Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
Hi Federico, The first hit from Google 'how to run command from gdb' https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/gdb/html_chapter/gdb_5.html#:~:text=Use%20the%20run%20command%20to,section%20Commands%20to%20specify%20files). # gdb (gdb) file /usr/sbin/asterisk (gdb) run –gvvc Starting program: /usr/sbin/asterisk -gvc [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". snip Created by Mark Spencer Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'core show warranty' for details. snip... etc etc On 8/20/23 09:12, Federico wrote: I cannot follow your instructions, because asterisk segfaults on start. It never starts Can you give me instruction to trap this segfault on starting asterisk? Like gdb …..asterist –gvvc *From:* asterisk-users *On Behalf Of *Mark Murawski *Sent:* Saturday, August 19, 2023 11:04 PM *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault Hi Federico, Segfaults are 100% not by design. Typically if something seg faulted, either there is a logic bug or a component mismatch. The you should definitely be able to use more than one connection (we use multiple connections with postgres odbc with no issue). If Asterisk segfaults when using odbc Try this: - use ps and get the pid of Asterisk - run gdb, attach to the asterisk pid - do something that would cause the seg fault - get a backtrace (bt) and show all threads backtrace (thread apply all bt) if Asterisk segfaults when starting up Run Asterisk straight from gdb Wait for segfault, get backtrace, and all threads backtrace On 8/16/23 18:48, Federico wrote: I tested this issue with version 13 and version 18. In res_odbc.conf, if I add a second, new data source like [asterisk] enabled=yes dsn=asterisk sanitysql => select 1 isolation => read_committed username=root ;password= pre-connect => yes forcecommit => yes connect_timeout => 10 negative_connection_cache => 0 max_connections =>500 my odbc.ini [cdr] Description = MySQL ODBC Driver Testing Driver = maria Socket = /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock User = root Password = Database = public Option = 3 I get, immediately, segmentation fault. With only one, it works fine. Is this by design? Philip -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
I cannot follow your instructions, because asterisk segfaults on start. It never starts Can you give me instruction to trap this segfault on starting asterisk? Like gdb …..asterist –gvvc From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of Mark Murawski Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2023 11:04 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault Hi Federico, Segfaults are 100% not by design. Typically if something seg faulted, either there is a logic bug or a component mismatch. The you should definitely be able to use more than one connection (we use multiple connections with postgres odbc with no issue). If Asterisk segfaults when using odbc Try this: - use ps and get the pid of Asterisk - run gdb, attach to the asterisk pid - do something that would cause the seg fault - get a backtrace (bt) and show all threads backtrace (thread apply all bt) if Asterisk segfaults when starting up Run Asterisk straight from gdb Wait for segfault, get backtrace, and all threads backtrace On 8/16/23 18:48, Federico wrote: I tested this issue with version 13 and version 18. In res_odbc.conf, if I add a second, new data source like [asterisk] enabled=yes dsn=asterisk sanitysql => select 1 isolation => read_committed username=root ;password= pre-connect => yes forcecommit => yes connect_timeout => 10 negative_connection_cache => 0 max_connections =>500 my odbc.ini [cdr] Description = MySQL ODBC Driver Testing Driver = maria Socket = /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock User = root Password = Database = public Option = 3 I get, immediately, segmentation fault. With only one, it works fine. Is this by design? Philip -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
Hi Federico, Segfaults are 100% not by design. Typically if something seg faulted, either there is a logic bug or a component mismatch. The you should definitely be able to use more than one connection (we use multiple connections with postgres odbc with no issue). If Asterisk segfaults when using odbc Try this: - use ps and get the pid of Asterisk - run gdb, attach to the asterisk pid - do something that would cause the seg fault - get a backtrace (bt) and show all threads backtrace (thread apply all bt) if Asterisk segfaults when starting up Run Asterisk straight from gdb Wait for segfault, get backtrace, and all threads backtrace On 8/16/23 18:48, Federico wrote: I tested this issue with version 13 and version 18. In res_odbc.conf, if I add a second, new data source like [asterisk] enabled=yes dsn=asterisk sanitysql => select 1 isolation => read_committed username=root ;password= pre-connect => yes forcecommit => yes connect_timeout => 10 negative_connection_cache => 0 max_connections =>500 my odbc.ini [cdr] Description = MySQL ODBC Driver Testing Driver = maria Socket = /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock User = root Password = Database = public Option = 3 I get, immediately, segmentation fault. With only one, it works fine. Is this by design? Philip -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 7:48 PM Federico wrote: > I tested this issue with version 13 and version 18. > > In res_odbc.conf, if I add a second, new data source like > > > > [asterisk] > > enabled=yes > > dsn=asterisk > > sanitysql => select 1 > > isolation => read_committed > > username=root > > ;password= > > pre-connect => yes > > forcecommit => yes > > connect_timeout => 10 > > negative_connection_cache => 0 > > max_connections =>500 > > > > my odbc.ini > > [cdr] > > Description = MySQL ODBC Driver Testing > > Driver = maria > > Socket = /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock > > User = root > > Password = > > Database = public > > Option = 3 > > > > > > I get, immediately, segmentation fault. > > With only one, it works fine. > > Is this by design? > There's nothing explicitly written to prevent such a thing within Asterisk itself. There is no backtrace here so nothing to show where the crash actually occurred, be it Asterisk itself or UnixODBC. If UnixODBC we're a somewhat simple user of it, so specific configuration of it or its build may be the source of it. -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Project Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
>Setting "batch=yes" in your /etc/asterisk/cdr.conf file may fix this by moving the database interaction to separate threads away from the call. I can certainly try this, but I believe the maria-odbc-driver is what is running as a single thread. Its been a few months since I played with this, I think there may also be a compiled in parameter in the unixodbc regarding threading that's default value was changed in recent years. The only asterisk issue is why it would hang at SET(CDR_PROP(disable)=1)? Perhaps there is an interaction where odbc_adaptive always checks an aspect of the tables it interacts with (and needlessly when disabling cdr). I started looking at the source - but got pulled onto another project before I was able to determine anything, and have not revisited the issue. So for me this isn't current but just me throwing in my recollections that may pertain to Federico's issue. On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 5:37 PM C. Maj wrote: > On 8/17/23 12:44, John Harragin wrote: > > You should be able to define multiple data sources. However I'm having my > > own issues. I have my dialplan accessing one maria database which is > hosted > > locally on the asterisk server then logging cdr with odbc adaptive which > > connects to maria on a remote machine. This works fine except when the > > remote server is out of reach the calls zombie and eventually lead to a > > fault. > > Setting "batch=yes" in your /etc/asterisk/cdr.conf file may fix this by > moving the database interaction to separate threads away from the call. > > -- > _ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: > https://community.asterisk.org/ > > New to Asterisk? Start here: > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
On 8/17/23 12:44, John Harragin wrote: You should be able to define multiple data sources. However I'm having my own issues. I have my dialplan accessing one maria database which is hosted locally on the asterisk server then logging cdr with odbc adaptive which connects to maria on a remote machine. This works fine except when the remote server is out of reach the calls zombie and eventually lead to a fault. Setting "batch=yes" in your /etc/asterisk/cdr.conf file may fix this by moving the database interaction to separate threads away from the call. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
