Re: [asterisk-users] Some advice

2007-08-14 Thread William McCloskey
The stability problems we have seem to be related to asterisk crashing
the apache install on the box when the PHP scripts are performing
functions via asterisk. Don't know exactly how they work it all, but
that's the gist of it.

Best Regards,
William J McCloskey
Information Technology Manager
503-827-8141 
www.timbercon.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
Bosch
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 3:36 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Some advice

William McCloskey wrote:
> I need a quick bit of advice from the list.
> 
> We purchased an asterisk based phone system back about 6 months ago
and
> we are using Cisco 7940G phones (I know, not everyone's favorites). We
> are using the second line on the phones for paging with a auto-answer,
> now my question is having the system call 20 of these paging
extensions,
> should that be enough load to cause instability in the system? Our
> vendor is claiming it is causing the problems we are having, and I
> really find that hard to believe.

Can you be more specific about the "stability problems"? That's a bit
vague -- it makes it hard to understand what's really happening.

-Stephen-

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Some advice

2007-08-14 Thread William McCloskey
I need a quick bit of advice from the list.

We purchased an asterisk based phone system back about 6 months ago and
we are using Cisco 7940G phones (I know, not everyone's favorites). We
are using the second line on the phones for paging with a auto-answer,
now my question is having the system call 20 of these paging extensions,
should that be enough load to cause instability in the system? Our
vendor is claiming it is causing the problems we are having, and I
really find that hard to believe.

Thoughts? Should that be enough to cause major stability problems?

It's an Athlon 3800+ with 512mb ram and a Sangoma card with one PRI.
Total of about 60 extensions (40 phones) on the system but only about
2-4 active calls at any given time with very little transcoding or other
such intensive processes going on.

Thanks,
William


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Recognize 800 number

2007-08-14 Thread William McCloskey
If your 800 number is setup in the same way I understand them to be, the
800 numbers are just forwards to a did (or your main number in the
instance). You'll need to get a specific did setup just for your 800
number to use then you can just recognize the specific DID.

 

Best Regards,

William J McCloskey
Information Technology Manager
503-827-8141 
www.timbercon.com  

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Mann
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Recognize 800 number

 

Is there a way to recognize if someone called our PRI using an 800
number?  The DID is showing my 4 digit primary line, not anything
obvious signifying that an 800 number is called?

 



This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments
transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and
privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the
individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. If you are the
intended recipient, further disclosures are prohibited without proper
authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, printing, or use of this information is strictly prohibited and
possibly a violation of federal or state law and regulations. If you
have received this information in error, please notify Texas Health
Management Group immediately at 1-817-310-4999. Texas Health Management
Group, its subsidiaries, and affiliates hereby claim all applicable
privileges related to this information.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner  , and is

believed to be clean. 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Single ringer phone for incoming calls, that anyone can answer

2007-06-24 Thread William McCloskey
You  might look at this:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+Pickup

>From what I understand you want to be able to do a call pickup and have
it work with just the main ringing phone and not have it pickup the rest
of the phones in your group. That's more what you are looking for.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mitcheloc
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 10:10 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Single ringer phone for incoming
calls,that anyone can answer

Tom,

It sounds like this is what you need:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+callgroups+and+pickupgroups

Cheers,

On 6/23/07, Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 23/06/2007, at 6:01 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote:
>
> > Can't you give the "ringer phone" a different ring tone/tune ?
> >
> > Gordon
>
> Gordon,
>
> Well, we can give the 'ringer phone' whatever ring tone we wish, but
> that's not the issue at hand.
>
> We need a way to answer the incoming call on our personal phones
> without explicitly directing the call to dial every phone (so they
> don't "ring").
>
> Regards
> Tom
>
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


-- 

Mitchel Constantin
Snap - A desktop user interface for Asterisk
www.snapanumber.com

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Polycom 430 , 501 and 550

2007-04-30 Thread William McCloskey
If it supports the old Cisco POE, you might be able to try this:

568b
1 OrWh
2 Or
3 GrWh
4 Bl
5 WhBl
6 Gr
7 BrWh
8 Br

Phone Side
1 OrWh
2 Or
3 GrWh
4 BrWh
5 Br
6 Gr
7 Bl
8 WhBl

(From voip-info.org wiki, Cisco POE)

That config has allowed me to run 7940g's on a standard Dell POE switch.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Davis
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 10:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Polycom 430 , 501 and 550

Stephen Bosch wrote:
> Justin Hamade wrote:
>> The 501 is more "weird" then that.  The cat5 cable with the built in
>> power injector is cool but to use it with a PoE (802.3af) switch you
>> need a "special" cable (the pairs are just different you can probably
>> look it up and make your own).
> 
> Is this true? I read earlier on the list that there's some sort of
logic
> unit in the cable -- but if it's just a matter of pin assignments,
I'll
> make my own effing cable ;)
> 
> Does anybody have a clear answer on this?

The IP 501 supports both Cisco and 802.11af with different cables. While

there are pin assignments differences, there are also electrical 
differences in the discovery protocols. The special cable is an artifact

of this.

I don't know of anyone who was able to make the phone work without the 
cable, and the 501 is not designed to work without it. If it were just a

matter of pin assignments, then people would be selling cables on eBay.

I notice that now that 802.11af is THE standard, Polycom is supporting 
it on their new phones without any special cables.



--
Jeff Davis
Netsource Consulting
Polycom Certified Reseller
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches

2006-12-12 Thread William McCloskey
Layer 2 switches support all the basic switching functionality. QoS,
SNMP, POE, VLANs, Etc... depending on the model and features. Layer 3
switches are essentialy basic routers with a switch built in.

One thing about Cisco CDP and a lot of POE switches is you can get CDP
support with a custom Ethernet cable, just swap pins 4-5 with 7-8 (This
is how I'm running Cisco 7940G's with a Dell POE Switch).

-
 William J McCloskey

 Information Technology Manager 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 503-827-8141
 503-228-6747 fax
 www.timbercon.com
-

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory
Andrews
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 7:32 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches

 Edgewater Networks markets a 24 port switch, with PoE (both Cisco CDP
and 802.3af supported), and Layer 2/3 management features that retails
for less than $1500.  The model is EC-2402POE-01


Cory Andrews

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
May
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:22 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches

On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:53:53AM -0500, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
> What's the price for these HP switches?
> 
> And also I someone can give me a link to some document where I can 
> read about Layer 2 and Layer 3, how they help in VoIP traffic, it'll
be helpful.

> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

CDW's retail price was about $7,000.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches

2006-12-11 Thread William McCloskey
http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?c=us&cs=04&kc=6W300&l
=en&oc=pct3448poe-sapp&s=bsd

Dell make a nice Poe switch. I've got 20 some odd Cisco 7940G's running
on it at the moment.

-
 William J McCloskey

 Information Technology Manager 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 503-827-8141
 503-228-6747 fax
 www.timbercon.com
-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory
Andrews
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 7:27 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches

The guy in the UK who bought on Ebay is threatening to buy 2 units 


Cory Andrews
Executive Vice President
++
VoIPSupply.com
PBXSelect.com
++
454 Sonwil Drive
Buffalo, NY 14225
voice direct - 716.250.3402
fax - 716.630.1548
e - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m - 716.907.4059
aim - B2Cory

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
May
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:22 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches

On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:53:53AM -0500, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
> What's the price for these HP switches?
> 
> And also I someone can give me a link to some document where I can 
> read about Layer 2 and Layer 3, how they help in VoIP traffic, it'll
be helpful.

> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

CDW's retail price was about $7,000.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users