Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-16 Thread Michael D Schelin
Good point. Here is another Suggestion.  Why not use the existing analog 
phones to their PBX and go out to channel banks for their phone line 
trunks.  Then go to Asterisk for  the rest. They don't have 700 trunks.  
This will save on equipment costs and you will get some of the benefits 
of Asterisk.  It's not the best solution but it will work.  Also if you 
do want to replace all you system with new phones then try my idea of 
using the cat 3 cable. As far as the switches gos, remember it's not the 
cable the determines  the speed but the equipment connected to it.  I 
have yet to see a sip phone above 10 Mb.  So you can disregard Mr.  
Hamilton's statement about the switch.  Yes you investment will be high, 
but that is a business expense.  I'm currently doing that cat 3 trick.  
Don't worry about your customers connecting to your phone system. They 
won't know it's IP.

John Novack wrote:

Andy Hamilton wrote:
And then you'd need to purchase 700 VoIP phones; not a small 
investment. With all due respect to Mr. Schelin, I think the analog 
method may be best, unless you plan to expand the services that you 
offer to the guests. If the rooms did have cat3, you could eventually 
expand your offering to include internet access for the guests, 
advanced phone features (on the IP phones), etc...
 

Even Cat 3 anymore could be a real problem
Most inexpensive hubs and switches are 10/100, with no way to lock 
them to 10 .

Wear and tear on SIP phones, most hotels are used to paying 12-15 
bucks for room phones, and some always end up walking away..

And then there is the issue of E911. Depending on the location, some 
jurisdictions, and I feel sure many more to come, are requiring E911 
to know not only the street address but the room number.

Good luck. Stick with the analog for now.
John Novack
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-16 Thread Andy Hamilton
The cat 3 issue depends on your phone, if you went with VoIP phones,
you would need to make sure that it could be set/forced to 10Mbps. I
have only used Cisco phones, and, save the 7910 and 7902 (may a few
others), they all are fully capable of doing 100Mbps because of their
internal switch (you can colocate a comptuer with the phone); you'd
need to tell them to go 10.

Cisco hardware would also be a huge investment for the hotel, most
likely way more than what the average guest needs.

Also, just FYI, the 7971does... gigabit ethernet!! That's pretty sweet.

-Andy

PS - Is the currently installed wiring cat3?


On 4/16/05, Michael D Schelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Good point. Here is another Suggestion.  Why not use the existing analog
 phones to their PBX and go out to channel banks for their phone line
 trunks.  Then go to Asterisk for  the rest. They don't have 700 trunks.
 This will save on equipment costs and you will get some of the benefits
 of Asterisk.  It's not the best solution but it will work.  Also if you
 do want to replace all you system with new phones then try my idea of
 using the cat 3 cable. As far as the switches gos, remember it's not the
 cable the determines  the speed but the equipment connected to it.  I
 have yet to see a sip phone above 10 Mb.  So you can disregard Mr.
 Hamilton's statement about the switch.  Yes you investment will be high,
 but that is a business expense.  I'm currently doing that cat 3 trick.
 Don't worry about your customers connecting to your phone system. They
 won't know it's IP.
 
 
 John Novack wrote:
 
 
snip
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-16 Thread C F
The way to do this in my opinion is to stay with analog phones in the
room and *not* ip phones for a couple of reasons:
With Cellphones the way they are right now, you will never recover
and/or justify the costs ($60 per phone plus wiring for IP, vs $5 per
phone and no wiring for analog).
Over complicating the phone with too many features (as is the case
with IP Phones), just makes ppl not use them, in an office environment
you just train them.
I think you should stay with analog phones, and use VOIP cards with
the channel banks, and one asterisk box. ADIT 600 support a CMG card
which allows you to use MGCP with up to 48 channels per card. There
are 2 ways of configuring this:
1. For each 40 channels you use 1 CMG card (since it uses a slot you
can't use 48 channel in a single Adit 600 chassis with a CMG card),
this way you will be losing 8 channels per VOIP card since you can
never use the resources of the card to for the 8 remaining channels is
supports.
2. For each 4 adit 600 chassis you use a fifth one that has 2 quad T1
cards, and 4 CMG cards. You plug the 4 chassis to the 8 T1 ports, and
you use the 4 CMG cards to convert up to 48 channels to VOIP (you
can't use the built in t1 ports on an adit 600 if you use the CMG).
You could also configure it relying that not all the rooms will make a
call at the exact same moment. In which case you could modify #2 above
with another Quad T1(for a total of 3), and only 3 CMG cards, and a
total of seven Adit 600 chassis for each set. Plugging in the 12 T1s
to the 3 Quad T1 cards, and this will allow for upto (48 *3) 144
simultaneuos conversations (50% of available ports), instead of 288
(12 * 24) 100% available ports.

