Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-12 Thread Joe Carroll
Any suggestions ?

Available options for the two settings similiar to the one identified are as 
follows:

admin> set send-dnis-type-of-number?
send-dnis-type-of-number:
 Type of Number to be sent in called party IE in the setup message to
 pstn. For ISDN signaling. To be used on egress gateway for VoIP calls.
Enumerated field, values:
 unknown:
 international:
 national:
 network-spec:
 subscriber:
 abbreviated:
 transparent:  Setting this, we can pass TON transparently as received from
 upper layers or in case of VoIP, as received from Near End gateway.

admin> set send-dnis-numbering-plan?
send-dnis-numbering-plan:
 Numbering Plan to be sent in called party IE in the setup message to
 pstn. For ISDN signaling. To be used on egress gateway for VoIP calls.
Enumerated field, values:
 unknown:
 isdn-telephony:
 data:
 telex:
 national:
 private:
 transparent:  Setting this, we can pass NP transparently as received from
 upper layers or in case of VoIP, as received from Near End gateway.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leon Sun [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:00 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

It should work.


Leon Sun
Times Telecom
Tel: 604-279-8787 ext 1586
Fax: 604-278-2793
Mobile: 604-780-2668

Click this button now and leave your phone number. Talk to me for free.
powered by www.clicksaya.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 1:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

We are providing voip services, these 911 calls are going out from our
subscribers to the lec to be delivered to the 911 PSAP..   Would this apply
in that scenario ?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leon Sun
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 3:31 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Joe,

I am not sure if your 911 call is incoming or outgoing on PRIs.
#assume you have a T1 in {1 1 1}

Read t1 { 1 1 1}
Set line send-dnis-type-of-number ?

You will see options. Some 911 providers support media-before-connect. Plz
make sure your all of TNT support 183.

Hope it can help you


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Alex..  would you point us in the right direction, or perhaps consider
sending a sample max tnt config reflecting how this is done?  Thank you..
-Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

I believe the ISDN call plan can be configured as part of the trunk
group / route.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown
instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?
Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611,
911, etc require this special code ???
>
> PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:
>
>
>  <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
> Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
> Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
> Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
> Called_Num  (National) 911
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and
outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that
a carrier would deliver to an end user...
>
>
>
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
>>> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejec

Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-09 Thread Leon Sun
It should work.


Leon Sun 
Times Telecom 
Tel: 604-279-8787 ext 1586 
Fax: 604-278-2793 
Mobile: 604-780-2668

Click this button now and leave your phone number. Talk to me for free.
powered by www.clicksaya.com
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 1:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

We are providing voip services, these 911 calls are going out from our
subscribers to the lec to be delivered to the 911 PSAP..   Would this apply
in that scenario ?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leon Sun
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 3:31 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Joe,

I am not sure if your 911 call is incoming or outgoing on PRIs.
#assume you have a T1 in {1 1 1}

Read t1 { 1 1 1}
Set line send-dnis-type-of-number ?

You will see options. Some 911 providers support media-before-connect. Plz
make sure your all of TNT support 183.

Hope it can help you


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Alex..  would you point us in the right direction, or perhaps consider
sending a sample max tnt config reflecting how this is done?  Thank you..
-Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

I believe the ISDN call plan can be configured as part of the trunk
group / route.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown
instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?
Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611,
911, etc require this special code ???
>
> PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:
>
>
>  <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
> Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
> Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
> Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
> Called_Num  (National) 911
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and
outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that
a carrier would deliver to an end user...
>
>
>
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
>>> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting
the
>> number, not the TNT...
>
> Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
> it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.
>
> This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC
2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87
e24
> St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647
1274
>
>  Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
>  Those who count the vote decide everything.
>-- (Joseph Stalin)
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  

Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-08 Thread Joe Carroll
We are providing voip services, these 911 calls are going out from our 
subscribers to the lec to be delivered to the 911 PSAP..   Would this apply in 
that scenario ?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leon Sun
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 3:31 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Joe,

I am not sure if your 911 call is incoming or outgoing on PRIs.
#assume you have a T1 in {1 1 1}

Read t1 { 1 1 1}
Set line send-dnis-type-of-number ?

You will see options. Some 911 providers support media-before-connect. Plz
make sure your all of TNT support 183.

Hope it can help you


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Alex..  would you point us in the right direction, or perhaps consider
sending a sample max tnt config reflecting how this is done?  Thank you..
-Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

I believe the ISDN call plan can be configured as part of the trunk
group / route.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown
instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?
Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611,
911, etc require this special code ???
>
> PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:
>
>
>  <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
> Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
> Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
> Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
> Called_Num  (National) 911
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and
outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that
a carrier would deliver to an end user...
>
>
>
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
>>> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting
the
>> number, not the TNT...
>
> Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
> it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.
>
> This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC
2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87
e24
> St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647
1274
>
>  Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
>  Those who count the vote decide everything.
>-- (Joseph Stalin)
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678

Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-08 Thread Leon Sun
Joe,

I am not sure if your 911 call is incoming or outgoing on PRIs.
#assume you have a T1 in {1 1 1}

Read t1 { 1 1 1}
Set line send-dnis-type-of-number ?

