[Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
Hi, I just upgraded to the recent CVS, and IAX1 no longer seems to be available. Is there a way to reenable it? Tor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
Tor Houghton wrote: Hi, I just upgraded to the recent CVS, and IAX1 no longer seems to be available. Is there a way to reenable it? Use IAX2, it is a better IAX protocol. Jeremy McNamara P.S. If you really must have it, dig thru the channels/Makefile, but there is zero reason to use it any longer. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:56:48PM -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: Use IAX2, it is a better IAX protocol. Jeremy McNamara P.S. If you really must have it, dig thru the channels/Makefile, but there is zero reason to use it any longer. Well, I use IAX1 between the clients on the inside of the NAT to my local Asterisk, and IAX2 between the local Asterisk and my remote Asterisk. Previously (I have not tried yet with current version), when both clients and Asterisk used IAX2, the clients would communicate directly with remote Asterisk and so confuse my NAT firewall. Tor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
Tor Houghton wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:56:48PM -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: Use IAX2, it is a better IAX protocol. Jeremy McNamara P.S. If you really must have it, dig thru the channels/Makefile, but there is zero reason to use it any longer. Well, I use IAX1 between the clients on the inside of the NAT to my local Asterisk, and IAX2 between the local Asterisk and my remote Asterisk. Previously (I have not tried yet with current version), when both clients and Asterisk used IAX2, the clients would communicate directly with remote Asterisk and so confuse my NAT firewall. Tor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Probably a port collision on your NAT box. I believe that IAX and IAX2 use different ports. -brian ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 20:13, Tor Houghton wrote: Well, I use IAX1 between the clients on the inside of the NAT to my local Asterisk, and IAX2 between the local Asterisk and my remote Asterisk. Previously (I have not tried yet with current version), when both clients and Asterisk used IAX2, the clients would communicate directly with remote Asterisk and so confuse my NAT firewall. In iax.conf, set: notransfer=yes That prevents IAX from transferring call to remote Asterisk, so it will stay in path. F ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
Tor Houghton wrote: Well, I use IAX1 between the clients on the inside of the NAT to my local Asterisk, and IAX2 between the local Asterisk and my remote Asterisk. Previously (I have not tried yet with current version), when both clients and Asterisk used IAX2, the clients would communicate directly with remote Asterisk and so confuse my NAT firewall. Are you using cvs latest or cvs stable? I thought IAX1 was still in cvs stable, but I could be wrong. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Eric Wieling wrote: Tor Houghton wrote: Well, I use IAX1 between the clients on the inside of the NAT to my local Asterisk, and IAX2 between the local Asterisk and my remote Asterisk. Previously (I have not tried yet with current version), when both clients and Asterisk used IAX2, the clients would communicate directly with remote Asterisk and so confuse my NAT firewall. Are you using cvs latest or cvs stable? I thought IAX1 was still in cvs stable, but I could be wrong. To enable IAX1, the following line in channels/Makefile needs to be uncommented. # If you really want IAX1 uncomment the following, but it is # unmaintained # #CHANNEL_LIBS+=chan_iax.so James ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:58:19PM -0400, James Golovich wrote: # If you really want IAX1 uncomment the following, but it is # unmaintained # #CHANNEL_LIBS+=chan_iax.so Thanks all, I'll move to IAX2 after I've tested the notransfer option. Tor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Upgraded to latest CVS, now no IAX1?
Brian Cuthie wrote: Tor Houghton wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:56:48PM -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: Use IAX2, it is a better IAX protocol. Jeremy McNamara P.S. If you really must have it, dig thru the channels/Makefile, but there is zero reason to use it any longer. Well, I use IAX1 between the clients on the inside of the NAT to my local Asterisk, and IAX2 between the local Asterisk and my remote Asterisk. Previously (I have not tried yet with current version), when both clients and Asterisk used IAX2, the clients would communicate directly with remote Asterisk and so confuse my NAT firewall. Tor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Probably a port collision on your NAT box. I believe that IAX and IAX2 use different ports. Or you can deactivate transfers at iax.conf: notransfer=yes Daniel -brian ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
