RE: [Asterisk-Users] FXS vs. FXO

2004-07-25 Thread Shlomi Bachar 








Here is the output of the status equipment command
:

BootCode Version: 1.23



 CardType Status SW Vers CLEI

  -- --- 

SLOT A T1x2 Present 6.1.2 SIC3DH0CAA

SLOT 1 FXSx8 Present 1.09 SIC3GJ0CAA

SLOT 2 FXSx8 Present 1.09 SIC3GJ0CAA

SLOT 3 FXS5Gx8 Present 1.10 SIC2780JAA

SLOT 4 FXSx8 Present 1.09 SIC3GJ0CAA

SLOT 5 FXSx8 Not Present

SLOT 6 V35x2 Not Present



- Shlomi



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shlomi Bachar
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 4:23
PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FXS vs.
FXO



Hello,



Ive recently purchased
Adit 600 with 3FXS and 1FXO to be connected to my * server via T100P card. This
is the output of status equipment command in the Adit600:





For some reason the FXO card
is seen as FXS, why? Is it ok? On the card it is written FXO.



Regards,

Shlomi Bachar

Re: [Asterisk-Users] FXS vs. FXO

2004-07-25 Thread Daniel Jimenez 

Shlomi Bachar wrote:
 Ive recently purchased Adit 600 with 3FXS and 1FXO to be connected to 
my * server via T100P card. This is the output of status equipment 
command in the Adit600:

 For some reason the FXO card is seen as FXS, why? Is it ok? On the card 
it is written FXO.

I would ask ADIT, not the mailing list for a PBX. You could also, you 
know, TRY it.

--
Daniel Jimenez djimenez[at]pobox[dot]com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users