Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.3/Ports] Make does nothing
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:44:28 +0200, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I updated the Ports collection to compile the latest Asterisk, but after running make config, make just returns without doing anything: For those having the same problem: make clean ; make config ; make ; make deinstall ; make reinstall does the trick. I shouldn't have expected csup to remove stale stuff from previous compilings. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.3] Right-way to recover Zaptel?
If Asterisk is running that will happen. Make sure to shutdown asterisk cleanly before doing that. Anthony Vincent wrote: Hello I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD that I compiled from the Ports collection. It's the second time I'm having an issue with a FXO card and/or the Zaptel driver. I couldn't figure out what else to do, so I just rebooted the server, but I'd like to know what happened, and whether there's a less drastic solution. Here's some infos: === # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zaptel stop zaptelkldunload: can't find file wcte12xp.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't find file wcte11xp.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't find file wct4xxp.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't find file wct1xxp.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy kldunload: can't find file wcfxo.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't find file tau32pci.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't find file qozap.ko: No such file or directory kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy Sep 6 19:11:12 freebsd kernel: kldunload: attempt to unload file that was loaded by the kernel # kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 19 0xc040 7a05b0 kernel 21 0xc0ba1000 5c304acpi.ko 121 0xc2d6c000 19000linux.ko 131 0xc3ba9000 32000zaptel.ko 171 0xc3c0d000 a000 wcfxs.ko # kldunload -i 13 kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy # kldunload -i 17 kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy === Thanks for any tip. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.3] Right-way to recover Zaptel?
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:47:58 -0600, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If Asterisk is running that will happen. Make sure to shutdown asterisk cleanly before doing that. Sorry, forgot to say that I couldn't restart or stop/start Asterisk: [Sep 6 19:06:17] WARNING[23110]: chan_zap.c:4157 zt_handle_event: Ring/Off-hook in strange state 6 on channel 1 [Sep 6 19:06:20] WARNING[23110]: chan_zap.c:4157 zt_handle_event: Ring/Off-hook in strange state 6 on channel 1 freebsd*CLI Disconnected from Asterisk server Executing last minute cleanups # asterisk -vr Asterisk 1.4.20.1, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2008 Digium, Inc. and others. == Parsing '/usr/local/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf': Found == Parsing '/usr/local/etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf': Found Unable to connect to remote asterisk (does /var/run/asterisk.ctl exist?) # # reboot I couldn't unload the Zaptel driver manually, and couldn't restart Asterisk :-/ Is there something else I could have tried before rebooting? Thank you. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.3] Why not use safe_asterisk?
Vincent wrote: Hello I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD 6.3 host, and unless I'm mistaken, it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/asterisk script doesn't make use of /usr/local/sbin/safe_asterisk to restart Asterisk in case it crashes. Is this correct, and if yes, why not use it? Thank you. I've been wondering about that myself for a while too :) MySQL is known to be using that method under FreeBSD for quite some time similarly, by running the the /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server. Any active contributors to the net/asterisk wanna shed some light on this mystery? Vahan ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.3] Zaptel stops responding
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:36:27 +0200, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will do, although it could be a problem in the Zaptel code, which is not written by the mfg. Thanks. I also notice that I can't restart the driver: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zaptel restart zaptelkldunload: can't unload file: Device busy zaptelkldload: can't load /usr/local/lib/zaptel/zaptel.ko: File exists ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.3] Zaptel stops responding
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:47:04 -0500, Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please call the reseller from which you bought the card or the manufacturer for support. Will do, although it could be a problem in the Zaptel code, which is not written by the mfg. Thanks. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] [FreeBSD 6.2] Error compiling Zaptel from Ports?