You will see options. Some 911 providers support media-before-connect. Plz
make sure your all of TNT support 183.

Hope it can help you


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 10:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Alex..  would you point us in the right direction, or perhaps consider
sending a sample max tnt config reflecting how this is done?  Thank you..
-Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

I believe the ISDN call plan can be configured as part of the trunk
group / route.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown
instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?
Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611,
911, etc require this special code ???
>
> PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:
>
>
>  <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
> Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
> Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
> Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
> Called_Num  (National) 911
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and
outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that
a carrier would deliver to an end user...
>
>
>
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
>>> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting
the
>> number, not the TNT...
>
> Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
> it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.
>
> This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC
2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87
e24
> St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647
1274
>
>  Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
>  Those who count the vote decide everything.
>-- (Joseph Stalin)
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To U

Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-08 Thread Joe Carroll
Alex..  would you point us in the right direction, or perhaps consider sending 
a sample max tnt config reflecting how this is done?  Thank you..  -Joe

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

I believe the ISDN call plan can be configured as part of the trunk
group / route.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown 
> instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?  
>  Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611, 
> 911, etc require this special code ???
>
> PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:
>
>
>  <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
> Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
> Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
> Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
> Called_Num  (National) 911
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and 
> outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that a 
> carrier would deliver to an end user...
>
>
>
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
>>> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the
>> number, not the TNT...
>
> Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
> it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.
>
> This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
> St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
>
>  Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
>  Those who count the vote decide everything.
>-- (Joseph Stalin)
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-06 Thread Alex Balashov
I believe the ISDN call plan can be configured as part of the trunk 
group / route.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown 
> instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?  
>  Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611, 
> 911, etc require this special code ???
> 
> PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:
> 
> 
>  <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
> Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
> Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
> Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
> Called_Num  (National) 911
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
> 
> Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and 
> outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that a 
> carrier would deliver to an end user...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
> 
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
>> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
>>> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
>>> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the
>> number, not the TNT...
> 
> Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
> it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.
> 
> This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?
> 
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> --
> Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
> St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
> 
>  Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
>  Those who count the vote decide everything.
>-- (Joseph Stalin)
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-06 Thread Joe Carroll
We talked with the LEC and discovered that 911 has to be sent as Unknown 
instead of National... Anyone know how we might tell the TNT to do this?   
Apparently, according to the carrier, all Special Access Numbers, 411, 611, 
911, etc require this special code ???

PRI DEBUG FOLLOWS:


 <--nt SETUP  CRV=14997 (Orig)   Prot=Q931   12:51:47.260 06-06-08
Bearer_Cap  80 90 A2 (Speech,Rate=64K)
Channel_Id  A1 83 83 (Pref,Intf=0,Chan=3)
Calling_Num (National,Restricted,Failed) 229317
Called_Num  (National) 911

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Carroll
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and 
outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that a 
carrier would deliver to an end user...




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
> > "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>
> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the
> number, not the TNT...

Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.

This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

 Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
 Those who count the vote decide everything.
   -- (Joseph Stalin)

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-05 Thread Joe Carroll
Yes, we are using the max tnt to aggregate several PRIs both inbound and 
outbound from multiple carriers.  This PRI is a normal two way circuit that a 
carrier would deliver to an end user...




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:27 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
> > "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
>
> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the
> number, not the TNT...

Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.

This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

 Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
 Those who count the vote decide everything.
   -- (Joseph Stalin)

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-05 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith (lists) wrote:
> On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
> > "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
> 
> That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the 
> number, not the TNT...

Remember: "9-1-1" is a *dialling pattern*, not a *directory number*;
it's entirely possible that trunks wouldn't accept it directly.

This *is* a *LEC* trunk, right?

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth   Baylink  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

 Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
 Those who count the vote decide everything.
   -- (Joseph Stalin)

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith (lists)
On June 4, 2008 06:20:57 pm Joe Carroll wrote:
> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing
> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"

That really looks like the switch that the TNT is talking to is rejecting the 
number, not the TNT...

-A.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Mik Cheez
Cause 28 indicates "Invalid number format".

