RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-11 Thread mattf
works great, thanks for posting it.

This illustrates my point perfectly that to have this functionality you have
to modify the patch every time you want to upgrade your CVS. Is there any
way we can pursuade Mark to at least make it a compile-time option if not a
parking.conf option?

Thanks,

MATT---


-Original Message-
From: Iain Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 2:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key



Oh dear.  You can either manually enter in the missing line or apply the 
attached patch as before (you need a clean res_parking.c which you can get 
by deleting the file and then doing cvs co asterisk again).  This patch 
works on my system updated to the latest cvs.

  Iain


--On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:54 pm -0500 mattf 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Here's my patch results:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ./Parking.patch
> patching file res/res_parking.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 25.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 228 (offset 13 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 288 (offset 12 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 408 (offset 13 lines).
> 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# cat res/res_parking.c.rej
> ***
> *** 25,30 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
> --- 25,31 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
> + #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>   #include 
>
>
> is the first fail a bad thing?
>
> This is CVS from 15 minutes ago.
>
> Thanks,
>
> MATT---
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Iain Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
>
>
>
> Try the attached patch.  Go to your asterisk root directory and type:
>
>   patch -p0 < path_to_patch/Parking.patch
>
> .. then rebuild asterisk.
>
>   Iain
>
>
>
> --On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:43 am -0500 John Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I have applied the patch and restarted Asterisk.
>>
>> But it still only requires a single # to transfer.
>> Did I possibly miss something?
>>
>> This is just to show that it was applied.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# pwd
>> /usr/src/asterisk
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ../old_asterisk/doublehash.patch
>> patching file res/res_parking.c
>> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
>> Apply anyway? [n]
>> Skipping patch.
>> 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2004, at 4:53 PM, mattf wrote:
>>
>> There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
>> patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
>> instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
>>
>> Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
>> change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most
>> recent CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful
>> Asterisk-code-God(please Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in
>> the parking.conf file but noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's
>> actually a rather simple code change from what I can guess reading the
>> patch code. I've been told that the core developers(Mark) don't want to
>> mess with doublehash, but maybe if enough people say they want it we can
>> get them to make this harmless addition to the parking code.
>>
>> Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
>> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
>>
>> MATT---
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
>> To: Asterisk Mailling List
>> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
>>
>>
>> Has there been any resolution to this?
>>
>> Does anyone have a good way to allow
>> someone to choose whether they want to
>> be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
>> the other end.
>>
>> Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
>> key for # to *?
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>> ___
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread Iain Stevenson
Oh dear.  You can either manually enter in the missing line or apply the 
attached patch as before (you need a clean res_parking.c which you can get 
by deleting the file and then doing cvs co asterisk again).  This patch 
works on my system updated to the latest cvs.

 Iain

--On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:54 pm -0500 mattf 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Here's my patch results:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ./Parking.patch
patching file res/res_parking.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 25.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 228 (offset 13 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 288 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 408 (offset 13 lines).
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# cat res/res_parking.c.rej
***
*** 25,30 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
--- 25,31 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
+ #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
is the first fail a bad thing?

This is CVS from 15 minutes ago.

Thanks,

MATT---



-Original Message-
From: Iain Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key


Try the attached patch.  Go to your asterisk root directory and type:

  patch -p0 < path_to_patch/Parking.patch

.. then rebuild asterisk.

  Iain



--On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:43 am -0500 John Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have applied the patch and restarted Asterisk.

But it still only requires a single # to transfer.
Did I possibly miss something?
This is just to show that it was applied.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# pwd
/usr/src/asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ../old_asterisk/doublehash.patch
patching file res/res_parking.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
John



On Mar 9, 2004, at 4:53 PM, mattf wrote:

There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most
recent CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful
Asterisk-code-God(please Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in
the parking.conf file but noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's
actually a rather simple code change from what I can guess reading the
patch code. I've been told that the core developers(Mark) don't want to
mess with doublehash, but maybe if enough people say they want it we can
get them to make this harmless addition to the parking code.
Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
MATT---

-Original Message-
From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
To: Asterisk Mailling List
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
Has there been any resolution to this?

