RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I own one of these. It's a great phone overall. It's the only thing I've tried that was able to display a much beloved Polycom IP600. The only thing to be aware of is that the phone only supports two active calls at a time, and only one G.729a coded call at a time. Not certain where you're getting your numbers. The 480 CTi can be found for $279 with one remote handset included. A second remote handset is $99. I also have a Panasonic KXTG-4000 KSU system, which remains in service just because my wife is familiar with its use. Before the 480 CTi I used the Panasonic KSU and a pair of dual FXS ATAs to connect to my Asterisk server. The Aastra remote handsets are a little more fiddly to use. Occasionally some functions require multiple button pushes whereas the Panasonic handsets have more edicated function buttons. Life's too short to suffer through using a cheap phone. Michael On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:48:37 -0400 (EDT), Doug Crompton wrote: >Iain, > > Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From what I can see >if I bought this phone and two remotes my outlay would be close to $800 >US. This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to do with >your money! > >You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS devices for that >amount! > >Doug > >On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote: > >> Doug, >> >> What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base Ethernet/SIP screenphone supporting multiple wireless handsets [but as this is a non-commercial list I won't go into more detail here, google for the above model number if you're interested in more info.] >> >> - Iain >> >> --- >> Message: 4 >> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT) >> From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >> <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> >> Message-ID: >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >> >> Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a >> bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless >> sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple >> extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The >> other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have >> backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power >> over ethernet would help. >> >> Doug >> > > >"Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) > > >* Doug Crompton * >* Richboro, PA 18954 * >* 215-431-6307 * >* * >* [EMAIL PROTECTED]* >* http://www.crompton.com * > > > >___ >--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > >Asterisk-Users mailing list >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
We use cisco 7960's but thats not cheap..BTW Doungyour signature :"Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) is a good one.. tell that to your president..and the patriot act.s/patriot/cutallrights/PS Andrew.. penguins as in linux based ?or the phone just quacks all the time ?;) On 6/27/06, shadowym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Which public STUN servers are you using or did you setup your own?> -Original Message-> From: Cullin J. Wible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:56 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial> Discussion'; 'Iain Barker'> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?>> We've used a number of the polycom 301 and 501 phones in our office. >> We have also deployed a dozen of the Linksys SPA-1001> single-line FXS adapters using G726, SIP, NAT and STUN. They> are extremely reliable and easy to deploy - $60-$70 US each.>> We tested a number of IAX hard phones and didn't find > anything that was reliable and/or suitable for our corporate> setting. We really wanted to run IAX for remote users, but> eventually decided that SIP/STUN was easier to support.>> We also tested the IAXy device and found that it's inability > to use DNS resolution, only be configured on Linux, and only> run ulaw/alaw made and that it cost more then the SPA-1001,> which can use DNS, G726/G729 and has web-based configuration> for less money the more attractive option. >> We also tested the IAX hard phone made by AT-COM only to find> that a number of features such as call transfer do not work.>> For home/remote users: setup STUN, and use a SPA-1001. For a > corporate setting I highly recommend the Polycom phones.>> Cheers,>> Cullin J. Wible> Co-Founder & CTO> Email Data Source, Inc.> 212-514-8900 x1006> >> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of> Doug Crompton> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:49 PM> To: Iain Barker> Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?>> Iain,>> Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From> what I can see if I bought this phone and two remotes my > outlay would be close to $800 US.> This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to> do with your money!>> You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS> devices for that amount! >> Doug>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote:>> > Doug,> >> > What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base> > Ethernet/SIP screenphone supporting multiple wireless > handsets [but as> > this is a non-commercial list I won't go into more detail> here, google> > for the above model number if you're interested in more info.]> >> > - Iain > >> > ---> > Message: 4> > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT)> > From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion> > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>> > Message-ID:> > < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII> >> > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not > there for a> > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a> > wireless sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow> > multiple extension off of one base. The base would connect to the > > internet. The other problem is many of these phones require> power, so> > even if you have backup for your central system the phone> still needs> > to be on it. Power over ethernet would help. > >> > Doug> >>>> "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little> temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben> Franklin (1759) >> > * Doug Crompton *> * Richboro, PA 18954*> * 215-431-6307 *> **> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*> * http://www.crompton.com *> >>> ___> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -->> Asterisk-Users mailing list> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>>___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- MikeSales Manager http://www.theclubvoip.comMaking it happen1.888.470.7253 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Which public STUN servers are you using or did you setup your own? > -Original Message- > From: Cullin J. Wible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:56 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial > Discussion'; 'Iain Barker' > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > We've used a number of the polycom 301 and 501 phones in our office. > > We have also deployed a dozen of the Linksys SPA-1001 > single-line FXS adapters using G726, SIP, NAT and STUN. They > are extremely reliable