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:20:38 +0100, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -Wno-pointer-sign *** Error code 1 I wonder if maybe the people who ported Asterisk to FreeBSD aren't using a more recent version of GCC than what's available in the 6.2 ports: == # cc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 == Since GCC was not upgraded by running cvsup, what would be a valid way to upgrade it myself? By downloading a package for a more recent version of FBSD? Thank you. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] FreeBSD Compile Errors
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:57:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: I'm trying to compile Asterisk on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and I'm getting the following error: cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DMAKE_VALGRIND_HAPPY -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -I/usr/local/include/spandsp -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -fomit-frame-pointer -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -fPIC -c -o app_page.o app_page.c cc -shared -Xlinker -x -o app_page.so app_page.o gmake[1]: *** No rule to make target `app_rxfax.o', needed by `app_rxfax.so'. Stop. gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk/work/asterisk-1.2.13/apps' MAybe you haven't patched it correctly? grep fax apps/Makefile -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Digium g.729 codec seg faults on rev 30652
Kim Culhan wrote: Was running the Digium FreeBSD g.729 codec until recently when the latest Asterisk bits were obtained via svn: svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk asterisk MAYBE it is the same problem: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-April/147577.html ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) compile error
Hi, I have also failed the same point. Mine is 5.4-Stable Jul 16, did make world from 5.3 which works * 1.0.6(?) ports and I did cvsup ports-supfile again several minutes ago. NG. -- Zen Darren Wiebe wrote Did you do a make clean? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD. Yeah, even deleted all the files in the asterisk ports , and refreshed it ports collection. Always fails to compile at this point. Am I missing a package dependency somewhere? Hiya, I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports updates. The port won't compile I just get this. chan_zap.c: In function `pri_dchannel': chan_zap.c:8391: error: structure has no member named `cause' chan_zap.c:8886: error: structure has no member named `inband_progress' gmake[1]: *** [chan_zap.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk/work/asterisk-1.0.9/channels' gmake: *** [subdirs] Error 1 *** Error code 2 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) - Playback , MP3Player and Musiconhold not working
Ask this question on asterisk-bsd Chris - Original Message - From: Jack Towards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:38 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) - Playback ,MP3Player and Musiconhold not working I installed Asterisk 1.0.9 in a Freebsd 5.4 ( with no zaptel card); I have 2 zoom x5v and works great ( in extensions 123 and 321 ) but I was trying to test cmd Playback, MusicOnHold, MP3Player but when I call to extension 100 I don't hear the sound ( mp3 or gsm that I put) , I only hear noise If I leave a message in a mailbox the same, all the record is noise - extensionns.conf - [general] static=yes writeprotect=no [sip] exten = 123,1,Dial(SIP/123,20,tr) exten = 123,2,Voicemail,u123 exten = 123,102,Voicemail,b123 exten = 321,1,Dial(SIP/321,20,tr) exten = 321,2,Voicemail,u321 exten = 321,102,Voicemail,b321 exten = 100,1,Answer ;exten = 100,2,MusicOnHold(default) ;exten = 100,2,Playback(tt-weasels,skip) exten = 100,2,MP3Player(/usr/local/share/asterisk/mohmp3/fpm-sunshine.mp3) ;exten = 100,3,Voicemail(100) exten = 100,4,Hangup - I see the mpg123 running /usr/local/bin/mpg123 -q -r 8000 -f 8192 -b 2048 --mono -s fpm-calm-river.mp3 same happens if I use Playback or MusiconHold. ( I hear noise ) I'm confused, I load the module of the sound card to the kernel.. (this is related to this problem ?? ) + FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: VIA VT82C686A at io 0xcc00 irq 10 kld snd_via82c686 (1p/1r/0v channels duplex default) + Any idea or help, will be apreciated. Thanks ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) compile error
Darren Wiebe wrote Did you do a make clean? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD. Yeah, even deleted all the files in the asterisk ports , and refreshed it ports collection. Always fails to compile at this point. Am I missing a package dependency somewhere? Hiya, I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports updates. The port won't compile I just get this. chan_zap.c: In function `pri_dchannel': chan_zap.c:8391: error: structure has no member named `cause' chan_zap.c:8886: error: structure has no member named `inband_progress' gmake[1]: *** [chan_zap.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk/work/asterisk-1.0.9/channels' gmake: *** [subdirs] Error 1 *** Error code 2 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) compile error
Did you do a make clean? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD. Darren Wiebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Ackroyd wrote: Hiya, I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports updates. The port won't compile I just get this. chan_zap.c: In function `pri_dchannel': chan_zap.c:8391: error: structure has no member named `cause' chan_zap.c:8886: error: structure has no member named `inband_progress' gmake[1]: *** [chan_zap.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/asterisk/work/asterisk-1.0.9/channels' gmake: *** [subdirs] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Anyone got any ideas? Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Asterisk and G729 codec
On 18/11/2004 17:25 kido noagbodji said the following: I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error message: [codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.c:248 ast_load_resource: Shared object libc.so.6 not found Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.c:380 load_modules: Loading module codec_g729a.so failed! did you download the freebsd binary for codec_g729a.so or did you download the linux binary ? while freebsd can work with linux executables, i'm not so sure it'll work with asterisk modules. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd voicemail everything seems to work??