Does anyone have a good way to allow
someone to choose whether they want to
be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
the other end.
Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
key for # to *?
John

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





Parking.patch
Description: Binary data


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread mattf
Here's my patch results:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ./Parking.patch
patching file res/res_parking.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 25.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 228 (offset 13 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 288 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 408 (offset 13 lines).
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# cat res/res_parking.c.rej
***
*** 25,30 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
--- 25,31 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
+ #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 


is the first fail a bad thing?

This is CVS from 15 minutes ago.

Thanks,

MATT---



-Original Message-
From: Iain Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key



Try the attached patch.  Go to your asterisk root directory and type:

  patch -p0 < path_to_patch/Parking.patch

.. then rebuild asterisk.

  Iain



--On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:43 am -0500 John Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> I have applied the patch and restarted Asterisk.
>
> But it still only requires a single # to transfer.
> Did I possibly miss something?
>
> This is just to show that it was applied.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# pwd
> /usr/src/asterisk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ../old_asterisk/doublehash.patch
> patching file res/res_parking.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
> Apply anyway? [n]
> Skipping patch.
> 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2004, at 4:53 PM, mattf wrote:
>
> There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
> patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
> instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
>
> Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
> change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most
> recent CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful
> Asterisk-code-God(please Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in
> the parking.conf file but noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's
> actually a rather simple code change from what I can guess reading the
> patch code. I've been told that the core developers(Mark) don't want to
> mess with doublehash, but maybe if enough people say they want it we can
> get them to make this harmless addition to the parking code.
>
> Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
>
> MATT---
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
> To: Asterisk Mailling List
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
>
>
> Has there been any resolution to this?
>
> Does anyone have a good way to allow
> someone to choose whether they want to
> be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
> the other end.
>
> Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
> key for # to *?
>
>
> John
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread Iain Stevenson
Try the attached patch.  Go to your asterisk root directory and type:

 patch -p0 < path_to_patch/Parking.patch

.. then rebuild asterisk.

 Iain



--On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:43 am -0500 John Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

I have applied the patch and restarted Asterisk.

But it still only requires a single # to transfer.
Did I possibly miss something?
This is just to show that it was applied.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# pwd
/usr/src/asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ../old_asterisk/doublehash.patch
patching file res/res_parking.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
John



On Mar 9, 2004, at 4:53 PM, mattf wrote:

There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most
recent CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful
Asterisk-code-God(please Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in
the parking.conf file but noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's
actually a rather simple code change from what I can guess reading the
patch code. I've been told that the core developers(Mark) don't want to
mess with doublehash, but maybe if enough people say they want it we can
get them to make this harmless addition to the parking code.
Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
MATT---

-Original Message-
From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
To: Asterisk Mailling List
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
Has there been any resolution to this?

Does anyone have a good way to allow
someone to choose whether they want to
be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
the other end.
Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
key for # to *?
John

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





Parking.patch
Description: Binary data


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread John Congdon
On Mar 10, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Stephen Davies wrote:



On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Fran Boon wrote:

Patch failed - this is what this output is showing.

As Matt said the patch needs modifying to patch cleanly against the
current version of the code...
You didn't read his mail properly.

Steve



Thanks for the defense Steve.
I was just getting bitchy thinking that same thought.
Fran,

I said I was including that console stuff, proving that
the patch had been applied.  I compiled asterisk
and restarted and it still only takes on # to transfer.
John

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread Stephen Davies


On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Fran Boon wrote:

> Patch failed - this is what this output is showing.
> 
> As Matt said the patch needs modifying to patch cleanly against the 
> current version of the code...

You didn't read his mail properly.

Steve


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread Fran Boon
John Congdon wrote:
I have applied the patch and restarted Asterisk.
But it still only requires a single # to transfer.
Did I possibly miss something?
This is just to show that it was applied.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# pwd
/usr/src/asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ../old_asterisk/doublehash.patch
patching file res/res_parking.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
Patch failed - this is what this output is showing.

As Matt said the patch needs modifying to patch cleanly against the 
current version of the code...