and easy to deploy - $60-$70 US each. > > We tested a number of IAX hard phones and didn't find > anything that was reliable and/or suitable for our corporate > setting. We really wanted to run IAX for remote users, but > eventually decided that SIP/STUN was easier to support. > > We also tested the IAXy device and found that it's inability > to use DNS resolution, only be configured on Linux, and only > run ulaw/alaw made and that it cost more then the SPA-1001, > which can use DNS, G726/G729 and has web-based configuration > for less money the more attractive option. > > We also tested the IAX hard phone made by AT-COM only to find > that a number of features such as call transfer do not work. > > For home/remote users: setup STUN, and use a SPA-1001. For a > corporate setting I highly recommend the Polycom phones. > > Cheers, > > Cullin J. Wible > Co-Founder & CTO > Email Data Source, Inc. > 212-514-8900 x1006 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Doug Crompton > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:49 PM > To: Iain Barker > Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > Iain, > > Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From > what I can see if I bought this phone and two remotes my > outlay would be close to $800 US. > This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to > do with your money! > > You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS > devices for that amount! > > Doug > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote: > > > Doug, > > > > What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base > > Ethernet/SIP screenphone supporting multiple wireless > handsets [but as > > this is a non-commercial list I won't go into more detail > here, google > > for the above model number if you're interested in more info.] > > > > - Iain > > > > --- > > Message: 4 > > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT) > > From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > > > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not > there for a > > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a > > wireless sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow > > multiple extension off of one base. The base would connect to the > > internet. The other problem is many of these phones require > power, so > > even if you have backup for your central system the phone > still needs > > to be on it. Power over ethernet would help. > > > > Doug > > > > > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little > temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben > Franklin (1759) > > > * Doug Crompton * > * Richboro, PA 18954* > * 215-431-6307 * > ** > * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* > * http://www.crompton.com * > > > > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Hi, Cullin J. Wible wrote: > We have also deployed a dozen of the Linksys SPA-1001 single-line FXS > adapters using G726, SIP, NAT and STUN. They are extremely reliable and easy > to deploy - $60-$70 US each. I bought a Grandstream GXP-2000 and played now a little with it. It seems to work really perfect. The Quality is compareable to my tiptel195 ISDN phone. The configuration can be done via TFTP and Web. I ordered it in Germany and the price was 97 EUR inclusive shipping. The only disadvantage the phone has is the very basic addressbook, but I think it will be improved with the next firmware versions. Best regards, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
We've used a number of the polycom 301 and 501 phones in our office. We have also deployed a dozen of the Linksys SPA-1001 single-line FXS adapters using G726, SIP, NAT and STUN. They are extremely reliable and easy to deploy - $60-$70 US each. We tested a number of IAX hard phones and didn't find anything that was reliable and/or suitable for our corporate setting. We really wanted to run IAX for remote users, but eventually decided that SIP/STUN was easier to support. We also tested the IAXy device and found that it's inability to use DNS resolution, only be configured on Linux, and only run ulaw/alaw made and that it cost more then the SPA-1001, which can use DNS, G726/G729 and has web-based configuration for less money the more attractive option. We also tested the IAX hard phone made by AT-COM only to find that a number of features such as call transfer do not work. For home/remote users: setup STUN, and use a SPA-1001. For a corporate setting I highly recommend the Polycom phones. Cheers, Cullin J. Wible Co-Founder & CTO Email Data Source, Inc. 212-514-8900 x1006 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Crompton Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:49 PM To: Iain Barker Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? Iain, Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From what I can see if I bought this phone and two remotes my outlay would be close to $800 US. This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to do with your money! You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS devices for that amount! Doug On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote: > Doug, > > What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base > Ethernet/SIP screenphone supporting multiple wireless handsets [but as > this is a non-commercial list I won't go into more detail here, google > for the above model number if you're interested in more info.] > > - Iain > > --- > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT) > From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a > wireless sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow > multiple extension off of one base. The base would connect to the > internet. The other problem is many of these phones require power, so > even if you have backup for your central system the phone still needs > to be on it. Power over ethernet would help. > > Doug > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307* * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Iain, Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From what I can see if I bought this phone and two remotes my outlay would be close to $800 US. This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to do with your money! You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS devices for that amount! Doug On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote: > Doug, > > What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base Ethernet/SIP > screenphone supporting multiple wireless handsets [but as this is a > non-commercial list I won't go into more detail here, google for the above > model number if you're interested in more info.] > > - Iain > > --- > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT) > From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless > sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple > extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The > other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have > backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power > over ethernet would help. > > Doug > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307* * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Doug, What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base Ethernet/SIP screenphone supporting multiple