Re: [asterisk-users] IF else

2008-11-19 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, michel freiha wrote:

 Hi all,

 I have the following context in extensions.conf:

 [a2billing]
 exten = _X.,1,Gotoif($[${EXTEN} = 111] ? 21)
 exten = _X.,2,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
 exten = _X.,3,Wait,2
 exten = _X.,4,Hangup
 exten = _X.,21,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _X.,22,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,23,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _X.,24,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,25,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _X.,26,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,27,Hangup

 If the customer dial 111, it'll be router to the entry with priority 21,
 else it'll go to priority 2...I would like to add a third condition that if
 the user dial let's say 112 it'll go to the priority 28 let's say

1. Stop using numbers.
2. Start using labels.
3. Add comments.

exten = _X.,1,Gotoif($[${EXTEN} = 111]?exten111)
exten = _X.,n,Gotoif($[${EXTEN} = 112]?exten112)

exten = _X.,n,Noop(Didn't dial 111 or 112)
exten = _X.,n,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
exten = _X.,n,Wait,2
exten = _X.,n,Hangup

exten = _X.,n(exten111),Noop(Dialled 111)
exten = _X.,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
exten = _X.,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
exten = _X.,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
exten = _X.,n,Hangup

exten = _X.,n(exten112),Noop(Dialed 112)
exten = _X.,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
exten = _X.,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
exten = _X.,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
exten = _X.,n,Hangup


Gordon


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IF else

2008-11-19 Thread Atis Lezdins
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Gordon Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, michel freiha wrote:

 Hi all,

 I have the following context in extensions.conf:

 [a2billing]
 exten = _X.,1,Gotoif($[${EXTEN} = 111] ? 21)
 exten = _X.,2,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
 exten = _X.,3,Wait,2
 exten = _X.,4,Hangup
 exten = _X.,21,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _X.,22,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,23,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _X.,24,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,25,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _X.,26,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,27,Hangup

 If the customer dial 111, it'll be router to the entry with priority 21,
 else it'll go to priority 2...I would like to add a third condition that if
 the user dial let's say 112 it'll go to the priority 28 let's say

 1. Stop using numbers.
 2. Start using labels.
 3. Add comments.

 exten = _X.,1,Gotoif($[${EXTEN} = 111]?exten111)
 exten = _X.,n,Gotoif($[${EXTEN} = 112]?exten112)

 exten = _X.,n,Noop(Didn't dial 111 or 112)
 exten = _X.,n,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
 exten = _X.,n,Wait,2
 exten = _X.,n,Hangup

 exten = _X.,n(exten111),Noop(Dialled 111)
 exten = _X.,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,n,Hangup

 exten = _X.,n(exten112),Noop(Dialed 112)
 exten = _X.,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _X.,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _X.,n,Hangup


1) Start using AEL (remove this context from extensions.conf and add
to extensions.ael):

context a2billing {
  _X. = {
if(${EXTEN}=111) {
  Playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
  Wait(2);
  Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
  Wait(2);
  Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
  Wait(2);
  Hangup();
} else if(${EXTEN}=112) {
  Playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
  Wait(2);
  Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
  Wait(2);
  Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
  Wait(2);
  Hangup();
} else {
  DeadAGI(a2billing.php);
  Wait(2)
  Hangup();
}
}

2) Start using extension masks (also works with AEL):

[a2billing]
exten = _111,1,Noop(Dialled 111)
exten = _111,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
exten = _111,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
exten = _111,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
exten = _111,n,Hangup

exten = _112,1,Noop(Dialed 112)
exten = _112,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
exten = _112,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
exten = _112,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
exten = _112,n,Hangup

exten = _X.,1,Noop(Didn't dial 111 or 112)
exten = _X.,n,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
exten = _X.,n,Wait,2
exten = _X.,n,Hangup


Regards,
Atis

-- 
Atis Lezdins,
VoIP Project Manager / Developer,
IQ Labs Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: atis.lezdins
Cell Phone: +371 28806004
Cell Phone: +1 800 7300689
Work phone: +1 800 7502835

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IF else

2008-11-19 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Atis Lezdins wrote:

 1) Start using AEL (remove this context from extensions.conf and add
 to extensions.ael):

 context a2billing {
  _X. = {
if(${EXTEN}=111) {
  Playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
  Wait(2);
  Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
  Wait(2);
  Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
  Wait(2);
  Hangup();
} else if(${EXTEN}=112) {
  Playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
  Wait(2);
  Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
  Wait(2);
  Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
  Wait(2);
  Hangup();
} else {
  DeadAGI(a2billing.php);
  Wait(2)
  Hangup();
}
 }

You're missing a couple of semi-colons.

