Re: [asterisk-users] Quick Question - Jabra Headset and Aastra 53i - Where is the speaker/headset enable setting on Aastra UI?
bruce bruce wrote: Hi Everyone, I can connect the Jabra GN2124 + GN2100 (smart cord) to the Aastra 53i receiver port and I get a tone. But when I connect it to the headset port there is no tone. I am running firmware 2.4 and I can't seem to find that DHSG, EHS or whatever the setting maybe called to enable to get this headset work with the phone. Can anyone quickly tell me where the audio options are on this phone? Thanks, Bruce Press the tools button. Press 2 (Preferences) Press 5 (Set Audio) You now have 3 options to set the handsfree/headset mode, mic volume and DHSG -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Quick Question - Jabra Headset and Aastra 53i - Where is the speaker/headset enable setting on Aastra UI?
Thanks. That is one thing I really HATE about AASTRA - them confusing the user with providing different setting level on the WEB UI and the PHONE UI - very stupid. But thank you and it works just fine. -Bruce On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gareth Blades list-aster...@skycomuk.comwrote: bruce bruce wrote: Hi Everyone, I can connect the Jabra GN2124 + GN2100 (smart cord) to the Aastra 53i receiver port and I get a tone. But when I connect it to the headset port there is no tone. I am running firmware 2.4 and I can't seem to find that DHSG, EHS or whatever the setting maybe called to enable to get this headset work with the phone. Can anyone quickly tell me where the audio options are on this phone? Thanks, Bruce Press the tools button. Press 2 (Preferences) Press 5 (Set Audio) You now have 3 options to set the handsfree/headset mode, mic volume and DHSG -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] quick question on conf bridge
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Jerry Geis wrote: I have a customer that is using a quad core xeon server with 4 GIG ram and Te210P card. [snip] anyway they wish to start using it for a 30 person conference bridge. I presume this is no issue??? I am running centos 64 and asterisk 1.4.30 [snip] I have not done anything with conferencing on asterisk and didnt know if using the bridge is really CPU intensive or not. Assuming no aggressive transcoding, plenty of RAM, plenty of CPU. -- Thanks in advance, - Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Quick question about time
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Alan Chandler wrote: Does the GotoIfTime application work in the local time of the server, or UTC? Looking at the code, I'd say it was localtime of the server. From pbx.c, in ast_check_timing() : time(t); localtime_r(t,tm); Gordon ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question
Tomislav Parčina wrote: Is there any h323 channel driver that supports DTMF inband signalization? Thank you for your answer! The native H.323 driver, chan_h323, does support inband DTMF. Good Luck, Jeremy McNamara ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question
You could try chan_oh323.so and chan_h323.so. I think also ooh323 supports inband DTMFs. Regards Alberto Sagredo Tomislav Parčina escribió: Is there any h323 channel driver that supports DTMF inband signalization? Thank you for your answer! -- Tomislav ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] quick question on ztdummy
On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote: asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must compile ztdummy. I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #). recompiled. did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked However, now when I reboot it is not automatically loading ztdummy? Should it be? I would expect it to? What did I miss? Edit /etc/modules It should be listed there -- Michiel van Baak http://michiel.vanbaak.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x7E0B9A2D Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] quick question on ztdummy
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:35:19PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote: On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote: asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must compile ztdummy. I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #). recompiled. did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked However, now when I reboot it is not automatically loading ztdummy? Should it be? I would expect it to? What did I miss? Edit /etc/modules It should be listed there /etc/modules is Debian-specific (right?) Alternatively, modprobe it in /etc/init.d/zaptel -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] quick question on ztdummy
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:49:19PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote: / asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must // compile ztdummy. // I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #). // recompiled. // did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked // // However, now when I reboot it is not automatically loading ztdummy? // Should it be? // I would expect it to? // // What did I miss? // / Edit /etc/modules It should be listed there It is there: install ztdummy /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install ztdummy /sbin/ztcfg huh? 'modprobe ztdummy' will do what you want. ztdummy does not require any configuration. Hence no need for ztcfg. lsmod | grep ztdummy reports nothing. If you just installed, make sure that 'depmod -a' was run. Alternatively, insmod the module directly. But this may not work for the next boot. Also try 'modinfo ztdummy' to check if the module name is listed for the current kernel. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] quick question on ztdummy
