Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy compile under 2.6.28 ?
Gordon Henderson schrieb: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Gordon Henderson wrote: > >> It looks like something has changed in the HPET kernel code in 2.6.28 >> (maybe .27 too) that's stopped ztdummy.c compiling (in 1.2 and 1.4 >> versions of zapata) A kernel structure member has been renamed with some >> crypic comments in the lkml about it. > > OK, a few checks in the dahdi code (look, I spelt it right! :) and the > changes are minimal and would apply to both the 1.2 and 1.4 versions of > ztdummy. What's the recomended way to publish patches - if anyone wants > them? The bug tracker: http://bugs.digium.com Philipp Kempgen -- AMOOCON 2009, May 4-5, Rostock / Germany -> http://www.amoocon.de Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.de AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied -> http://www.amooma.de Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998 -- ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy compile under 2.6.28 ?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Gordon Henderson wrote: > It looks like something has changed in the HPET kernel code in 2.6.28 > (maybe .27 too) that's stopped ztdummy.c compiling (in 1.2 and 1.4 > versions of zapata) A kernel structure member has been renamed with some > crypic comments in the lkml about it. OK, a few checks in the dahdi code (look, I spelt it right! :) and the changes are minimal and would apply to both the 1.2 and 1.4 versions of ztdummy. What's the recomended way to publish patches - if anyone wants them? Thanks, Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy compile under 2.6.28 ?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, David Backeberg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Gordon Henderson > wrote: > >> Meanwhile what's the 2nd best way to use ztdummy - force it to use the RTC >> instead? > > The best way to use ztdummy is to read about the change to using > DAHDI, and use dahdi_dummy instead. > > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/DAHDI Thanks, but I'm sticking to 1.2 for the time being. I might look at what's changed in dhadi though, and I'll switch to it when I can type it without making a typo. Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy compile under 2.6.28 ?
Gordon Henderson wrote: > > Anyone know the right thing to do - I'm not up on the linux kernel guts, > nor how ztdummy might interact with it, so simply renaming the structure > member (from expires to _expires) is probably not the right thing to do... > If you're already making system changes and updating your kernel, now might be a good time to make the switch to dahdi. dahdi_dummy works with recent kernels. But otherwise, you might be interested in the history of dahdi_dummy.c to get some hints about what you might need to do for ztdummy if you want to make a local patch for that. http://svn.digium.com/view/dahdi/linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi_dummy.c?view=log Cheers, Shaun ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy compile under 2.6.28 ?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Gordon Henderson wrote: > Meanwhile what's the 2nd best way to use ztdummy - force it to use the RTC > instead? The best way to use ztdummy is to read about the change to using DAHDI, and use dahdi_dummy instead. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/DAHDI ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] ztdummy compile under 2.6.28 ?
It looks like something has changed in the HPET kernel code in 2.6.28 (maybe .27 too) that's stopped ztdummy.c compiling (in 1.2 and 1.4 versions of zapata) A kernel structure member has been renamed with some crypic comments in the lkml about it. Anyone know the right thing to do - I'm not up on the linux kernel guts, nor how ztdummy might interact with it, so simply renaming the structure member (from expires to _expires) is probably not the right thing to do... Meanwhile what's the 2nd best way to use ztdummy - force it to use the RTC instead? Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users