wireless handsets [but as this is a non-commercial list I won't go into more detail here, google for the above model number if you're interested in more info.] - Iain --- Message: 4 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power over ethernet would help. Doug ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Doug Crompton wrote: I guess I did not make my point clearly enough. I already do have just that. An spa-3000 with ALL internal analog phones on it's on FXO. That's wrong, phones hook to an FXS. But this gives just ONE extension for all phones. Yes I could get more FXS's and run seperate wires. I am using a HT-488 as my secondary FXS, which works ok, but still has problems with DTMF unless I use inband through the gateway a wellgate 3701a in my case. So with that background what would be nice is a wireless device like the Panasonic cordless with one base and multiple phone capability that connected via ethernet and serves the phones. Just wishful thinking. I will stick with what I have until something useful, sylish, and less expensive arrives. Yeah, that does sound nice... I have a panasonic cordless hooked to the HT-488, this gives me mobility with my preferred fxs, and also allows for multiple calls to occur which is very slick. ie I can call out long distance and calls can still arrive through the fxo to the other house phones. This is kind of disorienting to housemates who are used to standard phone systems ;~) Marty ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I guess I did not make my point clearly enough. I already do have just that. An spa-3000 with ALL internal analog phones on it's on FXO. But this gives just ONE extension for all phones. Yes I could get more FXS's and run seperate wires. So with that background what would be nice is a wireless device like the Panasonic cordless with one base and multiple phone capability that connected via ethernet and serves the phones. Just wishful thinking. I will stick with what I have until something useful, sylish, and less expensive arrives. Doug On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Michael George wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:08:48AM -0400, Doug Crompton wrote: > > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a > > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless > > sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple > > extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The > > other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have > > backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power > > over ethernet would help. > > 1. If you have *, you don't necessarily need multiple handsets off of one > base. > 2. Cordless phones also require power > 3. If the multi-handset cordless phone does suit your needs best, then > get a SIP ATA device like a Sipura or IAXy and you should have your > needs met. > > -- > -M > > There are 10 kinds of people in this world: > Those who can count in binary and those who cannot. > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307* * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:08:48AM -0400, Doug Crompton wrote: > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless > sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple > extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The > other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have > backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power > over ethernet would help. 1. If you have *, you don't necessarily need multiple handsets off of one base. 2. Cordless phones also require power 3. If the multi-handset cordless phone does suit your needs best, then get a SIP ATA device like a Sipura or IAXy and you should have your needs met. -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in this world: Those who can count in binary and those who cannot. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power over ethernet would help. Doug On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, shadowym wrote: > I believe all three Aastra phones(9112, 9133i, 480i)have exactly the same > handsets and speakerphone hardware which is THE most > important thing. After that it just depends on what > additional features you want. They are ALL solid business > phones IMHO and Aastra's support of the Asterisk community > and the end user is outstanding! > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:19 AM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > > > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:39 -0700, shadowym wrote: > > > I love my Aastra 9133i with v1.4 firmware. Pretty much everything > > > just works with Asterisk right out of the box and it has > > all the features I need. > > > > If cost is important the 9112i would be better. I install all > > three Aastra models and the sound quality is good across the range. > > -- > > Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307* * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I believe all three Aastra phones(9112, 9133i, 480i)have exactly the same handsets and speakerphone hardware which is THE most important thing. After that it just depends on what additional features you want. They are ALL solid business phones IMHO and Aastra's support of the Asterisk community and the end user is outstanding! > -Original Message- > From: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:19 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:39 -0700, shadowym wrote: > > I love my Aastra 9133i with v1.4 firmware. Pretty much everything > > just works with Asterisk right out of the box and it has > all the features I need. > > If cost is important the 9112i would be better. I install all > three Aastra models and the sound quality is good across the range. > -- > Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:39 -0700, shadowym wrote: > I love my Aastra 9133i with v1.4 firmware. Pretty much everything just > works with Asterisk right out of the box and it has all the features I need. If cost is important the 9112i would be better. I install all three Aastra models and the sound quality is good across the range. -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
The Polycom 501's or 601's are the way to go On 6/23/06, shadowym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I love my Aastra 9133i with v1.4 firmware. Pretty much everything justworks with Asterisk right out of the box and it has all the features I need. > -Original Message-> From: Jonathan k. Creasy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:03 AM> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?>> I'll second that. I really like the provisioning features. My> customers prefer the 501 because they like the layout and> speaker phone functionality. >> -Jonathan>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of> Joshua West> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:20 AM> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? >> I find the Polycom Soundpoint 301 and 501 models to be great phones.>> Christian Victor wrote:> > Crazy Boy schrieb:> >> >> We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 > members in our organization. At present all are using> softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can> anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for> Asterisk with low-cost? > >>> >> > I would say a Swissvoice IP 10S, a Snom 300 or - if you want better> > quality - a Polycom 300.