[asterisk-users] voicemail issue

2006-10-10 Thread stan ford
the last thing i was trying to do was change the default password to same as voicemail. i also tried reversing these changes but doesnt work. this is my log. i should probably mention that im running trixbox 1.21. when i connect to the voicemail system remotely, i enter the username, then a password and thats when this comes up.     Core debug is at least 1    -- Executing Macro("Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2", "hangupcall") in new stack    -- Executing ResetCDR("Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2", "w") in new stack    -- Executing NoCDR("Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2", "") in new stack    -- Executing Wait("Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2", "5") in new
 stack    -- Executing Hangup("Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2", "") in new stack 
		How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low  PC-to-Phone call rates.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] password for vm users

2006-10-09 Thread stan ford
how about password strength? or remembering and not allowing password? or password duration?Marco Mouta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  just set your initial password to be equal to vm-account number, and Voicemail application will do that for you and will request users to setup a new password!  On 10/9/06, stan ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:how does one force mandatory password change on login? and a period of time to pass before mandating a password change?      im using trixbox so if you have that info. that would be good, if you have it for
 asterisk, im sure i could figure it out as well      thx.  Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.   ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Com os melhores cumprimentos,Marco Mouta ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] password for vm users

2006-10-09 Thread stan ford
easy enough. thanks!Marco Mouta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  just set your initial password to be equal to vm-account number, and Voicemail application will do that for you and will request users to setup a new password!  On 10/9/06, stan ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:how does one force mandatory password change on login? and a period of time to pass before mandating a password change?      im using trixbox so if you have that info. that would be good, if you have it for asterisk, im sure i could figure it out as well     
 thx.  Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.   ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Com os melhores cumprimentos,Marco Mouta
 ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] password for vm users

2006-10-08 Thread stan ford
how does one force mandatory password change on login? and a period of time to pass before mandating a password change?      im using trixbox so if you have that info. that would be good, if you have it for asterisk, im sure i could figure it out as well     thx. 
		Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] commercial asterisk

2006-10-06 Thread stan ford
anyone have experience with IntuitiveVoice's Asterisk system?  
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: failed registration

2006-10-06 Thread stan ford
what about the interval of the registration? is 2 minutes too often? Dovid B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Timed out from what I have seen comes from either a poor internet connection or a problem with your ITSP.- Original Message -   From: stan ford   To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com   Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:42 AM  Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: failed registration  stan ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i have this issue with failed registrations with my sip provider. it doesn't happen often, but it does happen. it also happens with 2 different vsp providers, so i dont think its them. this happens maybe 8 times a day, but then that doesn't sound too bad considering it registers itself every 2 minutes. im using trixbox 1.1 and have grandsream 101 SIP phones. thanks alot.     Oct  4 06:12:02 NOTICE[2831] chan_sip.c: Failed to authenticate on
 REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3)Oct  4 06:12:19 NOTICE[2831] chan_sip.c:    -- Registration for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' timed out, trying again (Attempt #4)  Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com   Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.   Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail. 
		Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: failed registration

2006-10-05 Thread stan ford
stan ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:i have this issue with failed registrations with my sip provider. it doesn't happen often, but it does happen. it also happens with 2 different vsp providers, so i dont think its them. this happens maybe 8 times a day, but then that doesn't sound too bad considering it registers itself every 2 minutes. im using trixbox 1.1 and have grandsream 101 SIP phones. thanks alot.     Oct  4 06:12:02 NOTICE[2831] chan_sip.c: Failed to authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3)Oct  4 06:12:19 NOTICE[2831] chan_sip.c:    -- Registration for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' timed out, trying again (Attempt #4)  Stay in the know. Pulse on the
 new Yahoo.com. Check it out.   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com  
		Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. 
		Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] failed registration

