[asterisk-users] Strange problem with Asterisk 1.8.9.3
Hello List. Last month i started to face a strange issue on an asterisk server 1.8.9.3 built on Centos 5.3 x86_64 dedicated server. out of the blue UDP stops responding .. and keep getting the following output: -- Opening message for the problem -- [Mar 21 09:57:04] ERROR[6748] netsock2.c: getaddrinfo(pbx2.server.com, (null), ...): Temporary failure in name resolution [Mar 21 09:57:04] WARNING[6748] acl.c: Unable to lookup 'pbx2.server.com' THEN - [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 10 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1045' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 140 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 33 [Mar 21 09:57:15] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C3000' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 87 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5005' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 241 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1071' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 117 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1070' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 115 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1077' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 101 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1073' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 96 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1047' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 132 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1072' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 138 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1042' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 158 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5006' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 267 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1053' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 136 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'ipkall1' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 168 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1078' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 141 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1051' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 139 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1046' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 157 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1076' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 116 this problem kept repeating randomly two or three times a day causing me losses. and then i migrated to another Centos 6x x86_64 dedicated server same asterisk version. everything returns to normal if i reboot the server. for a moment i thought i wasn't even able to nslookup but i could wget or yum or do other stuff..although i have my iptables disabled for a the last week for testing purposes. what i did today after the problem is: bindaddress: set to server IPv4 address instead of defaulting. disabled IPv6 from the server. any suggestions to what is causing this issue? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Strange problem with Asterisk 1.8.9.3
Looks like a DNS issue. On 21 April 2013 11:05, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote: Hello List. Last month i started to face a strange issue on an asterisk server 1.8.9.3 built on Centos 5.3 x86_64 dedicated server. out of the blue UDP stops responding .. and keep getting the following output: -- Opening message for the problem -- [Mar 21 09:57:04] ERROR[6748] netsock2.c: getaddrinfo(pbx2.server.com, (null), ...): Temporary failure in name resolution [Mar 21 09:57:04] WARNING[6748] acl.c: Unable to lookup 'pbx2.server.com' THEN - [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 10 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1045' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 140 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 33 [Mar 21 09:57:15] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C3000' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 87 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5005' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 241 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1071' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 117 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1070' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 115 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1077' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 101 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1073' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 96 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1047' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 132 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1072' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 138 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1042' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 158 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5006' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 267 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1053' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 136 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'ipkall1' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 168 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1078' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 141 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1051' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 139 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1046' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 157 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1076' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 116 this problem kept repeating randomly two or three times a day causing me losses. and then i migrated to another Centos 6x x86_64 dedicated server same asterisk version. everything returns to normal if i reboot the server. for a moment i thought i wasn't even able to nslookup but i could wget or yum or do other stuff..although i have my iptables disabled for a the last week for testing purposes. what i did today after the problem is: bindaddress: set to server IPv4 address instead of defaulting. disabled IPv6 from the server. any suggestions to what is causing this issue? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Strange problem with Asterisk 1.8.9.3
thank you , but how would it be DNS issue while other users drop unreachable too? all operators and SIP Peers go unreachable .. not only unable to register. oe peer using FQDN the rest are IP addresses. On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:18 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like a DNS issue. On 21 April 2013 11:05, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote: Hello List. Last month i started to face a strange issue on an asterisk server 1.8.9.3 built on Centos 5.3 x86_64 dedicated server. out of the blue UDP stops responding .. and keep getting the following output: -- Opening message for the problem -- [Mar 21 09:57:04] ERROR[6748] netsock2.c: getaddrinfo(pbx2.server.com, (null), ...): Temporary failure in name resolution [Mar 21 09:57:04] WARNING[6748] acl.c: Unable to lookup 'pbx2.server.com' THEN - [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 10 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1045' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 140 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 33 [Mar 21 09:57:15] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C3000' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 87 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5005' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 241 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1071' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 117 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1070' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 115 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1077' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 101 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1073' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 96 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1047' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 132 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1072' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 138 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1042' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 