On 22:40, Fri 30 Sep 05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:35:19PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote: On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote: asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must compile ztdummy. I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #). recompiled. did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked However, now when I reboot it is not automatically loading ztdummy? Should it be? I would expect it to? What did I miss? Edit /etc/modules It should be listed there /etc/modules is Debian-specific (right?) Alternatively, modprobe it in /etc/init.d/zaptel Good point, I indeed think it's debian specific. Haven't touched any other Linux in years ;) /etc/init.d/zaptel is also Debian-specific ;) -- Michiel van Baak http://michiel.vanbaak.info [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x7E0B9A2D Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QUICK QUESTION
How can I have asterisk ignore incoming rings so it doesn't answer a specific line. I tried setting up an empty context section but that didn't work. Make a long delay the first line of the phone's context. This can even be turned on and off using a few more lines. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QUICK QUESTION
How can I have asterisk ignore incoming rings so it doesn't answer a specific line. I tried setting up an empty context section but that didn't work. What I did is this [incoming-line-noanswer] exten = s,1,Hangup Works perfectly Or, if you want your CDR to have the callerid, do it like this [incoming-line-noanswer] exten = s,1,Wait(5) ; wait 5 seconds so CallerID can be grabbed exten = s,2,Hangup hth ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] QUICK QUESTION
This will make it ring a phone forever until its picked up by a user [incoming-line] exten = s,1,Dial(SIP/whatever) To ignore it toatally, drop all reference to it. If its analoge it'll just ring and ring until the caller gives up. Dan Levine wrote: Hey Everyone, How can I have asterisk ignore incoming rings so it doesn't answer a specific line. I tried setting up an empty context section but that didn't work. Thanks Dan - Dan Levine CYTEXONE | Your Technology Specialists t: 877.CYTEXONE x 810 l: 212.477.0990 x 810 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cytexone.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question on Wildcard T100P
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 13:14 -0500, Corey S. McFadden wrote: Guys, This is probably a stupid question, but I've got a client ordering service from a CLEC and they're going with a fractional T1. Only 6 channels are going to be voice. Is this a problem with the Wildcard T100P? We've only worked with a full PRI before. Thanks for any insight. No trouble at all. Glad to hear you where able to convince the client to use a T1 instead of analog. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk
This tends to be a religious issue. I guess I am an older admin. :) I come from the school of thought that it is a good idea to reboot a server that is not meant to be used interactivly (console or terminal) on a schedule. Most software does not require it. In my experience, the systems that have some sort of auto reboot, typically run for years without any real maintenance. My * box reboots itself on sundays at 0300. It also rsyncs config files and voicemail on an hourly basis with another server ( that does not reboot. All it does is act as a samba and nfs fileserver.) Calls are scp as soon as they are combined after the call. --- David Hickman PH 314-433-0133 x31Fax 314-865-4752 AIM:fsckrmrfICQ:7059948 YahooIM:dhickman PGP Prefered - Use current key from the keyservers. On Oct 18, 2004, at 16:11, Matt G wrote: Hi All, I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done? I've seen conflicting answers, some people have told me that the only reason for asterisk to be stopped/started daily was for mpg123 causing many childs, which has since been fixed using 'no buffer' or 'nb' appended to the line in musiconhold.conf. Others have told me there is no reason whatsoever to restart/stop it, yet there's instructions on how to do it on the wiki, are these just outdated? Is there any other reason why one would want to stop and restart asterisk daily? (or at any other scheduled time?) On a related note, is asterisk -rx restart now the equivalent of asterisk -rx stop now /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk (or whatever command is used to restart it)?. I have a job cronned on a slackware system to restart it daily using -rx restart now and it creates a new PID, and Process Time, but when I run the same thing on Redhat 9 I get an error saying that it exited on sig 13. I'm sure this is just a redhat specific thing as this isn't the only problem I'm running into, but it would be nice to find some answers. Thanks, Matt ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, David H Hickman wrote: This tends to be a religious issue. I guess I am an older admin. :) I come from the school of thought that it is a good idea to reboot a server that is not meant to be used interactivly (console or terminal) on a schedule. Most software does not require it. In my experience, the systems that have some sort of auto reboot, typically run for years without any real maintenance. Most of our servers stay up until there is some need (such as power reconfiguration) to power them down. The time between restarts is usually about a year. The asterisk box is close to half a year now. Asterisk itself has been restarted once since we needed to change a configuration that required a restart to reload. Peter ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk
