RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread brian
Thanks for the really splendid details on * vs Nor*.

You bring up some really valid points.  My only question is that I
understand Norstar etc to be a "digital" phone system as opposed to a
"analog" phone system.  I think it's just a different voltage/frequency,
but perhaps someone could enlighten me.

I'm leaning towards a forklift operation.  Mainly because there are only
a couple of users who live on the phones and the other stations are just
to save people from running to answer a phone.

We had narrowed the field when I put the question out there, but I
wanted to leave it open to gather unbiased feedback.  I opted to use the
Polycom 500  for our phone-intense stations.  It's a good phone and will
best mimic our current phones.  

Based on some other feedback I have my eye on a Sipura SPA-841 as a
"basic" phone.  It should support all the features we currently use with
only Two line appearance.  That is fine for most people/stations.  

For now I'm going to develop * off to the side with two Polycom 500's.
Then we'll get the hardware in place, get the dialplan built, and do a
few weekend tests where we patch the lines over for the weekend and
torture them.  If all goes well we'll leave the Nor* offline and
decomission it after a two week safety period.  I figure this maximizes
our ROI on VOIP by allowing us to sell the whole nor* system to someone
who will appreciate it.  

The testing phase will allow me to train the 1 or 2 people who do heavy
phone work ahead of the cutover so that they can help other employees
get the hang of it.  The nice thing as I see it is that VOIP will add
features, not remove them.  Initially our goal will be to keep the
dialplan nice and simple.  Down the road we can make it complicated by
adding cool features.  But of course, that's the strategic advantage to
* as opposed to our current Nortel MoneyPit. 

Down the road I'd like to get a 802.11b wireless phone.  It would be
cooler still if I had one that was GSM capable and could play on
cingular's network when it couldn't find a wireless station.  I guess we
have to have something to dream about :).  Although I seem to remember
GTE MobileNet had a service like this 10 years ago that was wireless
when you were away and landline when you were near.




Brian Greul
Texas Shirt Company
www.txshirts.com
713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)

-Original Message-
From: Jim Van Meggelen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 2:59 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey gang,
>   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to 
> Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing and proof of

> concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to 
> re-purchase and have "orphans" around.

I've got a few different IP phones in my lab (including a C7960), I'm
currently loving my Polycom 300 - a solid phone for the price, and
everyone says the 500 and 600 are even better. I think I'll be going
with Polycom for my customers until the next best thing comes along.

I looked at the Snom phones when I was at Astricon, and while they may
be technically great, the problem I had with them is that they are not
weighted properly. If you've ever yanked your phone off the desk you'll
understand the need for a proper ballast. The handsets feel cheap too,
because they're too lightweight. Still, from everything I've read you'll
certainly want to try one out. Also, the Snom 220 seems to be the best
bet as a reception phone, especially if you want a busy lamp field on
your swithboard.

The Cisco phones are great, but it's hard to stomach paying an extra
$100-$300 for that little drawing of the Golden Gate Bridge they put on
all their products.

One of the exciting things about standards-based telephony is that you
can mix and match your phones. It's the same as analog sets; the agony
is in the sheer number of choices available.

> We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was 
> hoping some folks would share what they have found. My primary goal is

> to replicate the 7310's features and to allow room for growth in the 
> future with telephony applications.

One of the big differences between the Norstar and the Asterisk is that
the Norstar is a key system, the Asterisk is a PBX. If you completely
replace the Norstar your users will will no longer have access to line
status on their phones; that is all handled behind the scenes. Also, you
will not get busy lamp field, which means you won't be able to monitor
who is on the phone (there are ways of doing this in Asterisk, but it

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey gang,
>   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system
> to Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing
> and proof of concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone
> and don't want to re-purchase and have "orphans" around.

I've got a few different IP phones in my lab (including a C7960), I'm
currently loving my Polycom 300 - a solid phone for the price, and
everyone says the 500 and 600 are even better. I think I'll be going
with Polycom for my customers until the next best thing comes along.

