RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines {Scanned}
Sorry Everyone, My mother past away this week. I see there might be some fixes for this. I will try them tonight. Thanks, David On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 11:14 -0700, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:48 -0500, Jay Milk wrote: Nothing wrong with putting them all in the same context and using Goto -- in fact, I've been using that with nine SIP lines from three different providers and a dozen incoming DIDs from two IAX providers. Why, you ask? Because you have your ALL call-distribution nicely contained in a single file -- extensions.conf. I never said there was anything wrong with that if that is what you choose to do, however I did say that if you do not choose to put them all in the same context and have them all go to different contexts instead asterisk ignores your feeble request and does what it wants. And that in my book qualifies as a bug. If I set a unique context for each account, the mere fact they are all from the same sip proxy should not override that. It does not if they are from different proxies so it makes no sense that it does when they are the same proxy. I think it was either a lazy programmer or a bad sort algorithm (perhaps an if that doesnt have enough compares for unique connection information?) Granted this is a rare occurance for testing purposes, if a test case was not created to test for this problem specifically it would not be uncovered until someone used asterisk to try to do exactly this. I just feel that people should have choice, simple little freedoms to do their extensions.conf however they want, and not be forced to put them all in the same context if they do not want to. Maybe my feelings on freedom and choice are too far out there and the better solution is to do it one way because that way is best for one person. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ X1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ X2 This is what I did. I used the BV number as an extension and handled it in a context. There may be better way. James Taylor MetroTel 3505 Summerhill Road Suite 11 Texarkana, Tx 75503 903-793-1956 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Shaw Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:26 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List Subject: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines Hello All, I have 4 Broadvoice lines. If I call any of the lines it shows that is coming from the first line. exaple [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I call X3 it shows that someone called X1. ANY HELP Please. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ver 1 Thanks, David ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:37 -0500, jltaylor wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ X1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ X2 This is what I did. I used the BV number as an extension and handled it in a context. There may be better way. Yeah but the asterisk bug is that it ignores the context if you use different ones in the account into. They all must goto the same context (smae with stanaphone) which kinda sucks, but ... oh and a tip: do *NOT* use 1NXX for the extension. The leading 1 will match the dialing rules that broadvoice provides and it will cause it to loop (I found that out the hardway, 20-30 outbound calls via broadvoice within 5 seconds). Leave off the leading one and it should be fine (which is how I do it for multiple accounts that way I know the extensions are unique and all). -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines
This is not just a broadvoice problem this occurs with at least stanaphone as well. Basically it appears to be a bug unless there is a special trick that is required to have multiple accounts from the same proxy. If you have 1 proxy but multiple registers and all it uses the same extension for all of them. It doesnt seperate between contexts or anything. Quite anoying. I would suggest that you contact asterisk-dev or whatever to see about getting someone more familiar with the system to fix this, since this is the 2nd time you posted about this problem and last time you got no response. Just wanted to add its not broadvoice specifically, so people dont try to say well it must be something they are doing use someone else rather than actually fixing the problem. A bad workaround would be to set different proxies for each line but that can get very ugly if for any reason your network isnt well connected to 4 unique proxies (lab, lax, chi, dca, mia, nyc). On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 08:25 -0700, David Shaw wrote: Hello All, I have 4 Broadvoice lines. If I call any of the lines it shows that is coming from the first line. exaple [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I call X3 it shows that someone called X1. ANY HELP Please. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ver 1 Thanks, David ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines
Nothing wrong with putting them all in the same context and using Goto -- in fact, I've been using that with nine SIP lines from three different providers and a dozen incoming DIDs from two IAX providers. Why, you ask? Because you have your ALL call-distribution nicely contained in a single file -- extensions.conf. -Original Message- From: trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:56 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:37 -0500, jltaylor wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] e.com/ X1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:passwd:[EMAIL PROTECTED] roadvoice.com/ X2 This is what I did. I used the BV number as an extension and handled it in a context. There may be better way. Yeah but the asterisk bug is that it ignores the context if you use different ones in the account into. They all must goto the same context (smae with stanaphone) which kinda sucks, but ... oh and a tip: do *NOT* use 1NXX for the extension. The leading 1 will match the dialing rules that broadvoice provides and it will cause it to loop (I found that out the hardway, 20-30 outbound calls via broadvoice within 5 seconds). Leave off the leading one and it should be fine (which is how I do it for multiple accounts that way I know the extensions are unique and all). -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] multiples broadvoice lines
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:48 -0500, Jay Milk wrote: Nothing wrong with putting them all in the same context and using Goto -- in fact, I've been using that with nine SIP lines from three different providers and a dozen incoming DIDs from two IAX providers. Why, you ask? Because you have your ALL call-distribution nicely contained in a single file -- extensions.conf. I never said there was anything wrong with that if that is what you choose to do, however I did say that if you do not choose to put them all in the same context and have them all go to different contexts instead asterisk ignores your feeble request and does what it wants. And that in my book qualifies as a bug. If I set a unique context for each account, the mere fact they are all from the same sip proxy should not override that. It does not if they are from different proxies so it makes no sense that it does when they are the same proxy. I think it was either a lazy programmer or a bad sort algorithm (perhaps an if that doesnt have enough compares for unique connection information?) Granted this is a rare occurance for testing purposes, if a test case was not created to test for this problem specifically it would not be uncovered until someone used asterisk to try to do exactly this. I just feel that people should have choice, simple little freedoms to do their extensions.conf however they want, and not be forced to put them all in the same context if they do not want to. Maybe my feelings on freedom and choice are too far out there and the better solution is to do it one way because that way is best for one person. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