Hope this helps.


On 4/15/05, Andy Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And then you'd need to purchase 700 VoIP phones; not a small investment.
 With all due respect to Mr. Schelin, I think the analog method may be
 best, unless you plan to expand the services that you offer to the
 guests. If the rooms did have cat3, you could eventually expand your
 offering to include internet access for the guests, advanced phone
 features (on the IP phones), etc...
 I stray from the topic.
 
 You'll be facing some sort of hardware investment aside from the
 server, I think, and that is either IP Phones or a lot of hardware to
 support the analog lines, per Rusty's suggestion.
 
 Granted, this will be a large project, I think it would be wise to
 weigh the benefits of going to IP Phones now that will most likely go
 mainstream in the near future or support an aging but solid analog
 technology.
 
 -Andy
 
 On 4/15/05, Michael D Schelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If your rooms analog phones are wired with cat 3 cabling you can do 10
  Mb over it.  Convert all the rooms to Ethernet  and use large switches.
  One Asterisk box should do the trick. Remember not every room will be
  using  the phone  system at the same time.  This should work for you.
 
 
  shane fowler wrote:
 
   we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone
   system over to asterisk or if it's possible at all.  The building is
   two sections containing a large office section (with data cabling) and
   the second section is a hotel with no data cabling.  The first section
   is a no brainer with sip hard and soft phones but the hotel part is
   where the problem lies.
  
   The current count of rooms in the hotel is about 600...that's at a
   minimum 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a
   rough number i'm saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the
   Adit 600 to do up to 48 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1
   connections back to asterisk but for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30
   T1'show in the world would you do that??  just several asterisk
   servers with 2-3 Adits per server?  is there any other way?  I'm open
   to suggestions.
  
   Thanks..
  
   Shane
  
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

RE: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Rusty Shackleford
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 shane fowler
 Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:10 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a 
 rough number i'm 
 saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the Adit 600 
 to do up to 48 
 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1 connections back to 
 asterisk but 
 for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30 T1'show in the 
 world would you do 
 that??  just several asterisk servers with 2-3 Adits per 
 server?  is there 
 any other way?  I'm open to suggestions.

Remember that in a hospitality environment, the volume of simultaneous
calls is typically quite low, given the number of stations in the
system.

You could use 600's with the CMG-02 cards to backhaul to asterisk via
MGCP. Asterisk's MGCP handling is not as robust as it might be, but it
may serve your needs.

Another option would be to bank on that high stations:calls ratio. In
other words, you'll never need to provide 700 DS0's directly into the
PBX. We spec'd a very similar (400 stations) hospitality system recently
using a slug of Adtran 624's hanging off of an Adtran 830 equipped with
5 quad T1/PRI cards. Careful planning and dial-plan design can keep most
inter-station traffic at the 830, with only those calls requiring trunk
or PBX feature access traversing a small number of T1's between the 830
and the PBX (asterisk).

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.11 - Release Date: 04/14/2005
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread William Boehlke

The rule of thunb we use is 5% of the in-room stations will be in use at a
time.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rusty
Shackleford
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:45 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shane 
 fowler
 Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:10 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a rough 
 number i'm saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the Adit 600 
 to do up to 48 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1 connections 
 back to asterisk but for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30 T1'show 
 in the world would you do that??  just several asterisk servers with 
 2-3 Adits per server?  is there any other way?  I'm open to 
 suggestions.

Remember that in a hospitality environment, the volume of simultaneous calls
is typically quite low, given the number of stations in the system.

You could use 600's with the CMG-02 cards to backhaul to asterisk via MGCP.
Asterisk's MGCP handling is not as robust as it might be, but it may serve
your needs.

Another option would be to bank on that high stations:calls ratio. In other
words, you'll never need to provide 700 DS0's directly into the PBX. We
spec'd a very similar (400 stations) hospitality system recently using a
slug of Adtran 624's hanging off of an Adtran 830 equipped with
5 quad T1/PRI cards. Careful planning and dial-plan design can keep most
inter-station traffic at the 830, with only those calls requiring trunk or
PBX feature access traversing a small number of T1's between the 830 and the
PBX (asterisk).

