Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager Proxy - Still required?

[BJ Weschke]

On 8/17/07, Andrew Ruthven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With more recent version of v1.2 and with v1.4 are things like the
> AstManProxy still recommended if you want to have a bunch of
> applications talking directly to Asterisk?
>

 If you're looking to have a number of clients monitor events, etc,
I'd say that having a proxy in between is still a "good thing". The
performance of the manager itself is greatly improved since before 1.2
but there are still ongoing (albeit random, sporadic) issues with cpu
race and huge memory allocations that still need to get resolved.

-- 
Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc.
http://www.btwtech.com/

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Manager Proxy - Still required?

[Andrew Ruthven]

Hi,

With more recent version of v1.2 and with v1.4 are things like the
AstManProxy still recommended if you want to have a bunch of
applications talking directly to Asterisk?

Cheers!

-- 
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
At work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG fpr: 34CA 12A3 C6F8 B156 72C2  D0D7 D286 CE0C 0C62 B791


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users