You should be able to define multiple data sources. However I'm having my own issues. I have my dialplan accessing one maria database which is hosted locally on the asterisk server then logging cdr with odbc adaptive which connects to maria on a remote machine. This works fine except when the remote server is out of reach the calls zombie and eventually lead to a fault. The cli imply that the calls hang on SET(CDR_PROP(disable)=1) which is ironic since instructing the system not to connect to the cdr server appears to cause the problem and there may be a defect in the adaptive_odbc implementation where it somehow still communicates with the server during the cdr_func(disable). My experimentation suggests that the maria_odbc driver utilizes a single thread (there are odbc directives to adjust this - but it seems they have been superseded). Once a cdr hangs, new calls hang on odbc calls to the local database. In my case the remote server is 5' away and in the same switch that Asterisk is plugged into, so it hasn't been critical to fix this - but it may provide some clues to your situation. On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:04 AM Federico wrote: > I tested this issue with version 13 and version 18. > > In res_odbc.conf, if I add a second, new data source like > > > > [asterisk] > > enabled=yes > > dsn=asterisk > > sanitysql => select 1 > > isolation => read_committed > > username=root > > ;password= > > pre-connect => yes > > forcecommit => yes > > connect_timeout => 10 > > negative_connection_cache => 0 > > max_connections =>500 > > > > my odbc.ini > > [cdr] > > Description = MySQL ODBC Driver Testing > > Driver = maria > > Socket = /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock > > User = root > > Password = > > Database = public > > Option = 3 > > > > > > I get, immediately, segmentation fault. > > With only one, it works fine. > > Is this by design? > > > > Philip > > > > > > > -- > _ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: > https://community.asterisk.org/ > > New to Asterisk? Start here: > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation Fault Asterisk 13.7.0-rc2 (libmysqlclient?)
I compiled Asterisk 13.5.0 (and 13.7.0-rc2), PJproject 2.4.5, and DAHDI 2.11.0 from source. I am using Debian 8.2 and mysql is version 5.5.46. This is a recent problem and when we went back to 13.5.0 and started seeing the issue, we started thinking that mysql must have updated and caused the problem. I think you are spot-on with your analysis. I will do a little experimentation with mysql and see if I can isolate where the problem started. Thanks, --Matt From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com <asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com> on behalf of A J Stiles <asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 7:38 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation Fault Asterisk 13.7.0-rc2 (libmysqlclient?) On Monday 18 Jan 2016, Matthew Murphy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am getting a segmentation fault (seems to occur randomly) using Asterisk > 13.7.0-rc2 with PJProject 2.4.5. It appears to be something that > libmysqlclient is complaining about when doing a query in > ps_endpoint_id_ips. We are using Asterisk Realtime. This also seems to > occur in Asterisk 13.5.0. Which bits did you compile from Source Code yourself, and which bits (if any) are precompiled by your distribution? What is your libmysqlclient version? If you are using some sort of Ubuntu / Debian-based distribution, could it possibly have done a sneaky `apt-get upgrade` behind your back? -- AJS Note: Originating address only accepts e-mail from list! If replying off- list, change address to asterisk1list at earthshod dot co dot uk . -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation Fault Asterisk 13.7.0-rc2 (libmysqlclient?)
On Monday 18 Jan 2016, Matthew Murphy wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am getting a segmentation fault (seems to occur randomly) using Asterisk > 13.7.0-rc2 with PJProject 2.4.5. It appears to be something that > libmysqlclient is complaining about when doing a query in > ps_endpoint_id_ips. We are using Asterisk Realtime. This also seems to > occur in Asterisk 13.5.0. Which bits did you compile from Source Code yourself, and which bits (if any) are precompiled by your distribution? What is your libmysqlclient version? If you are using some sort of Ubuntu / Debian-based distribution, could it possibly have done a sneaky `apt-get upgrade` behind your back? -- AJS Note: Originating address only accepts e-mail from list! If replying off- list, change address to asterisk1list at earthshod dot co dot uk . -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault with 13.5.0 / PJSIP 2.4.5
Recursive wrote: Dear colleagues, I just have experienced a segmentation fault with Asterisk 13.5.0 and PJSIP 2.4.5. Both of them have been compiled on a standard Debian Wheezy 64 bit. I did not apply any patch or alter the sources of Asterisk or PJSIP in any way. Before compiling and installing, I removed all traces of all old Asterisk and PJSIP versions from my system very thoroughly. The segmentation fault occurred when I was re-registering multiple endpoints one after another as fast as I could do it manually (by operating the respective phones) and at the same time tried to make calls from these phones. I have attached what was happening before the segfault in the CLI; I had started Asterisk with -vc. Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the situation, so if we want to know the cause of the problem, I guess it's necessary that a developer analyzes the attachment and the respective part of the source code. I think I am not (yet ?) so deep in Asterisk that I could help debug the problem, but if anybody tells me what to do I am willing to help. Information is on the wiki[1] which details how to get a backtrace from a core dump which may be present. Otherwise it's unlikely that the problem can be located without exact details for reproducing it. If you can get a backtrace though you can file an issue on the issue tracker[2]. [1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+a+Backtrace [2] https://issues.asterisk.org/jira -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault with 13.5.0 / PJSIP 2.4.5
> > Information is on the wiki[1] which details how to get a backtrace from a > core dump which may be present. Otherwise it's unlikely that the problem can > be located without exact details for reproducing it. If you can get a > backtrace though you can file an issue on the issue tracker[2]. > > [1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+a+Backtrace > [2] https://issues.asterisk.org/jira > Thanks for the references. I am playing around with Asterisk several months now and never have experienced a segfault until yesterday. I always thought the software would be stable (because I have heard that even large companies use it) and haven't compiled with the options for a core dump, so it looks like that we'll never know what was happening. But I am planning to upgrade to 13.6.0 anyway, and when doing so, I'll enable the core dumps like shown in [1]. Regards, Recursive -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault after upgrading from asterisk-10.5.0 to asterisk-11.1.2
First thing to *ALWAYS* check is if you have any Asterisk version specific modules (Fax for Asterisk, G.729, etc). Ensure these are not loaded (noload in modules.conf, or simply move them out of the asterisk modules dir). Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 - Original Message - After upgrading from asterisk-10.5.0 to asterisk-11.1.2, I am getting a Segmentation fault. [root@localhost asterisk-11.1.2]# asterisk -vvc Asterisk 11.1.2, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2012 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer marks...@digium.com Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'core show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'core show license' for details. = == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/logger.conf': Found == Manager registered action DBGet == Manager registered action DBPut == Manager registered action DBDel == Manager registered action DBDelTree == Registered custom function 'MESSAGE' == Registered custom function 'MESSAGE_DATA' == Registered application 'MessageSend' == Manager registered action MessageSend == Manager registered action DataGet == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/codecs.conf': Found Asterisk Dynamic Loader Starting: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modules.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/dnsmgr.