2006-10-05 Thread stan ford
i have this issue with failed registrations with my sip provider. it doesn't happen often, but it does happen. it also happens with 2 different vsp providers, so i dont think its them. this happens maybe 8 times a day, but then that doesn't sound too bad considering it registers itself every 2 minutes. im using trixbox 1.1 and have grandsream 101 SIP phones. thanks alot.     Oct  4 06:12:02 NOTICE[2831] chan_sip.c: Failed to authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3)Oct  4 06:12:19 NOTICE[2831] chan_sip.c:    -- Registration for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' timed out, trying again (Attempt #4) 
		Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out. 
 __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] t1 voip to failover pri

2006-10-02 Thread stan ford
if i went with an SDSL line, don't those lines hook up to a common point, the DSLAM?     i do like this idea of faling over not to a pri but another cheaper high speed line.adebayo omo-dare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I wouldn't first presume that there is any law that states you have to run VoIP over a PRI. Other technologies exist such as SDSL - with some providers speaking of crazy prices such as £65pcm for 2Mbs 5:1 contention ration and £100 for 1:1 (U.K) - should be even less in the states if that's where you are.      One option, but not the only one, would be to drop your pri when your contract ends and take up SDSL - and voila an initial saving, in your
 case, of a 000 or more in the year.     You could also have two SDSL lines for a little less than the price of the PRI. Both lines would not only serve for High Availability -possibly even better availability than single PRI- but could also, actively, both switch traffic, giving you 4Mbps of bandwidth for your VoIP, or if you choose, some other requirement while not required as failover - all for the price of less than one PRI.     Then there is compression - 64k non negotiable, per channel for PRI, and flexible -i.e., less the 64k- for VoIP (International high quality Calls are transported at 16k), giving you the capacity to potentially service more traffic with less initial outlay.      Other real cost efficiencies come in the form of the fact that IP-to-IP (local/national/international) calls are free. So if you have a lot of inter-branch communications,
 or communications you can switch on to IP, you can totally erradicate this cost - unlike with the PRI where you will still be subject to payment.  Think like this - say I have two offices - one in london and the other New York. How much will I save by moving my calls on to VoIP with no per-time or call setup charges.     Features related to OAM&P, can also be faster and cheaper with you having a lot more power in your hands.     In real senses, and with regards to reliability, you should take in to consideration the great moves currently being made by telecom companies (incumbents most especially), with regards to a complete shift to NGNs, which have a strong focus on ToIP. With new fiber (FTTP), new technology, etc, a lot of networks are highly reliable at the present moment - I guess this would also depend on where you are.     The thing about it is
 that complete IP networks in terms of telecom now look inevitable. And whether you do it yourself or it is done for you - it is the way things, many expect, are going to be in the next 5 or so years.  stan ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm confused with something, maybe someone can explain to me.      if your currently on  a pri and are considering moving over to VOIP, that means you would have to purchase a t1 or fractional t1 for a your voip connections.      but then, voip connections aren't as reliable as PRI. so then you would probbaly have to get a PRI failover.      but then having a PRI failover means that you now have to pay 400 for a T1, then another 400 for your PRI line. wouldn't have you have just defeated the cause of
 savig money by now having to have a PRI on standby? now costing you 800 a month? wouldn't it almost be the same price to stick with the PRI only?     is anyone out there, using a VOIP only  with no failover?  __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users  Now you can scan emails quickly with a reading pane. Get the new Yahoo! Mail.___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		 All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] t1 voip to failover pri

2006-10-02 Thread stan ford
I'm confused with something, maybe someone can explain to me.      if your currently on  a pri and are considering moving over to VOIP, that means you would have to purchase a t1 or fractional t1 for a your voip connections.      but then, voip connections aren't as reliable as PRI. so then you would probbaly have to get a PRI failover.      but then having a PRI failover means that you now have to pay 400 for a T1, then another 400 for your PRI line. wouldn't have you have just defeated the cause of savig money by now having to have a PRI on standby? now costing you 800 a month? wouldn't it almost be the same price to stick with the PRI only?     is anyone out there, using a VOIP only  with no failover? __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
 around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] suggest a configuration