Joe Carroll wrote:
> See below, we replaced the area code and prefix of with NPANXX for 
> concerns
> 
> Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing 
> "Called = 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"
> 
> 
> Extension Changed NPANXX7604 new state InUse for Notify User NPANXX7555
> -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Set("SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518", 
> "CALLERID(number)=NPANXX3551") in new stack
> -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Dial("SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518", 
> "SIP/To-TNT/3100911") in new stack
> -- Called To-TNT/3100911
> Really destroying SIP dialog '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Method: NOTIFY
> -- Got SIP response 484 "Address Incomplete" back from 172.16.10.230
>   == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
>   == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518' status is 
> 'CHANUNAVAIL'
> -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Set("SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518", 
> "CDR(userfield)=") in new stack
>  Extension Changed NXX5557604 new state Idle for Notify User NXX5557555
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mik Cheez
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:39 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
> 
> The first place you may want to look is in the SYSLOG of the TNT,
> allowing you to see things such as the ISDN error code along with the
> SIP code.  You can try to catch that on the terminal of the TNT, but it
> may make more sense to pipe your syslogs out to an external box, if you
> aren't doing it already.
> 
> JR's suggestion that it may be a limit of the trunk you're using.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Joe Carroll
See below, we replaced the area code and prefix of with NPANXX for concerns

Interestingly enough, on the syslog messages from the TNT we are seeing "Called 
= 911, Q850 Cause = 28, SIP Response = 484"


Extension Changed NPANXX7604 new state InUse for Notify User NPANXX7555
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Set("SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518", 
"CALLERID(number)=NPANXX3551") in new stack
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Dial("SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518", 
"SIP/To-TNT/3100911") in new stack
-- Called To-TNT/3100911
Really destroying SIP dialog '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Method: NOTIFY
-- Got SIP response 484 "Address Incomplete" back from 172.16.10.230
  == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
  == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518' status is 'CHANUNAVAIL'
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Set("SIP/NPANXX7604-08c46518", 
"CDR(userfield)=") in new stack
 Extension Changed NXX5557604 new state Idle for Notify User NXX5557555

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mik Cheez
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:39 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

The first place you may want to look is in the SYSLOG of the TNT,
allowing you to see things such as the ISDN error code along with the
SIP code.  You can try to catch that on the terminal of the TNT, but it
may make more sense to pipe your syslogs out to an external box, if you
aren't doing it already.

JR's suggestion that it may be a limit of the trunk you're using.



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Mik Cheez
The first place you may want to look is in the SYSLOG of the TNT, 
allowing you to see things such as the ISDN error code along with the 
SIP code.  You can try to catch that on the terminal of the TNT, but it 
may make more sense to pipe your syslogs out to an external box, if you 
aren't doing it already.

JR's suggestion that it may be a limit of the trunk you're using.

Joe Carroll wrote:
> Hi Mik:
> The TNT is at the ip address 172.16.10.230 and the asterisk box is at 
> 172.16.10.240...
> 
> 
> The trunk group is 3100..   so we send 3100911 to the TNT and get the message 
> below..   I couldn't figure it out..any ideas ??
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mik Cheez
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:03 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??
> 
> Without knowing more about how you have your TNT set up, typically you'd
> configure your outbound T1's to a specific trunkgroup and prepend that
> trunkgroup number to the phonenumber.
> 
> Should it be assumed that 172.16.10.230 is the address of the TNT?
> 
> Mik
> 
> Joe Carroll wrote:
>> Quick question for the folks using MAX TNTs for aggregators..
>>
>>
>>
>> When I send a call out the MAX I get the following
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Got SIP response 484 "Address Incomplete" back from 172.16.10.230
>>
>>
>>
>> Any ideas on how to make 911 appear as a ten digit number to the device
>> so that it will pass the number out to the PSTN ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT ??

2008-06-04 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
On 6/3/08, Joe Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Quick question for the folks using MAX TNTs for aggregators..
>
>
>
> When I send a call out the MAX I get the following….
>
>
>
> -- Got SIP response 484 "Address Incomplete" back from 172.16.10.230
>
>
>
> Any ideas on how to make 911 appear as a ten digit number to the device so
> that it will pass the number out to the PSTN ?
>

I've never used a TNT before but what does your dial pattern matching look like?

If you were using Asterisk, your match would probably look like this:

_NXXNXX

"911" would match NXX but not the remaining digits, hence the 484
Address Incomplete.  I bet your TNT is doing something similar

However:
_NXXNXX
_911

Would work just fine (in Asterisk).  You need to figure out how to do
something similar on your TNT.

-- 
Kristian Kielhofner
NOT sent from my iPhone or Blackberry

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 911 via MAX TNT

2008-06-04 Thread JR Richardson
> When I send a call out the MAX I get the following
> 
> -- Got SIP response 484 "Address Incomplete" back from 172.16.10.230
> 
> Any ideas on how to make 911 appear as a ten digit number to the device so
> that it will pass the number out to the PSTN ?

This is not a max tnt problem, the tnt will pass anything you send to it,
911/411/7 digit/10digit/011 international, the question is, does your PSTN
provider accept 911 call on the trunk your passing the call to?

JR


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users