Re: [asterisk-users] RELEASE message in q931.c
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > ; Allow inband audio (progress) when a call is RELEASEd by the far > ; end of a PRI > ; > ;inbanddisconnect=yes > > What does this mean about the default value? The default value is 'no', to make the behavior be the same as previous versions of libpri/chan_zap/chan_dahdi. -- Kevin P. Fleming Director of Software Technologies Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM) ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] RELEASE message in q931.c
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 04:49:37PM +0100, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote: > I seem to remember that there was a change to q931.c that meant a line > did not drop immedately, and then that change was reverted ? > > I think that these are the lines of code: > > /* wait for a RELEASE so that sufficient time has passed > for the inband audio to be heard */ > if (pri->acceptinbanddisconnect && (c->progressmask & > PRI_PROG_INBAND_AVAILABLE)) >break; > > was this change every reverted in zaptel 1.4 ? It was made optional. ; Allow inband audio (progress) when a call is RELEASEd by the far ; end of a PRI ; ;inbanddisconnect=yes What does this mean about the default value? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] RELEASE message in q931.c
I seem to remember that there was a change to q931.c that meant a line did not drop immedately, and then that change was reverted ? I think that these are the lines of code: /* wait for a RELEASE so that sufficient time has passed for the inband audio to be heard */ if (pri->acceptinbanddisconnect && (c->progressmask & PRI_PROG_INBAND_AVAILABLE)) break; was this change every reverted in zaptel 1.4 ? Julian __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