 2) Start using extension masks (also works with AEL):

 [a2billing]
 exten = _111,1,Noop(Dialled 111)
 exten = _111,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _111,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _111,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _111,n,Hangup

 exten = _112,1,Noop(Dialed 112)
 exten = _112,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _112,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _112,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _112,n,Hangup

 exten = _X.,1,Noop(Didn't dial 111 or 112)
 exten = _X.,n,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
 exten = _X.,n,Wait,2
 exten = _X.,n,Hangup

And, just in case the 2 extensions really are supposed to do the exact 
same thing, use extension pattern matching:

context a2billing
 {
 _11[12] =
 {
 playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
 wait(2);
 record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
 wait(2);
 playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
 wait(2);
 hangup();
 };
 _x. =
 {
 deadagi(a2billing.php);
 wait(2);
 hangup();
 };
 };

(The above is my first attempt at AEL. It parses, but it hasn't actually 
been tested.)

I would question the use of deadagi() in a non-h extension. Are signals 
not being trapped correctly in a2billing.php?

Thanks in advance,

Steve Edwards  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IF else

2008-11-19 Thread Atis Lezdins
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Steve Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Atis Lezdins wrote:

 1) Start using AEL (remove this context from extensions.conf and add
 to extensions.ael):

 context a2billing {
  _X. = {
if(${EXTEN}=111) {
  Playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
  Wait(2);
  Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
  Wait(2);
  Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
  Wait(2);
  Hangup();
} else if(${EXTEN}=112) {
  Playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
  Wait(2);
  Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
  Wait(2);
  Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
  Wait(2);
  Hangup();
} else {
  DeadAGI(a2billing.php);
  Wait(2)
  Hangup();
}
 }

 You're missing a couple of semi-colons.

Sorry, that was untested proof of options :)


 2) Start using extension masks (also works with AEL):

 [a2billing]
 exten = _111,1,Noop(Dialled 111)
 exten = _111,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _111,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _111,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _111,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _111,n,Hangup

 exten = _112,1,Noop(Dialed 112)
 exten = _112,n,Playback(AR_GetGiveToID)
 exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _112,n,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5)
 exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _112,n,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
 exten = _112,n,Wait(2)
 exten = _112,n,Hangup

 exten = _X.,1,Noop(Didn't dial 111 or 112)
 exten = _X.,n,DeadAGI,a2billing.php
 exten = _X.,n,Wait,2
 exten = _X.,n,Hangup

 And, just in case the 2 extensions really are supposed to do the exact
 same thing, use extension pattern matching:

 context a2billing
 {
 _11[12] =
 {
 playback(AR_GetGiveToID);
 wait(2);
 record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:ulaw,,5);
 wait(2);
 playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording);
 wait(2);
 hangup();
 };
 _x. =
 {
 deadagi(a2billing.php);
 wait(2);
 hangup();
 };
 };

 (The above is my first attempt at AEL. It parses, but it hasn't actually
 been tested.)

 I would question the use of deadagi() in a non-h extension. Are signals
 not being trapped correctly in a2billing.php?


AFAIK that's how a2billing is built, it's intentionally DeadAGI on
live channel. Ugly hack that gives warnings all the time in logs, but
it works and seems to provide correct billing info :)

Regards,
Atis

-- 
Atis Lezdins,
VoIP Project Manager / Developer,
IQ Labs Inc,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: atis.lezdins
Cell Phone: +371 28806004
Cell Phone: +1 800 7300689
Work phone: +1 800 7502835

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone else having problems with the list

2007-09-25 Thread Carlos Hernandez
Yes for me.

Carlos

--

Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
 I have sent a few emails over the past couple of days that simply have 
 not arrived on the list (or so it seems).

 Is anyone else encountering this ?

 Julian

___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone else having problems with the list

2007-09-25 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 22:43, Tue 25 Sep 07, Carlos Hernandez wrote:
 Yes for me.
 
 Carlos
 
 --
 
 Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
  I have sent a few emails over the past couple of days that simply have 
  not arrived on the list (or so it seems).
 
  Is anyone else encountering this ?
 
  Julian

I have similar problems.
Some mails arrive, some dont. If I check the listarchive on
the web I see more emails then in mutt.
I already disabled greylisting etc and browsed thru the spam
quarantine but nothing.
-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?