I looked at the Snom phones when I was at Astricon, and while they may
be technically great, the problem I had with them is that they are not
weighted properly. If you've ever yanked your phone off the desk you'll
understand the need for a proper ballast. The handsets feel cheap too,
because they're too lightweight. Still, from everything I've read you'll
certainly want to try one out. Also, the Snom 220 seems to be the best
bet as a reception phone, especially if you want a busy lamp field on
your swithboard.

The Cisco phones are great, but it's hard to stomach paying an extra
$100-$300 for that little drawing of the Golden Gate Bridge they put on
all their products.

One of the exciting things about standards-based telephony is that you
can mix and match your phones. It's the same as analog sets; the agony
is in the sheer number of choices available.

> We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I
> was hoping some folks would share what they have found. My
> primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to allow
> room for growth in the future with telephony applications.

One of the big differences between the Norstar and the Asterisk is that
the Norstar is a key system, the Asterisk is a PBX. If you completely
replace the Norstar your users will will no longer have access to line
status on their phones; that is all handled behind the scenes. Also, you
will not get busy lamp field, which means you won't be able to monitor
who is on the phone (there are ways of doing this in Asterisk, but it's
not as intuitive to implement). Finally, the Norstar has hundreds of
easy to use features; each one you'll want to keep will need to be
carefully hand-crafted in the dial plan.

> Our primary driver is configurability and features that we
> can get in Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money
> from Nortel.

Nortel sure has fallen behind. Even the VoIP stuff they have does not
work well, and is barely standards-compliant (if at all).

> Namely-
> Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call
> handling, better automation. I'd like to be able to integrate
> smart features like directory and call handling to the
> handset, but I'll freely admit I'm just starting out. My
> initial goal is to just to get onto Asterisk and get it
> working. I'll worry about cool stuff later.

I think you'll be wise to leave the Nortel KSU in place for a bit. That
way you can introduce new features to the users without them also having
to learn new phones. There are challenges either way.
 
> Our integration and migration plan is as follows:  If anyone
> has some suggestions or pointers I'd love to hear them.
> 
> 1. Test and evaluate Asterisk with TDM400 with 1 FXO/FSO port
> each. 2. Configure Asterisk to be the primary PBX and slave
> the Nortel Meridian system to it using a second TDM400.  This
> avoids immediate replacement of all handsets.  Will allow
> immediate access to features such as Voicemail. 3. Overtime,
> upgrade desk phones to IP phones.  When all phones are
> replaced, decommission Nortel and sell on Ebay.  :)

Are you using calling line ID? The problem here is that you have two
systems that will each need to wait two rings before answering. The
Asterisk will need two rings to get the caller ID, and then it'll take
two more to pass the same CLID on to the Norstar.

[PSTN]==(2 rings for CLID)==[Asterisk]==(2 rings for CLID)==[Nor*]

Make sure you put an autoattendant in the middle, to ensure your callers
don't have to wait too many rings before some indication that there's a
system at the other end. 

Also, there is some danger of echo if you put the Asterisk in the
middle. You'll want to be patient with this, as it may take a bit of
tweaking to sort out. 
IMPORTANT: Make sure your Asterisk and Nortel are grounded to the same
point. Best way to achieve this easily will be to plug them into the
same electrical outlet. You do NOT want voltage potentials on the analog
loop between the * and Nor*, believe me.

The fact is, analog is a technology that really doesn't lend itself well
to integration. It can be made to work, but callers and users will have
to deal with a lot of extra rings. Also, transfers and the like will
involve hookswitch flashes and such. I'm not saying avoid it, just be
aware of the need to manage user expectations. One possible way to
handle this would be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Michael Graves
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:34:12 -0600, Me wrote:

>Why not use ATA adapters? This way you can use just about any phone you
>want.
>

This works well for simple applications, but does not satisfy the
business user who needs a multi-line phone with ots of business class
features. I love my Polycom IP600s ;-)

Michael
--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Jon Radon
SIP may evolve quickly, but implementations do not IME.  For a small
operation I don't see this as a large issue.