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:35:32 -, Victor Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Trying to configure a voicemail system on FreeBSD 4.10 + asterisk 0.9.0, I found the following problems: Download the latest asterisk versions from cvs (try a make update in the asterisk src directory) Jason ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD asterisk and zaptel versions
On 07/11/2004 21:06 Richard Airlie said the following: I had been running asterisk-0.9 with zaptel 0.7 with no problems (both built from FreeBSD ports). Yesterday I cvsup'd my ports tree and build asterisk 1.0.1_1 and zaptel 0.8_1, which seemed to work except that any attempt to play music on hold completely hangs to box. as has been discussed on the asterisk-bsd list, there could be some threading issues involved, though that would most likely be on 4-STABLE and not 5.x. have you checked if both zaptel.ko and ztdummy.ko are loaded ? MoH needs a timer and you'd either need ztdummy or a digium wildcard in the box for a timing source. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 100% cpu
On 21/09/2004 20:20 Jan Baggen said the following: Compiled Asterisk from FreeBSD port (0.9.0_2) When I start asterisk it uses 100% cpu. Searches on Google say to comment the noload = chan_oss.so in modules.conf But this is already commented. Make.conf contains some optimizations. add 'noload = pbx_wilcalu' into modules.conf. that's what's causing the high CPU load. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk
In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works! I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter that. What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refresh my ports tree on my local servers nightly. I cannot wait to try this out :) -- Jason T. Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jtn.cx/~jtn/ BOFH Extraordiaire Sysadmin Ombudsman GPG key 0xFF676C9E GPG key fingerprint = 6272 5482 EDDD D0A3 FED2 262A FABB 599D FF67 6C9E disclaimer: My opinions are my own. Don't bother my employer about them. pgpq4tYTFcY0E.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk
/usr/ports/misc/zaptel -- Arnold Cavazos, Jr. abcjr at abcjr . net On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:06:00AM -0500, Jason T. Nelson wrote: In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works! I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter that. What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refresh my ports tree on my local servers nightly. I cannot wait to try this out :) -- Jason T. Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jtn.cx/~jtn/ BOFH Extraordiaire Sysadmin Ombudsman GPG key 0xFF676C9E GPG key fingerprint = 6272 5482 EDDD D0A3 FED2 262A FABB 599D FF67 6C9E disclaimer: My opinions are my own. Don't bother my employer about them. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk
port misc/zaptel In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works! I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter that. What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refresh my ports tree on my local servers nightly. I cannot wait to try this out :) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk
It's in /usr/ports/misc/zaptel. For everyone else, there were some updates to the driver recently by Maxim Sobolev (the maintainer) that can be obtained by cvsup (see /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile). It works great with a single x100p card here as well! Cheers, Rich -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stenton Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk port misc/zaptel In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works! I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter that. What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refresh my ports tree on my local servers nightly. I cannot wait to try this out :) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323 issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not care about h232. Just comment out the line with FORBIDDEN= in the port Makefile. (You will need to do it for pwlib and openh323 as well, if I recall correctly). You can then make install it in the usual fashion. If you are worried about the H323 security issues then I guess you will need to do some hacking or reconfiguring to get rid of it. Richard. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323 issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not care about h232. dare i hope? randy make install -DNO_IGNORE I'm also working on a freebsd port that uses the cvs version of asterisk, let me know if you're interested in taking a look. http://something.inethouston.net/~dwcjr/asterisk.patch -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd?
make install -DNO_IGNORE h, scary considering i don't need h323. or am i misunderstanding something? I'm also working on a freebsd port that uses the cvs version of asterisk, let me know if you're interested in taking a look. o! but i am about to go back on the road. so i don't know if i will have time this week. randy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:38:32AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: make install -DNO_IGNORE h, scary considering i don't need h323. or am i misunderstanding something? NO_IGNORE is going to bypass all of the forbidden lines for all of the dependencies -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD port of asterisk
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the Asterisk source base. Thanks You need to ask on asterisk-dev, not asterisk-users. My guess would be break them down to manageable pieces with explanations and post them to bugs.digium.com. - Andrew Thompson http://aktzero.com/ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD port of asterisk
Andrew Thompson wrote: David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the Asterisk source base. Thanks You need to ask on asterisk-dev, not asterisk-users. My guess would be break them down to manageable pieces with explanations and post them to bugs.digium.com. Exactly. Post them to bugs so other people may test them and confirm if it works and adds functionality and fixes important things. As a FreeBSD user, I'm curious of what you've done! Need a fix for pbx_wilcalu that still seems to race my CPU if I enable it. /O ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote: On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote: Dam wish I was that good to do that. You can pitch into the bounty to sweeten the pot for someone who is good enough. I know some guys who are capable and I've forwarded on the bounty notice but I'm guessing it's not high enough to make it worth their while shrug. So ask them for a quote, there is a lot of people who whould love FreeBSD support. /Chris ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote: Dam wish I was that good to do that. You can pitch into the bounty to sweeten the pot for someone who is good enough. I know some guys who are capable and I've forwarded on the bounty notice but I'm guessing it's not high enough to make it worth their while shrug. -joe -- Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com Custom Internet and Computer Solutions Linux, UNIX, Java Training ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD?? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Dam wish I was that good to do that. On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD?? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD?? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD?? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