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] ERROR[27062]: config_options.c:512 aco_process_config: Unable to load config file 'acl.conf' == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/http.conf': Found == Manager registered action Ping == Manager registered action Events == Manager registered action Logoff == Manager registered action Login == Manager registered action Challenge == Manager registered action Hangup == Manager registered action Status == Manager registered action Setvar == Manager registered action Getvar == Manager registered action GetConfig == Manager registered action GetConfigJSON == Manager registered action UpdateConfig == Manager registered action CreateConfig == Manager registered action ListCategories == Manager registered action Redirect == Manager registered action Atxfer == Manager registered action Originate == Manager registered action Command == Manager registered action ExtensionState == Manager registered action PresenceState == Manager registered action AbsoluteTimeout == Manager registered action MailboxStatus == Manager registered action MailboxCount == Manager registered action ListCommands == Manager registered action SendText == Manager registered action UserEvent == Manager registered action WaitEvent == Manager registered action CoreSettings == Manager registered action CoreStatus == Manager registered action Reload == Manager registered action CoreShowChannels == Manager registered action ModuleLoad == Manager registered action ModuleCheck == Manager registered action AOCMessage == Manager registered action Filter == Registered custom function 'AMI_CLIENT' == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager_humbug.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] NOTICE[27062]: manager.c:7545 __init_manager: Invalid keyword displaysystemname = yes in manager.conf [general] == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/users.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/cdr.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] NOTICE[27062]: cdr.c:1613 do_reload: CDR logging disabled, data will be lost. -- CEL logging disabled. == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/udptl.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: udptl.c:1413 removed_options_handler: t38faxudpec in udptl.conf is no longer supported; use the t38pt_udptl configuration option in sip.conf instead. [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: udptl.c:1415 removed_options_handler: t38faxmaxdatagram in udptl.conf is no longer supported; value is now supplied by T.38 applications. Asterisk PBX Core Initializing Registering builtin applications: == Registered custom function 'EXCEPTION' == Registered custom function 'TESTTIME' [Answer] == Registered application 'Answer' [BackGround] == Registered application 'BackGround' [Busy] == Registered application 'Busy' [Congestion] == Registered application 'Congestion' [ExecIfTime] == Registered application 'ExecIfTime' [Goto] == Registered application 'Goto' [GotoIf] == Registered application 'GotoIf' [GotoIfTime] == Registered application 'GotoIfTime' [ImportVar] == Registered application 'ImportVar' [Hangup] == Registered application 'Hangup' [Incomplete] == Registered application 'Incomplete' [NoOp] == Registered application 'NoOp' [Proceeding] == Registered application 'Proceeding' [Progress] == Registered application 'Progress'
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault after upgrading from asterisk-10.5.0 to asterisk-11.1.2
I see asterisk is finding res_jabber.so not compiled for your asterisk version. As Tim just said, remove all the modules from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules and reinstall asterisk. [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: loader.c:804 inspect_module: Module 'res_jabber.so' was not compiled with the same compile-time options as this version of Asterisk. ** [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: loader.c:805 inspect_module: Module 'res_jabber.so' will not be initialized as it may cause instability. [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: loader.c:895 load_resource: Module 'res_jabber.so' could not be loaded. Leandro 2013/1/10 Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com First thing to *ALWAYS* check is if you have any Asterisk version specific modules (Fax for Asterisk, G.729, etc). Ensure these are not loaded (noload in modules.conf, or simply move them out of the asterisk modules dir). Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 -- After upgrading from asterisk-10.5.0 to asterisk-11.1.2, I am getting a Segmentation fault. [root@localhost asterisk-11.1.2]# asterisk -vvc Asterisk 11.1.2, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2012 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer marks...@digium.com Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'core show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'core show license' for details. = == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/logger.conf': Found == Manager registered action DBGet == Manager registered action DBPut == Manager registered action DBDel == Manager registered action DBDelTree == Registered custom function 'MESSAGE' == Registered custom function 'MESSAGE_DATA' == Registered application 'MessageSend' == Manager registered action MessageSend == Manager registered action DataGet == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/codecs.conf': Found Asterisk Dynamic Loader Starting: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modules.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/dnsmgr.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] ERROR[27062]: config_options.c:512 aco_process_config: Unable to load config file 'acl.conf' == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/http.conf': Found == Manager registered action Ping == Manager registered action Events == Manager registered action Logoff == Manager registered action Login == Manager registered action Challenge == Manager registered action Hangup == Manager registered action Status == Manager registered action Setvar == Manager registered action Getvar == Manager registered action GetConfig == Manager registered action GetConfigJSON == Manager registered action UpdateConfig == Manager registered action CreateConfig == Manager registered action ListCategories == Manager registered action Redirect == Manager registered action Atxfer == Manager registered action Originate == Manager registered action Command == Manager registered action ExtensionState == Manager registered action PresenceState == Manager registered action AbsoluteTimeout == Manager registered action MailboxStatus == Manager registered action MailboxCount == Manager registered action ListCommands == Manager registered action SendText == Manager registered action UserEvent == Manager registered action WaitEvent == Manager registered action CoreSettings == Manager registered action CoreStatus == Manager registered action Reload == Manager registered action CoreShowChannels == Manager registered action ModuleLoad == Manager registered action ModuleCheck == Manager registered action AOCMessage == Manager registered action Filter == Registered custom function 'AMI_CLIENT' == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager_humbug.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] NOTICE[27062]: manager.c:7545 __init_manager: Invalid keyword displaysystemname = yes in manager.conf [general] == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/users.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/cdr.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] NOTICE[27062]: cdr.c:1613 do_reload: CDR logging disabled, data will be lost. -- CEL logging disabled. == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/udptl.conf': Found [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: udptl.c:1413 removed_options_handler: t38faxudpec in udptl.conf is no longer supported; use the t38pt_udptl configuration option in sip.conf instead. [2013-01-10 14:20:10] WARNING[27062]: udptl.c:1415 removed_options_handler: t38faxmaxdatagram in udptl.conf is no longer supported; value is now supplied by T.38
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation Fault
On 11-08-03 02:01 AM, Richard Zulu wrote: I have used gdb so that I can perform a backtrace however the program executes and exits without a stack thus not helpful. Any help is appreciated! https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+a+Backtrace -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Check us out at: http://digium.com http://asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] segmentation fault
- Rilawich Ango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Segmentation fault occurs after executing the following cmd. Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|35|Ttr) Is it a bug and how to fix it? Below is the core dump message converted by gdb. #0 0x068be1ad in realtime_peer (newpeername=0x1b37844 10.20.0.1, sin=0x0) at chan_sip.c:2547 #1 0x068becb3 in find_peer (peer=0x1b37844 10.20.0.1, sin=0x0, realtime=1) at chan_sip.c:2676 It is a bug, appears to be the same problem as bug 12362, and the fix is in the pending 1.4.20 release as well as the 1.4 branch in subversion. Jeff ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault
Adam Lovegrove wrote:
Asterisk is crashing about once a day with segmentation fault.