2006-10-02 Thread stan ford
I have to setup a pbx system for a  company, can someone suggest a configuration.      Currently their phone bill is 1600 a month     Currenlty 27 phone lines     1/2 of the calls are long distance     I'd like the savings of a voip network, but also the reliability of a pstn/pri.           
		How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low  PC-to-Phone call rates.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] pay as you go t.t38 fax termination and origination

2006-09-30 Thread stan ford
no, i have to retain my fax numbers hmm. thanks anyways.John Kington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  At 12:15 AM 9/28/2006 -0700, you wrote:>i can't for the life of me find a pay as you go termination and >origination service.>>there's garfachi, but they don't offer DID's in anywhere else other than >CA. Any suggestions? Thanks.They do offer tollfree DID. What about using one of those?Regards,John___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		 All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] pstn failback

2006-09-29 Thread stan ford
Lacy,  can you confirm what i was saying about SIP Phones. if i fail from my voip connection to my pri, would i need to swap out my SIP phones with another type of digital phone?Lacy Moore - Aspendora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   a couple things, if you guys could clear up for me.     A) If i have a bunch of sip ip phones, and if i were to fail to my PRI. I should still be able to use my ip phones right? i assume the signal will be changed by my T1 card? and the reverse i would assume is true for incoming calls.      Outgoing could be handled by the dial plan.  Incoming would have to be something worked
 out with the providers.   B) How about DID's, how would that be handled. is there a DID failover as well? I have my VOIP service with one company, if i had my PRI service with another. how would those DID's get failed to the other provider, if thats even possible at all in a timely manner.      Not sure how this would be handled.     C) also are failover pri's generally cheaper that their active counterparts?     thanks alot.   ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
 Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] pstn failback

2006-09-29 Thread stan ford
thanks for the responses     a couple things, if you guys could clear up for me.     A) If i have a bunch of sip ip phones, and if i were to fail to my PRI. I should still be able to use my ip phones right? i assume the signal will be changed by my T1 card? and the reverse i would assume is true for incoming calls.     B) How about DID's, how would that be handled. is there a DID failover as well? I have my VOIP service with one company, if i had my PRI service with another. how would those DID's get failed to the other provider, if thats even possible at all in a timely manner.     C) also are failover pri's generally cheaper that their active counterparts?     thanks alot.Shawn Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Stan,I agree with the comment below, we switched from analog lines to a PRI andit's not always as reliable as some people think. We are in a somewhat rurallocation and we have outages regularly. 1-4 hour outages every few monthsare not uncommon for us. Outages of 60 seconds or so are even more common.I'm told this is because the T1 line is running somewhat noisy/dirty andafter so many CRC errors the equipment is resetting.Make sure you negotiate a good SLA so that you can get credit when it doesgo down!You also have to be careful like mentioned below, if you get 2 PRI's, evenfrom different CLECS, the will normally still come out of the same CentralOffice and travel side by side on the cable. So it's likely if 1 goes downthen the other one will also. Summary: It's a good idea to have a few analog lines since they can take awhole lot more abuse than the digital T1 can handle. (Static/Noise
 doesn'tmake your call drop!)-Original Message-From: Lacy Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 4:23 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [asterisk-users] pstn failback-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1stan ford wrote:> On fonalities web page, i see they offer pstn failback as a feature oftheir asterisk package. i've also heard before of failing back to a pri lineif your t1 voip line fails. my question is. in order to have pstn or prifailback, dont you basically have to have all the equipment there onstandby, a PRI line, TDM cards, PRI/T1 cards, a bunch of digital or analongphones. it just seems like a whole lot of hardware to be sitting therewaiting for a disaster. unless im just not understanding pstn/pri failback.can someone shed some light?> > also, if you've got a
 dedicated full t1 line for voice, and have a lowamount of users for that t1, is there really to worry about failing back toa pstn? seeing how reliable a t1 is. is anyone out here using full voiptelelphony solution only?> Having had our XO connection go down within a week or so of switching toa PRI, I can see how having a fallback would be good. It was down forabout 4 hours. However, that was back in May or June and hasn't beendown since. I couldn't justify having something on standby for ourbusiness. But, our clients can reach us by phone in the office or cell,and we can easily make outgoing calls on our cellphones. Our type ofbusiness is not really dependent on absolutely having the phones up 100%of the time.If you do get a fallback, get it from different providers. If your T1from provider X is down, chances are a PRI from provider X will befollowing the same path and be down as well.-BEGIN PGP
 SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.orgiD8DBQFFHOX9VVXe/Qmwk9QRArSYAKDJN6Tf/L+L3ruXyXYcAeVbIyMxBwCgi2wMYwcV6yYYJX2cVly2z0dsdZ4==+Ik2-END PGP SIGNATURE-___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
		 All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] pstn failback