*cough* not a thing. - Joshua Colp. - Original Message - From: James Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD?? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD?? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
head on over to http://people.freebsd.org/~blackend/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/index.html and have a look at chapter 13, Writing FreeBSD Device Drivers, and have fun. =) If I didn't have all sorts of other half finished projects, I'd mess with it... but I've only done simple apps before, nothing like writing a driver.. fobbit.org has gotten the old Creative VoIP blaster working under FreeBSD, but its a whole application, and not just a driver. - - - Jon At 09:54 PM 3/29/2004 -0400, you wrote: *cough* not a thing. - Joshua Colp. - Original Message - From: James Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD?? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD?? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
One other on-line resource: http://zapatatelephony.org/ The _original_ driver was for BSD. The folks at Digium appearently ported it to Linux and likely improved it over time. But the old BSD driver is still there. The zapata cards were a kind of open source hardware project. The hardware design was made public See above URL. Getting the old BSD driver to build would be a good first step. See here for old BSD driver http://zapatatelephony.org/tor.c --- Jon Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: head on over to http://people.freebsd.org/~blackend/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/arch-handbook/index.html and have a look at chapter 13, Writing FreeBSD Device Drivers, and have fun. =) If I didn't have all sorts of other half finished projects, I'd mess with it... but I've only done simple apps before, nothing like writing a driver.. fobbit.org has gotten the old Creative VoIP blaster working under FreeBSD, but its a whole application, and not just a driver. - - - Jon At 09:54 PM 3/29/2004 -0400, you wrote: *cough* not a thing. - Joshua Colp. - Original Message - From: James Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD?? On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote: Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them? Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD?? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users = Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
On 2004 Mar 29, at 20:54, Chris Albertson wrote: One other on-line resource: http://zapatatelephony.org/ The _original_ driver was for BSD. The folks at Digium apparently ported it to Linux and likely improved it over time. But the old BSD driver is still there. Apparently. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-April/009745.html -Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
Currently the asterisk port is blocked due to vulnerabilities in pwlib. Chris - Original Message - From: Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:30 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up To all; I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because it compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I start asterisk, I get a segmentation fault. asterisk -c reveals : [...snip...] [codec_gsm.so] = (GSM/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator) == Registered translator 'gsmtolin' from format GSM to SLINR, cost 1 == Registered translator 'lintogsm' from format SLINR to GSM, cost 5 [codec_mp3_d.so] = (MP3/PCM16 (signed linear) Translator (Decoder only)) Segmentation fault (core dumped) So, I check the core dump to see what I can find, and get : Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_gsm.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_gsm.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_mp3_d.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_mp3_d.so Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)... done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2953ff53 in unpack_huff () from /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_mp3_d.so (gdb) Would there, by chance, be a missing library or package that I need? Could someone point out a possible solution? (Maybe the port assumed I have an mp3 library installed?) Joe ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
On Thursday 25 March 2004 15:30, Joe Lewis wrote: I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because it compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I start asterisk, I get a segmentation fault. Please email the ports maintainer and ask for a fix. The Asterisk community is by-and-large not responsible for broken FreeBSD ports. -Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
But I thought asterisk was just a console application, with no need for XWindows at all. Or is it on hold due to the GUI controlling mechanisms? Joe Chris Stenton wrote: Currently the asterisk port is blocked due to vulnerabilities in pwlib. Chris - Original Message - From: "Joe Lewis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:30 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up To all; I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because it compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I start asterisk, I get a segmentation fault. "asterisk -c" reveals : [...snip...] [codec_gsm.so] = (GSM/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator) == Registered translator 'gsmtolin' from format GSM to SLINR, cost 1 == Registered translator 'lintogsm' from format SLINR to GSM, cost 5 [codec_mp3_d.so] = (MP3/PCM16 (signed linear) Translator (Decoder only)) Segmentation fault (core dumped) So, I check the core dump to see what I can find, and get : Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_gsm.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_gsm.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_mp3_d.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_mp3_d.so Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)... done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2953ff53 in unpack_huff () from /usr/local/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_mp3_d.so (gdb) Would there, by chance, be a missing library or package that I need? Could someone point out a possible solution? (Maybe the port assumed I have an mp3 library installed?) Joe ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Article converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.) But I thought asterisk was just a console application, with no need for XWindows at all. Or is it on hold due to the GUI controlling mechanisms? You don't have to run Asterisk from the console. I start mine as a daemon, and then connect to it remotely by logging into the Asterisk box (via SSH) and typing asterisk -r. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] freeBSD zaptel driver