This is the error..
/usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 111: 3482 Segmentation fault (core
dumped) nice –n $PRIORITY ${ASTSBINDIR}/asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS}
/dev/${TTY} /dev/${TTY}
Asterisk ended with exit status 139
Asterisk exited on signal 11.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
mpg123: no process killed
Is this information helpful?
Can anyone suggest anything?
Can I provide anymore useful information for troubleshooting?
I think it would be useful if you could describe what the system is
doing when it crashes - if you know. Also, the core dump will probably
help someone diagnose the problem. (but don't send it to the list :-)
/Per Jessen, Zürich
--
ENIDAN Technologies GmbH - managed email security.
Starting at SFr1/month/user - http://www.spamchek.ch/
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault on Asteriskstartup:res_config_mysql.so problem?
Did you do a make make install for add-ons BEFORE doing
so for asterisk?
If so try asterisk first and when all is installed install
add-ons.
--
I tried a make clean make make install for asterisk and then for
asterisk-addons but am still getting the segmentation fault on asterisk
startup. rm res_config_mysql.so allows Asterisk to start.
Still trying...
mkdir /usr/lib/asterisk.backup.20060928
mv /usr/lib/asterisk/* /usr/lib/asterisk.backup.20060928
mkdir /usr/include/asterisk.backup.20060928
mv /usr/include/asterisk/* /usr/include/asterisk.backup.20060928/
cd /usr/src/asterisk-1.2.12.1
make clean make make install
cd /usr/src/asterisk-addons-1.2.4
perl -p -i.bak -e
's/CFLAGS.*D_GNU_SOURCE/CFLAGS+=-D_GNU_SOURCE\nCFLAGS+=-DMYSQL_LOGUNIQUEID/'
Makefile
make clean make make install
Install logs look fine.
STARTING ASTERISK
/usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 40: 6631 Segmentation fault (core
dumped) asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} /dev/${TTY} /dev/${TTY}
Asterisk ended with exit status 139
Asterisk exited on signal 11.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
/usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 40: 6690 Segmentation fault (core
dumped) asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} /dev/${TTY} /dev/${TTY}
Asterisk ended with exit status 139
Asterisk exited on signal 11.
Automatically restarting Asterisk.
rm res_config_mysql.so allows Asterisk to start.
Any advice appreciated.
Cameron
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault on Asterisk startup:res_config_mysql.so problem?
Did you do a make make install for add-ons BEFORE doing so for asterisk? If so try asterisk first and when all is installed install add-ons. -- I tried a make clean make make install for asterisk and then for asterisk-addons but am still getting the segmentation fault on asterisk startup. rm res_config_mysql.so allows Asterisk to start. Any other suggestions appreciated. Cameron ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Segmentation fault on Asterisk startup: res_config_mysql.so problem?
On 16:04, Sun 24 Sep 06, kjcsb wrote:
When Asterisk starts I get a Segmentation fault
/usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 40: 30548 Segmentation fault (core
dumped) asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} /dev/${TTY} /dev/${TTY}
Asterisk ended with exit status 139
Asterisk exited on signal 11.
If I remove /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/res_config_mysql.so Asterisk starts
normally.
tail /var/log/asterisk/full.log
Sep 24 15:46:05 VERBOSE[30608] logger.c: == Parsing
'/etc/asterisk/res_mysql.conf': Sep 24 15:46:05 VERBOSE[30608] logger.c:
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk/res_mysql.conf': Found
Sep 24 15:46:05 WARNING[30608] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: No
database socket found, using '/tmp/mysql.sock' as default.
Sep 24 15:46:05 DEBUG[30608] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime Host:
127.0.0.1
Sep 24 15:46:05 DEBUG[30608] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime Port: 3306
Sep 24 15:46:05 DEBUG[30608] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime User: root
Sep 24 15:46:05 DEBUG[30608] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime Password:
password
vi /etc/asterisk/res_mysql.conf
[general]
dbhost = 127.0.0.1
dbname = asterisk
dbuser = root
dbpass = password
dbport = 3306
;dbsock = /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
If I uncomment the dbsock line I get the same result (although the database
socket warning is not displayed in the log file).
I am using MySQL for CDR logging so I don't think it's a MySQL problem.
Asterisk 1.2.12.1
Asterisk addon 1.2.4
When I install Asterisk I receive a warning:
Your Asterisk modules directory, located at /usr/lib/asterisk/modules
contains modules that were not installed by this version of Asterisk.
However I cleared out the /usr/lib/asterisk/modules directory before make
clean make make install for both add-ons and asterisk so I'm a bit
mystified by that.
Did you do a make make install for add-ons BEFORE doing
so for asterisk?
If so try asterisk first and when all is installed install
add-ons.
--
Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD
Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:02:28 -0500, Patrick Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
Asterisk died this morning with this message
safe_asterisk: line 83: 6828 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} 1/dev/${TTY} /dev/${TTY}
Any idea what is the problem ?
You should post this on the bugtracker (bugs.digium.com) along with a back
trace. See asterisk-sources/doc/README.backtrace for info on how to do a
backtrace.
Justin Tunney
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault
I had the same problem when I did an SVN of the latest version of the
1.2 branch this past Friday (2/10) and re-made zaptel, libpri and
asterisk. I don't if someone goofed when updating the supposed stable
Asterisk 1.2 branch or what. But here's what I did to fix it...
I'm using Asterisk at Home. To get back to a working system I first
made a backup of everything through the AMP interface. I made backups
of my zaptel.conf and zapata.conf files to a separate location. Then, I
downloaded the tar version of AAH 2.5 (instead of the ISO). I followed
the instructions to untar and install AAH. Because AAH doesn't really
have a 100% working restore feature, what I had to do was:
1) go ahead and use the restore function in the AMP interface -
restoring the backup I had just made.