F
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-10 Thread John Congdon
I have applied the patch and restarted Asterisk.

But it still only requires a single # to transfer.
Did I possibly miss something?
This is just to show that it was applied.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# pwd
/usr/src/asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# patch -p0 < ../old_asterisk/doublehash.patch
patching file res/res_parking.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file res/res_parking.c.rej
John



On Mar 9, 2004, at 4:53 PM, mattf wrote:

There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a 
call
instead of once as is default in Asterisk.

Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most 
recent
CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful 
Asterisk-code-God(please
Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in the parking.conf file but
noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's actually a rather simple
code change from what I can guess reading the patch code. I've been told
that the core developers(Mark) don't want to mess with doublehash, but 
maybe
if enough people say they want it we can get them to make this harmless
addition to the parking code.

Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
MATT---

-Original Message-
From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
To: Asterisk Mailling List
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
Has there been any resolution to this?

Does anyone have a good way to allow
someone to choose whether they want to
be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
the other end.
Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
key for # to *?
John

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-09 Thread John Baker
In your extensions.conf, set Global Variable

TRANSFER_ENABLE=T

then one of your extensions looks like:

[from-internal]
exten => s,1,SetVar(TRANSFER_ENABLE=T)
exten => s,2,NoOp
exten => *,1,GotoIf($[${TRANSFER_ENABLE} = 0]?2:8)
exten => *,2,SetVar(TRANSFER_ENABLE=T)
exten => *,3,Wait(0)
exten => *,4,Playback(pbx-transfer)
exten => *,5,Playback(is-set-to)
exten => *,6,Playback(pound)
exten => *,7,Goto(s,1)
exten => *,8,SetVar(TRANSFER_ENABLE=)
exten => *,9,Wait(0)
exten => *,10,Playback(pbx-transfer)
exten => *,11,Playback(is-not-set)
exten => *,12,Goto(s,2)

and then include this extension where your phones dial out...then on
your dial-outs, something like this:

exten => _NXX,1,Dial(${OUTBOUND}/${EXTEN},40,${TRANSFER_ENABLE}r)
exten => _NXX,2,Congestion
exten => _NXX,102,Congestion

Well, you get the idea.  You press the * button before a call, wait for
the message, then you can dial out without the # button being active.

John


On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 21:25, mattf wrote:
> Anything would be an improvement over how we have to patch constantly to use
> transfers now.
> 
> As for not having to send # more than transfer, not quite true in my case.
> One of the companies that is is our building uses our system in a
> semi-automated fashion to contact banks to verify funds available for
> creation of customer accounts. They very often need to press # to navigate
> financial IVR systems and often have to transfer their calls internally.
> 
> MATT---
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Goryachev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
> 
> 
> I can't add a comment to the bug tracker without logging in, and I
> forget my login details
> 
> anyway, I would suggest changing the patch to the opposite behaviour.
> ie, single # is transfer, but double # means send a # to the remote.
> 
> This would mean that in the majority of cases, things don't change for
> the end user, which might make it more likely for the patch to be
> accepted??
> 
> Also, I think you are going to transfer a call more frequantly than you
> will need to send # ...
> 
> Regards,
> Adam
> 
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 08:53, mattf wrote:
> > There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
> > patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
> > instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
> > 
> > Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
> > change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most
> recent
> > CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful Asterisk-code-God(please
> > Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in the parking.conf file but
> > noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's actually a rather simple
> > code change from what I can guess reading the patch code. I've been told
> > that the core developers(Mark) don't want to mess with doublehash, but
> maybe
> > if enough people say they want it we can get them to make this harmless
> > addition to the parking code.
> > 
> > Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
> > http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
> > 
> > MATT---
> > 
> > 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
> > To: Asterisk Mailling List
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
> > 
> > 
> > Has there been any resolution to this?
> > 
> > Does anyone have a good way to allow
> > someone to choose whether they want to
> > be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
> > the other end.
> > 
> > Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
> > key for # to *?
> > 
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > ___
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> -- 
>  -- 
> Adam Goryachev
> Website Managers
> Ph:  +61 2 9345 4395[EMAIL PR

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-09 Thread mattf
Anything would be an improvement over how we have to patch constantly to use
transfers now.