There have been several bites on the bounty, but nobody's hooked yet, so I don't think a duplication of effort is an issue at this point. I do wish that someone would get this done though, as I don't exactly get thrilled over maintaining linux boxes. *sigh* -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 866.477.5638 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Arnold Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freeBSD zaptel driver On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Rowley wrote: Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have any talent... :| ) We have people looking into zaptel support under FreeBSD. But are there other people out there working with this issue? It time to speak up now so we don't duplicate the effort. And i don't really care who gets the bounty, as long as it gets done. /Chris ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freeBSD zaptel driver
On Sunday 29 February 2004 20:13, Michael Rowley wrote: Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have any talent... :| ) If this issue is holding up a project, proceed with a Linux installation. Given the complexity and scope of the conditions of the bounty, it's unlikely any part will be released by the developers until everything is complete. I'd expect completion in years, not months (if ever). In fact, I'm confident enough of this prediction that I'll add $100 to the bounty if the conditions are met within one year of today (i.e. if you prove me wrong). -Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freeBSD zaptel driver
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Rowley wrote: Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have any talent... :| ) We have people looking into zaptel support under FreeBSD. But are there other people out there working with this issue? It time to speak up now so we don't duplicate the effort. And i don't really care who gets the bounty, as long as it gets done. /Chris ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Andrew Joakimsen wrote: I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug 374, but always get these messages: click# make Makefile, line 21: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 23: Need an operator Use 'gmake' http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+FreeBSD (Just added gmake, forgot it before.) /Olle ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Not sure if it matters or not, but have you tried gmake? On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:29, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug 374, but always get these messages: click# make Makefile, line 21: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 23: Need an operator Makefile, line 72: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 74: Need an operator Makefile, line 76: Need an operator Makefile, line 116: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 118: Need an operator Makefile, line 119: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 121: Need an operator Makefile, line 149: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 151: Need an operator Makefile, line 152: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 154: Need an operator Makefile, line 155: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 157: Need an operator Makefile, line 158: Need an operator Makefile, line 159: Need an operator Makefile, line 161: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 163: Need an operator Makefile, line 164: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 165: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 167: Need an operator Makefile, line 168: Need an operator Makefile, line 175: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 179: Need an operator Makefile, line 182: Need an operator Makefile, line 213: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 214: Could not find .depend Makefile, line 215: Need an operator Makefile, line 233: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 236: Need an operator Makefile, line 239: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue Any advice? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Matthew Enger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xintegration ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
I haven't looked @ Frrebsd support, but possibly using gmake will fix the problem pfor you? On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:29:58AM -0500, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug 374, but always get these messages: click# make Makefile, line 21: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 23: Need an operator Makefile, line 72: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 74: Need an operator Makefile, line 76: Need an operator Makefile, line 116: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 118: Need an operator Makefile, line 119: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 121: Need an operator Makefile, line 149: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 151: Need an operator Makefile, line 152: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 154: Need an operator Makefile, line 155: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 157: Need an operator Makefile, line 158: Need an operator Makefile, line 159: Need an operator Makefile, line 161: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 163: Need an operator Makefile, line 164: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 165: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 167: Need an operator Makefile, line 168: Need an operator Makefile, line 175: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 179: Need an operator Makefile, line 182: Need an operator Makefile, line 213: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 214: Could not find .depend Makefile, line 215: Need an operator Makefile, line 233: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 236: Need an operator Makefile, line 239: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue Any advice? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
It looks like my conversion of the STUN server to a GNU Autotools build system will go into Vovida.org's CVS system soon. My next task will be to do the same for Asterisk. Third task is to get Asterisk to use STUN. Back to BSD: I think GNU Autotools is the right way to fix this. But until then, Yes, you should try and make your BSD system as GNU-like as you can. Heck, I've got a GNU/Solaris system right here that I'm writting this with. Just put /usr/local/... first in your path and install the standard utilities there But as I said the long term fix is to use automake/autoconf to build custom Makefiles for your system. One more thing. Please people, if you post an error message that reads in part ...at line number NNN why don't you quote line number NNN? I assume you are posting in order to get help. Why not make it easy for people to help you. At least quote the line that is giving the error --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't looked @ Frrebsd support, but possibly using gmake will fix the problem pfor you? On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:29:58AM -0500, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug 374, but always get these messages: click# make Makefile, line 21: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 23: Need an operator Makefile, line 72: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 74: Need an operator Makefile, line 76: Need an operator Makefile, line 116: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 118: Need an operator Makefile, line 119: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 121: Need an operator Makefile, line 149: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 151: Need an operator Makefile, line 152: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 154: Need an operator Makefile, line 155: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 157: Need an operator Makefile, line 158: Need an operator Makefile, line 159: Need an operator Makefile, line 161: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 163: Need an operator Makefile, line 164: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 165: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 167: Need an operator Makefile, line 168: Need an operator Makefile, line 175: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 179: Need an operator Makefile, line 182: Need an operator Makefile, line 213: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 214: Could not find .depend Makefile, line 215: Need an operator Makefile, line 233: Missing dependency operator Makefile, line 236: Need an operator Makefile, line 239: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue Any advice? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users = Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Freebsd
