Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Doug Lytle wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corey S. McFadden wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty
>>> counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if
>>> that's the problem let me know.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah, that's the problem.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
> In my case, I'm not using quotes:
>
> exten => s,3,Set(CALLERID(Name)=${CALLERID})
> exten => s,4,Set(CALLERID(Number)=${CALLERIDNUM})
>
Still waiting for a SIP debug with a bad request reply...
/O :-)
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Steve, I'm glad to know what the problem is. We're back to normal now. FWIW, this was working up until about a week and a half ago and didn't affect our non-Cisco phones... I'm not sure what component (Asterisk, chan_sip, 79xx firmware, etc.) became less tolerant of the error between then and now but I hope it's not indicative of a larger issue. Thanks again, -Corey > > Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty > > counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if > > that's the problem let me know. > > Yeah, that's the problem. > > Steve * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corey S. McFadden wrote:
Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty
counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if
that's the problem let me know.
Yeah, that's the problem.
Steve
In my case, I'm not using quotes:
exten => s,3,Set(CALLERID(Name)=${CALLERID})
exten => s,4,Set(CALLERID(Number)=${CALLERIDNUM})
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty
nor safety."
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corey S. McFadden wrote: > Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty > counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if > that's the problem let me know. Yeah, that's the problem. Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Olle, Thanks for looking into it. In doing some ngrep work I figured out where my problem is. Acutal error from the 79xx inside the SIP header is: Warning: 399 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing FROM: field' >From looks like this: From: ""Sales Queue"" Doug Lytle wrote: > > Olle E. Johansson wrote: > > > >> Corey S. McFadden wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Here's the CLI output: > >>>-- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from 192.168.249.94 > >>>-- SIP/502-9a58 is circuit-busy > >>> > >>> I've tried a few different Asterisk versions CVS-HEAD, stable, even > >>> 1.2 beta. I've also bounced between SIP firmware 7.4 and 7.5 on the > >>> 7960/7940 phones. > > > > As of Friday evening, we've been seeing this on our system as well. > > Olle, do you want debugs from other people as well, or will the one > > you've requested be enough? > Just make sure I get one. If I can't figure that one out, I might need > more. Thank you for asking. The first one in my mailbox tomorrow morning > (it's late in Sweden) will get my attention :-) > > I need to know version of Asterisk as well. > > As we are getting very close to release, it's important for us to track > down and resolve all outstanding bugs as quickly as possible. The SIP > channel has been changing quite a lot during the last two months, so > there are a lot of new code in there right now. > > Thank you for your assistance! > > /O > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > * > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. > * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Doug Lytle wrote: > Olle E. Johansson wrote: > >> Corey S. McFadden wrote: >> >> >>> Here's the CLI output: >>>-- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from 192.168.249.94 >>>-- SIP/502-9a58 is circuit-busy >>> >>> I've tried a few different Asterisk versions CVS-HEAD, stable, even >>> 1.2 beta. I've also bounced between SIP firmware 7.4 and 7.5 on the >>> 7960/7940 phones. > > As of Friday evening, we've been seeing this on our system as well. > Olle, do you want debugs from other people as well, or will the one > you've requested be enough? Just make sure I get one. If I can't figure that one out, I might need more. Thank you for asking. The first one in my mailbox tomorrow morning (it's late in Sweden) will get my attention :-) I need to know version of Asterisk as well. As we are getting very close to release, it's important for us to track down and resolve all outstanding bugs as quickly as possible. The SIP channel has been changing quite a lot during the last two months, so there are a lot of new code in there right now. Thank you for your assistance! /O ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Olle E. Johansson wrote: Corey S. McFadden wrote: Here's the CLI output: -- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from 192.168.249.94 -- SIP/502-9a58 is circuit-busy I've tried a few different Asterisk versions CVS-HEAD, stable, even 1.2 beta. I've also bounced between SIP firmware 7.4 and 7.5 on the 7960/7940 phones. Please send me a full SIP debug to I can see what the Cisco thinks is so bad coming from us. As of Friday evening, we've been seeing this on our system as well. Olle, do you want debugs from other people as well, or will the one you've requested be enough? Doug ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Corey S. McFadden wrote: > We've been experiencing an odd issue lately. I'm not sure when it started > because it's not happening on most calls--it seems confined to a couple of > our queues. It's consistent though. > > Here's the CLI output: > -- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from 192.168.249.94 > -- SIP/502-9a58 is circuit-busy > > I've tried a few different Asterisk versions CVS-HEAD, stable, even 1.2 > beta. I've also bounced between SIP firmware 7.4 and 7.5 on the 7960/7940 > phones. > > Anyone else seeing anything like this? Please send me a full SIP debug to I can see what the Cisco thinks is so bad coming from us. Thank you /Olle ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
We've been experiencing an odd issue lately. I'm not sure when it started because it's not happening on most calls--it seems confined to a couple of our queues. It's consistent though. Here's the CLI output: -- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from 192.168.249.94 -- SIP/502-9a58 is circuit-busy I've tried a few different Asterisk versions CVS-HEAD, stable, even 1.2 beta. I've also bounced between SIP firmware 7.4 and 7.5 on the 7960/7940 phones. Anyone else seeing anything like this? -Corey * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