2006-09-29 Thread stan ford
On fonalities web page, i see they offer pstn failback as a feature of their asterisk package. i've also heard before of failing back to a pri line if your t1 voip line fails. my question is. in order to have pstn or pri failback, dont you basically have to have all the equipment there on standby, a PRI line, TDM cards, PRI/T1 cards, a bunch of digital or analong phones. it just seems like a whole lot of hardware to be sitting there waiting for a disaster. unless im just not understanding pstn/pri failback. can someone shed some light?     also, if you've got a dedicated full t1 line for voice, and have a low amount of users for that t1, is there really to worry about failing back to a pstn? seeing how reliable a t1 is. is anyone out here using full voip telelphony solution only?     thanks. 
		Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] t1-pri or sip trunk?

2006-09-28 Thread stan ford
if you have to setup an office of 100 users now. would you rather setup a sip trunk,a t1-pri, or even a t1? and why?     thx 
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] pay as you go t.t38 fax termination and origination

2006-09-28 Thread stan ford
i can't for the life of me find a pay as you go termination and origination service.     there's garfachi, but they don't offer DID's in anywhere else other than CA. Any suggestions? Thanks. 
		Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out. 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: FXO module in TDM400P (UK, BT) - Hangup detection failing

2004-11-03 Thread stan
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 10:58:39PM +, StrUK wrote:
 
> I guess my question is: does anyone have polarity reversal hangup  
> detection working on a BT line with an fxo module in a TDM400P?

Testing with my fxo module shows that it takes about 8 seconds from
pressing hangup on the mobile phone before hangup is detected in
asterisk (maybe this relates to your 9 seconds).  I'm not sure if this
is when the local exchange sends the polarity reversal or if asterisk is
detecting a hangup in some other way.  I have busydetect=no and
callprogress=no so I'm (AFAIK) not using any "fake disconnect functions"
as per the keypad lights page[1].

If I pick up the phone during the 8 seconds I get a usable dialtone,
which might be worrying if I didn't want people calling certain numbers.
This seems to indicate that the local exchange knows that the mobile has
hungup, as it wouldn't give dialtone in the middle of call.  So perhaps
I dont have polarity reversal hangup detection working, but HTH anyway.

I'm not using the fxo callerid and asterisk is from cvs checkout date
14-Aug-2004 (as downloaded from bri-stuff.0.1.0-RC4a)

my zapata config for the fxo module:

group=1
context=fxo
signalling=fxs_ks
usecallerid=no
callwaitingcallerid=no
threewaycalling=no
cancallforward=no
transfer=no
immediate=no
callwaiting=no
usecallingpres=no
callreturn=no
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=no
echotraining=800
rxgain=0.0
txgain=2.0
busydetect=no
callprogress=no
channel=6

[1]
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20Disconnect%20Supervision


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running.
Henry Devito wrote:
Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard 
drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts,  I need to know what 
motherboard works ok for asterisk,  I have no problems with the Dual 
and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used.  Now I plan on building a 
Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading.  I looked through the wiki and 
could not find the recommended P4 board.  Does anyone have any 
suggestions?  Thanks.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sending broadcasts to all phones?