> >> > The Snom looks good and is solid, the Swissvoice is similar plus it > > supports PoE, the Polycom is a bit more expensive but worth the> > additional cost.> >> > Chris> > ___> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --> >> > Asterisk-Users mailing list> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> >>>> --> Joshua West> Linux Infrastructure Engineer> Boston Engineering Corporation> http://www.boston-engineering.com>>> ___> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -->> Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>>___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I love my Aastra 9133i with v1.4 firmware. Pretty much everything just works with Asterisk right out of the box and it has all the features I need. > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan k. Creasy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:03 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > I'll second that. I really like the provisioning features. My > customers prefer the 501 because they like the layout and > speaker phone functionality. > > -Jonathan > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Joshua West > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:20 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > I find the Polycom Soundpoint 301 and 501 models to be great phones. > > Christian Victor wrote: > > Crazy Boy schrieb: > > > >> We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 > members in our organization. At present all are using > softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can > anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for > Asterisk with low-cost? > >> > > > > I would say a Swissvoice IP 10S, a Snom 300 or - if you want better > > quality - a Polycom 300. > > > > The Snom looks good and is solid, the Swissvoice is similar plus it > > supports PoE, the Polycom is a bit more expensive but worth the > > additional cost. > > > > Chris > > ___ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > -- > Joshua West > Linux Infrastructure Engineer > Boston Engineering Corporation > http://www.boston-engineering.com > > > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
My fellow employees like their Polycom 600s even more. Andrei (MPI) Jonathan k. Creasy wrote: I'll second that. I really like the provisioning features. My customers prefer the 501 because they like the layout and speaker phone functionality. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua West Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? I find the Polycom Soundpoint 301 and 501 models to be great phones. Christian Victor wrote: Crazy Boy schrieb: We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost? I would say a Swissvoice IP 10S, a Snom 300 or - if you want better quality - a Polycom 300. The Snom looks good and is solid, the Swissvoice is similar plus it supports PoE, the Polycom is a bit more expensive but worth the additional cost. Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I'll second that. I really like the provisioning features. My customers prefer the 501 because they like the layout and speaker phone functionality. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua West Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? I find the Polycom Soundpoint 301 and 501 models to be great phones. Christian Victor wrote: > Crazy Boy schrieb: > >> We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost? >> > > I would say a Swissvoice IP 10S, a Snom 300 or - if you want better > quality - a Polycom 300. > > The Snom looks good and is solid, the Swissvoice is similar plus it > supports PoE, the Polycom is a bit more expensive but worth the > additional cost. > > Chris > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- Joshua West Linux Infrastructure Engineer Boston Engineering Corporation http://www.boston-engineering.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I find the Polycom Soundpoint 301 and 501 models to be great phones. Christian Victor wrote: > Crazy Boy schrieb: > >> We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in >> our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy >> hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best >> hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost? >> > > I would say a Swissvoice IP 10S, a Snom 300 or - if you want better > quality - a Polycom 300. > > The Snom looks good and is solid, the Swissvoice is similar plus it > supports PoE, the Polycom is a bit more expensive but worth the > additional cost. > > Chris > ___ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- Joshua West Linux Infrastructure Engineer Boston Engineering Corporation http://www.boston-engineering.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
I have not had a problem getting SNOMs. Keep in mind that SNOM phones have a penguin inside. m,, Penguins.. On 6/23/06, Christian Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian Stredicke schrieb: > snom 300 :-) Could be a bit hard to get 150 of them at one time imho. ;-) Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- --- Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email! Hind sight is most always 20/20 or better. --- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
If you do not have a budget, grandstream is not bad You do not get what you do not pay But you do not allways get what you paid for t. Jacobson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Victor Sent: vendredi 23 juin 2006 14:25 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? Crazy Boy schrieb: > We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 22/06/2006 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Christian Stredicke schrieb: > snom 300 :-) Could be a bit hard to get 150 of them at one time imho. ;-) Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Crazy Boy schrieb: > We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in > our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy > hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best > hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost? I would say a Swissvoice IP 10S, a Snom 300 or - if you want better quality - a Polycom 300. The Snom looks good and is solid, the Swissvoice is similar plus it supports PoE, the Polycom is a bit more expensive but worth the additional cost. Chris ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
snom 300 :-) CS From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crazy BoySent: Friday, June 23, 2006 7:16 AMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? Dear Friends,We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost?Thank you.Regards,Chandra. Ring'em or ping'em. Make PC-to-phone calls as low as 1¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
Dear Friends,We have implemented "Asterisk" in our organization. There are 150 members in our organization. At present all are using softphones. Now, I want to buy hardphones for our staff. Can anybody suggest me that what is the best hardphone for Asterisk with low-cost?Thank you.Regards,Chandra. Ring'em or ping'em. Make PC-to-phone calls as low as 1¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