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:39:06 -0700, Damon Estep
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You will always want access to firmware, SIP phones evolve quickly and
> new features and bug fixes are usually implanted via firmware updates.
-- 
Is it something someone said, was it something someone said?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah That makes sense.
Thanks for pointing that out.
I'm so used to thinking of phone as bricks with a wire and handset and
some stress relief buttons.  :)
Your other post about the ATA adapters is dead-on.  Multi-line display
and friends (address book etc) are invaluable.
I thought about going soft-phone.  But I'm not sure I trust our windows
systems that much.  We still have a couple of applications that have us
hogtied to windows.  Evil UPS OnlineWorldship is one such poorly written
application.  Ironic that UPS uses Unix on the backend but won't support
it for clients.  I have about 8 Win9x machines because of that issue.
I'm eyeing a flight from Exchange/Outlook later this year.
And our graphics stuff is all Windows/Adobe based.  

I guess the thing with soft-phones is that I'm not sure how stable the
machines are.  It's bad enough to lose your phone or your computer, but
both at once is really spooky.  ;)
On a bright note, we have gigabit everywhere in the building.  So QOS
and bandwidth had better not be an issue internally.  :) 

Brian Greul
Texas Shirt Company
www.txshirts.com
713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
Brian,
	You really, really want to get SIP phones.  Softphones (Windows, PC 
hardware) just do not have the quality and reliability that dedicated 
hardware SIP phones do.

	If your windows computers go down with the latest worm, you won't even 
be able to call someone to ask for help or answer the phone when 
customers start complaining.  It's really pretty obvious here.

	Also, I am a big Polycom fan.  The three phones that you would look at 
are very rich in features, and range from $115 - $255.  Getting one 
brand really makes things easier, and Cisco sure doesn't offer anything 
for $115.  The 7960 does not have one feature (I know of) that the 
Polycom IP 600 ($255) does not have.  The Polycom's work better for 
paging, intercom, presence, conferencing, and more.  The 7960's seem to 
be running off of brand recognition.  Don't get me wrong, they are 
excellent phones, but I feel that they just don't compete with the 
Polycom offering in features.  Think of it this way: Polycom is like 
Avis - They try harder.

--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Matthew Boehm
> ATAs are great for residential

Linksys PAP2-NA is a 2 line ATA for $50 resale. Works great with Asterisk.

> and fax machines (assuming the ATA is fax aware).

Just because your ATA is fax aware doesn't guarantee it will work. We
use the PAP2-NA's and they are fax aware but don't work as reliabaly as they
should. Hopefully Asterisk will come out with T.38 support for FoIP.

  There are some ATA's out there that support fax detection and use T.38 but
since Asterisk doesn't support T.38, the fax probably won't go thru.

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread brian
Ah That makes sense.
Thanks for pointing that out.

I'm so used to thinking of phone as bricks with a wire and handset and
some stress relief buttons.  :)

Your other post about the ATA adapters is dead-on.  Multi-line display
and friends (address book etc) are invaluable.

I thought about going soft-phone.  But I'm not sure I trust our windows
systems that much.  We still have a couple of applications that have us
hogtied to windows.  Evil UPS OnlineWorldship is one such poorly written
application.  Ironic that UPS uses Unix on the backend but won't support
it for clients.  I have about 8 Win9x machines because of that issue.

I'm eyeing a flight from Exchange/Outlook later this year.

And our graphics stuff is all Windows/Adobe based.  