___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone else having problems with the list

2007-09-25 Thread Guenther Sohler
me too :)

 Original-Nachricht 
 Datum: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:57:25 +0200
 Von: Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 An: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone else having problems with the list

 On 22:43, Tue 25 Sep 07, Carlos Hernandez wrote:
  Yes for me.
  
  Carlos
  
  --
  
  Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
   I have sent a few emails over the past couple of days that simply have
   not arrived on the list (or so it seems).
  
   Is anyone else encountering this ?
  
   Julian
 
 I have similar problems.
 Some mails arrive, some dont. If I check the listarchive on
 the web I see more emails then in mutt.
 I already disabled greylisting etc and browsed thru the spam
 quarantine but nothing.
 -- 
 
 Michiel van Baak
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
 GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD
 
 Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?
 
 
 ___
 
 Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th. 
 http://www.astricon.net/ 
 
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS.
Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail

___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Anyone else having problems with the list

2007-09-25 Thread Jared Smith
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:14 +0100, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
 I have sent a few emails over the past couple of days that simply have 
 not arrived on the list (or so it seems).

I'll take a look at this again... I thought we had most of the problems
with the mailing lists fixed, but we seem to be having some problems
again.  (This is most likely our spam-catching system being
over-aggressive, but I'll look into it.)


-- 
Jared Smith
Community Relations Manager
Digium, Inc.


___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-03 Thread JD
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
I am curious though about a companies competence when they have a
production system and it takes a week of multiple outages to chnage
something.  You would think any professional company would have a test
and development network seperate from the production one where they can
*anounce* and schedule downtime for infrastructure changes.  

 

Those were my exact thoughts.  Had I received a warning, I might have 
been able to do something about it.. like set call forwarding to go to 
my cell phone until they worked out their kinks.  Unprofessional in my view.
A response to their email, even an auto responder noting an outage in 
some area would keep me from getting so hot under the collar. 

All in all though my only complaint with broadvoice is that their tech
support knows very little on average even about broadvoice specific
things, like their rate plans and what is actually included with each
package (ie which exchanges are within which subpackage for a given
country).  To bil this information has to exist somewhere, you would
think that on a corporate level they would make this information more
available like vonage does, but I can live without that.
 

They do have enough information for most on their web site.  The account 
portal seems put together enough.

JD
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread JD Austin

Andre Normandin wrote:
Hello,
About 4PM EDT I noticed that my broadvoice service cannot register..
Anyone else having problems with their broadvoice service?
FYI: I connect to the 147.135.20.128 (nyc) proxy... 

Thanks,
 - Andre
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

I'm down too.
BROADVOICE do you watch this list?
This is twice in seven days that you've had an outage.
JD
--
JD Austin
Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.twingeckos.com
phone/fax: 480.422.1250 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread JD Austin



I'm down too.
BROADVOICE do you watch this list?
This is twice in seven days that you've had an outage.
JD
My connection is back up.  Maybe they DO read this list :)
--
JD Austin
Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.twingeckos.com
phone/fax: 480.422.1250 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
Its like they are rebooting their sip proxies, my sip connection has
been up/down all day, when it starts to come back it returns a 404 and
then finally registers.  I think this is related to the upgrades they
have been doing for about a week now, which I also believe are related
to the FCC ruling that VoIP providers in the US who connect to the PSTN
provide CALEA (wiretap) support or be fined.


On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 16:00 -0700, JD Austin wrote:
 
 Andre Normandin wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 About 4PM EDT I noticed that my broadvoice service cannot register..
 
 Anyone else having problems with their broadvoice service?
 
 FYI: I connect to the 147.135.20.128 (nyc) proxy... 
 
 Thanks,
   - Andre

 I'm down too.
 
 BROADVOICE do you watch this list?
 This is twice in seven days that you've had an outage.
 
 JD
 
-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Chris Coulthurst
Probably a coincidence, but Teliax has been very choppy audio today.
Most of my callers from 1 to 4 pm were Mr. Roboto.  Please let it NOT be
a trend...

Chris Coulthurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
|Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 5:18 PM
|To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
|Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?
|
|yes
|
|from sometime after 4 to around 5:30 pm.
|
|jerry
|
|___
|Asterisk-Users mailing list
|Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Joseph Gutowski
I haven't lost my registration, but calls from Verizon, Nextel, and
Sprint cell phones to my BV number (which worked in the past) are now
getting a This call cannot be completed as dialed, please check the
number and try again message.

Calls from landlines seem to work fine, and my Rogers phone which is
currently roaming on Cingular connects fine.

