
Just a thought
Stu
Dushyanth wrote:
Hey guys,
Iam having a peculiar problem with my asterisk installation. The specs
are..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# asterisk -V
Asterisk 1.2.7.1
Wildcard: Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1
Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (4 modules) ( 2 FXO, 2 FXS)
Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (4 modules) ( 1 FXO, 3 FXS)
Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM2400P Prototype (24 modules) (12 FXO's - rest
empty)
Total 15 FX0's, 5 FXS out of which 5 to 6 FXO/FXS are being used. We have
about 300 active SIP accounts.
Queues, SIP extensions, Agents are in MySQL database using asterisk
realtime static.
CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz with Hyper threading
RAM : 1G
Mobo : Intel SE7501HG2
The system is stable, however, the IDE disk crashes every 3/4 months. There
are DMA timeout errors for the IDE disk before it fails completely. The
same issue occured for the past three disks and I was doubting the
recommended hdparm setting
'hdparm -d 1 -X udma2 -c 3 /dev/IDE Device'
So, I removed this setting after the last crash and the system workd fine
for another 3 months. Yes'day, the disk failed again with same symptoms.
All the disks were seagate baraccuda IDE drives.
zttool doesnt show any IRQ misses even without the above hdparm setting and
there is no noticeable problem in asterisk with the PRI line etc. Below is
my /proc/interrupts as well as /dev/hda settings.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 24771857 24719039IO-APIC-edge timer
1:102 62IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 1 0IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
14: 134159 135915IO-APIC-edge ide0
185: 32988610 16463264 IO-APIC-level wctdm
193: 22173177 27275710 IO-APIC-level wctdm
201: 21737611 27711650 IO-APIC-level wctdm24xxp
209: 22038077 27401613 IO-APIC-level wcte11xp
225: 18992311 0 IO-APIC-level eth1
233:1171166879 IO-APIC-level eth0
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 49493157 49493156
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# hdparm -i /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Model=ST340014A, FwRev=3.06, SerialNo=5JX96VFV
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw15uSec Fixed DTR10Mbs RotSpdTol.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2:
* signifies the current active mode
I looked at the mailing lists and couldnt any such issues reported.
Please advice. Should i be using SCSI disks on RAID 1 or something ? Will
that help ?
Also, should i be looking at any other mobo then Intel SE7501HG2 ? Iam
planning to put in a another asterisk server as a failover and would
appreciate inputs abt the kind of hardware i should be using for the system
with the specs i mentioned.
Thanks
Dushyanth
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
- --
Randomly Generated Fortune Tag:
Many pages make a thick book.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFJfmmK69Y+xPZrWYRAi5jAJ9z3DHMK0sWvjiomDj3Qw0o3CA3vwCeJeIZ
UtyXmqFJTTTQ6iWJCk/fOWI=
=vygm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel-1.2.9 compile error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I can confirm the same problem, it looks like the oct612x directory tree is missing from the tarball Stu Bill Maidment wrote: Hi I've just tried to compile the zaptel-1.2.9 release and I get the following error: HOSTCC /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/fw2h /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/fw2h /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/OCT6114-128D.ima /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m_fw.h make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/../oct612x/include/oct6100api/oct6100_api.h', needed by `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp/vpm450m.o'. Stop. make[2]: *** [/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9/wct4xxp] Error 2 make[1]: *** [_module_/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.9] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.17-1.2174_FC5-i686' make: *** [linux26] Error 2 zaptel-1.2.8 compiled OK. So what has changed? Did I do something wrong? Cheers Bill - -- Randomly Generated Fortune Tag: Many pages make a thick book. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFAlUkK69Y+xPZrWYRApE/AJ947hGNhPOnHVVojbg/8X2kvPTKgQCgn0+d N9FEkMIUKqol8Lru+N+ByxE= =Gr3f -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] IAX2 Connection fails over time...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I have a x86 Pentium D asterisk system with two Digium 400's in it. I am establishing a IAX2 Connection to another Asterisk system running on a Solaris server. When a call is placed between the two systems, everything seems fine for a variable period of time, then for some reason beyond what my diagnostics has found, the call begins to lag, and both asterisk's servers report LAG. Network wise, the systems have a 4-10 msec ping time. Once the call is terminated, everything returns to normal, and the call can be reconnected. Until the call is terminated, no other calls can be setup with that host. Both systems are running 1.2.x. We are using the GSM codec for the calls. Any ideas on what we should check? Stu - -- Randomly Generated Fortune Tag: There is a great discovery still to be made in Literature: that of paying literary men by the quantity they do NOT write. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEySV/K69Y+xPZrWYRAg2fAKCPy4inQdicqTrwvoW+VQMRS/vlIQCfVSLT OC0G/AfRej+vzfdvw/tgfbY= =Ck7n -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Merlin Legend PRI not quite there yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maybe I missed something, but which side provides the clock? Have you tried reversing the clock source? Sure looks like timing errors to me. Stu Sheldon Sterling Moses wrote: Greetings list, I have been beating around a problem for a while now and decided after weeks of searching I would try the list once again. The jist is this: Merlin Legend connected to verizon via a 100D (PRI) card. Works great. Asterisk connected via a crossover'd TE110P to a second 100D (PRI) in the legend. The green light on the TE110P comes on, but we have a red alarm on the 100D card. Asterisk can see RED ALARMS on the PRI when we busy out the 100D card on the legend system. Asterisk also shows the alarms disappear when we restore the 100D card on the legend. We reset the card and run a loopback. After the loopback the red alarm is gone for roughly 4 to 10 minutes then turns back on. I believe this to be a threshold of errors being reached which triggers the red alarm. Checking the status of the 100D card shows it has a RED alarm and error events: Checking the error events shows MIS (Misframes) 250 Slips: 57 Errored Seconds: 255 Bursty Seconds: 017 Severely Errored Seconds: 255 Frame Slips: 255 We have replaced the crossover cable. (Using standard 1-5, 2-4, 4-2, 5-1 pinout). We have replaced the 100D with a known good unit We have replaced the previous T100P with this new TE110P We replaced the server with a supermicro P4 server. All the results are the same. QUESTION is where can I go from here? What can we do to correct this problem? Could this be a timing setting on the legend switch? Anything would be appreciated, even a snicker or two about our still using merlin legends will be accepted. :-) Sterling. Asterisk intense debug on span 1: - --- SNIP Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data asterisk1*CLI [ 00 03 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 001EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended [ 02 01 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data asterisk1*CLI [ 00 03 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 001EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended [ 02 01 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data asterisk1*CLI [ 00 03 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 001EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended [ 02 01 7f ] Unnumbered frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 M3: 3 P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3 [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode extended) ] 0 bytes of data -- snip --- ztcfg -v shows: Zaptel Configuration == SPAN 1: ESF/B8ZS Build-out: 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) Channel map: Channel 01: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 03) Channel 04: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 04) Channel 05: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 05) Channel 06: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 06) Channel 07: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 07) Channel 08: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 08) Channel 09: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 09) Channel 10: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 10) Channel 11: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 11) Channel 12: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 12) Channel 13: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 13) Channel 14: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 14) Channel 15: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 15) Channel 16: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 16) Channel 17: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 17) Channel 18: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 18) Channel 19: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 19) Channel 20: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 20) Channel 21: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 21) Channel 22: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 22) Channel 23: Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 23) Channel 24: D-channel (Default) (Slaves: 24) 24 channels configured. ztclock shows: - ztclock - clock source accuracy test (3 passes) Flushing input buffer... Flush Complete. Test is approximately 3