2) Go through every single configuration window within the AMP
interface and click 'submit' to re-apply the settings one by one. This
really only takes like 10 minutes.
3) Then I clicked the red bar along the top to apply the change in
settings.
4) In the process of installing itself, AAH will blow away your
zaptel.conf and zapata.conf files that you spent so long just getting
right. That's why you made backup copies of those to another directory.
;) Restore those files manually.
5) In order to get my T1 actually functioning I had to not only
shutdown the server but pull the plug on it for a few minutes and then
plug it back in/hit the on button.
Not sure if you're using AAH as well - but hope this helps someone else
who ended up in the same position as I did late Friday night.
Best of Luck,
Sascha
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:02:28 -0500, Patrick Fortin wrote:
Hi
Asterisk died this morning with this message
safe_asterisk: line 83: 6828 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
asterisk ${CLIARGS} ${ASTARGS} 1/dev/${TTY}
/dev/${TTY}
Any idea what is the problem ?
You should post this on the bugtracker (bugs.digium.com) along with
a back trace. See asterisk-sources/doc/README.backtrace for info on
how to do a backtrace.
Justin Tunney
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
Ouch, Do you know how to use gdb, the Gnu Debugger? That will give you a clue as to where the segmentation fault is coming from. Good, then let me move on to the insults and ranting. 1. Why are you running on Slackware? Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated? Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn. 2. The dearth of information of value in your posting is amazing. I went to http://www.automated.it/guidetoasterisk.htm (a good start, good effort Mr. Powell.) As stated above, you life might be easier using FEDORA, not an endorsement of Red Hat, rather a plea for a unified Linux base (please don't say Debian, self-installing the micro-chip in my head was easier.) (it is the new Anti-AMD Intel Rantino chip for those interested.) 3. I've never installed or used Asterisk before, so I do not know much about it. 1. What is your goal with installing Asterisk? 2. Do you have Digium or other hardware installed? 3. Are you running SIP/H323/MGCP? 4. Did you modify any files? 4. What was the last thing on the *CLI screen before the seg fault? Come on Mr. Caesar throw us a bone here. All Hail, Race The Tyrant Vanderdecken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julius Schwartzenberg Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 11:47 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault Hi, I'm trying to set up a fresh system for use with Asterisk. I've never installed or used Asterisk before, so I do not know much about it. I'm using Slackware Linux 10.1 and followed this guide: http://www.automated.it/guidetoasterisk.htm When I try to run asterisk though, at the point the guide suggests to try it, I get 'Segmentation fault'. Any idea what to do? Are there any known problems with Slackware and Asterisk? Thanks in advance, Julius ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
Race Vanderdecken wrote: Good, then let me move on to the insults and ranting. 1. Why are you running on Slackware? Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated? Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn. Why do you not follow Ann Landers simple adage, Better to keep one's mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove any doubt? B. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
On February 20, 2005 01:11 pm, Race Vanderdecken wrote: 1. Why are you running on Slackware? Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated? Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn. Got a problem with Slackware? It works *very* well with Asterisk. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
Because I am more civilized?
By the way, it was Samuel Clemens's fool... quote, who stole it from
Mr. Lincoln, who stole if from Confucius (another educational Tyrant.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
Capouch
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 1:26 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given
gnu-lashing}
Race Vanderdecken wrote:
Good, then let me move on to the insults and ranting.
1. Why are you running on Slackware?
Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated?
Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but
your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn.
Why do you not follow Ann Landers simple adage, Better to keep one's
mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove any doubt?
B.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
Brian Capouch wrote: Race Vanderdecken wrote: Good, then let me move on to the insults and ranting. 1. Why are you running on Slackware? Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated? Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn. Why do you not follow Ann Landers simple adage, Better to keep one's mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove any doubt? Or maybe a double fool because he also disrespected Debian GNU/Linux in his reply. Is ignorance really bliss? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
I have no problem with Slackware,
But when you are learning to drive a car you should first try a Chevy
with an automatic transmission first before strapping on a 6 speed
Ferrari.
Humor helps in teaching and getting a person to step out of a rut they
are having a problem in and gives them a chance to rethink what might be
going on.
Remember, my goal is to reduce the number of variables in the system.
Race
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew
Kohlsmith
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 1:39 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given
gnu-lashing}
On February 20, 2005 01:11 pm, Race Vanderdecken wrote:
1. Why are you running on Slackware?
Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated?
Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but
your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn.
Got a problem with Slackware? It works *very* well with Asterisk.
-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 13:51 -0500, Paul wrote: Or maybe a double fool because he also disrespected Debian GNU/Linux in his reply. *And* recommended Fedora, which makes it triple. I just dumped FC3 and replaced it with Debian because Fedora's kernels constantly gave me issues, e.g. with proprietary AVM kernel drivers which didn't even work. On the other hand, no probs whatsoever with Debian. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no problem with Slackware,
Me neither. I learned Linux with Slack. Found it to be extremely
friendly. And that was 10 years ago. Last time I chacked, it was still
friendly (and not at all GUI, unless you want it served that way)
But when you are learning to drive a car you should first try
a Chevy with an automatic transmission first before strapping
on a 6 speed Ferrari.
Popular opinion holds that people who learn to drive standard first
generally end up being better drivers. And why wouldn't you want to
learn on a Ferrari since you can get one for free!?!
Humor helps in teaching and getting a person to step out of a
rut they are having a problem in and gives them a chance to
rethink what might be going on.
Ya, but humour should be dispensed carefully, lest offence be given.
Remember, my goal is to reduce the number of variables in the system.
The problem I see with Fedora is that you can install it successfully
without learning anything about Linux. Slackware is rather good for
learning Linux, because it is friendly and helpful, but still expects
you to make the decisions. I'd argue that a familiarity with the shell
is going to be essential for even a basic Asterisk install. It's not a
pre-qualifier so much as an essential skill.
LOL! You're just bored and are trolling for a holy war, eh? Well, I
guess we gotta shake off these Febraury blah's somehow.
GENTOO IS FOR WANNABE NEWBIES!!! (that oughta stir things up)
--
Jim Van Meggelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Kohlsmith
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 1:39 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer
given gnu-lashing}
On February 20, 2005 01:11 pm, Race Vanderdecken wrote:
1. Why are you running on Slackware?
Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated?
Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but your
results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn.
