[asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2010-01-14 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi,

running Asterisk 1.6.2.0 and have started to see in messages:

[Jan 14 05:43:43] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (4007ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 05:43:53] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (9ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 05:44:02] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (5008ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 05:44:12] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (7ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:44:43] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (3008ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:44:53] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (9ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:45:04] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (5008ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 06:45:14] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (7ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:10:27] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (3007ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:10:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Reachable. (8ms / 
3000ms)
[Jan 14 07:20:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now Lagged. (4007ms / 
3000ms)

If I run a constant ping to that peer all looks fine:

PING 192.168.1.110 (192.168.1.110) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.509 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=0.496 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=0.486 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=0.500 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=6 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=7 ttl=60 time=0.499 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=8 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=9 ttl=60 time=0.495 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=10 ttl=60 time=0.494 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=11 ttl=60 time=0.497 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=12 ttl=60 time=0.496 ms

Any thoughts on what cause be causing it please ?

-- 
Thanks, Phil

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2010-01-14 Thread Steve Howes

On 14 Jan 2010, at 10:08, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
 running Asterisk 1.6.2.0 and have started to see in messages:

 [Jan 14 05:43:43] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now  
 Lagged. (4007ms / 3000ms)
 [Jan 14 07:20:37] NOTICE[29231] chan_sip.c: Peer '100' is now  
 Lagged. (4007ms / 3000ms)

 If I run a constant ping to that peer all looks fine:

 PING 192.168.1.110 (192.168.1.110) 56(84) bytes of data.
 64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.509 ms
 64 bytes from 192.168.1.110: icmp_seq=12 ttl=60 time=0.496 ms

 Any thoughts on what cause be causing it please ?

Faulty handset? ICMP could be working but 'further up' stuff might be  
screwing up. Tried new firmware/re-flash/reboot/whatever?

S

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2009-07-15 Thread Ishfaq Malik
Oh, I forgot to mention, the customer can make outbound calls from this 
extension. Just calls cannot be routed back even though the IP Address 
and port are in the realtime cache.

Ishfaq Malik wrote:
 Hi There

 I have an extension which is in a different country and is constantly 
 lagged (about 800ms). When anyone tries to call this extension we get a 
 No route to destination message.

 Now I would have thought that the server should be able to find a route 
 to the destination seeing as the peer poke finds it's way there. Or is 
 that lag too much to create a SIP channel?

 Thanks in advance

 Ish
   

-- 
Ishfaq Malik
Software Developer
PackNet Ltd

Office:   0161 660 3062

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2009-07-15 Thread Rob Hillis
800ms is horrendous lag for a VoIP connection.  If I were you, I'd be
investing some time in finding out why the lag is so great.  Even if I
do a ping to a UK address, I'm getting pings of no more than 300ms from
Australia.  Unless you've got multiple satellite connections in the path
(in which case VoIP is pretty close to a lost cause anyway) I'd be
looking at these high pings as a symptom of a network problem somewhere
else.

Ishfaq Malik wrote:
 I have an extension which is in a different country and is constantly 
 lagged (about 800ms). When anyone tries to call this extension we get a 
 No route to destination message.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2009-07-15 Thread Ishfaq Malik
Cheers Rob, I was thinking it was due to a low bandwidth connection at 
the other end but from what you're saying it sounds like this is not the 
case.


Rob Hillis wrote:
 800ms is horrendous lag for a VoIP connection.  If I were you, I'd be
 investing some time in finding out why the lag is so great.  Even if I
 do a ping to a UK address, I'm getting pings of no more than 300ms from
 Australia.  Unless you've got multiple satellite connections in the path
 (in which case VoIP is pretty close to a lost cause anyway) I'd be
 looking at these high pings as a symptom of a network problem somewhere
 else.

 Ishfaq Malik wrote:
   
 I have an extension which is in a different country and is constantly 
 lagged (about 800ms). When anyone tries to call this extension we get a 
 No route to destination message.
   

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   

-- 
Ishfaq Malik
Software Developer
PackNet Ltd

Office:   0161 660 3062

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2009-07-15 Thread Rob Hillis
Low bandwidth is another possibility, but I'd have though that any
connection slow enough to generate that much latency wouldn't be usable
for VoIP in the first place.

Ishfaq Malik wrote:
 Cheers Rob, I was thinking it was due to a low bandwidth connection at 
 the other end but from what you're saying it sounds like this is not the 
 case.

   

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Lagged Extension

2009-07-10 Thread Ishfaq Malik
Hi There

I have an extension which is in a different country and is constantly 
lagged (about 800ms). When anyone tries to call this extension we get a 
No route to destination message.

Now I would have thought that the server should be able to find a route 
to the destination seeing as the peer poke finds it's way there. Or is 
that lag too much to create a SIP channel?

Thanks in advance

Ish
-- 
Ishfaq Malik
Software Developer
PackNet Ltd

Office:   0161 660 3062

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users