I guess the thing with soft-phones is that I'm not sure how stable the
machines are.  It's bad enough to lose your phone or your computer, but
both at once is really spooky.  ;)

On a bright note, we have gigabit everywhere in the building.  So QOS
and bandwidth had better not be an issue internally.  :) 


Brian Greul
Texas Shirt Company
www.txshirts.com
713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)

-Original Message-
From: Damon Estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:39 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

You will always want access to firmware, SIP phones evolve quickly and
new features and bug fixes are usually implanted via firmware updates. 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:29 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Okay,
>   I'm feeling a little stupid here But I'm gonna ask anyway.
> 
> You mention support and firmware on the Ci$co phones.
> 
> I understand the support item.
> I guess it makes sense that the phones have firmware.  Does it have to

> be updated or changed or messed with that often?
> 
> If there is an article somewhere that covers this I'd love to read it.
> 
> It seems like most of the VOIP marketing-speak is aimed at companies 
> with mega$$$ who want to spend $500/head on it.
> We're a tad smaller and we have $ to spend not $$ or $$$ or .  :)

> Worse yet, we need $ to go find and bring back it's friends.  :)  
> Anyhow, I haven't seen anything that really tackles moving from a CISC

> Nortel Meridian KSU to a IP based system.  I'm guessing that this is 
> Nortel's absolute worst nightmare.  It seems like they trickle down 
> the technology from the
> large switches to the micro PBX systems.   
> 
> 
> Brian Greul
> Texas Shirt Company
> www.txshirts.com
> 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Damon Estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:10 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Many use cisco IP phones, almost any model. Support and firmware 
> access has a fee.
> SNOM 190 works well, free firmware, good community support.
> Lots of reports of good luck with Polycom phones (IP500), but they 
> wont provide any support when used with * and you have to get your 
> firmware from the net, not from polycom, even if are willing to pay.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:51 AM
> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> > 
> > Hey gang,
> >   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to 
> > Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing
> and proof of
> 
> > concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to 
> > re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
> > 
> > We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> > I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was
> hoping
> > some folks would share what they have found.
> > My primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to
> allow room
> > for growth in the future with telephony applications.
> > 
> > Our primary driver is configurability and features that we
> can get in
> > Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money from Nortel.
> > 
> > Namely-
> > Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call handling, 
> > better automation.
>

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Damon Estep
You will always want access to firmware, SIP phones evolve quickly and
new features and bug fixes are usually implanted via firmware updates. 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:29 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Okay,
>   I'm feeling a little stupid here But I'm gonna ask anyway.
> 
> You mention support and firmware on the Ci$co phones.
> 
> I understand the support item.
> I guess it makes sense that the phones have firmware.  Does 
> it have to be updated or changed or messed with that often?
> 
> If there is an article somewhere that covers this I'd love to 
> read it.  
> 
> It seems like most of the VOIP marketing-speak is aimed at 
> companies with mega$$$ who want to spend $500/head on it.  
> We're a tad smaller and we have $ to spend not $$ or $$$ or 
> .  :)  Worse yet, we need $ to go find and bring back 
> it's friends.  :)  Anyhow, I haven't seen anything that 
> really tackles moving from a CISC Nortel Meridian KSU to a IP 
> based system.  I'm guessing that this is Nortel's absolute 
> worst nightmare.  It seems like they trickle down the 
> technology from the
> large switches to the micro PBX systems.   
> 
> 
> Brian Greul
> Texas Shirt Company
> www.txshirts.com
> 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Damon Estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:10 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Many use cisco IP phones, almost any model. Support and 
> firmware access has a fee.
> SNOM 190 works well, free firmware, good community support.
> Lots of reports of good luck with Polycom phones (IP500), but 
> they wont provide any support when used with * and you have 
> to get your firmware from the net, not from polycom, even if 
> are willing to pay.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:asterisk-users- 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:51 AM
> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> > 
> > Hey gang,
> >   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to 
> > Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing 
> and proof of
> 
> > concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to 
> > re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
> > 
> > We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> > I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was
> hoping
> > some folks would share what they have found.
> > My primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to 
> allow room 
> > for growth in the future with telephony applications.
> > 
> > Our primary driver is configurability and features that we 
> can get in 
> > Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money from Nortel.
> > 
> > Namely-
> > Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call handling, 
> > better automation.
> > I'd like to be able to integrate smart features like directory and
> call
> > handling to the handset, but I'll freely admit I'm just 
> starting out.
> > My initial goal is to just to get onto Asterisk and get it working.
> > I'll worry about cool stuff later.
> > 
> > Our integration and migration plan is as follows:  If 
> anyone has some 
> > suggestions or pointers I'd love to hear them.
> > 
> > 1. Test and evaluate Asterisk with TDM400 with 1 FXO/FSO port each.
> > 2. Configure Asterisk to be the primary PBX and slave the Nortel 
> > Meridian system to it using a second TDM400.  This avoids immediate 
> > replacement of all handsets.  Will allow immediate access 
> to features 
> > such as Voicemail.
> > 3. Overtime, upgrade desk phones to IP phones.  When all phones are 
> > replaced, decommission Nortel and sell on Ebay.  :)
> > 
> > Cold turkey option is to spend the extra $ and buy the handsets
> upfront
> > and just ditch nortel without a transition period.
> > 
> > We currently have 4 pbx lines and 1 dedicated fax/credit card line.
> > We have 10 handsets.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Brian Greul
> > Texas Shirt Company
> > www.txshirts.com
&