As for not having to send # more than transfer, not quite true in my case.
One of the companies that is is our building uses our system in a
semi-automated fashion to contact banks to verify funds available for
creation of customer accounts. They very often need to press # to navigate
financial IVR systems and often have to transfer their calls internally.

MATT---

-Original Message-
From: Adam Goryachev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key


I can't add a comment to the bug tracker without logging in, and I
forget my login details

anyway, I would suggest changing the patch to the opposite behaviour.
ie, single # is transfer, but double # means send a # to the remote.

This would mean that in the majority of cases, things don't change for
the end user, which might make it more likely for the patch to be
accepted??

Also, I think you are going to transfer a call more frequantly than you
will need to send # ...

Regards,
Adam

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 08:53, mattf wrote:
> There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
> patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
> instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
> 
> Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
> change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most
recent
> CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful Asterisk-code-God(please
> Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in the parking.conf file but
> noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's actually a rather simple
> code change from what I can guess reading the patch code. I've been told
> that the core developers(Mark) don't want to mess with doublehash, but
maybe
> if enough people say they want it we can get them to make this harmless
> addition to the parking code.
> 
> Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
> 
> MATT---
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
> To: Asterisk Mailling List
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
> 
> 
> Has there been any resolution to this?
> 
> Does anyone have a good way to allow
> someone to choose whether they want to
> be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
> the other end.
> 
> Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
> key for # to *?
> 
> 
> John
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
 -- 
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
Ph:  +61 2 9345 4395[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: +61 2 9345 4396www.websitemanagers.com.au

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-09 Thread Adam Goryachev
I can't add a comment to the bug tracker without logging in, and I
forget my login details

anyway, I would suggest changing the patch to the opposite behaviour.
ie, single # is transfer, but double # means send a # to the remote.

This would mean that in the majority of cases, things don't change for
the end user, which might make it more likely for the patch to be
accepted??

Also, I think you are going to transfer a call more frequantly than you
will need to send # ...

Regards,
Adam

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 08:53, mattf wrote:
> There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
> patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
> instead of once as is default in Asterisk.
> 
> Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
> change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most recent
> CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful Asterisk-code-God(please
> Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in the parking.conf file but
> noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's actually a rather simple
> code change from what I can guess reading the patch code. I've been told
> that the core developers(Mark) don't want to mess with doublehash, but maybe
> if enough people say they want it we can get them to make this harmless
> addition to the parking code.
> 
> Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
> http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885
> 
> MATT---
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
> To: Asterisk Mailling List
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key
> 
> 
> Has there been any resolution to this?
> 
> Does anyone have a good way to allow
> someone to choose whether they want to
> be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
> the other end.
> 
> Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
> key for # to *?
> 
> 
> John
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
 -- 
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
Ph:  +61 2 9345 4395[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: +61 2 9345 4396www.websitemanagers.com.au

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key

2004-03-09 Thread mattf
There is a better way to deal with this, it's the doublehash patch. This
patch makes it so you have to press the hash key twice to transfer a call
instead of once as is default in Asterisk.

Sad thing is that every time the parking code changes the patch has to
change(sometimes twice a week) and I don't have a patch for the most recent
CVS. I've asked numerous times for some wonderful Asterisk-code-God(please
Mark ;)) to make it a configurable variable in the parking.conf file but
noone seems to think it's worthy of doing. It's actually a rather simple
code change from what I can guess reading the patch code. I've been told
that the core developers(Mark) don't want to mess with doublehash, but maybe
if enough people say they want it we can get them to make this harmless
addition to the parking code.

Here's a bug where it's been talked about:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=885

MATT---


-Original Message-
From: John Congdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:24 PM
To: Asterisk Mailling List
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Outbound Transfer and the # key


Has there been any resolution to this?

Does anyone have a good way to allow
someone to choose whether they want to
be able to transfer a call vs send the # to
the other end.

Is there  a simple way to change the Transfer
key for # to *?


John

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users