2004-10-16 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
A friend of mine has a real panasonic PBX setup at his house, and is 
able to pick up the phone, dial an extension, and it broadcasts what he 
says over every phone in his house without the phones having to be 
picked up. 

What is this feature called?
Would it be possible to set this up with Asterisk given the appropriate 
phones? (Cisco?)

Thanks,
Stan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap, Highquality IP Phones

2004-10-15 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
Where do I buy one?
Stan
Matt Riddell wrote:
James H. Thompson wrote:
Link to Sipura Press Release
http://www.sipura.com/Documents/SipuraPressRelease007.pdf

I've put it up on the news page in HTML (just in case it takes anyone 
else as long as it takes me to open a PDF file!)

The URL is: http://www.sineapps.com/news.php?rssid=230
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Large Scale Asterisk Migration

2004-10-12 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
Just as a what if...
Lets say I have a 250 phone rollout.  I have three incoming T1 lines 
(however thoes are usually setup) with say 1000 phone numbers available 
to me.  Every phone is currently analog, but I would like to move to a 
VOIP based setup when the prices become comperable. 

What am I looking at for equipment here?  How do I possibly provide 250 
phone ports with the Digium 4 port pci cards?  Wouldn't I need a ton of 
them?

Thanks,
Stan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Unable to locate sample sounds

2004-10-10 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
I am running the latest asterisk CVS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/asterisk # locate demo-thanks
/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/demo-thanks.gsm
This directory has 150+ files.
I changed the [demo] section in extensions to [incoming] to play with 
this included definition:

[incoming]
;
; We start with what to do when a call first comes in.
;
exten => s,1,Wait,1 ; Wait a second, just for fun
exten => s,2,Answer ; Answer the line
exten => s,3,DigitTimeout,5 ; Set Digit Timeout to 5 seconds
exten => s,4,ResponseTimeout,10 ; Set Response Timeout to 10 seconds
exten => s,5,BackGround(demo-congrats)  ; Play a congratulatory message
exten => s,6,BackGround(demo-instruct)  ; Play some instructions
exten => 2,1,BackGround(demo-moreinfo)  ; Give some more information.
exten => 2,2,Goto(s,6)
When someone calls, I get this error:
   -- Executing Wait("SIP/147.135.8.129-08146c60", "1") in new stack
   -- Executing Answer("SIP/147.135.8.129-08146c60", "") in new stack
   -- Executing DigitTimeout("SIP/147.135.8.129-08146c60", "5") in new 
stack
   -- Set Digit Timeout to 5
   -- Executing ResponseTimeout("SIP/147.135.8.129-08146c60", "10") in 
new stack
   -- Set Response Timeout to 10
   -- Executing BackGround("SIP/147.135.8.129-08146c60", 
"demo-congrats") in new stack
Oct 10 21:48:38 WARNING[196619]: file.c:475 ast_openstream: File 
demo-congrats does not exist in any format
Oct 10 21:48:38 WARNING[196619]: file.c:779 ast_streamfile: Unable to 
open demo-congrats (format ULAW): No such file or directory
Oct 10 21:48:38 WARNING[196619]: pbx.c:4672 pbx_builtin_background: 
ast_streamfile failed on SIP/147.135.8.129-08146c60 fro demo-congrats

Why can it not find the files?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice registration timeout

2004-10-10 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
This line was reprovisioned, and the password was changed. 