158 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5006' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 267 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1053' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 136 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'ipkall1' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 168 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1078' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 141 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1051' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 139 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1046' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 157 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1076' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 116 this problem kept repeating randomly two or three times a day causing me losses. and then i migrated to another Centos 6x x86_64 dedicated server same asterisk version. everything returns to normal if i reboot the server. for a moment i thought i wasn't even able to nslookup but i could wget or yum or do other stuff..although i have my iptables disabled for a the last week for testing purposes. what i did today after the problem is: bindaddress: set to server IPv4 address instead of defaulting. disabled IPv6 from the server. any suggestions to what is causing this issue? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Strange problem with Asterisk 1.8.9.3
ok it seems a bug in asterisk .. work around is to add the FQDNS to the hosts file and try to setup local DNS On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote: thank you , but how would it be DNS issue while other users drop unreachable too? all operators and SIP Peers go unreachable .. not only unable to register. oe peer using FQDN the rest are IP addresses. On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:18 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like a DNS issue. On 21 April 2013 11:05, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote: Hello List. Last month i started to face a strange issue on an asterisk server 1.8.9.3 built on Centos 5.3 x86_64 dedicated server. out of the blue UDP stops responding .. and keep getting the following output: -- Opening message for the problem -- [Mar 21 09:57:04] ERROR[6748] netsock2.c: getaddrinfo(pbx2.server.com, (null), ...): Temporary failure in name resolution [Mar 21 09:57:04] WARNING[6748] acl.c: Unable to lookup 'pbx2.server.com' THEN - [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 10 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1045' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 140 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 33 [Mar 21 09:57:15] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C3000' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 87 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5005' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 241 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1071' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 117 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1070' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 115 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1077' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 101 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1073' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 96 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1047' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 132 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1072' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 138 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1042' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 158 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5006' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 267 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1053' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 136 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'ipkall1' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 168 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1078' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 141 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1051' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 139 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1046' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 157 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1076' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 116 this problem kept repeating randomly two or three times a day causing me losses. and then i migrated to another Centos 6x x86_64 dedicated server same asterisk version. everything returns to normal if i reboot the server. for a moment i thought i wasn't even able to nslookup but i could wget or yum or do other stuff..although i have my iptables disabled for a the last week for testing purposes. what i did today after the problem is: bindaddress: set to server IPv4 address instead of defaulting. disabled IPv6 from the server. any suggestions to what is causing this issue? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To
Re: [asterisk-users] Strange problem with Asterisk 1.8.9.3
I don't know with this version but certainly the SIP stack in earlier version would get blocked when it couldn't do a name resolution and cause symptoms exactly as you describe. It shouldn't happen but there you go. On 21 April 2013 12:24, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote: thank you , but how would it be DNS issue while other users drop unreachable too? all operators and SIP Peers go unreachable .. not only unable to register. oe peer using FQDN the rest are IP addresses. On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:18 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like a DNS issue. On 21 April 2013 11:05, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote: Hello List. Last month i started to face a strange issue on an asterisk server 1.8.9.3 built on Centos 5.3 x86_64 dedicated server. out of the blue UDP stops responding .. and keep getting the following output: -- Opening message for the problem -- [Mar 21 09:57:04] ERROR[6748] netsock2.c: getaddrinfo(pbx2.server.com, (null), ...): Temporary failure in name resolution [Mar 21 09:57:04] WARNING[6748] acl.c: Unable to lookup ' pbx2.server.com' THEN - [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 10 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1045' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 140 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer '' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 33 [Mar 21 09:57:15] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C3000' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 87 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5005' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 241 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1071' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 117 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1070' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 115 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1077' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 101 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1073' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 96 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1047' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 132 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1072' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 138 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1042' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 158 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C5006' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 267 [Mar 21 09:57:21] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1053' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 136 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c:-- Registration for '8885...@pbx2.server.com' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3) [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'ipkall1' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 168 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1078' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 141 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1051' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 139 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1046' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 157 [Mar 21 09:57:41] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1076' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 116 this problem kept repeating randomly two or three times a day causing me losses. and then i migrated to another Centos 6x x86_64 dedicated server same asterisk version. everything returns to normal if i reboot the server. for a moment i thought i wasn't even able to nslookup but i could wget or yum or do other stuff..although i have my iptables disabled for a the last week for testing purposes. what i did today after the problem is: bindaddress: set to server IPv4 address instead of defaulting. disabled IPv6 from the server. any suggestions to what is causing this issue? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and