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Damon Estep
You could, but in a business environment the features of the phones are
very useful, such as multiple call appearances without annoying call
waiting beeps, a multi line display, a web interface for address books,
remote firmware updates, the list goes on. ATAs are great for
residential and fax machines (assuming the ATA is fax aware). 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Me
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:34 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Why not use ATA adapters? This way you can use just about any 
> phone you want.
> 
> 
> Start Your Own Internet Service!
> http://www.YourOwnISP.com
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:28 AM
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> 
> Okay,
>   I'm feeling a little stupid here But I'm gonna ask anyway.
> 
> You mention support and firmware on the Ci$co phones.
> 
> I understand the support item.
> I guess it makes sense that the phones have firmware.  Does it have to
> be updated or changed or messed with that often?
> 
> If there is an article somewhere that covers this I'd love to read it.
> 
> It seems like most of the VOIP marketing-speak is aimed at companies
> with mega$$$ who want to spend $500/head on it.  We're a tad 
> smaller and
> we have $ to spend not $$ or $$$ or .  :)  Worse yet, we need $ to
> go find and bring back it's friends.  :)  Anyhow, I haven't seen
> anything that really tackles moving from a CISC Nortel 
> Meridian KSU to a
> IP based system.  I'm guessing that this is Nortel's absolute worst
> nightmare.  It seems like they trickle down the technology from the
> large switches to the micro PBX systems.
> 
> 
> Brian Greul
> Texas Shirt Company
> www.txshirts.com
> 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Damon Estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:10 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Many use cisco IP phones, almost any model. Support and 
> firmware access
> has a fee.
> SNOM 190 works well, free firmware, good community support.
> Lots of reports of good luck with Polycom phones (IP500), but 
> they wont
> provide any support when used with * and you have to get your firmware
> from the net, not from polycom, even if are willing to pay.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:51 AM
> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> >
> > Hey gang,
> >   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to
> > Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing 
> and proof of
> 
> > concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to
> > re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
> >
> > We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> > I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was
> hoping
> > some folks would share what they have found.
> > My primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to 
> allow room
> > for growth in the future with telephony applications.
> >
> > Our primary driver is configurability and features that we 
> can get in
> > Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money from Nortel.
> >
> > Namely-
> > Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call handling,
> > better automation.
> > I'd like to be able to integrate smart features like directory and
> call
> > handling to the handset, but I'll freely admit I'm just 
> starting out.
> > My initial goal is to just to get onto Asterisk and get it working.
> > I'll worry about cool stuff later.
> >
> > Our integration and migration plan is as follows:  If 
> anyone has some
> > suggestions or pointers I'd love to hear them.
> >
> > 1. Test and evaluate Asterisk with TDM400 with 1 FXO/FSO port each.
> > 2. Configure Asterisk to be the primary PBX and slave the Nortel
> > Meridian system to it using a second TDM400.  This avoids immediate
> > replacement of all handsets.  Will allow immediate access 
> to features
> > such as Voicemail

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Me
Why not use ATA adapters? This way you can use just about any phone you
want.


