RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

2006-05-02 Thread Lee Archer
I downloaded the source and built it from that.  SuSE10 comes with a
version of asterisk 1.0.X on the DVD.

Regards

Lee 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yu Safin
Sent: 01 May 2006 16:31
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

On 1/24/06, Lee Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, I've got it running on my test box but didn't know if there 
 was any global objection to using it.  I've had a few funnies with it 
 but that might be down to Supermicro and P4's with the EM64T thing.

 Regards

 Lee

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben 
 Klang
 Sent: 24 January 2006 15:49
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

 On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:26, Lee Archer wrote:
  Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10
platform?
  I'm currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts 
  of the business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.
 Just about all of my production Asterisk servers are on SuSE 9.3.  My 
 development and demo boxes are SuSE 10.  Both run great.  I do however

 usually tweak the RPM that came with it to add in a few patches.  If 
 you are comfortable with running Asterisk 1.0.9 then the RPM works 
 very well.  SuSE always seems to really think things through when they

 package applications.

 For running something newer than Asterisk 1.0.9 SuSE 10 is also works 
 fine.
 For your own sanity you'll want to not install/uninstall the SuSE 
 Asterisk RPMs.  One possible gotcha: be careful of possibly 
 conflicting kernel modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra as the 
 Zaptel drivers are not part of any Asterisk package but rather the 
 kernel.  The zaptel compile from source installs modules to 
 /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc so you'll want to delete the files in 
 extra.  You'll also have to remember that each time you update the
kernel RPM.

 Hope that helps.  The bottom line from me is Thumbs Up.

 /BAK/
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

did you have to install asterisk from source or from rpm?
I have installed asterisk under RH and I am switching over to SuSE OSS
10.0.  I could not find the rpm for asterisk.  My searches show that
the rpm is available for the commercial version of SuSE.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


###

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

2006-05-01 Thread Yu Safin

On 1/24/06, Lee Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks, I've got it running on my test box but didn't know if there was
any global objection to using it.  I've had a few funnies with it but
that might be down to Supermicro and P4's with the EM64T thing.

Regards

Lee

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Klang
Sent: 24 January 2006 15:49
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:26, Lee Archer wrote:
 Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10 platform?
 I'm currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts of
 the business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.
Just about all of my production Asterisk servers are on SuSE 9.3.  My
development and demo boxes are SuSE 10.  Both run great.  I do however
usually tweak the RPM that came with it to add in a few patches.  If you
are comfortable with running Asterisk 1.0.9 then the RPM works very
well.  SuSE always seems to really think things through when they
package applications.

For running something newer than Asterisk 1.0.9 SuSE 10 is also works
fine.
For your own sanity you'll want to not install/uninstall the SuSE
Asterisk RPMs.  One possible gotcha: be careful of possibly conflicting
kernel modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra as the Zaptel drivers
are not part of any Asterisk package but rather the kernel.  The zaptel
compile from source installs modules to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc so
you'll want to delete the files in extra.  You'll also have to remember
that each time you update the kernel RPM.

Hope that helps.  The bottom line from me is Thumbs Up.

/BAK/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


did you have to install asterisk from source or from rpm?
I have installed asterisk under RH and I am switching over to SuSE OSS
10.0.  I could not find the rpm for asterisk.  My searches show that
the rpm is available for the commercial version of SuSE.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

2006-01-24 Thread Angel Gabriel
My reccomendation. if it's not broke, then don't fix it. Unless
your getting in al new hardware, then maybe do the switch, but until
then, tell your boss, or whover is calling the shots, that the system
works, and until there is a major flaw, or a major reason to switch
other, other than just for the sake of it I would leave it as it.

On 1/24/06, Lee Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10 platform?  I'm
 currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts of the
 business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.

 Regards

 Lee ###

 This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
 For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

2006-01-24 Thread Ben Klang
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:26, Lee Archer wrote:
 Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10 platform?
 I'm currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts of
 the business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.
Just about all of my production Asterisk servers are on SuSE 9.3.  My 
development and demo boxes are SuSE 10.  Both run great.  I do however 
usually tweak the RPM that came with it to add in a few patches.  If you are 
comfortable with running Asterisk 1.0.9 then the RPM works very well.  SuSE 
always seems to really think things through when they package applications.

For running something newer than Asterisk 1.0.9 SuSE 10 is also works fine.  
For your own sanity you'll want to not install/uninstall the SuSE Asterisk 
RPMs.  One possible gotcha: be careful of possibly conflicting kernel modules 
in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra as the Zaptel drivers are not part of any 
Asterisk package but rather the kernel.  The zaptel compile from source 
installs modules to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc so you'll want to delete the 
files in extra.  You'll also have to remember that each time you update the 
kernel RPM.

Hope that helps.  The bottom line from me is Thumbs Up.

/BAK/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

2006-01-24 Thread Lee Archer
Thanks, I've got it running on my test box but didn't know if there was
any global objection to using it.  I've had a few funnies with it but
that might be down to Supermicro and P4's with the EM64T thing.

Regards

Lee 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Klang
Sent: 24 January 2006 15:49
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SuSe 10

On Tuesday 24 January 2006 09:26, Lee Archer wrote:
 Has anyone had any experience with the Asterisk on a SuSe 10 platform?
 I'm currently using FC3 but because we use SuSe within other parts of 
 the business I'm being pushed to changed the OS.
Just about all of my production Asterisk servers are on SuSE 9.3.  My
development and demo boxes are SuSE 10.  Both run great.  I do however
usually tweak the RPM that came with it to add in a few patches.  If you
are comfortable with running Asterisk 1.0.9 then the RPM works very
well.  SuSE always seems to really think things through when they
package applications.

For running something newer than Asterisk 1.0.9 SuSE 10 is also works
fine.  
For your own sanity you'll want to not install/uninstall the SuSE
Asterisk RPMs.  One possible gotcha: be careful of possibly conflicting
kernel modules in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/extra as the Zaptel drivers
are not part of any Asterisk package but rather the kernel.  The zaptel
compile from source installs modules to /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc so
you'll want to delete the files in extra.  You'll also have to remember
that each time you update the kernel RPM.

Hope that helps.  The bottom line from me is Thumbs Up.

/BAK/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users