Got a problem with Slackware? It works *very* well with Asterisk.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 18/02/2005
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
Thanks a lot for your message. Race Vanderdecken schreef: Ouch, Do you know how to use gdb, the Gnu Debugger? That will give you a clue as to where the segmentation fault is coming from. No, I once used it being instructed exactly by a developer to solve a problem in Dosemu, but I never did anything else with it. I understand that I need to recompile Asterisk with debugging support. Could you give me some pointers on what to do next? Good, then let me move on to the insults and ranting. 1. Why are you running on Slackware? Are you trying to prove a point or just enjoy being frustrated? Open Source is like Broad Spectrum Pesticide, it works but your results may vary and you may end up killing your lawn. I'm using a pretty old system and I have good experiences with Slackware on other systems. Here are the specs of the system I'm using: IBM/Cyrix PR-200 (@150MHz), 64MB RAM, two HDs which are combined ~2GB. 2. The dearth of information of value in your posting is amazing. I went to http://www.automated.it/guidetoasterisk.htm (a good start, good effort Mr. Powell.) As stated above, you life might be easier using FEDORA, not an endorsement of Red Hat, rather a plea for a unified Linux base (please don't say Debian, self-installing the micro-chip in my head was easier.) (it is the new Anti-AMD Intel Rantino chip for those interested.) I've never used Fedora on older systems, but I thought it wouldn't run very well on the system I'm using. (Good thing you don't have an Anti-IBM chip ;) 3. I've never installed or used Asterisk before, so I do not know much about it. 1. What is your goal with installing Asterisk? We have about 8 telephones that use the plain telephone system to call each other and externally. Some of them are analog and others are digital (ISDN). I've also still got the old ISDN card from before we had ADSL. (Eicon Diva 2.01 ISA, seems to work with the hisax module.) Since I read that Asterisk worked with any ISDN adapter that was supported by ISDN4Linux, I thought it might be possible to hook it up in such a way that the phones could call the Asterisk system and that Asterisk would forward the call to a computer (and maybe even over the internet). Also the other way around would be neat. 2. Do you have Digium or other hardware installed? No. Only the ISDN adapter. 3. Are you running SIP/H323/MGCP? No. I've experimented with SIP before, but only with a softphone, using an account from SIPPhone.com. It would be nice if I could call my Asterisk system using SIP! 4. Did you modify any files? None from Asterisk. 4. What was the last thing on the *CLI screen before the seg fault? The command to run Asterisk. It immediatly gives the error when I try to run it. Is Asterisk able to do, what I thought it would do or am I just messing? Come on Mr. Caesar throw us a bone here. All Hail, Race The Tyrant Vanderdecken Thanks again, Julius ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault {Writer given gnu-lashing}
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 22:59 +0100, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: I'm using a pretty old system and I have good experiences with Slackware on other systems. Here are the specs of the system I'm using: IBM/Cyrix PR-200 (@150MHz), 64MB RAM, two HDs which are combined ~2GB. Here is your trouble. The Cyrix chip is what is the newer Via chipsets are based on. It isn't a real pentium chipset and needs to get tuned down via the CFLAGS to 586 or lower. You will probably hit the limits of that machine really quickly. You may want to find a slightly better machine for testing. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install
Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? As far I know, although Digium hosts the asterisk-users list and supports the Asterisk development, Asterisk is still a GPL open source project and asterisk-list is not a Digium support channel. Asking questions about a vendor other than Digium is no difference than asking questions about Digium hardware. Asking about a knock off vendor is grating on many peoples nerves. Asking about a problem caused by a knock of vendor is VERY grating. Why should those who are directly supporting Digium by helping to run this list as well as Digium be charged with having to do support for other companies? I'm not the OP and do agree with supporting digium where possible, but it would appear that digium is no longer selling the x100p card (or at least its removed from the web site). Given some folks only need/want/aford a single fxo port, is this actually considered a knock-off at this time? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 04:38 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? As far I know, although Digium hosts the asterisk-users list and supports the Asterisk development, Asterisk is still a GPL open source project and asterisk-list is not a Digium support channel. Asking questions about a vendor other than Digium is no difference than asking questions about Digium hardware. Asking about a knock off vendor is grating on many peoples nerves. Asking about a problem caused by a knock of vendor is VERY grating. Why should those who are directly supporting Digium by helping to run this list as well as Digium be charged with having to do support for other companies? I'm not the OP and do agree with supporting digium where possible, but it would appear that digium is no longer selling the x100p card (or at least its removed from the web site). Given some folks only need/want/aford a single fxo port, is this actually considered a knock-off at this time? Isn't a TDM01b a single port FXO? It also has the benefit of being able to scale up a little bit before having slot/interupt problems. This really is an edge case. If the original vendor had to do the support, they couldn't sell the parts at such a low price point. If the price rose to the amount to offer proper support, there wouldn't be much distinction between them and Digium. Digium would then likely get the sale as it is a feel good action. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100Pinstall
- Original Message - From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 4:54 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100Pinstall On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 04:38 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? As far I know, although Digium hosts the asterisk-users list and supports the Asterisk development, Asterisk is still a GPL open source project and asterisk-list is not a Digium support channel. Asking questions about a vendor other than Digium is no difference than asking questions about Digium hardware. Asking about a knock off vendor is grating on many peoples nerves. Asking about a problem caused by a knock of vendor is VERY grating. Why should those who are directly supporting Digium by helping to run this list as well as Digium be charged with having to do support for other companies? I'm not the OP and do agree with supporting digium where possible, but it would appear that digium is no longer selling the x100p card (or at least its removed from the web site). Given some folks only need/want/aford a single fxo port, is this actually considered a knock-off at this time? Isn't a TDM01b a single port FXO? It also has the benefit of being able to scale up a little bit before having slot/interupt problems. This really is an edge case. If the original vendor had to do the support, they couldn't sell the parts at such a low price point. If the price rose to the amount to offer proper support, there wouldn't be much distinction between them and Digium. Digium would then likely get the sale as it is a feel good action. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Just for FYI Digit Networks offers 30 days of support for the clone X100P. Matter of fact their support is great. I purchased 4 cards from them to set up testing in my lab. I wouldn't use the clones in production use, but for some home users, testing and such they are inexpensive and well just inexpensive. Why spend $133 on a card for a low end machine when you can spend $30. Not everyone has a budget for tinkering around and home use. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:41:08 -0600, Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? As far I know, although Digium hosts the asterisk-users list and supports the Asterisk development, Asterisk is still a GPL open source project and asterisk-list is not a Digium support channel. Asking questions about a vendor other than Digium is no difference than asking questions about Digium hardware. --JJL44 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 09:55 -0800, Asterisk List wrote: On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:41:08 -0600, Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? As far I know, although Digium hosts the asterisk-users list and supports the Asterisk development, Asterisk is still a GPL open source project and asterisk-list is not a Digium support channel. Asking questions about a vendor other than Digium is no difference than asking questions about Digium hardware. Asking about a knock off vendor is grating on many peoples nerves. Asking about a problem caused by a knock of vendor is VERY grating. Why should those who are directly supporting Digium by helping to run this list as well as Digium be charged with having to do support for other companies? arghhh. insert standard clone rant/ -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install