Normally I would think that it was a routing issue (like people had
with certain exchanges and Cingular in the past), but between three
carriers from phones that have used this number daily for the past 2
months or so?

Anyone else have this happen? I called BV support and they said they
must be dialing the number wrong and didn't want to do anything even
after I explained how that is not the case.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Brian Watters
BroadVoice is once again having issues .. There tech support is also
reporting issues with no ETR so they don't even know what's wrong .. Inbound
calls are hit and miss ... Outbound calls are DOA.

BRW
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph
Gutowski
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:28 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

I haven't lost my registration, but calls from Verizon, Nextel, and Sprint
cell phones to my BV number (which worked in the past) are now getting a
This call cannot be completed as dialed, please check the number and try
again message.

Calls from landlines seem to work fine, and my Rogers phone which is
currently roaming on Cingular connects fine.

Normally I would think that it was a routing issue (like people had with
certain exchanges and Cingular in the past), but between three carriers from
phones that have used this number daily for the past 2 months or so?

Anyone else have this happen? I called BV support and they said they must
be dialing the number wrong and didn't want to do anything even after I
explained how that is not the case.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Andre Normandin
Mine seemed to have come back somewhere between 5:30 and 6...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:18 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?


yes

from sometime after 4 to around 5:30 pm.

jerry

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Mark Musone
Don't say that! i just moved from broadvoice to teliax!!!



On 5/2/05, Andre Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mine seemed to have come back somewhere between 5:30 and 6...
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Geis
 Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:18 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?
 
 yes
 
 from sometime after 4 to around 5:30 pm.
 
 jerry
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Luki
Must be number dependent -- out of 12 numbers on one server, 2 regs
failed (404 not found) for about 15 minutes around 4:30pm PST, but are
fine since. Other numbers remained unaffected and work find incoming
and outgoing... BTW, all numbers have the same area code and exchange.
Interesting...

--Luki
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Derek Whitten
Boy.. with all this discussion about broadvoice lately, makes me
appreciate my nufone account..   

:-)



On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 19:46, Andre Normandin wrote:
 Mine seemed to have come back somewhere between 5:30 and 6...
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Geis
 Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:18 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?
 
 
 yes
 
 from sometime after 4 to around 5:30 pm.
 
 jerry
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Derek Whitten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kFuQ Productions


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Chris Coulthurst
I've only had teliax for about 2 weeks or so, and was impressed at
first, but their complete LACK of customer support is truly sad.  I
think it's a one-man operation and he has a second job or something.
Never a callback until a threatening email, and maybe a few hours in the
morning is all Ive seen someone on the 'java chat' tech window.  I'm
already looking for a replacement.  

(I wonder how broadvoice is? LOL)


Chris Coulthurst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Musone
|Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:12 PM
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues
today?
|
|Don't say that! i just moved from broadvoice to teliax!!!
|
|
|
|On 5/2/05, Andre Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Mine seemed to have come back somewhere between 5:30 and 6...
|
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry
Geis
| Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:18 PM
| To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
| Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?
|
| yes
|
| from sometime after 4 to around 5:30 pm.
|
| jerry
|
| ___
| Asterisk-Users mailing list
| Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
| ___
| Asterisk-Users mailing list
| Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|___
|Asterisk-Users mailing list
|Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Luki
 I wonder how broadvoice is? LOL
Quite frankly, they still are on my personal recommended list. Last
week's downtime (those few hours when nothing worked, remember?) was
the first outage this year for me. And yes, I'm using those accounts
actively, each has easily 10-15 calls a day. I don't call today an
outage since 10 out of 12 numbers worked for me, and those two only
has issues for 15 minutes. Stuff happens; I guess they are
implementing the required wire-tapping and/or 911 stuff... or
whatever.

--Luki
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 21:39 -0700, Luki wrote:
 has issues for 15 minutes. Stuff happens; I guess they are
 implementing the required wire-tapping and/or 911 stuff... or
 whatever.

I think its fair to say they are doing something :)

I also have few problems with them in general, just stuff happened
recently, and while for some things, temporary outages arent that big of
a deal, for many telephone stuff is more critical to their business or
whatever.  VoIP in general is new, and the legislation for US based (or
those that operate there) companies is changing which is going to force
them to make infrastructure changes.  Depending on how it was originally
set up it depends on how severe that is.  

I am curious though about a companies competence when they have a
production system and it takes a week of multiple outages to chnage
something.  You would think any professional company would have a test
and development network seperate from the production one where they can
*anounce* and schedule downtime for infrastructure changes.  

