Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On 12/09/11 09:48 PM, Joseph wrote: Was NAT problem fixed in 1.8.7 ? I'm using 1.4 but I've tried 1.6 and 1.8.5 and in both cases connection is not working with my provider with SIP + NAT. The connection is showing up as registered but the call is not coming IN (congestion). Can you define NAT problem? I'm unaware of any issues with Asterisk (or end points) behind NAT. It is mostly likely a configuration issue rather than a bug. -- Leif Madsen http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/asterisk -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Sawah tareksa...@hotmail.com wrote: i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. please advise? Nobody will know why your asterisk crashed unless you follow the instructions here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+a+Backtrace Please try that, and then rerun your call test. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the stable branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a rabbit hole you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4. do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 From: da...@debsinc.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the stable branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a rabbit hole you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 11:00 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4. do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 From: da...@debsinc.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch. 1.4 is the stable branch, but it seems that all of the resources are being channeled into 1.8 and 10.0, so 1.6 is a rabbit hole you really shouldn't be headed into. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. my question is .. is there a different in resource consumption between all versions? how come 1.4 could handle over 500 calls while 1.6 crashed at 100? please advise? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital Systems CCNP, MCSE, RHCE, TELECOM USA: +1 386 492 9993 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8
On 09/12/11 14:08, Paul Belanger wrote: On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org Was NAT problem fixed in 1.8.7 ? I'm using 1.4 but I've tried 1.6 and 1.8.5 and in both cases connection is not working with my provider with SIP + NAT. The connection is showing up as registered but the call is not coming IN (congestion). -- Joseph -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