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.11 - Release Date: 04/14/2005
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.12 - Release Date: 4/15/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.12 - Release Date: 4/15/2005
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Harry McGregor
As others have already posted about methods to reduce the number of T1s
into your Asterisk box, I will look at some other issues, and a differnt
angle.

On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 12:09 -0500, shane fowler wrote:
 we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone system 
 over to asterisk or if it's possible at all.  The building is two sections 
 containing a large office section (with data cabling) and the second section 
 is a hotel with no data cabling.  The first section is a no brainer with sip 
 hard and soft phones but the hotel part is where the problem lies.
 
 The current count of rooms in the hotel is about 600...that's at a minimum 
 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a rough number i'm 
 saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the Adit 600 to do up to 48 
 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1 connections back to asterisk but 
 for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30 T1'show in the world would you do 
 that??  just several asterisk servers with 2-3 Adits per server?  is there 
 any other way?  I'm open to suggestions.

Remember you are dealing with Analog lines here.  Most hotel rooms that
have 3 or 4 phones, only have 1 line.  They just have multiple
extensions of the same line.  A hotel room with one phone in the
bathroom, one next to the bed, and one on a table, still only needs one
DS0 from your Asterisk system.

Unless the hotel has a really large cable plant, each room probably hits
a wiring closet on it's floor.  I would use the channel banks, large
UPS, and a decent asterisk server (dual power supply, server quality
hardware, mirrored drives) with a Quad T1 card  (or two) for that floor.
I would then use dual Gig E to connect your system.  Probably to two
differnt GigE switches, each on different floors of the hotel.

A 600 room hotel would have at most 75-100 rooms per floor, which you
can easily handle with a single Asterisk server.  Per floor, even with
your Quad T1 card, you should be looking at $3000-3500 for the server,
$1K for the UPS (unless you Ebay the UPS), and then your channel banks.

The only issue here will be cooling for the wiring closet.

Harry
 Thanks..
 
 Shane
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
-- 
Harry McGregor, Computing Manager
Tucson Support Group - U.S. Geological Survey
University of Arizona - Environment and Natural Resource Building
520-670-5574 (office) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
520-661-7875 (Cell) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The opinions/statements expressed herein are my own and should
not be taken as a position, opinion, or endorsement of the
University of Arizona or the U.S. Geological Survey.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Michael D Schelin
Oh one more thing. There is a 300 foot limit to Ethernet.  Also the 
minimum number of wires is 4.

shane fowler wrote:
we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone 
system over to asterisk or if it's possible at all.  The building is 
two sections containing a large office section (with data cabling) and 
the second section is a hotel with no data cabling.  The first section 
is a no brainer with sip hard and soft phones but the hotel part is 
where the problem lies.

The current count of rooms in the hotel is about 600...that's at a 
minimum 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a 
rough number i'm saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the 
Adit 600 to do up to 48 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1 
connections back to asterisk but for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30 
T1'show in the world would you do that??  just several asterisk 
servers with 2-3 Adits per server?  is there any other way?  I'm open 
to suggestions.

Thanks..
Shane
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Michael D Schelin
If your rooms analog phones are wired with cat 3 cabling you can do 10 
Mb over it.  Convert all the rooms to Ethernet  and use large switches. 
One Asterisk box should do the trick. Remember not every room will be 
using  the phone  system at the same time.  This should work for you. 

shane fowler wrote:
we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone 
system over to asterisk or if it's possible at all.  The building is 
two sections containing a large office section (with data cabling) and 
the second section is a hotel with no data cabling.  The first section 
is a no brainer with sip hard and soft phones but the hotel part is 
where the problem lies.

The current count of rooms in the hotel is about 600...that's at a 
minimum 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a 
rough number i'm saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the 
Adit 600 to do up to 48 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1 
connections back to asterisk but for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30 
T1'show in the world would you do that??  just several asterisk 
servers with 2-3 Adits per server?  is there any other way?  I'm open 
to suggestions.

Thanks..
Shane
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Andy Hamilton
And then you'd need to purchase 700 VoIP phones; not a small investment.
With all due respect to Mr. Schelin, I think the analog method may be
best, unless you plan to expand the services that you offer to the
guests. If the rooms did have cat3, you could eventually expand your
offering to include internet access for the guests, advanced phone
features (on the IP phones), etc...
I stray from the topic.