All in all though my only complaint with broadvoice is that their tech
support knows very little on average even about broadvoice specific
things, like their rate plans and what is actually included with each
package (ie which exchanges are within which subpackage for a given
country).  To bil this information has to exist somewhere, you would
think that on a corporate level they would make this information more
available like vonage does, but I can live without that.


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread Tim Connolly
No.. but...
In their defense though, Cisco sold us a million dollars in routers
taunting they could handle the load. 6 months later we were trading them in
for Junipers because they were only able to handle the load as long as it
was low in packet per second count. Sometime they just don't have a way to
real world test this stuff without throwing it into the wind to see if it
flies.
I do have two big complaints about Broadvoice. I keep getting billed
for calls that they claim are free calls on their website. I even
implemented their suggested dial plan for Asterisk. Second complaint is that
I can only register with one proxy at a time. Why shouldn't I be able to
register with all three? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of trixter
http://www.0xdecafbad.com
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:59 PM
To: Luki; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 21:39 -0700, Luki wrote:
 has issues for 15 minutes. Stuff happens; I guess they are
 implementing the required wire-tapping and/or 911 stuff... or
 whatever.

I think its fair to say they are doing something :)

I also have few problems with them in general, just stuff happened
recently, and while for some things, temporary outages arent that big of
a deal, for many telephone stuff is more critical to their business or
whatever.  VoIP in general is new, and the legislation for US based (or
those that operate there) companies is changing which is going to force
them to make infrastructure changes.  Depending on how it was originally
set up it depends on how severe that is.  

I am curious though about a companies competence when they have a
production system and it takes a week of multiple outages to chnage
something.  You would think any professional company would have a test
and development network seperate from the production one where they can
*anounce* and schedule downtime for infrastructure changes.  

All in all though my only complaint with broadvoice is that their tech
support knows very little on average even about broadvoice specific
things, like their rate plans and what is actually included with each
package (ie which exchanges are within which subpackage for a given
country).  To bil this information has to exist somewhere, you would
think that on a corporate level they would make this information more
available like vonage does, but I can live without that.


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice issues today?

2005-05-02 Thread trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 00:09 -0500, Tim Connolly wrote:
 No.. but...
   In their defense though, Cisco sold us a million dollars in routers
 taunting they could handle the load. 6 months later we were trading them in
 for Junipers because they were only able to handle the load as long as it
 was low in packet per second count. Sometime they just don't have a way to
 real world test this stuff without throwing it into the wind to see if it
 flies.

Yes, I can see that, I dont know if that is the case or if its
configuration changes.  Either way they should anounce that they are
upgrading if that is what they are doing.  Given the short duration of
the outages and their frequency over time I would expect that is what
they are doing and its not failing equipment.



   I do have two big complaints about Broadvoice. I keep getting billed
 for calls that they claim are free calls on their website. I even
 implemented their suggested dial plan for Asterisk. Second complaint is that
 I can only register with one proxy at a time. Why shouldn't I be able to
 register with all three? 
 
dont forget about proxy.nyc.broadvoice.com which is more hidden..
proxy.lab.broadvoice.com I think its testing but who knows, broadvoice
is alledgly lowell ma based (about 1 hour outside boston) and lab is
near there based on traceroute.


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else tried Speex 1.1 CVS?

2005-01-03 Thread Steve Kann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I built the CVS version of the Speex library - v1.2 it calls itself.
Asterisk seg faults trying to use codec_speex.so.
I'll have a look to try to fix it, but thought I'd just ask if anyone else 
knows what needs to be done?

 

Hmm, should be OK if you're using the latest speex.  There was an 
interim period where the API changed, such that speex_(encode|decode) 
was changed to take use int instead of float, but later, the int api was 
changed to use speex_(encode|decode)_int instead..

-SteveK
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else seeing this?

2004-10-20 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Brian,
I haven't reported this yet, as I don't have an overall picture of what 
is happening, but

A couple of weeks ago I had several machine lockups on the same day 
while testing MFC/R2 with a tor2. It hasn't happened any more here. I 
have no idea why it suddenly started or stopped. However, now people are 
starting to deploy R2, I have reports of occasional lockups with tor2 
cards. I have no idea if these lockups have the same cause as mine.

Regards,
Steve
Brian West wrote:
Anything after these versions:
zaptel.c version 1.95 (known working)
chan_zap.c version 1.357 (known working)
with a tor2 card... causes kernel panic... 