I wouldn't recommend a reload. More than once I've issued a reload to Asterisk and it just sat there, never actually reloaded. Went into limbo, wouldn't accept any future commands either. Had to kill -9 the process and load it again. Plus certain changes you make, like certain changes to the iax.conf file, don't get loaded when you do a reload. I spent an hour trying to fix a problem, modify the iax, reload asterisk, problem still there. Finally stopped asterisk, started it clean, problem was gone, same exact config. As far as stop now and starting it again. I don't truly see the need. Every once in a while I've had to do it to fix a quality issue or memory problem or something odd. Maybe instead of once a day, once a week. Would probably be good. I may implement this myself. I'd recommend the asterisk -rx stop now /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk method to accomplish your goal. Maybe even a stop now sleep 1 killall -9 asterisk sleep 1 /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk Would take a little longer, but would ensure Asterisk is dead before reloading it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt G Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 5:12 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk Hi All, I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done? I've seen conflicting answers, some people have told me that the only reason for asterisk to be stopped/started daily was for mpg123 causing many childs, which has since been fixed using 'no buffer' or 'nb' appended to the line in musiconhold.conf. Others have told me there is no reason whatsoever to restart/stop it, yet there's instructions on how to do it on the wiki, are these just outdated? Is there any other reason why one would want to stop and restart asterisk daily? (or at any other scheduled time?) On a related note, is asterisk -rx restart now the equivalent of asterisk -rx stop now /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk (or whatever command is used to restart it)?. I have a job cronned on a slackware system to restart it daily using -rx restart now and it creates a new PID, and Process Time, but when I run the same thing on Redhat 9 I get an error saying that it exited on sig 13. I'm sure this is just a redhat specific thing as this isn't the only problem I'm running into, but it would be nice to find some answers. Thanks, Matt ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk
I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done? I've seen conflicting answers, some people have told me that the only reason for asterisk to be stopped/started daily was for mpg123 causing many childs, which has since been fixed using 'no buffer' or 'nb' appended to the line in musiconhold.conf. Others have told me there is no reason whatsoever to restart/stop it, yet there's instructions on how to do it on the wiki, are these just outdated? Is there any other reason why one would want to stop and restart asterisk daily? (or at any other scheduled time?) On a related note, is asterisk -rx restart now the equivalent of asterisk -rx stop now /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk (or whatever command is used to restart it)?. I have a job cronned on a slackware system to restart it daily using -rx restart now and it creates a new PID, and Process Time, but when I run the same thing on Redhat 9 I get an error saying that it exited on sig 13. I'm sure this is just a redhat specific thing as this isn't the only problem I'm running into, but it would be nice to find some answers. The only reason to ever restart any server is if there are problems that have not yet been fixed (such as memory not being released, etc). Obviously some exceptions for MS stuff. Some older Admin's will suggest that systems should be rebooted weekly, etc. That's only needed if there is a problem. The effort should be focused on fixing the root-cause, not rebooting. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk
I can tell you from first hand experience that unless you've got +1000 extensions completely configured, it's not a problem in the slightest. After that, you'll start getting to many files open messages (on a vanilla system install) and the server will go temporarily unresponsive (which can be semi-remedied by modifying your OS's max open files - but even then * had problems). On Oct 18, 2004, at 5:11 PM, Matt G wrote: Hi All, I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done? I've seen conflicting answers, some people have told me that the only reason for asterisk to be stopped/started daily was for mpg123 causing many childs, which has since been fixed using 'no buffer' or 'nb' appended to the line in musiconhold.conf. Others have told me there is no reason whatsoever to restart/stop it, yet there's instructions on how to do it on the wiki, are these just outdated? Is there any other reason why one would want to stop and restart asterisk daily? (or at any other scheduled time?) On a related note, is asterisk -rx restart now the equivalent of asterisk -rx stop now /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk (or whatever command is used to restart it)?. I have a job cronned on a slackware system to restart it daily using -rx restart now and it creates a new PID, and Process Time, but when I run the same thing on Redhat 9 I get an error saying that it exited on sig 13. I'm sure this is just a redhat specific thing as this isn't the only problem I'm running into, but it would be nice to find some answers. Thanks, Matt ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