[asterisk-users] strange problem in asterisk + mediant2k setup
Dear all I have asterisk 1.2 with mediant2k i have create SIP Trunk from asterisk 2 mediant and my PRI terminated on Mediant 2000 E1 port now everthing is fine but problem is when i call to somebody outside and he/she disconnect my phone but my asterisk counitine ringing my SIP Snom phone why ??? if i call to outside and mobile or phone would be busy but my IP SNOM Phone give me ruinging means i dont understand problem on mediant side or asterisk outgoing call working fine but only when some one disconnect call i dont get any message like phone is busy or something else but my asterisk phone continue rining - Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Strange problem with asterisk
Situation such. There is an asterisk working as office pbx. 6 fxo - 18 fxs ports. All works perfectly, but some times in a week something occurs. Could not catch what exactly yet. But symptoms such. The asterisk infinitely writes the message of a type to broad gullies: WARNING [20757] chan_zap.c: We're Zap/8-1, not ... ZOMBIE. Numbers of channels can change. Because of that that broad gullies get littered fairly promptly, I have not time to see that occured in an instant of the beginning of this event. When the asterisk is in such condition, the appropriating channel does not work, in this case 8. What can it be? asterisk version 1.2.14-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1x ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Strange problem with asterisk
Hi, Vitaly: Vitaly Oborsky wrote: Situation such. There is an asterisk working as office pbx. 6 fxo - 18 fxs ports. All works perfectly, but some times in a week something occurs. Could not catch what exactly yet. But symptoms such. The asterisk infinitely writes the message of a type to broad gullies: WARNING [20757] chan_zap.c: We're Zap/8-1, not ... ZOMBIE. Numbers of channels can change. Because of that that broad gullies get littered fairly promptly, I have not time to see that occured in an instant of the beginning of this event. When the asterisk is in such condition, the appropriating channel does not work, in this case 8. What can it be? asterisk version 1.2.14-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1x This looks suspiciously like a Babelfish translation... and I have to admit it's a bit confusing. Can you try rewording it? :\ -Stephen- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Strange problem with asterisk
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:32:33PM +0300, Vitaly Oborsky wrote: Situation such. There is an asterisk working as office pbx. 6 fxo - 18 fxs ports. All works perfectly, but some times in a week something occurs. Could not catch what exactly yet. But symptoms such. The asterisk infinitely writes the message of a type to broad gullies: WARNING [20757] chan_zap.c: We're Zap/8-1, not ... ZOMBIE. Numbers of channels can change. Because of that that broad gullies get littered fairly promptly, I have not time to see that occured in an instant of the beginning of this event. When the asterisk is in such condition, the appropriating channel does not work, in this case 8. What can it be? asterisk version 1.2.14-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1x Could you try a later verssion of bristuff? I seem to recall a bug report for chan_zap (or is it Zaptel) with exactly those symptoms. I cannot find it right now. Anybody? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] strange problem with asterisk in media proxy mode
HiI am facing very strange problem when i try to use asterisk in media proxy mode by using canreinvite=no i receive no voice at both ends. and when i use canreinvite=yes voice is OK at both endpoints. i tried to use play back application to check if asterisk is communicating well with UA and play back works fineanyone ever faced this problem pls help mehere is the declaration of my UAs in sip.conf[5000500]type=peerhost=dynamicdtmfmode=rfc2833context=defaultcanreinvite=yesallow=all[5000600]type=peerhost=dynamicdtmfmode=rfc2833context=defaultcanreinvite=yesallow=all thanks allot Brings words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] strange problem PBX-Asterisk
Thanks for the hints, 'overlapdial=yes' did the trick. br, kurt --On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:08:08 PM +0200 Peter Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Christian Victor wrote: maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about the following 'error': When I make a call from the PBX to * I get number not available, but on debug I see, that asterisk is searching just for the first digit in the extension, which of course doesn't exist, eg: I seems that you PBX uses Overlap Dial and transmits the extensien digit by digit and Asterisk expects the extension to be en bloc. So when it receives anything from the PBX (wich is in this case the first digit) Asterisk thinks that this is the whole block of extension. Don't know how to fix it though. ;-) This in case you are on a PRI: see overlapdial at http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+config+zapata.conf It needs to be set on pri links where ovarlap dialing is used, even incoming towards asterisk. Without more information on the connections between the systems and the configuration it is hard to figure out what is wrong. Peter ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] strange problem PBX-Asterisk
Hi, maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about the following 'error': When I make a call from the PBX to * I get number not available, but on debug I see, that asterisk is searching just for the first digit in the extension, which of course doesn't exist, eg: I dial 77 (for conn to *) and 12345 (valid extension) on the console I see: -- Extension '1' in context 'sip-local' from '+ 14070' does not exist. Rejecting call on channel 0/1, span 1 Everything worked fine before an update on Friday, but I haven't changed any config files then. I 'downgraded' to 1.0RC2 today, but then same problem. If any of you has any hints, please let me know. Thanks a lot, br, Kurt ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] strange problem PBX-Asterisk
Hi Kurt! maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about the following 'error': When I make a call from the PBX to * I get number not available, but on debug I see, that asterisk is searching just for the first digit in the extension, which of course doesn't exist, eg: I seems that you PBX uses Overlap Dial and transmits the extensien digit by digit and Asterisk expects the extension to be en bloc. So when it receives anything from the PBX (wich is in this case the first digit) Asterisk thinks that this is the whole block of extension. Don't know how to fix it though. ;-) Christian ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] strange problem PBX-Asterisk
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Christian Victor wrote: maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about the following 'error': When I make a call from the PBX to * I get number not available, but on debug I see, that asterisk is searching just for the first digit in the extension, which of course doesn't exist, eg: I seems that you PBX uses Overlap Dial and transmits the extensien digit by digit and Asterisk expects the extension to be en bloc. So when it receives anything from the PBX (wich is in this case the first digit) Asterisk thinks that this is the whole block of extension. Don't know how to fix it though. ;-) This in case you are on a PRI: see overlapdial at http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+config+zapata.conf It needs to be set on pri links where ovarlap dialing is used, even incoming towards asterisk. Without more information on the connections between the systems and the configuration it is hard to figure out what is wrong. Peter ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Strange Problem with Asterisk....