Stan
Stan Brinkerhoff wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to setup * with Broadvoice.
I am using Gentoo Linux, and * 1.0.0, and now CVS.
My current config looks like:
(sip.conf)
[general]
port=5060
context=sip_incoming
tos=lowdelay
notifymimetype=text/plain
allow=gsm
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
canreinvite=no
nat=no
register => 8027051441:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[broadvoice]; use for outbound and inbound proxy auth
type=peer
username=802705
fromuser=802705
secret=xx
host=sip.broadvoice.com
dtmfmode=inband
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
canreinvite=no
insecure=very
srvlookup=yes
[broadvoice-in1] ; use to match Broadvoice host 1
type=peer
host=147.135.0.128
[broadvoice-in2] ; use to match Broadvoice host 2
type=peer
host=147.135.8.128
When I start asterisk -c I get:
Asterisk Ready.
*CLI> Oct 10 19:46:49 WARNING[81925]: chan_sip.c:665 retrans_pkt: 
Maximum retries exceeded on call 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for seqno 102 
(Critical Request)
Oct 10 19:47:03 NOTICE[81925]: chan_sip.c:3978 sip_reg_timeout: 
Registration for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' timed out, trying again

These two errors keep repeating.
I have tried every config I can find on the web, on the wiki, and in 
these Asterisk-user emails for the last 2 months.  At one point I had 
a 404 error, but I can't get that to even show up anymore.

Any help would be appreciated!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice registration timeout

2004-10-10 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
Hello,
I have been trying to setup * with Broadvoice.
I am using Gentoo Linux, and * 1.0.0, and now CVS.
My current config looks like:
(sip.conf)
[general]
port=5060
context=sip_incoming
tos=lowdelay
notifymimetype=text/plain
allow=gsm
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
canreinvite=no
nat=no
register => 8027051441:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[broadvoice]; use for outbound and inbound proxy auth
type=peer
username=802705
fromuser=802705
secret=xx
host=sip.broadvoice.com
dtmfmode=inband
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
canreinvite=no
insecure=very
srvlookup=yes
[broadvoice-in1] ; use to match Broadvoice host 1
type=peer
host=147.135.0.128
[broadvoice-in2] ; use to match Broadvoice host 2
type=peer
host=147.135.8.128
When I start asterisk -c I get:
Asterisk Ready.
*CLI> Oct 10 19:46:49 WARNING[81925]: chan_sip.c:665 retrans_pkt: 
Maximum retries exceeded on call 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for seqno 102 (Critical 
Request)
Oct 10 19:47:03 NOTICE[81925]: chan_sip.c:3978 sip_reg_timeout: 
Registration for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' timed out, trying again

These two errors keep repeating.
I have tried every config I can find on the web, on the wiki, and in 
these Asterisk-user emails for the last 2 months.  At one point I had a 
404 error, but I can't get that to even show up anymore.

Any help would be appreciated!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] caller id over iax

2004-08-12 Thread Stan Dard
Hi all - thanks for all your help. (not)

I've just sussed it.

I had a dial plan line..

;exten => s,5003,SetCIDNum(0${CALLERIDNUM})

The 0$ was the problem, remove the '0' and it works fine. So watch out
for this in extensions.conf - you could add or remove whatever you want
there for your Caller ID prefixes.

Obviously nobody has any idea about dial plans better than me here! (and
I'm a newbie).



On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 15:51, Stan Dard wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I've 'inherited' an existing Asterisk with a number of users, and some
> pstn connections through its Zaptel card. 
>  
> I've recently set up another Asterisk which has no direct pstn access
> and I've connected the 2 systems with IAX. The original system has an
> extension number range 1xxx and the new asterisk has the number range
> 3xxx. I can call both ways, and when required can access the
> inbound/outbound pstn connections from both systems. Thats excellent -
> it works a treat! 
>  
> But my problem is with Caller ID. 
> When I call from *1 to the new system the extension caller id's are
> correct. But when I call in the other direction I always get a leading
> '0' infront of the extension number.. ie 03003. 
>  
> I've almost googled myself insane searching for an answer & would really
> appreciate any suggestions anyone may have. 
>  
>  Many Thanks
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] caller id over iax

2004-08-12 Thread Stan Dard
Hi

I've 'inherited' an existing Asterisk with a number of users, and some
pstn connections through its Zaptel card. 
 