I'm using * under RH9... When I go into production, I'll probably be changing distros, though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sussman Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 7:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM... Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... BTW, where would I find a useful FM? David -- David J. Sussman, MBA email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web:http://www.processdevelopmentgroup.com phone: 248-212-7293 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
WipeOut wrote: David Sussman wrote: Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM... Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... BTW, where would I find a useful FM? David Works fine on RH9.. I have a basic install guide.. http://members.lycos.co.uk/wipe_out/asterisk/ New page created on the Wiki: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+linux+distributions Please add info on Linux distributions supported, both for Asterisk in general and zaptel device drivers. Also added this question to the FAQ. Thank you! /Olle ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware) drivers and that RH8 is preferred. Do you recall what kind of problem? The only problem I have is an annoying echo that I haven't yet gotten rid of. There is no problem with RH9 and Zaptel drivers at this time. There might have been months ago when v9 first appeared on the scene, but all is well now. Ours have been running fine and stable for months with Zaptel. :) FWIW, each RH version from 7.0 to current has improved the video detection and support drivers (and thus X11 stuff) as have other linux distros. If the Netfinity 4000R can support 800x600 or better resolution, there is a high probability the v9 X11 stuff will work; might take some playing around substituting drivers though. We even have one new $350 Emachine with a Celeron (very cheap) and RH9 working just fine with asterisk, as well as a higher-end Dell 1-ghz laptop. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware) drivers and that RH8 is preferred. Do you recall what kind of problem? The only problem I have is an annoying echo that I haven't yet gotten rid of. the only problems ive had with redhat 9 is the new thread model. it can be solved using: export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.2 (i think) before you start asterisk, i do this in the asterisk init script so i dont forget. duncan ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... yes, asterisk under rh 9.0 works good. I have 3 systems running with that distro. BTW, where would I find a useful FM? http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf and several unofficial websites with a lot of infos... search the ML for them Matteo -- Brancaleoni Matteo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Espia - Emmegi Srl ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
At 05:15 PM 11/1/2003, you wrote: Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM... Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... Asterisk works VERY well under RH9. Be sure to install kernel-sources and keep them up-to-date along with the rest of the system. BTW, where would I find a useful FM? Um, yeah. (1) Search the mailing list archives. (2) Check out http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk. --Ernest ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware) drivers and that RH8 is preferred. Asterisk works VERY well under RH9. Be sure to install kernel-sources and keep them up-to-date along with the rest of the system. Ray Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oneunified.net 704 576 5101 -- Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
There are links to several other Asterisk related sites at the bottom of the page at http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/ On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 18:26, Brancaleoni Matteo wrote: Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... yes, asterisk under rh 9.0 works good. I have 3 systems running with that distro. BTW, where would I find a useful FM? http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf and several unofficial websites with a lot of infos... search the ML for them Matteo -- Sample configs, scripts, more : http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/ BTEL Consulting 504-899-1387 or 850-484-4545 or 877-677-9643 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Quick Question
At 05:03 PM 11/1/2003, you wrote: Netfinity 4000R servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go back to RH7.3... I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware) drivers and that RH8 is preferred. Do you recall what kind of problem? The only problem I have is an annoying echo that I haven't yet gotten rid of. --Ernest ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