Can anyone else confirm this?  I honestly think it's a combo issue with the
new zap reload and that zaptel change.  But I have spent hours trying to
narrow it down to those two files and those changes.
Has anyone else seen strange issues when using PRI?
If we have zaptel.c 1.95 and latest chan_zap.c you can place and take calls
but if you do something like show channels at the CLI you'll deadlock the
box.  I have no thread apply all bt since the glibc on this box didn't have
debug compiled in on it. (will retry this tomorrow)
If you have the latest zaptel.c and the latest chan_zap.c placing any call
out/in the zap interface will cause a kernel panic and kill the box. 

Use the above listed known working files and you have no problems.  

I would open a bug report but I would like to find more information before
doing so.
Thanks,
Brian
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else tried Speex 1.1 CVS?

2004-10-17 Thread Patrick
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I built the CVS version of the Speex library - v1.2 it calls itself.
 Asterisk seg faults trying to use codec_speex.so.
 I'll have a look to try to fix it, but thought I'd just ask if anyone else 
 knows what needs to be done?
 
Use version 1.0.4. Works on my box (v1-0).

Regards,
Patrick

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice Problems?

2004-07-22 Thread Andres

Could this possibly indicate a problem with asterisk where the first
address resolved from sip.broadvoice.com isn't functioning correctly,
and asterisk doesn't try the alternate address? This isn't a scientific
analysis...just proposing an ideaI don't know enough about the
internals to make a statement like this, I'm hoping that someone out
there can provide more intelligent analysis of this!
 

Asterisk does no do DNS queries every time it tries to send a call to another 
provider.  It only does so on startup/reload.  So it will only pickup the first 
address resolved.  If it is down (like in your case) then your screwed.  Might be 
worthwile to put in a BUG report to get a better funcionality here.  Like for example 
if the remote host does not answer then redo the DNS query...
Andres
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice Problems?

2004-07-22 Thread Gregory Youngblood
 Could this possibly indicate a problem with asterisk where the first 
 address resolved from sip.broadvoice.com isn't functioning 
 correctly, 
 and asterisk doesn't try the alternate address? This isn't a 
 scientific 
 analysis...just proposing an ideaI don't know enough about the 
 internals to make a statement like this, I'm hoping that someone out 
 there can provide more intelligent analysis of this!
 
 Asterisk does no do DNS queries every time it tries to send a 
 call to another provider.  It only does so on startup/reload. 
  So it will only pickup the first address resolved.  If it is 
 down (like in your case) then your screwed.  Might be 
 worthwile to put in a BUG report to get a better funcionality 
 here.  Like for example if the remote host does not answer 
 then redo the DNS query...

Instead of doing another DNS query, sip.broadvoice.com is returning more
than one IP address, simply keep all of the addresses returned from that
initial DNS query, and if a call fails on one, just try the others already
in memory. I suppose, if all of those failed, performing another DNS query
to see if there are new entries to try would make scenarios where one IP
address fails less likely to impact service. The system would have a little
more internal redundancy, allowing it to gracefully handle failover to other
addresses, making recovery from similar external failures more automated and
requiring less manual intervention to restore service. Almost always a good
thing for a telco system. From my experience, it isn't that unusual for
multiple IP addresses to be provided for VoIP services, or for one of the IP
addresses to be down from time to time for maintenance purposes.

As I mentioned in a previous message, I'm just getting started with
Asterisk. Perhaps something like this is already happening, though it
doesn't sound like it based on what I've been reading in this thread.

Greg

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice Problems?

2004-07-21 Thread Arthur D'Alessandro III
I have also been having problems today registering...  I contacted them, but
they have no known issues.   It finally did register on it's own.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Normandin
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:44 PM
To: Asterisk-Users
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice Problems?

Suddenly my broadvoice will no longer register. It was working fine for over
1 month without a single problem, now I get a SIP registration timed out
message.

I called them, and I was told that they are experiencing problems, and they
hoped to have it resolved ASAP.

I called them at around 10 AM EST this morning. It's now 8:30 EST PM, and I
still have not heard back, and the problem is not resolved.

Is anyone else having problems with their broadvoice account?



 - Andre

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else having Broadvoice Problems?

2004-07-21 Thread Marty Mastera
 
 I have also been having problems today registering...  I contacted
them,
 but
 they have no known issues.   It finally did register on it's own.
 

For those having trouble with BV, try this for a test: in sip.conf,
replace occurrences of sip.broadvoice.com with this IP: 147.135.0.129,
explanation follows...