Just download 1.0.3, don't use the voicepet scripts. they are versions 0.7 and 0.9 of *. If it is a true clone from digit networks it will work fine with 1.0.3. I just set up 3 different machines with the cards from digit networks. Henry - Original Message - From: Dave Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:57 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install I've just installed a Digitnetworks X100P clone in my * server and run the install script for the voicepet-single-x100p tarball. The install appeared to run OK with modprobe wcfxo successful and the ztcfg reporting Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01). When I try to start * though I get a segmentation fault after loading res_features.so. I discovered that the Digitnetwork install script seems to modify all of the .conf files, leaving .conf.old copies. I tried moving the .conf.old files back to .conf but am still get the seg fault. Has anyone else run into this kind of problem ? The * server has been running fine up until now. I can't get it to show the * version right now, but compiled from CVS around 11 Jan. Dave CAUTION: This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately via email and then destroy this message and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Winstone Pulp International Ltd. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100P install
Henry Devito wrote: Just download 1.0.3, don't use the voicepet scripts. they are versions 0.7 and 0.9 of *. If it is a true clone from digit networks it will work fine with 1.0.3. I just set up 3 different machines with the cards from digit networks. Henry Yes, thanks for that. After posting I wondered if the script installed the whole * package, so I recompiled/installed the cvs I'd downloaded and after a bit more fiddling have managed ot get it working. Dave CAUTION: This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately via email and then destroy this message and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Winstone Pulp International Ltd. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100Pinstall
Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? Um, I didn't think this was a Digium support channel. I thought this was an Asterisk Users channel. Seems to me the question should be fair game. (Sorry I don't have an answer to your question, though, Dave). regards, Paul - Original Message - From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 9:41 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault after Digitnetwork X100Pinstall On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 16:57 +1300, Dave Green wrote: I've just installed a Digitnetworks X100P clone in my * server and run the install script for the voicepet-single-x100p tarball. The install appeared to run OK with modprobe wcfxo successful and the ztcfg reporting Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01). When I try to start * though I get a segmentation fault after loading res_features.so. I discovered that the Digitnetwork install script seems to modify all of the .conf files, leaving .conf.old copies. I tried moving the .conf.old files back to .conf but am still get the seg fault. Shouldn't you contact your vendor for support and not a different vendors support channel? Another company with retarded disclaimers sending to a KNOWN publicly archived mailing list. Fix the problem or be ridiculed regularly for the stupidity. CAUTION: This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately via email and then destroy this message and any attachments. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Winstone Pulp International Ltd. -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault on asterisk startup
Ok, just removed this last module works, asterisk is starting without errors anymore, but I wanted to use ILBC codec so it's importan for me. Can anyone help me, getting this to work? Start off with running ulimit -c unlimited before you start asterisk. Once it crashes, type gdb /path/to/asterisk core From there, enter the following: bt x/5i $eip info registers info threads and quit out. After doing that, you might want to save the output of uname -a cat /proc/cpuinfo and send it to the list. (Note for other people/developers, perhaps something similar to samba's panic action might be useful, which automates a lot of this stuff might come in use.) Hope this helps, Andrew Griffiths ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault on asterisk startup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start off with running ulimit -c unlimited before you start asterisk. Once it
crashes, type gdb /path/to/asterisk core
From there, enter the following:
bt
x/5i $eip
info registers
info threads
and quit out. After doing that, you might want to save the output of
uname -a
cat /proc/cpuinfo
and send it to the list.
(Note for other people/developers, perhaps something similar to samba's panic
action might be useful, which automates a lot of this stuff might come in
use.)
Hope this helps,
Andrew Griffiths
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Ok I did.
uname -a gave me this:
Linux chaospbx 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 unknown
cat /proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : CyrixInstead
cpu family : 6
model : 1
model name : 6x86MX 2.5x Core/Bus Clock
stepping: 4
cpu MHz : 166.405
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: yes
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr cx8 pge cmov mmx cyrix_arr
bogomips: 331.77
of course I think you wanted the gdb output, I hope that's correct:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x3aeb in ?? ()
#1 0x405e2752 in iLBC_encode (bytes=0x810fda0 ÿ ÿú\017`\022\021¢G\\214,
block=0xb47c, iLBCenc_inst=0x810e868) at iLBC_encode.c:93
#2 0x405e0eea in lintoilbc_frameout (tmp=0x810e868) at codec_ilbc.c:196
#3 0x0805ca2f in calc_cost (t=0x405e9240) at translate.c:238
#4 0x0805ce4a in ast_register_translator (t=0x405e9240) at translate.c:299
#5 0x405e0fef in load_module () at codec_ilbc.c:263
#6 0x080551ce in ast_load_resource (resource_name=0x80defdb
codec_ilbc.so)
at loader.c:312
#7 0x08055636 in load_modules () at loader.c:407
#8 0x08084136 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbe04) at asterisk.c:1485
(gdb) x/5i $eip
0x3aeb: Cannot access memory at address 0x3aeb
(gdb) info registers
eax0xbfffd924 -1073751772
ecx0xbfffd974 -1073751692
edx0x3 3
ebx0x4001e89c 1073866908
esp0xbfffd450 0xbfffd450
ebp0xbfffd99c 0xbfffd99c
esi0x4012819c 1074954652
edi0x40231a9d 1076042397
eip0x3aeb 0x3aeb
eflags 0x10282 66178
cs 0x23 35
ss 0x2b 43
ds 0x2b 43
es 0x2b 43
fs 0x2b 43
gs 0x2b 43
fctrl 0x37f895
fstat 0x122290
ftag 0x 65535
fiseg 0x23 35
fioff 0x405e4895 1079920789
foseg 0x2b 43
fooff 0xbfffd920 -1073751776
fop0x11c284
xmm0 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm1 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm2 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm3 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm4 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm5 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm6 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm7 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
mxcsr 0x1f80 8064
orig_eax 0x -1
(gdb) info threads
* 1 process 8318 0x3aeb in ?? ()
Perhaps it is important to mention, that I got the bad modules again
from a friend. His modules work within my asterisk with no errors.
Very confusing for me. I still hope you can help.
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault on asterisk startup
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Andreas 'TheChaos' Groll wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start off with running ulimit -c unlimited before you start asterisk. Once
it crashes, type gdb /path/to/asterisk core
From there, enter the following:
bt
x/5i $eip
info registers
info threads
and quit out. After doing that, you might want to save the output of
uname -a
cat /proc/cpuinfo
and send it to the list.
vendor_id : CyrixInstead
model name : 6x86MX 2.5x Core/Bus Clock
cpu MHz : 166.405
flags : fpu de tsc msr cx8 pge cmov mmx cyrix_arr
bogomips: 331.77
Is anyone else running asterisk with iLBC without problems on cyrix chips?