Alex Ayala wrote: I was wondering if anyone knows if Asterisk works in FreeBSD? I heard the problem was that the digium cards werent supported in FreeBSD. Thanks, Alex AFAIK, Asterisk can be made to compile and run but as you mentioned I think the problem is drivers.. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:13:02PM -0500, denon wrote: With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case. However, personally I have a few concerns: Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean that in a good way :). I'd hate to see development efforts get split up, and more time spent on porting/etc efforts, detracting from primary development. If it's now slowing down new development, it's always a step behind while someone patches up the current builds. in theory, the only real issues would be hardware/driver related. any excentricities the SCO-linux people add to the code can usually be ifdef'd back to normality. 8^) The other aspect of this whole thing, is that most people's PBX is an entirely standalone machine (or should be). Aside from AGI/etc which generally have to run locally (but are also usually very cross-platform anway), I can't understand why someone would prefer it on one OS over another. I mean, by the time you strip down the linux install to make it rock-stable, it's basically a kernel, compiler, and a handful of dependances. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as long as it's a robust kernel? i don't have any linux machines on my network to maintain, and i'd prefer not to add one just for this application. if the project is truly open source, then we should be able to make it go on a variety of platforms. Feel free to prove me long -- generally I'm a right OS for the job kind of guy, but in the case of appliances, it seems like the above logic makes sense. i don't view asterisk as an appliance. i see it as an application running on a server where it may very well have to interact with other applications. (radius? named? mysql/postgres? etc) some of these other applications might be what is determining what the right OS for the job is. -- [ Jim Mercer[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying.] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:02:59AM +0100, Alastair Maw wrote: As importantly, we'll get cross-unix portability for less effort. There won't be a *BSD port - the autoconf stuff will sort it all out for you. Of course, we'll have to do some work to make sure it all functions properly, but it should be relatively easy to keep everything together and working once that has happened. Forking a set of patches for FreeBSD or whatever isn't the right way to do this. i've not done an autoconf before, and i suspect it will require not a small amount of tweaking. i suspect the BSD patches will head in the direction of a number of those tweaks. while we could all wait around for someone to magically autoconf the code, in practical terms, i'm content to release the tweaks i'm making for freebsd/netbsd/openbsd/OSX (when i get time to clean it up, next week). -- [ Jim Mercer[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying.] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote: i've not done an autoconf before, and i suspect it will require not a small amount of tweaking. i suspect the BSD patches will head in the direction of a number of those tweaks. Some of the patches that get applied in the normal /usr/ports tree under FreeBSD is only in regards to location of files and directories. This usually solves a great number of consistancy problems. while we could all wait around for someone to magically autoconf the code, in practical terms, i'm content to release the tweaks i'm making for freebsd/netbsd/openbsd/OSX (when i get time to clean it up, next week). Are you going to have your system running H.323 as well? My current challange is getting H.323 up and running so I can talk to a local Cisco voice gateway, and a remote Cisco call manager. Getting everything just right in Linux, which I am not remotely familiar with any longer, is causing me to pull my hair out. I'll be very interested in your tweaks. -Sean ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:53 am, Jim Mercer wrote: any excentricities the SCO-linux people add to the code can usually be ifdef'd back to normality. 8^) Try the one in acl.c, referencing /proc/net/route. To do the analogous on FreeBSD, you have to parse kernel internal structures. That's a hack -- you don't want to have to do that in userland. -Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 05:02 am, Alastair Maw wrote: denon wrote: With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case. However, personally I have a few concerns: Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean that in a good way :). I'd hate to see development efforts get split up, and more time spent on porting/etc efforts, detracting from primary development. If it's now slowing down new development, it's always a step behind while someone patches up the current builds. I keep meaning to sort out autoconf/automake stuff for Asterisk. I notice that Asterisk is GPLed, so there won't be any licensing issues. I'm quite surprised no one else has got round to it before. Yes, but if you expect your changes to end up back in CVS, you'll have to disclaim your patches. -Tilghman ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alastair Maw wrote: I keep meaning to sort out autoconf/automake stuff for Asterisk. I notice that Asterisk is GPLed, so there won't be any licensing issues. I'm quite surprised no one else has got round to it before. Anyway, I have no time at the moment for this, but it'll happen at some point, I promise. :) There's already bribes ready for Colo, some small $ amounts, and cookies waiting when someone does it :) It sounds like Jim Mercer has existing patches, chances are those will fix certain things. The win will be much easier portability between systems, and fewer configuration woes, with better diagnostics for newbies. Forking a set of patches for FreeBSD or whatever isn't the right way to do this. Definately agree with you there, the priority should be fixing the code to be more portable, rather than just for one platform. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