I just got off the phone with BV support who said they are having some
hardware issues on the west coast which should be fixed sometime in the
morning on Thursday.

Interestingly, he said that despite this problem there are hundreds of
asterisk users currently registering without any problems.  They
suggested that maybe some users are specifying IP addresses instead of
FQDNs in their sip.conf, foiling BV's failover capabilities.  I *do*
use a FQDN and still have no outbound calling working (inbound seems to
work - albeit intermittently).

In my testing, I noticed that a DNS query on sip.broadvoice.com returns
two addresses: 147.135.8.129 and 147.135.0.129, with the .8.129 address
being returned more often than the other...if I replace references to
sip.broadvoice.com in sip.conf with the second address (147.135.0.129)
my outbound calling starts working again.

Could this possibly indicate a problem with asterisk where the first
address resolved from sip.broadvoice.com isn't functioning correctly,
and asterisk doesn't try the alternate address? This isn't a scientific
analysis...just proposing an ideaI don't know enough about the
internals to make a statement like this, I'm hoping that someone out
there can provide more intelligent analysis of this!


This also makes me wonder if the hundreds of other asterisk users who
are registering correctly despite the hardware problem *are* using IP
addresses instead of sip.broadvoice.com and just happen to have used the
IP that is still working?

Marty

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-07 Thread d . redmore
Why compress all your prompts to .gsm files?  Isn't * going to have to 
reformat them anyway based on the codec being used for the call?  I have all 
my voice prompts as 8khz/16bit .wav files (* can't seem to play back 8 bit 
files).  I recorded them through soundforge as a 48Khz/16bit mono .wav - did a 
little tweaking to compress and brighten them up - then resampled to 8khz.  
Quality is as good as any I've heard from any commercial PBX...  It is 
important to me, if I'm going to use * for my business, that the voice prompts 
sound as clean and clear as any other system - from a marketing/PR standpoint.




Dave Redmore
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Shaun Ewing

- Original Message - 
From: Brian Capouch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:21 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?


 I am using Audacity to record some voice prompts.

 The .wav files I'm producing are of stellar quality.  However, once I
 turn them into .gsm, they sound buzzy and muffled.

 I know that some of this comes with the territory, but I wonder if there
 is anyone out there who does this routinely, and who can advise me as to
 the MO I could use that results in the highest quality in the resulting
 playback files.

 Thanks.

 B.

What are you using to convert the wav files to gsm? I've been using 'sox'
under Linux and have had no quality issues whatsoever.

An example line to convert:

sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm

-Shaun

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Brian Capouch
Shaun Ewing wrote:
I know that some of this comes with the territory, but I wonder if there
is anyone out there who does this ( wav - gsm) routinely, and who can advise me as to
the MO I could use that results in the highest quality in the resulting
playback files.
What are you using to convert the wav files to gsm? I've been using 'sox'
under Linux and have had no quality issues whatsoever.
An example line to convert:

sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm

That's the exact command I'm using, but it sure does sound crappy to my 
ears.

Perhaps that's the best I can do w/gsm, and of course I expect once the 
sound is sent through the PSTN most of the highs and bottom are gone 
anyways.

I was just hoping there was something I could do to make the resulting 
files a bit clearer.

Thx.

B.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Michael T Farnworth
I have had been recording my gsm files by getting through to the Asterisk
answering service using a GrandStream BudgeTone 102 phone.  I then copy
the file which is stored in voicemail and use sox to increase the volume.  
Results are okay but nothing to write home about particularly (or maybe 
that is just my lack of a good telephone voice).

Michael

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Brian Capouch wrote:

 Shaun Ewing wrote:
 
 I know that some of this comes with the territory, but I wonder if
 there is anyone out there who does this ( wav - gsm) routinely, and
 who can advise me as to the MO I could use that results in the highest
 quality in the resulting playback files.
  
  What are you using to convert the wav files to gsm? I've been using 'sox'
  under Linux and have had no quality issues whatsoever.
  
  An example line to convert:
  
  sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm
  
 
 That's the exact command I'm using, but it sure does sound crappy to my 
 ears.
 
 Perhaps that's the best I can do w/gsm, and of course I expect once the 
 sound is sent through the PSTN most of the highs and bottom are gone 
 anyways.
 
 I was just hoping there was something I could do to make the resulting 
 files a bit clearer.
 
 Thx.
 