I've recently set up another Asterisk which has no direct pstn access
and I've connected the 2 systems with IAX. The original system has an
extension number range 1xxx and the new asterisk has the number range
3xxx. I can call both ways, and when required can access the
inbound/outbound pstn connections from both systems. Thats excellent -
it works a treat! 
 
But my problem is with Caller ID. 
When I call from *1 to the new system the extension caller id's are
correct. But when I call in the other direction I always get a leading
'0' infront of the extension number.. ie 03003. 
 
I've almost googled myself insane searching for an answer & would really
appreciate any suggestions anyone may have. 
 
 Many Thanks

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] zaphfc - hfc pci based ISDN card : point2point & DDI

2004-08-10 Thread stan
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 11:52:51AM +0100, Nick Barnes wrote:
> The reason I ask is that I installed a BRI system (Single Fritz! AVM card
> using chan_CAPI) last week which refused to work - turned out that British
> Telecom had provisioned the line as a point-to-point and not
> point-to-multipoint as requested. Accepting that BT were going to take
> several days to fix their cock-up, I tried to get the card to work in
> point-to-point mode, but failed miserably.
> 
> I could really do with getting point-to-point working on these cards as
> they're cheap and in plentiful supply.
> 
> Have I completely misunderstood the issue and am just being stoopid, or is
> it not possible to do this with these cards?
>

they work in ptp mode (not espcially well last time I tried) with the
mISDN drivers

> PS If HFC is the best way to go, does anybody have any recommendations on
> cheap HFC card suppliers in the UK?

search for "billion isdn pci" on ebay or other HFC-S cards listed on
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-zaptelBRI.  For new ones, i've seen them at
http://www.komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?sku=119006&cks=PRL though not tried
them from here myself.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] quadBRI and UK ISDN2e

2004-04-08 Thread stan
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 12:37:43PM +0100, Jon Fautley wrote:
> Morning Asterikians,
> 
> I've just got my nice shiny quadBRI card, and it seems to be working 
> very well - except for one little issue - CallerID.
> 
> The card is currently connected to an ISDN2e line in P2P mode, and an S0 
> adapter on our existing alcatel PBX.

Is this an omnipcx?

> The S0 connection recieves callerID 
> and displays it correctly - the 2e line doesn't, and BT have said that 
> CLID was enabled on the line two days ago. Does anyone have any pointers 
> on this?

I assume the callerid is also being displayed on the alcatel handsets?
or is this just callerid generated on internal calls?

If it is then that should show the bt line is setup correctly.  I have
callerid working from a bt 2e line in ptp mode using zaphfc.  So
assuming the bri-stuff versions match the only difference would be the
quadbri card.  Not sure where that leads because I think/thought all the
callerid stuff would be handled by libpri from a q.931 SETUP message on
the d-channel and not be driver/card specific.

I could only get my s0 box to operate in ptmp mode, so there would be
change in the signalling line in zapata.conf, but then if you weren't
changing that nothing tends to work rather than just callerid.  I also
note that you have to match the msn assigned to the s0 when dialling out
through the omnipcx whereas bt doesn't seem to be as fussy, but again
nothing todo with callerid.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] support for rfc3326 The Reason Header Field for SIP

2004-03-24 Thread stan
A minor gripe with our current system (* + CP7960s) is calls answered by
one handset showing as missed on others.  RFC3326 seems to answer this
problem but I see no support for it in the cisco phones or * (obviously
less of a problem with the latter being OSS).  Are cisco likely to add this?
Do any other SIP phones support RFC3326?  Anyone else have this gripe?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: cisco 7960G powered by 3com 3CNJPSE