Since no one yet has objected to this proposal, could you all move on from discussing if it should happen, and toward doing something. In the long run it shouldn't be that big of a deal to make the few changes necessary. Also if someone jumps in and gets the autoconf started, I'm sure Mark will be happier than asking him to do it. So once again, I ask you move on to doing something and not talking about if it should be done. Maybe this should also slide over to dev as it isn't really a user discussion, and dev is relatively quite. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote: Can we bribe you? :) sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50 plasma TV to play in the background. Is that all? That sounds rather cheap, compared to the things direction that I'd have to go if I wanted to stick to the cisci CM route, with licenses for every endpoint that I want to connect. Realistically... I just can not comprehend how to get stuff to work correctly with Linux. I used to be a Linux nut years ago, but once I found FreeBSD with it's ports collection, I wondered why anyone ever bothered with Linux and it's completely messed up software install requirements. Right now, under RedHat 9.0, I have * running, but no hardware, and I can't figure out how to get h.323 operational so I can talk to my cisco gateway with the PRI interface... I'm only guessing that FreeBSD would be much easier for non-programmers like myself. -Sean ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, denon wrote: I'd hate to see development efforts get split up, and more time spent on porting/etc efforts, detracting from primary development. If it's now slowing down new development, it's always a step behind while someone patches up the current builds. Once the code gets up to spec to be compiled on BSD systems, most likely it won't need much after that. When something is written with a 'linuxism' that breaks it from compiling on other platforms, its probably something that should get fixed anyways (for sanity's sake). Chances are it'll compile on a lot of other systems as well, heck, I'll build it on Tru64 to see if it works :) The other aspect of this whole thing, is that most people's PBX is an entirely standalone machine (or should be). Aside from AGI/etc which generally have to run locally (but are also usually very cross-platform anway), I can't understand why someone would prefer it on one OS over another. Aside from stability, security, and updatability, there's no particular reason. My network is almost entirely FreeBSD, to have a Linux box in the mix is a pain, especially when it comes to updating the dang thing. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as long as it's a robust kernel? I have yet to experience a really robust Linux kernel :) Doesn't mean they don't exist though... I think. Feel free to prove me long -- generally I'm a right OS for the job kind of guy, but in the case of appliances, it seems like the above logic makes sense. I've seen a lot of appliances built on bad platforms. Giving people the choice of OS only makes the SW platform stronger. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
I agree 100%. Sometimes code works on one system because of a quirk. Building and testing on multiple systems and debugging the autoconf scripts has a way of making the code mature and robust. I keep and old DEC Alpha (a 64 bit machine) and SPARC (big endian byte order) and run Solaris and Linux. You'd be amazed at the kinds of errors testing on multiple platforms turns up. Once the code gets up to spec to be compiled on BSD systems, most likely it won't need much after that. When something is written with a 'linuxism' that breaks it from compiling on other platforms, its probably something that should get fixed anyways (for sanity's sake). Chances are it'll compile on a lot of other systems as well, heck, I'll build it on Tru64 to see if it works :) The other aspect of this whole thing, is that most people's PBX is an entirely standalone machine (or should be). Aside from AGI/etc which generally have to run locally (but are also usually very cross-platform anway), I can't understand why someone would prefer it on one OS over another. Aside from stability, security, and updatability, there's no particular reason. My network is almost entirely FreeBSD, to have a Linux box in the mix is a pain, especially when it comes to updating the dang thing. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as long as it's a robust kernel? I have yet to experience a really robust Linux kernel :) Doesn't mean they don't exist though... I think. Feel free to prove me long -- generally I'm a right OS for the job kind of guy, but in the case of appliances, it seems like the above logic makes sense. I've seen a lot of appliances built on bad platforms. Giving people the choice of OS only makes the SW platform stronger. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users = Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
another. I mean, by the time you strip down the linux install to make it rock-stable, it's basically a kernel, compiler, and a handful of dependances. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as long as it's a robust kernel? At least in my case, I /can/ strip down a FreeBSD (or a picobsd release) install to its required components in a matter of minutes. I keep up with the latest security issues and major bugs. It's a must for my daily job. I track -stable and I'm watching -current when I can. I feel comfortable with keeping FreeBSD secure. To do this with Linux, I have to start over. I have an entirely different set of problems to keep track of, an unfamiliar..eh..release process, etc. If I worked in a Solaris or IRIX shop, I'd similarly prefer to run the system in an environment closer to the usual working environment. Just my thoughts. :) ...david --- david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote: so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ?? Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support, rather than SW support from asterisk. The Digium HW has yet to be supported in FreeBSD/NetBSD, and Asterisk doesn't support the VoiceTronix cards. I've seen a couple posts on the list about VoiceTronix cards, but seen no news of their support. I think the only cards that works with FreeBSD+Asterisk are the Quicknet Internet Line Jack and Internet Phone Jack. Less than optimal... When either one of those happens, I think we'll see more FreeBSD users. Incentive: If anyone is interested in trading coding time towards getting one of these goals accomplished, for colo+BW services, lemme know. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
I know a few people (myself included) are willing to help provide incentive funds to get this going. The big quesiton for Digium: What will it take to get * up to speed and the drivers ported to *BSD? What will it take to keep it there? -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638 Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom (UnitedLayer) Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote: so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ?? Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support, rather than SW support from asterisk. The Digium HW has yet to be supported in FreeBSD/NetBSD, and Asterisk doesn't support the VoiceTronix cards. I've seen a couple posts on the list about VoiceTronix cards, but seen no news of their support. I think the only cards that works with FreeBSD+Asterisk are the Quicknet Internet Line Jack and Internet Phone Jack. Less than optimal... When either one of those happens, I think we'll see more FreeBSD users. Incentive: If anyone is interested in trading coding time towards getting one of these goals accomplished, for colo+BW services, lemme know. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
