Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on sattelite link

2005-01-24 Thread mjr-asterisk
marius baranescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have a running Asterisk box . It is running great 
> My problem is that I can not get connected to the world :) . 
> My only option available here is a satellite connection . 
> I was testing different service providers but all of them are doing
> firewalling and NAT so SIP, IAX are not working
> I desperately need to get connected to the world :)) 
> Please recommend me a good ISP for Middle East (permanent 2 way 
> connection) , real IP adresses etc

I guess it depends on where you are in the Middle East.

My experience is in Iraq.  In this region are lots of really poor
providers reselling highly unreliable, congested, and jitter-prone
bandwidth.  There are a few that are not.

In major cities in Iraq TigrisNet resells Intelsat bandwidth via a
metro 802.11a network.  Elsewhere in Iraq (and likely the whole Middle
East) you can buy service from Intelsat directly.  Its not cheap, but
it works very well.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + Satellite connection

2004-12-08 Thread mjr-asterisk
"Jay Milk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> There have been prior discussion on this on the list -- just google for
> "starband site:lists.digium.com" and you should find it.  IIRC, there
> has been some sporadic success, but overwhelmingly, satellite-based VOIP
> connections are not considered feasible.

My company does IAX2/GSM over satellite links for many sites
throughout the world on through different satellite providers.  It is
fairly reliable.  There is obviously a lot of noticeable lag with
700ms RTTs, but you get used to that right away.

As long as there is a guarantee as to the minimum amount of bandwidth
your provider will give you, VoIP is feasible over satellite links.

Once the next generation of jitter buffer, timing, etc. gets finished
in asterisk, things will get even better over sat links and less than
desirable WAN paths.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] cisco poe + netgear

2004-11-15 Thread mjr-asterisk
Jeb Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> By far the best poe (price/performance) I have seen for Cisco poe (or
> standard poe) is the Netgear
> FSM7326P. http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=568864
> 
> It is a managed layer3 poe switch (24 port) with 2 gigabit ports also.
> 
> Works out of the box with Cisco and Snoms (it auto detects which
> polarity they want).  No adapters needed for either.  And it is about
> $1100.
> 
> We are using 4 of them and love them.

We are using 9 of them and are pretty unhappy with them.  Its really
nice that they power the Cisco phones, and they are very cheap.
However, we've had about one "lockup" per month with these switches
where the only solution to pass traffic again was to power cycle the
unit.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 76XX - How to ignore a call (silence ring)

2004-09-22 Thread mjr-asterisk
"Shawn Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I am preparing to setup a system using Cisco 7940 and 7960's I have the
> 7.1 SIP firmware on them.
> One issue I have run into is how to silence the ringer if a call comes
> in and you don't want to take it.
> Many phones have a DND button. I know the 79XX has the DND in the menu
> but it is to cumbersome to go into the settings then phone preferences
> then the DND and select yes.
> Is there any other way this can be achieved to silence the ringer if a
> call comes in and the person doesn't want to take it?

I've asked the Cisco TAC about this, and they told me I needed to
submit a "feature request" with my VAR.

If you bought your phones through a Cisco reseller with some clout,
I'd encourage you to submit a feature request for DND that does what
DND does on all other phone systems.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79xx + asterisk + some functions Q

2004-09-15 Thread mjr-asterisk
Alex Ongena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 1) Status info: can I see on my 7960 equipment (eventualy
>with the 7914 extension) who is free/busy and alike ?

While it looks like recent SIP images support this "multiple call
appearance" feature, to my knowledge asterisk does not.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] call quality monitoring

2004-09-12 Thread mjr-asterisk
Chris Icide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Satellite links can be pretty tough to troubleshoot.  It sounds like
> you are running into a uplink buffer issue.  On heavily loaded
> uplinks, the input buffers can get quite large, and if the satellite
> provider isn't using some form of buffer handling that prioritizes udp
> traffic, it may be that most of your voice packets are falling on the
> floor of the uplink facility...

Yeah, I thought about that too, which is why I set up tools to monitor
packet loss and measure jitter.  It uses a non-conflicting UDP port
near the one that IAX2 uses.  My tests indicate very little loss and
the same jitter in both directions.

What I really want is a way to get asterisk to yelp if it notices that
its about to make the call sound bad due to late/missing packets or
for whatever reason.  Right now it seems that the network is
functioning normally but still one direction of the calls sounds
intermittently awful.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] call quality monitoring

2004-09-10 Thread mjr-asterisk
I need to debug a call quality issue with remote users on the other
end of a satellite link.  The symptoms are: we here on the Internet
side can hear them just fine.  On their end, things work sorta OK most
times, but they often suffer from severe dropouts and digital
warbling, both of which I attribute to them missing packets.  Often
times they can't make out a word we are saying while we can hear them
crystal clearly.

Various pings and other network tests indicate that the underlying
network is functioning as well as can be expected for a sat link.  In
fact, the overall jitter seems to be pretty low (avg 20ms).  Packet
loss is around 1-2%, and latency is around 700ms on average.

I'm left to assume that the jitter buffer on that end isn't
functioning properly.  Both ends of the call have the same jitter
buffer settings.  The call is carried by IAX2 and encoded with ILBC.

The iax.conf files on each end start like this:

   >[general]
   >trunk=no
   >notransfer=yes
   >iaxcompat=no
   >
   >bandwidth=low
   >
   >disallow=all
   >allow=ilbc
   >
   >jitterbuffer=yes
   >dropcount=3
   >maxjitterbuffer=500
   >maxexcessbuffer=150
   >minexcessbuffer=40
   >jittershrinkrate=1

Of course, perhaps the jitter buffer isn't to blame, but given that
one side of the call sounds perfect, I can't think of anything else
obvious that would cause this.


Is there any way to extract from asterisk some idea of why it thinks
the calls sound bad?  For example, when the jitter buffer notices that
packets are discarded because they are too late, when excessive
packets are completely missing, etc.

I've been collecting a giant debug log for a while now, so I could
pretty easily sift through it if there's something good to look for.

Thanks.
-- 
Matt Ranney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users