RE: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
Mark, you're a darn good coder. . ... ;-) How about "TIP", Telephony Internet Protocol. Or is that to close to Sip? Ben -Original Message- From: Mark Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". Is it took hoaky? Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
IAX is short and I like it. Besides if that additional '2' irritates you then anyways in the near future when IAX2 is working fine ppl will switch eventually to IAX2 and then we'll refer to IAX2 as IAX Martin On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mark Spencer wrote: > What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". > Is it took hoaky? > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
I like it. It's better than STUN. *grin* On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:19:11AM -0600, Mark Spencer wrote: > What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". > Is it took hoaky? > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
Quoting Mark Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". > Is it took hoaky? > > Mark > I still live "LIVE"... LIghtweight Voice over IP Exchange Ron Gage ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
Finally, a question on this list I feel qualified to answer :D I like it. Keeps the name from being confused with other computer-related acronyms (a buddy of mine once asked why on earth I kept referring to AIX as a VoIP thing... Surely, he said, I had to know that it is an Operating System. It took us a few minutes to realize that he had misheard my references to IAX). TASTE... Sounds good to me. Opens the door to new odd conversational elements like "I can surf the web, but I can't TASTE anything". I like the ironic angle... And no computer acronym is too hoaky, so long as it is memorable and innofensive (IMHO). -Matthew Farley On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:19, Mark Spencer wrote: > What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". > Is it took hoaky? > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Matthew Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
TEA : Telephony data Exchange with Authentication goes well with SIP also :) or, RSTP: Really Simple Telephony Protocol (gets out that unlike h323 and SIP, this is designed to be simple, but way to easy to confuse with RTSP, or others). -SteveK On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:50:57AM -0500, Benjamin Miller wrote: > Mark, you're a darn good coder. . ... > > > ;-) > > > How about "TIP", Telephony Internet Protocol. > Or is that to close to Sip? > Ben > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Spencer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name > > > What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". > Is it took hoaky? > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steve Kann - Chief Engineer - 520 8th Ave #2300 NY 10018 - (212) 533-1775 HorizonLive.com - collaborate . interact . learn "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, NT, or better,' so I installed Linux." ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
At 09:19 13-3-2003 -0600, you wrote: What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". Is it took hoaky? Sounds good. It slightly reminds me of a local frat-club, but I'll get over that :-) Florian ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
> LIghtweight > Voice over IP > Exchange Or: Lightweight Internet Voice Exchange Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
Denon mentioned to me: SVP -- Streamlined Voice Protocol Jeremy Mark Spencer wrote: LIghtweight Voice over IP Exchange Or: Lightweight Internet Voice Exchange Mark
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
TASTE... tastes good for me. but have you thinked 'bout LISP ? ;-) Lightweight Internet Signalling Protocol or SIVEX? Simple Internet Voice EXchange WONVE : Working Over Nat Voice Exchange ;-) think that any combination could be done... matteo Il gio, 2003-03-13 alle 17:40, Mark Spencer ha scritto: > > LIghtweight > > Voice over IP > > Exchange > > Or: > > Lightweight > Internet > Voice > Exchange > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Matteo Brancaleoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Espia - Emmegi Srl ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
I still like my original idea, SVP - Streamlined Voice Protocol. I think the trick to naming IAX2, is to encourage the thought of streamlined and efficiency. If people want a feature-rich and bloated protocol, they'll run H.323, SIP, etc .. IAX is all about performance and resource utilization. denon At 09:19 AM 3/13/2003 -0600, you wrote: What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". Is it took hoaky? Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
I'm in favor of "TASTE" myself, though Mark's take on "LIVE" has the all-important "I", to establish the use of this protocol over IP networks, which is an important part of the protocol and conceptual structure, yes? Perhaps "ITASTE" with the "I" standing for the obvious "Internet". JT What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". Is it took hoaky? Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
Mark and List: I agree with the earlier post that said keep the name IAX. No we don't need to go through a progression like Algol60 -> Pascal -> Modula2 -> Modula3... To our multi-lingual listers - do IAX or TASTE have any non-English complications? Remember how much fun General Motors had with the "Nova" in Spanish (or Romance language) speaking countries? Howard White ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
Before you prepend the "I", does IAX2 really depend on IP? For example couldn't you send TASTE over ATM, FDDI, X25 or a simple serial cable? My bet is that most VoIP would work better if it weren't for the IP part. Yes I do have use for other transports. --- John Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in favor of "TASTE" myself, though Mark's take on "LIVE" has the > > all-important "I", to establish the use of this protocol over IP > networks, which is an important part of the protocol and conceptual > structure, yes? > > Perhaps "ITASTE" with the "I" standing for the obvious "Internet". > > JT > > > >What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > > >Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > > >"TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to > "SIP". > >Is it took hoaky? > > > >Mark > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users = Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
What about ITP Internet/IP Telephony Protocol On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:40, Mark Spencer wrote: > > LIghtweight > > Voice over IP > > Exchange > > Or: > > Lightweight > Internet > Voice > Exchange > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Karl Putland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
I like the name IAX, only because I want to get "call piggybacking" working and call it pigbIAX (pronounced "pig beaks"). :-) If I were to chose a new name, TASTE is probably the one I like the best... On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 08:19, Mark Spencer wrote: > What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > > Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > > "TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". > Is it took hoaky? > > Mark > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Jared Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Infrastructure Programmer Discovery Research Group 6975 Union Park Center, Suite 450 Midvale, UT 84047 1-800-678-3748 ext. 124 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
When you get tired of SIPping you can upgrade to TASTEing... How do we go from that to Asterisk? Searching for taste though isn't going to return favorable VoIP results, not that sip is great - but iax / iax2 is pretty distinct. I do like taste though. Steve Radich - Colocation / Virtual Dedicated / Dedicated Servers BitShop, Inc. - http://www.bitshop.com - $149/month colo special -Original Message- From: John Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name I'm in favor of "TASTE" myself, though Mark's take on "LIVE" has the all-important "I", to establish the use of this protocol over IP networks, which is an important part of the protocol and conceptual structure, yes? Perhaps "ITASTE" with the "I" standing for the obvious "Internet". JT >What do you all think of renaming IAX2 as: > >Telephony Authentication, Signalling, and Transport Exchange (TASTE) > >"TASTE" is easy to remember and has a sort of ironic relation to "SIP". >Is it took hoaky? > >Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
or Packet Telephony (Simple) Protocol On 13 Mar 2003, Karl Putland wrote: > What about ITP > > Internet/IP > Telephony > Protocol > > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:40, Mark Spencer wrote: > > > LIghtweight > > > Voice over IP > > > Exchange > > > > Or: > > > > Lightweight > > Internet > > Voice > > Exchange > > > > Mark > > > > ___ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- > Karl Putland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
> I agree with the earlier post that said keep the name IAX. I'm in this camp. It's short, sweet and meaningful. I even like the '2'. And I just can't stand any more acronyms... Just out of curiosity, early on in the discussion someone had suggested that upgrades to iax stream include version information. Did this wind up in the specification? John ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Proposed IAX2 Name
> Just out of curiosity, early on in the discussion someone had suggested that > upgrades to iax stream include version information. Did this wind up in the > specification? Yes, to the degree that there is a specification. As I've been working on IAX I've also been working using xml2rfc on preparing an RFC of IAX. Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