Start Your Own Internet Service!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com

- Original Message - 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:28 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?


Okay,
  I'm feeling a little stupid here But I'm gonna ask anyway.

You mention support and firmware on the Ci$co phones.

I understand the support item.
I guess it makes sense that the phones have firmware.  Does it have to
be updated or changed or messed with that often?

If there is an article somewhere that covers this I'd love to read it.

It seems like most of the VOIP marketing-speak is aimed at companies
with mega$$$ who want to spend $500/head on it.  We're a tad smaller and
we have $ to spend not $$ or $$$ or .  :)  Worse yet, we need $ to
go find and bring back it's friends.  :)  Anyhow, I haven't seen
anything that really tackles moving from a CISC Nortel Meridian KSU to a
IP based system.  I'm guessing that this is Nortel's absolute worst
nightmare.  It seems like they trickle down the technology from the
large switches to the micro PBX systems.


Brian Greul
Texas Shirt Company
www.txshirts.com
713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)

-Original Message-
From: Damon Estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:10 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

Many use cisco IP phones, almost any model. Support and firmware access
has a fee.
SNOM 190 works well, free firmware, good community support.
Lots of reports of good luck with Polycom phones (IP500), but they wont
provide any support when used with * and you have to get your firmware
from the net, not from polycom, even if are willing to pay.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:51 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
>
> Hey gang,
>   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to
> Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing and proof of

> concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to
> re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
>
> We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was
hoping
> some folks would share what they have found.
> My primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to allow room
> for growth in the future with telephony applications.
>
> Our primary driver is configurability and features that we can get in
> Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money from Nortel.
>
> Namely-
> Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call handling,
> better automation.
> I'd like to be able to integrate smart features like directory and
call
> handling to the handset, but I'll freely admit I'm just starting out.
> My initial goal is to just to get onto Asterisk and get it working.
> I'll worry about cool stuff later.
>
> Our integration and migration plan is as follows:  If anyone has some
> suggestions or pointers I'd love to hear them.
>
> 1. Test and evaluate Asterisk with TDM400 with 1 FXO/FSO port each.
> 2. Configure Asterisk to be the primary PBX and slave the Nortel
> Meridian system to it using a second TDM400.  This avoids immediate
> replacement of all handsets.  Will allow immediate access to features
> such as Voicemail.
> 3. Overtime, upgrade desk phones to IP phones.  When all phones are
> replaced, decommission Nortel and sell on Ebay.  :)
>
> Cold turkey option is to spend the extra $ and buy the handsets
upfront
> and just ditch nortel without a transition period.
>
> We currently have 4 pbx lines and 1 dedicated fax/credit card line.
> We have 10 handsets.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian Greul
> Texas Shirt Company
> www.txshirts.com
> 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread brian
Okay,
  I'm feeling a little stupid here But I'm gonna ask anyway.

You mention support and firmware on the Ci$co phones.

I understand the support item.
I guess it makes sense that the phones have firmware.  Does it have to
be updated or changed or messed with that often?

If there is an article somewhere that covers this I'd love to read it.  

It seems like most of the VOIP marketing-speak is aimed at companies
with mega$$$ who want to spend $500/head on it.  We're a tad smaller and
we have $ to spend not $$ or $$$ or .  :)  Worse yet, we need $ to
go find and bring back it's friends.  :)  Anyhow, I haven't seen
anything that really tackles moving from a CISC Nortel Meridian KSU to a
IP based system.  I'm guessing that this is Nortel's absolute worst
nightmare.  It seems like they trickle down the technology from the
large switches to the micro PBX systems.   