 B.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread wasim
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Brian Capouch wrote:

 I was just hoping there was something I could do to make the resulting 
 files a bit clearer.

put them through baudline and see what's happening
also you might wanna try bandpass filter using ecasound

- wasim
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Alastair Maw
On 06/10/03 08:25, Shaun Ewing wrote:

The .wav files I'm producing are of stellar quality.  However, once I
turn them into .gsm, they sound buzzy and muffled.

An example line to convert:

sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm
It'll sound much better if you go:

sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm resample

Of course, there's only so much you can do to make 8kHz prompts sound 
any good. Doing the original recording at 8kHz is a good start.

--
Alastair Maw
System Analyst @ MX Telcom
www.mxtelecom.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Brad Waite
Why, oh why, do we have to be limited to 8kHz prompts in the first place?

Alastair Maw wrote:

On 06/10/03 08:25, Shaun Ewing wrote:

The .wav files I'm producing are of stellar quality.  However, once I
turn them into .gsm, they sound buzzy and muffled.


An example line to convert:

sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm


It'll sound much better if you go:

sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm resample

Of course, there's only so much you can do to make 8kHz prompts sound 
any good. Doing the original recording at 8kHz is a good start.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 11:08, Brad Waite wrote:
 Why, oh why, do we have to be limited to 8kHz prompts in the first
 place?

Because that is what telephony is based on. 8khz by 8 bit if on a
digital link and 7 bit if in RBS signaling.

Why are you so worried about that amount of degradation when you can't
control how much makeup and other crap is sitting in the speaker holes
on the other side deadening the sound. Then there is the weather related
noise introduced in old analog links, and then there is the whole analog
loop. If the sound quality is of such a big issue with you, go to
something other than a telephony app to use.

 Alastair Maw wrote:
 
  On 06/10/03 08:25, Shaun Ewing wrote:
  
  The .wav files I'm producing are of stellar quality.  However, once I
  turn them into .gsm, they sound buzzy and muffled.
  
  
  An example line to convert:
 
  sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm
  
  
  It'll sound much better if you go:
  
  sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm resample
  
  Of course, there's only so much you can do to make 8kHz prompts sound 
  any good. Doing the original recording at 8kHz is a good start.
  
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Stuart Mackintosh
I have had to work on some files recently with a similar problem.

It seems that when a file is recorded in 16 bit and converted to 8 bit,
the clarity is lost. 
I have found the following ways the most productive:

1)Record through the voicemail system then import and edit them
afterwards. As long as you use a good quality channel, this operates
well.

2) Use sox with -t oss /dev/dsp as the input and a gsm file as the
output. -r 8000 for the sample rate and -b for 8 bit.



On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:08, Brad Waite wrote:
 Why, oh why, do we have to be limited to 8kHz prompts in the first place?
 
 Alastair Maw wrote:
 
  On 06/10/03 08:25, Shaun Ewing wrote:
  
  The .wav files I'm producing are of stellar quality.  However, once I
  turn them into .gsm, they sound buzzy and muffled.
  
  
  An example line to convert:
 
  sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm
  
  

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?

2003-10-06 Thread Joe Dennick
And then use standard Unix commands to move that recording to where you
want it like /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/new-recording.gsm so you can then
call it from your menus or prompts.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone else use Audacity for prompts?


Why do stuff the hard way?

; used to record prompts
exten = 205,1,Wait(2)
exten = 205,2,Record(/tmp/asterisk-recording:gsm)
exten = 205,3,Wait(2)
exten = 205,4,Playback(/tmp/asterisk-recording)
exten = 205,5,Wait(2)
exten = 205,6,Hangup



On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Stuart Mackintosh wrote:

 I have had to work on some files recently with a similar problem.

 It seems that when a file is recorded in 16 bit and converted to 8 
 bit, the clarity is lost. I have found the following ways the most 
 productive:

 1)Record through the voicemail system then import and edit them 
 afterwards. As long as you use a good quality channel, this operates 
 well.

 2) Use sox with -t oss /dev/dsp as the input and a gsm file as the 
 output. -r 8000 for the sample rate and -b for 8 bit.



 On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:08, Brad Waite wrote:
  Why, oh why, do we have to be limited to 8kHz prompts in the first 
  place?
 
  Alastair Maw wrote:
 
   On 06/10/03 08:25, Shaun Ewing wrote:
  
   The .wav files I'm producing are of stellar quality.  However, 
   once I turn them into .gsm, they sound buzzy and muffled.
  
  
   An example line to convert:
  
   sox file.wav -r 8000 -c 1 file.gsm
  
  

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users