You'll be facing some sort of hardware investment aside from the
server, I think, and that is either IP Phones or a lot of hardware to
support the analog lines, per Rusty's suggestion.

Granted, this will be a large project, I think it would be wise to
weigh the benefits of going to IP Phones now that will most likely go
mainstream in the near future or support an aging but solid analog
technology.

-Andy



On 4/15/05, Michael D Schelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If your rooms analog phones are wired with cat 3 cabling you can do 10
 Mb over it.  Convert all the rooms to Ethernet  and use large switches.
 One Asterisk box should do the trick. Remember not every room will be
 using  the phone  system at the same time.  This should work for you.
 
 
 shane fowler wrote:
 
  we are looking at the ability of being able to convert large phone
  system over to asterisk or if it's possible at all.  The building is
  two sections containing a large office section (with data cabling) and
  the second section is a hotel with no data cabling.  The first section
  is a no brainer with sip hard and soft phones but the hotel part is
  where the problem lies.
 
  The current count of rooms in the hotel is about 600...that's at a
  minimum 600 analog connections.  Some rooms have 2-3 phones so as a
  rough number i'm saying 700 total.  I see where some people use the
  Adit 600 to do up to 48 analog connections that trunks over 2 T1
  connections back to asterisk but for 700 phones thats 15 Adits with 30
  T1'show in the world would you do that??  just several asterisk
  servers with 2-3 Adits per server?  is there any other way?  I'm open
  to suggestions.
 
  Thanks..
 
  Shane
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread John Novack

Andy Hamilton wrote:
And then you'd need to purchase 700 VoIP phones; not a small investment. With all due respect to Mr. Schelin, I think the analog method may be best, unless you plan to expand the services that you offer to the guests. If the rooms did have cat3, you could eventually expand your offering to include internet access for the guests, advanced phone features (on the IP phones), etc...
 

Even Cat 3 anymore could be a real problem
Most inexpensive hubs and switches are 10/100, with no way to lock them 
to 10 .

Wear and tear on SIP phones, most hotels are used to paying 12-15 bucks 
for room phones, and some always end up walking away..

And then there is the issue of E911. Depending on the location, some 
jurisdictions, and I feel sure many more to come, are requiring E911 to 
know not only the street address but the room number.

Good luck. Stick with the analog for now.
John Novack
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Joseph Gutowski
How does his choice of analog or ethernet/SIP phones in the rooms make
a difference for E911? They'd still be interfacing with the same
Asterisk box and using the same outgoing trunks. And if the setup
handles E911 properly for one (which I don't believe would be
possible), it would do it for the other. Please correct me if I'm
wrong, because I really would like to know why this would make a
difference so I don't get myself stuck in this situation at some
point.

A bit off-topic, but I'm interested to hear from the original poster
why this hotel is considering an Asterisk install.

What's there now? What is missing or what do they hope to gain? Unless
they'te either expanding and outgrew or killed their current PBX
(which it doesn't sound like they did) or don't have a PBX at all,
what is the point of doing an install that is rather expensive no
matter which way you approach it?

Unless some of the more advanced features have become a requirement
among their clientelle, is there really a return from investing what
would be in the range of $25,000 (analog) or $125-15 (SIP) plus
wiring/telco-setup/configuring/maintence?

I'm not saying its a bad idea, but some information about what they're
hoping to gain, the type of clientelle they have, and how much they're
willing to spend (i.e. would they see a benefit to tying this into
wiring ethernet to all the rooms for guest use and giving higher-end
business clients nice SIP phones with features and internet access)
would certianlly help identify the best way to approach the problem.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] large analog to asterisk

2005-04-15 Thread Richard Lyman
*snipped
I'm not saying its a bad idea, but some information about what they're
hoping to gain, the type of clientelle they have, and how much they're
willing to spend (i.e. would they see a benefit to tying this into
wiring ethernet to all the rooms for guest use and giving higher-end
business clients nice SIP phones with features and internet access)
would certianlly help identify the best way to approach the problem.
 

i have no idea what this poster is dealing with.  i do know that some 
'smaller' hotel/motel's use centrex as not to bother themselves with 
'basic' pbx functions.  just food for thought.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users