[Asterisk-Users] huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)
Hello to all of you! I'm very new to this list and to asterisk and stuff at all. To build my asterisk server I installed a new machine running the new SUSE Linux 10.0 (retail version on DVD). I need asterisk (tried 1.0.9), bristuff (off junghanns.net, -0.2.0-RC8o) and the florz-patch because I have two HFC-S-ISDN cards in that machine. Now when it comes to compiling I get a huge bunch of warnings and stuff, zaptel 1.0.9.2 fails to compile and asterisk 1.0.9 also fails to compile. SUSE 10.0 uses gcc 4.0.2 and as I asked in some other mailing list and forums, that is the reason why * stuff fails to compile. Is there any stable asterisk version available which does compile fine on a gcc4.x ? If not, will the * source be changed to finely compile on gcc 4.x? If yes, when will that be? (I need the * stuff now). If not, why not? What's on with the 1.2.0-beta stuff out there on the asterisk.org webpages? Does that one compile on gcc4.x ? Please help! I really need my * box now... Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 21:21 +0200, [Ludwig IT-Services - GMAIL ] - Michael Ludwig wrote: > Hello to all of you! > > I'm very new to this list and to asterisk and stuff at all. > To build my asterisk server I installed a new machine running the new > SUSE Linux 10.0 (retail version on DVD). > I need asterisk (tried 1.0.9), bristuff (off junghanns.net, > -0.2.0-RC8o) and the florz-patch because I have two HFC-S-ISDN cards > in that machine. > Now when it comes to compiling I get a huge bunch of warnings and > stuff, zaptel 1.0.9.2 fails to compile and asterisk 1.0.9 also fails > to compile. > > SUSE 10.0 uses gcc 4.0.2 and as I asked in some other mailing list and > forums, that is the reason why * stuff fails to compile. > > Is there any stable asterisk version available which does compile fine > on a gcc4.x ? > > If not, will the * source be changed to finely compile on gcc 4.x? > If yes, when will that be? (I need the * stuff now). > If not, why not? > > What's on with the 1.2.0-beta stuff out there on the asterisk.org webpages? > Does that one compile on gcc4.x ? > > Please help! I really need my * box now... On my systems gcc -v gives gcc version 4.0.1 (4.0.1-5mdk for Mandriva Linux release 2006.0) I'm compiling and running 1.0.9 and CVS-HEAD. Warnings are _not_ errors! What is "and stuff"? -- Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:21:09PM +0200, [Ludwig IT-Services - GMAIL ] - Michael Ludwig said: > I'm very new to this list and to asterisk and stuff at all. > To build my asterisk server I installed a new machine running the new > SUSE Linux 10.0 (retail version on DVD). > I need asterisk (tried 1.0.9), bristuff (off junghanns.net, > -0.2.0-RC8o) and the florz-patch because I have two HFC-S-ISDN cards > in that machine. > Now when it comes to compiling I get a huge bunch of warnings and > stuff, zaptel 1.0.9.2 fails to compile and asterisk 1.0.9 also fails > to compile. > > SUSE 10.0 uses gcc 4.0.2 and as I asked in some other mailing list and > forums, that is the reason why * stuff fails to compile. > > Is there any stable asterisk version available which does compile fine > on a gcc4.x ? > > If not, will the * source be changed to finely compile on gcc 4.x? > If yes, when will that be? (I need the * stuff now). > If not, why not? > > What's on with the 1.2.0-beta stuff out there on the asterisk.org webpages? > Does that one compile on gcc4.x ? I've been running a * (cvs HEAD) instance on Debian unstable, which has upgraded to gcc 4. Gcc 4 still has problems compiling the kernel (as of 2.6.12) on debian, and you want to use the same version of the compiler on the zaptel modules that you do on the kernel. I was unable to get a clean compile of the kernel or * with gcc 4. The good part is that I have gcc 3.3 on the system too, so it's an easy symlink change. It may be that gcc 3.x is available on suse either by default or an additional package. Considering how new gcc 4 is, and how many major changes there were with it, I personally would wait another 6 months to a year before using it in production. I've also read stories that gcc 4 produces slower code than gcc 3. I'm sure others will have some insight as well :-) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:01:17PM -0400, Walt Reed wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:21:09PM +0200, [Ludwig IT-Services - GMAIL ] - > Michael Ludwig said: > > I'm very new to this list and to asterisk and stuff at all. > > To build my asterisk server I installed a new machine running the new > > SUSE Linux 10.0 (retail version on DVD). > > I need asterisk (tried 1.0.9), bristuff (off junghanns.net, > > -0.2.0-RC8o) and the florz-patch because I have two HFC-S-ISDN cards > > in that machine. > > Now when it comes to compiling I get a huge bunch of warnings and > > stuff, zaptel 1.0.9.2 fails to compile and asterisk 1.0.9 also fails > > to compile. > > > > SUSE 10.0 uses gcc 4.0.2 and as I asked in some other mailing list and > > forums, that is the reason why * stuff fails to compile. > > > > Is there any stable asterisk version available which does compile fine > > on a gcc4.x ? > > > > If not, will the * source be changed to finely compile on gcc 4.x? > > If yes, when will that be? (I need the * stuff now). > > If not, why not? > > > > What's on with the 1.2.0-beta stuff out there on the asterisk.org webpages? > > Does that one compile on gcc4.x ? > > I've been running a * (cvs HEAD) instance on Debian unstable, which has > upgraded to gcc 4. Gcc 4 still has problems compiling the kernel (as of > 2.6.12) on debian, and you want to use the same version of the compiler > on the zaptel modules that you do on the kernel. > > I was unable to get a clean compile of the kernel or * with gcc 4. You can ask about this in Debian lists. I don't have unstable so I can't test for myself, but the current unstable kernel surely builds for them. As for Asterisk 1.2: It should hit experimental any day now. There are also unofficial debs at http://rapid.dotsrc.org/experimental/ . If those don't build with gcc 4 then this should be reported. Most gcc 4 incompatibility bugs I saw were fixed pretty fast. Asterisk 1.0.9 and bristuff RC8l (the current package in unstable) probably builds with gcc4. I'm not sure if it has the florz patch in it. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] huge problem compiling * on gcc4.x (SUSE 10.0)
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:10:38AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen said: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:01:17PM -0400, Walt Reed wrote: > > I was unable to get a clean compile of the kernel or * with gcc 4. > > You can ask about this in Debian lists. I don't have unstable so I can't > test for myself, but the current unstable kernel surely builds for them. Sure, but it depends on which compiler they use... They may not use 4 on the kernel. In fact, I'm pretty sure they don't. The version of the kernel I was compiling is the version WITH debian patches (latest.) And it surely does not compile with gcc 4. > As for Asterisk 1.2: It should hit experimental any day now. There are > also unofficial debs at http://rapid.dotsrc.org/experimental/ . If those > don't build with gcc 4 then this should be reported. Most gcc 4 > incompatibility bugs I saw were fixed pretty fast. The incompatabilities are going to be kernel compiled with one version of GCC, zaptel module compiled with another. That, even if it appears to work, is not a good idea. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
