RE: [Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
At 4:13 PM +0100 on 6/20/04, Kevin Walsh wrote: Kubat, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Article auto-converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.) Where does the date/time stamp from Caller ID come from? On my extensions ATA188 and IAX2 soft phone the caller id date / time is 12/30 12:00AM. The Linux time is correct. SayUnixTime return the correct time. My phones have a built-in clock. The Cisco 7960s are configured to take their time from a NTP server. I have a couple of portable DECT phones connected to a Sipura SPA-2000. The phones allow the time to be set from within the setup menu, and the Sipura uses our local NTP server. Check whether your phones have a clock. All of mine do in one way or another, so I always get the correct time associated with the Caller*ID notices. It's possible that the time/date is also encoded into the Caller*ID signal. I haven't had cause to look into that. It's possible that the DECT phones ignore the local time and use the time provided by the Sipura (if the Caller*ID signal does indeed supply this information). Again, I haven't had cause to look into that. Check whether your ATA device can be configured to use a NTP server. Also check whether your soft phone, and the phone connected to your ATA, has a clock you can set. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ While many media adapters (SIP deskphones, analog-to-SIP converters, etc.) use NTP as their time-setting protocol, several (SNOM and others) use the Date: stamp in the SIP header to set their clocks upon an INVITE. This implies that the time is correctly set (via ntp) on your Asterisk server/SIP proxy. Asterisk currently sends a Date: stamp as part of the INVITE, so NTP is not always necessary. SER recently had an update to support this header - see the mailing list. I actually prefer having both methods on a device (selectable), since having to open up firewalls/etc. for NTP from the phones breaks some ease-of-implementation models. (Minor point, but valid in some environments.) SIP should contain everything you need when talking to a User-Agent. Personally, I don't like devices which _require_ (other than for provisioning) protocols other than SIP to be functional (web, telnet, syslog, snmp, ntp, etc.) It sounds neat to have things in different protocols, but that leads to customer service nightmares in the future. NTP is pretty innocuous, but it's still another "tech note" that you have to give to the customer's network team (which, not surprisingly, might not be the people installing the phones.) JT ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Kevin Walsh wrote: > It's possible that the time/date is also encoded into the Caller*ID > signal. I haven't had cause to look into that. It's possible that > the DECT phones ignore the local time and use the time provided by the > Sipura (if the Caller*ID signal does indeed supply this information). > Again, I haven't had cause to look into that. > Hi, Looks like BT Caller ID does include time and date information. have a look at http://www.sinet.bt.com/227v3p4.pdf Chris -- E Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IAXTEL: 17003366726 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:45:00 -0400, Kubat, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Where does the date/time stamp from Caller ID come from? On my extensions ATA188 and IAX2 soft phone the caller id date / time is 12/30 12:00AM. The Linux time is correct. SayUnixTime return the correct time. > As Matteo said, the caller ID date should be generated by the FXS device. In this case, the ATA 188 should be generating it. Make sure that your ATA 188 has the correct time. You can have it fetch the correct time by specifying the NTPIP variable in the configuration. This variable points to an NTP time server. -Shaun ___ Thanks everyone that worked.. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:45:00 -0400, Kubat, Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Where does the date/time stamp from Caller ID come from? On my extensions ATA188 > and IAX2 soft phone the caller id date / time is 12/30 12:00AM. The Linux time is > correct. SayUnixTime return the correct time. > As Matteo said, the caller ID date should be generated by the FXS device. In this case, the ATA 188 should be generating it. Make sure that your ATA 188 has the correct time. You can have it fetch the correct time by specifying the NTPIP variable in the configuration. This variable points to an NTP time server. -Shaun ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
Kubat, Philip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Article auto-converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.) > > Where does the date/time stamp from Caller ID come from? On my > extensions ATA188 and IAX2 soft phone the caller id date / time is 12/30 > 12:00AM. The Linux time is correct. SayUnixTime return the correct > time. > My phones have a built-in clock. The Cisco 7960s are configured to take their time from a NTP server. I have a couple of portable DECT phones connected to a Sipura SPA-2000. The phones allow the time to be set from within the setup menu, and the Sipura uses our local NTP server. Check whether your phones have a clock. All of mine do in one way or another, so I always get the correct time associated with the Caller*ID notices. It's possible that the time/date is also encoded into the Caller*ID signal. I haven't had cause to look into that. It's possible that the DECT phones ignore the local time and use the time provided by the Sipura (if the Caller*ID signal does indeed supply this information). Again, I haven't had cause to look into that. Check whether your ATA device can be configured to use a NTP server. Also check whether your soft phone, and the phone connected to your ATA, has a clock you can set. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
hi Il dom, 2004-06-20 alle 16:45, Kubat, Philip ha scritto: > Where does the date/time stamp from Caller ID come from? On my > extensions ATA188 and IAX2 soft phone the caller id date / time is > 12/30 12:00AM. The Linux time is correct. SayUnixTime return the > correct time. The date *should* be generated by the fxs device. When I receive cid on my analog phones via digium fxs cards, the time is kept up in sync with the server. Matteo. -- Brancaleoni Matteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Espia Srl ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Date Time Stamp with Caller ID
Where does the date/time stamp from Caller ID come from? On my extensions ATA188 and IAX2 soft phone the caller id date / time is 12/30 12:00AM. The Linux time is correct. SayUnixTime return the correct time. Any Ideas? Does this work? Thanks!
