[Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
http://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm Anyone ever use this box? Hows it compare with the Iaxy? Id like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less no name, but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? Thats appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! J Any experience? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
I have a couple. The audio quality is not as good as it has a noticeable amount of hiss in the background and it also does not support message waiting. It does however support other codecs other than ulaw/alaw which is why we went for it. On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 14:51, Steve Jones wrote: http://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm Anyone ever use this box? How’s it compare with the Iaxy? I’d like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less “no name”, but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? That’s appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! J Any experience? __ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Steve Jones wrote: x-tad-smallerhttp://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm/x-tad-smallerx-tad-smaller /x-tad-smallerx-tad-smallerAnyone ever use this box? How’s it compare with the Iaxy? I’d like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less “no name”, but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? That’s appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! /x-tad-smallerx-tad-smallerJ /x-tad-smallerx-tad-smallerAny experience? /x-tad-smaller I hadn't seen that one! I have the AG168V based ATA which with recent firmware update (1.51) is working very well with IAX2, although there is still an occasional crack sound on calls. I am very happy with the AG168v, which also a generic cheapo unit with a universal power adapter (I wonder if that's where the crack sound comes from), and with recent firmware audio quality is MUCH improved for IAX2 (I was using SIP for a while). I wonder if the unit you are linking to is also based on PA168 chipset? seems kind of likely to me. I also wonder about setting up the switch for ethernet purposes (ie does it use DHCP? can I set it to be static? can it port forward to the connected PC?,etc). Thanks for the link, Marty ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
On Jun 20, 2006, at 7:09 AM, Gareth Blades wrote: I have a couple. The audio quality is not as good as it has a noticeable amount of hiss in the background and it also does not support message waiting. I have looked at the docs and this appears to be identical to the AG168V with regards to the setup screens. Have you tried out the latest firmware from aredfox.com? The 1.51 firmware radically improved my voice quality for the device. Strangely it changed the ringtone to a non US sounding one, which is kind of slick for my installation, as it now acts as a distinctive ring feature (ie regular sounding ring PSTN incoming, strange short ring Voip call). Here is a link (third from bottom is IAX firmware) http://aredfox.com/edownloads.htm It does however support other codecs other than ulaw/alaw which is why we went for it. Another feature that I like about this device is that it can be flashed to an SIP ATA and back to IAX without losing all of your settings... Marty ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
Steve Jones wrote: http://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm Anyone ever use this box? How’s it compare with the Iaxy? I’d like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less “no name”, but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? That’s appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! J Any experience? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users We have used the Virbiage IAX ata, which works quite well. http://www.virbiage.com.au/3010.php later, Paul Hales -- Paul Hales Technical Manager AsteriskIT www.asteriskit.com.au bus: 03 8320 8100 mob: 0434 673 529 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:49 PM, Paul Hales wrote: Steve Jones wrote: http://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm Anyone ever use this box? How’s it compare with the Iaxy? I’d like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less “no name”, but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? That’s appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! J Any experience? -- -- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users We have used the Virbiage IAX ata, which works quite well. http://www.virbiage.com.au/3010.php later, Hmmm, that seems to indicate preorder on the website you linked us to? Are you a pre release tester, or is the website out of date? Marty ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
Paul Hales a écrit : Steve Jones wrote: http://www.x100p.com/products_2.htm Anyone ever use this box? How’s it compare with the Iaxy? I’d like to buy one or the other.. The Iaxy is appealing because to me, it seems less “no name”, but this one says that it supports using hostnames, whereas apparently the iaxy only supports IP addresses?? That’s appealing to the dynamic DNS guy in me! J It works fine. I've tried both, and I'd say this FXS beats the IAXy hands down. Good stuff. Cheers, Jean-Michel. -- Jean-Michel Hiver - http://ykoz.net/ Découvrez la Réunion des Technologies IP Telecom TEL: +262 (0)262 55 03 98 - RCS 434 273 330 SAINT PIERRE ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX FXS.. Any experience with...
We have used the Virbiage IAX ata, which works quite well. http://www.virbiage.com.au/3010.php later, Hmmm, that seems to indicate preorder on the website you linked us to? Are you a pre release tester, or is the website out of date? Marty The website is out of date - the other website (firefly) has the products ready to go. Paul Hales -- Paul Hales Technical Manager AsteriskIT www.asteriskit.com.au bus: 03 8320 8100 mob: 0434 673 529 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