Wondered if anybody might have some ideas about what could be causing this I have a T100p hooked up to an Adit 600 with 12 channels of voice off of a T-1 coming in. I have a t100p connected to a zhone z-plex with 24 fxs going to my stations. Some of the station are 2 line phones. These have 2 zap channels that are dialed when the extension is matched. Also, some extension require ringing 2 phones at the same time. For example the boss wants his assistants phone to ring also when someone calls him. Then the calls roll to a receptionist if not answered. Finally the call goes to voicemail This has been working fine for weeks now, but today the customer told me that one of the phones configured this way was hearing 3 to 4 other conversations on their phone. The phone did not give dialtone, but in picking up the handset you could hear someone shuffling paper working at their desk etc. When certain other extensions were on calls, you could hear clearly the person they were connected to, but not the person in the office. I checked all the wiring and couldn't find any problem. I rebooted the channelbank thinking maybe somehow it had gotten screwy. No change. Then, just for grins, I stopped and restarted *. Voila, the problem was gone. Can anyone think of a scenario that could cause * to do this? Thanks, Andy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Strange Problem with Asterisk....
I think there are issues with combining flash-hook supervised transfers with meetme conference bridges. Can you find out if that took place, i.e. someone tries to transfer into a meetme conference? Mark On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Andy Hester wrote: Wondered if anybody might have some ideas about what could be causing this I have a T100p hooked up to an Adit 600 with 12 channels of voice off of a T-1 coming in. I have a t100p connected to a zhone z-plex with 24 fxs going to my stations. Some of the station are 2 line phones. These have 2 zap channels that are dialed when the extension is matched. Also, some extension require ringing 2 phones at the same time. For example the boss wants his assistants phone to ring also when someone calls him. Then the calls roll to a receptionist if not answered. Finally the call goes to voicemail This has been working fine for weeks now, but today the customer told me that one of the phones configured this way was hearing 3 to 4 other conversations on their phone. The phone did not give dialtone, but in picking up the handset you could hear someone shuffling paper working at their desk etc. When certain other extensions were on calls, you could hear clearly the person they were connected to, but not the person in the office. I checked all the wiring and couldn't find any problem. I rebooted the channelbank thinking maybe somehow it had gotten screwy. No change. Then, just for grins, I stopped and restarted *. Voila, the problem was gone. Can anyone think of a scenario that could cause * to do this? Thanks, Andy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Strange Problem with Asterisk....
No, I have Meetme on an extension, but the users don't even know about it and the ext# for it is in a completely different range. Hrm okay. I don't know if I explained it adequately looking back on my post. The situation persisted over 8 to 10 hours and through numerous calls. what seems weird to me is that the other extensions functioned correctly, but the one didn't. I could pick up the handset and be listening to the sounds of someone working quietly at their desk, and then if they made a call, I could hear the ringing, the person answer, but not the caller. this happened over and over. But it didn't pick up the audio of all the other zap channels, just 4 or 5. You can do zap show channel foo to see what the state of a particular zap channel is. The only situation i've ever heard of anything like this in is related to MeetMe and flashhook transfer being combined. If it happens to get in the state again, let me know. Also, check the call detail records to see if there were any unusual calls at the time. Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