Brian Greul
Texas Shirt Company
www.txshirts.com
713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)

-Original Message-
From: Damon Estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 10:10 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

Many use cisco IP phones, almost any model. Support and firmware access
has a fee.
SNOM 190 works well, free firmware, good community support.
Lots of reports of good luck with Polycom phones (IP500), but they wont
provide any support when used with * and you have to get your firmware
from the net, not from polycom, even if are willing to pay.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:51 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Hey gang,
>   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to 
> Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing and proof of

> concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to 
> re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
> 
> We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was
hoping
> some folks would share what they have found.
> My primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to allow room 
> for growth in the future with telephony applications.
> 
> Our primary driver is configurability and features that we can get in 
> Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money from Nortel.
> 
> Namely-
> Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call handling, 
> better automation.
> I'd like to be able to integrate smart features like directory and
call
> handling to the handset, but I'll freely admit I'm just starting out.
> My initial goal is to just to get onto Asterisk and get it working.
> I'll worry about cool stuff later.
> 
> Our integration and migration plan is as follows:  If anyone has some 
> suggestions or pointers I'd love to hear them.
> 
> 1. Test and evaluate Asterisk with TDM400 with 1 FXO/FSO port each.
> 2. Configure Asterisk to be the primary PBX and slave the Nortel 
> Meridian system to it using a second TDM400.  This avoids immediate 
> replacement of all handsets.  Will allow immediate access to features 
> such as Voicemail.
> 3. Overtime, upgrade desk phones to IP phones.  When all phones are 
> replaced, decommission Nortel and sell on Ebay.  :)
> 
> Cold turkey option is to spend the extra $ and buy the handsets
upfront
> and just ditch nortel without a transition period.
> 
> We currently have 4 pbx lines and 1 dedicated fax/credit card line.
> We have 10 handsets.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Greul
> Texas Shirt Company
> www.txshirts.com
> 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?

2004-12-29 Thread Damon Estep
Many use cisco IP phones, almost any model. Support and firmware access
has a fee.
SNOM 190 works well, free firmware, good community support.
Lots of reports of good luck with Polycom phones (IP500), but they wont
provide any support when used with * and you have to get your firmware
from the net, not from polycom, even if are willing to pay.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 8:51 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IP Phone recommendations?
> 
> Hey gang,
>   I'm looking at escaping from a Nortel Meridian CISC system to
> Asterisk/Digium/SIP phones.  I'm currently in the testing and proof of
> concept phase.  I'm going to need a SIP phone and don't want to
> re-purchase and have "orphans" around.
> 
> We currently run Nortel 7310 phones and they work great.
> I'm sort of overwhelmed by all of the different IP phones.  I was
hoping
> some folks would share what they have found.
> My primary goal is to replicate the 7310's features and to allow room
> for growth in the future with telephony applications.
> 
> Our primary driver is configurability and features that we can get in
> Asterisk, that we can get without a lot of money from Nortel.
> 
> Namely-
> Voicemail, telecommuting workers on the pbx, better call handling,
> better automation.
> I'd like to be able to integrate smart features like directory and
call
> handling to the handset, but I'll freely admit I'm just starting out.
> My initial goal is to just to get onto Asterisk and get it working.
> I'll worry about cool stuff later.
> 
> Our integration and migration plan is as follows:  If anyone has some
> suggestions or pointers I'd love to hear them.
> 
> 1. Test and evaluate Asterisk with TDM400 with 1 FXO/FSO port each.
> 2. Configure Asterisk to be the primary PBX and slave the Nortel
> Meridian system to it using a second TDM400.  This avoids immediate
> replacement of all handsets.  Will allow immediate access to features
> such as Voicemail.
> 3. Overtime, upgrade desk phones to IP phones.  When all phones are
> replaced, decommission Nortel and sell on Ebay.  :)
> 
> Cold turkey option is to spend the extra $ and buy the handsets
upfront
> and just ditch nortel without a transition period.
> 
> We currently have 4 pbx lines and 1 dedicated fax/credit card line.
> We have 10 handsets.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Greul
> Texas Shirt Company
> www.txshirts.com
> 713-802-0369 / 713-861-6261 (fax)
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users