2004-03-16 Thread stan
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:01:46PM -0500, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Dean Collins wrote:
> 
> > Cisco have the terminals around the other way, this is a well known
> > problem, do a search and you'll find what you need to do.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Dean
> 
> Alright.. since I'm the one that posted about using the standard POE 
> injectors wih the 7960, I think I might need to revise the Wiki page.
> 
> Am I to understand that the 7960G does -NOT- support the 802.3af Power 
> Over Ethernet standard?
> 

I've built a cable according to the wiki page and this works with a G
model.  So it looks like the G models dont support 802.3af either.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] OT: cisco 7960G powered by 3com 3CNJPSE

2004-03-15 Thread stan
Is anyone using a 3com 3CNJPSE to power a 7960G?  
I have a couple of 7960Gs and 3CNJPSEs but no combination appears to
work.  Both phones work fine with a cisco power cube.  I get a 47.6V
reading across pins 5 and 8 on the patch cable coming from the 3CNJPSE.
The network still works through the 3CNJPSE, just no power to the phone
until I connect the power cube.  Using two straight through wired patch
cables, 7960G running sip firmware version 6.3.  I've tried different
patch cables with the same result.  Note this is a G version of the
phone which I understand is enable to work with 802.3af devices natively
and hence I believe doesn't require a specially wired patch cable.  I've
looked for a setting to tell the phone to get power via the network
without success, is there one?  Any ideas?

TIA
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] XML Phone book software.

2004-03-12 Thread stan
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 04:06:41PM -0600, Brian R. Swan wrote:
> I'm looking into writing a some phone book XML/PHP software for my Cisco 
> phones.  Specifically, I'd like to be able to use a web interface (on the 
> computer) to maintain a contact list, and then dial from it on the phone.  
> Maybe using MySql on the back end or something (to be determined).  Before I 
> start, and duplicate something else that exists, I wanted to see if anyone 
> has heard of software like that?  Searches of Sourceforge, Freshmeat, and 
> Google didn't turn up much or anything.
>

see the cmxml software section of
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+phone+cisco+79xx

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DSL (DMT) goes down when X100 plugged in

2004-02-25 Thread stan
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:17:27PM +, Chris Lee wrote:
> I have been told that when I plug my X100p into the line I get a 36 Khom 
> loop condition and this may be affecting my ADSL connection (it keeps 
> dropping the line).
> It may be to do with impedance differences here in the UK, But I know 
> very little about Such things.

are you using "modprobe wcfxo opermode=1", as I believe is recommended
for most european lines?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Cisco 7940 Smartnet in the UK

2004-02-11 Thread stan
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 04:34:46PM -, Jason Ross wrote:
> This is slightly off topic so sorry for the intrusion.
> 
> I've got a couple of 7940 phones I'd like to put on Smartnet but I'm
> looking for what I need to order, what it roughly costs and finally a
> reseller in the UK who is easy to deal with.
> 
> Preferably I'd like someone I can deal with online.
> 

outside the UK there is
http://www.ams.net/products/product_info.cfm?Product_ID=10891
at $6.90 - dont know if they'd deal with people outside the US.

However, elsewhere that part number doesn't seem to mean much.
A 7940 is a cateogory 1 device so product codes that seem to mean
something to others are:

CON-SW-VPKG1 (insight.com/uk - £39.99, tradeprice.co.uk - £31.99)
telephone and web support only (search with "smartnet" on tradeprice, 
their search doesn't seem to like part numbers)

CON-AR-VPKG1 - advanced replacement - normally cheaper than above but
didn't provide web support so I didn't look into it

CON-SNT-VPKG1 - 8x5xNBD version (8am-5pm, next business day) which I
believe is when you can expect support and get hardware replacement
respectively
(insight.com/uk - £63.99, tradeprice.co.uk - £45.35)

you can pay more for 24/7 support, 4hr response time or onsite engineer

I ended up going with insight coz I didn't find tradeprice till after,
so dont know what they're like

Also, it seems to take ages for the contract to get registered (2+
weeks) with cisco once u finally get one

HTH

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users