Re: [asterisk-users] RE: In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two H323 channels?

2007-03-13 Thread Pavel Jezek 

for 1.4 you have only two choices chan_h323 and chan_ooh323,
chan_oh323 from inaccessible networks, is death project, more than year 
unmaintained,
I'm using chan_h323 both from 1.2 and 1.4 without problems (opposite 
site to chan_h323 is ci$co gateway or callmanager)

also, chan_ooh323 isn't maintained as good as chan_h323,
if you will have some issues with chan_h323, you can report through 
digium bugtrack and reply come quite quickly, not so with chan_ooh323

thats my reasons, why I can recommend original chan_h323.
PJ





Thiago Maluf wrote:

Hi Users, Administrators and Pavel Jezek,
You prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree and it's of course that use 
channels by tree is very good.

But in 1.2.x, the chan_h323 is very simple and the chan_oh323 is so bad.
And I work with chan_ooh323, that it's too from Digium and work good!
And I am Studing one possible change to Asterisk 1.4.x , but in 1.4.x 
the oh323 channel don't have more, and studing the chan_h323, it's the 
old chan_oh323

I not wanna work with add_ons but in Asterisk 1.4.x, will I have work?
Somebody confirm it, have the same opinion. Or this new chan_h323 work 
fine without the problems that had the H323 or OH323 channels.

Thanks in Advanced.
Thiago Maluf Resende.

--

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:57:42 +0100
From: Pavel Jezek < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]   In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two
   H323Channels
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
   < asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
>

Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

as I know, ooh323 is external project from objective systems,
anyway, for 1.4 I prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree.



Thiago Maluf wrote:
> Now, the H323 Channels is updated and your bugs fixed.
> But Digium still develop your OOH323 Channel. My question is why?
> What is the better in Asterisk 1.4.x.? I know that in Asterisk 1.2.x
> OOH323 is very better than H323 or OH323.
> Thanks in advanced.
> Thiago.
>
> --
> --
--
> THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
> Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
> Tel: +55 21 86042100
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

> 
>
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com 
 --

>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
Tel: +55 21 86042100
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] RE: In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two H323 channels?

2007-03-13 Thread Thiago Maluf 

Hi Users, Administrators and Pavel Jezek,
You prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree and it's of course that use channels
by tree is very good.
But in 1.2.x, the chan_h323 is very simple and the chan_oh323 is so bad.
And I work with chan_ooh323, that it's too from Digium and work good!
And I am Studing one possible change to Asterisk 1.4.x , but in 1.4.x the
oh323 channel don't have more, and studing the chan_h323, it's the old
chan_oh323
I not wanna work with add_ons but in Asterisk 1.4.x, will I have work?
Somebody confirm it, have the same opinion. Or this new chan_h323 work fine
without the problems that had the H323 or OH323 channels.
Thanks in Advanced.
Thiago Maluf Resende.

--

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:57:42 +0100
From: Pavel Jezek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]   In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two
  H323Channels
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

as I know, ooh323 is external project from objective systems,
anyway, for 1.4 I prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree.



Thiago Maluf wrote:

Now, the H323 Channels is updated and your bugs fixed.
But Digium still develop your OOH323 Channel. My question is why?
What is the better in Asterisk 1.4.x.? I know that in Asterisk 1.2.x
OOH323 is very better than H323 or OH323.
Thanks in advanced.
Thiago.

--
--

--

THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
Tel: +55 21 86042100
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
Tel: +55 21 86042100
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users