Count me in for a few hundred bucks, contingent on the Zaptel cards becoming supported in OpenBSD. This has been discussed several times on the list (see archives) and some people have made really great contributions to getting it working on *BSD, but without the Zap drivers it's only partially of value. Plus, we need to have a larger O/S base to let Digium sell more cards, which in the end helps all of us. :-) JT I know a few people (myself included) are willing to help provide incentive funds to get this going. The big quesiton for Digium: What will it take to get * up to speed and the drivers ported to *BSD? What will it take to keep it there? -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks http://www.psknet.com 540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638 Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom (UnitedLayer) Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote: so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ?? Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support, rather than SW support from asterisk. The Digium HW has yet to be supported in FreeBSD/NetBSD, and Asterisk doesn't support the VoiceTronix cards. I've seen a couple posts on the list about VoiceTronix cards, but seen no news of their support. I think the only cards that works with FreeBSD+Asterisk are the Quicknet Internet Line Jack and Internet Phone Jack. Less than optimal... When either one of those happens, I think we'll see more FreeBSD users. Incentive: If anyone is interested in trading coding time towards getting one of these goals accomplished, for colo+BW services, lemme know. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Troy Settle wrote: I know a few people (myself included) are willing to help provide incentive funds to get this going. Maybe we should coordinate to make this an organized effort? The big quesiton for Digium: What will it take to get * up to speed and the drivers ported to *BSD? What will it take to keep it there? That question does need to be answered. If its a question of $, how much. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote: so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ?? Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support, rather than SW support from asterisk. I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to interface to the land lines, for the most part. ..david --- david raistrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:49:06PM -0700, David Raistrick wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote: so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ?? Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support, rather than SW support from asterisk. I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to interface to the land lines, for the most part. i am close to submitting patches for this. however, my real job keeps getting in the way. 8^( if i manage to get it going, then it becomes part of my real job, and things will move more quickly. -- [ Jim Mercer[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying.] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote: I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to interface to the land lines, for the most part. i am close to submitting patches for this. Yay jim! however, my real job keeps getting in the way. 8^( if i manage to get it going, then it becomes part of my real job, and things will move more quickly. Can we bribe you? :) ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote: I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to interface to the land lines, for the most part. I would also be interested in seeing both OSX and OpenBSD builds, I saw mention of the latter but was unable to find code/diffs etc. Again I can live without the hardware just now but in the future it would be good. f ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Fearghas McKay wrote: At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote: I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to interface to the land lines, for the most part. I would also be interested in seeing both OSX and OpenBSD builds, I saw mention of the latter but was unable to find code/diffs etc. i have, or have been granted access to: FreeBSD 4.x-stable NetBSD (current) OpenBSD (unsure) Mac OS X (something recent) Linux RH9 Again I can live without the hardware just now but in the future it would be good. it is my intent to put a patch kit together to get it compiling on the above. i'll announce to the list when the patches are available and it would be nice for people to put it up and spot any problems. initially, it will be without hardware support, but once we have a stable port to the other environments, i suspect the hardware geeks will be close behind. 8^) -- [ Jim Mercer[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying.] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:49:45PM -0700, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote: however, my real job keeps getting in the way. 8^( if i manage to get it going, then it becomes part of my real job, and things will move more quickly. Can we bribe you? :) sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50 plasma TV to play in the background. 8^) -- [ Jim Mercer[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying.] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
I have FreeBSD here and a lot of VoIP and Telephony equipment and will be happy to load up anything you send for testing. I can also put a FreeBSD 5.x machine outside of our firewall if you would like access to that for compatibility testing. How closely related to the ZapataTelephony.org project are the current drivers for the Digium products? I think that I read on that site that the original drivers were for FreeBSD. Sean - Original Message - From: Jim Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:05 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Fearghas McKay wrote: At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote: I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to interface to the land lines, for the most part. I would also be interested in seeing both OSX and OpenBSD builds, I saw mention of the latter but was unable to find code/diffs etc. i have, or have been granted access to: FreeBSD 4.x-stable NetBSD (current) OpenBSD (unsure) Mac OS X (something recent) Linux RH9 Again I can live without the hardware just now but in the future it would be good. it is my intent to put a patch kit together to get it compiling on the above. i'll announce to the list when the patches are available and it would be nice for people to put it up and spot any problems. initially, it will be without hardware support, but once we have a stable port to the other environments, i suspect the hardware geeks will be close behind. 8^) -- [ Jim Mercer[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 410-5633 ] [ I want to live forever, or die trying.] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote: Can we bribe you? :) sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50 plasma TV to play in the background. Hrm, thats a bit steep for me. How about 1.5 months, and a goat with fleas? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