IIRC, they where meant to be a cheaper version, so initially it made me think
that it might of been gcc emmitting a bad instruction for that cpu.
of course I think you wanted the gdb output, I hope that's correct:
Looks good :)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x3aeb in ?? ()
#1 0x405e2752 in iLBC_encode (bytes=0x810fda0 ? ??\017`\022\021?G\\214,
block=0xb47c, iLBCenc_inst=0x810e868) at iLBC_encode.c:93
#2 0x405e0eea in lintoilbc_frameout (tmp=0x810e868) at codec_ilbc.c:196
#3 0x0805ca2f in calc_cost (t=0x405e9240) at translate.c:238
#4 0x0805ce4a in ast_register_translator (t=0x405e9240) at translate.c:299
#5 0x405e0fef in load_module () at codec_ilbc.c:263
#6 0x080551ce in ast_load_resource (resource_name=0x80defdb
codec_ilbc.so)
at loader.c:312
#7 0x08055636 in load_modules () at loader.c:407
#8 0x08084136 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbe04) at asterisk.c:1485
(gdb) x/5i $eip
0x3aeb: Cannot access memory at address 0x3aeb
Hmmm, looks like saved EIP got overwritten at some stage. I'm not familar with
the translation code, but it might be possible that its buffer was exceeded,
based upon seeing the iLBC_encode passed with a parameter on the stack. I
don't have the code handy at the moment, after I grab it I'll have
a look over it and reply to this message.
(gdb) info registers
eax0xbfffd924 -1073751772
ecx0xbfffd974 -1073751692
edx0x3 3
ebx0x4001e89c 1073866908
esp0xbfffd450 0xbfffd450
ebp0xbfffd99c 0xbfffd99c
esi0x4012819c 1074954652
edi0x40231a9d 1076042397
eip0x3aeb 0x3aeb
eflags 0x10282 66178
cs 0x23 35
ss 0x2b 43
ds 0x2b 43
es 0x2b 43
fs 0x2b 43
gs 0x2b 43
fctrl 0x37f895
fstat 0x122290
ftag 0x 65535
fiseg 0x23 35
fioff 0x405e4895 1079920789
foseg 0x2b 43
fooff 0xbfffd920 -1073751776
fop0x11c284
xmm0 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm1 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm2 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm3 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm4 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm5 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm6 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
xmm7 {f = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}} {f = {-nan(0x7f),
-nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f), -nan(0x7f)}}
mxcsr 0x1f80 8064
orig_eax 0x -1
(gdb) info threads
* 1 process 8318 0x3aeb in ?? ()
Perhaps it is important to mention, that I got the bad modules again
from a friend. His modules work within my asterisk with no errors.
Very confusing for me. I still hope you can help.
Thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault on asterisk startup
Hmm, block is allocated near the top of the stack. Ack, I don't like the iLBC code for the quick 3 minutes or so I looked at it, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was overwriting more than it should be on the stack. Well, I'll hand this off to the developers / people who want to spend longer looking over the code (I just happen to be handy with a debugger occasionally). #0 0x3aeb in ?? () #1 0x405e2752 in iLBC_encode (bytes=0x810fda0 ? ??\017`\022\021?G\\214, block=0xb47c, iLBCenc_inst=0x810e868) at iLBC_encode.c:93 #2 0x405e0eea in lintoilbc_frameout (tmp=0x810e868) at codec_ilbc.c:196 #3 0x0805ca2f in calc_cost (t=0x405e9240) at translate.c:238 #4 0x0805ce4a in ast_register_translator (t=0x405e9240) at translate.c:299 #5 0x405e0fef in load_module () at codec_ilbc.c:263 #6 0x080551ce in ast_load_resource (resource_name=0x80defdb codec_ilbc.so) at loader.c:312 #7 0x08055636 in load_modules () at loader.c:407 #8 0x08084136 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbe04) at asterisk.c:1485 (gdb) x/5i $eip 0x3aeb: Cannot access memory at address 0x3aeb ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault on asterisk startup
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 08:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ack, I don't like the iLBC code for the quick 3 minutes or so I looked at it, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was overwriting more than it should be on the stack. Why wouldn't it surprise you? I have a PRI and have 10 or 12 iLBC codecs running during peak times. I don't understand how you can get from I don't like the sound of iLBC to iLBC must be written poorly. -A. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault on asterisk startup
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 08:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You missed my point. I'm talking about how it does data handling with various loops and memcpys etc. I don't care about the sound quality, nor do I care about how well written it is, I'm just making the observation based on my previous experience based on previous auditing of software. My apologies; I read code as codec and though you were making analysis of the code by listening to the codec. Regards, Andrew ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 23 September 2003 19:04, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Do what Critchfield and Pycko told you to do, but I'm betting you're using chan_h323 with a gatekeeper (it's a known bug I think). That's what's killing my Asterisk on reload: (gdb) bt #0 0x40571b3e in PSocket::os_select(int, fd_set*, fd_set*, fd_set*, PScalarArrayint const, PTimeInterval const) () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.5.2 #1 0x4056aef2 in PSocket::Select(PSocket::SelectList, PSocket::SelectList, PSocket::SelectList, PTimeInterval const) () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.5.2 #2 0x4056a8c5 in PSocket::Select(PSocket::SelectList, PTimeInterval const) () from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.5.2 #3 0x40c380e7 in H323TransportUDP::DiscoverGatekeeper(H323Gatekeeper, H323RasPDU, H323TransportAddress const) () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.12.2 #4 0x40c48ebf in H323Gatekeeper::StartDiscovery(H323TransportAddress const) () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.12.2 #5 0x40c48cfc in H323Gatekeeper::DiscoverByAddress(H323TransportAddress const) () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.12.2 #6 0x40bfd59c in H323EndPoint::SetGatekeeper(PString const, H323Transport*) () from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.12.2 #7 0x403ac4d4 in h323_set_gk (gatekeeper_discover=0, gatekeeper=0x403b4dc0 195.135.216.2, secret=0x403b4e40 ) at ast_h323.cpp:1005 #8 0x403a5231 in reload () at chan_h323.c:1643 #9 0x080554c2 in ast_module_reload () at loader.c:159 #10 0x0806d10a in handle_reload (fd=153, argc=1, argv=0xbd9ff61c) at cli.c:105 #11 0x0806cefa in ast_cli_command (fd=153, s=0x0) at cli.c:1006 #12 0x08085770 in netconsole (vconsole=0x80bcc28) at asterisk.c:193 #13 0x40023463 in pthread_detach () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 - -- Regards, Tais M. Hansen ComX Networks Tel: +45-70257474 Fax: +45-70257374 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/cWlx2TEAILET3McRAhjnAKCCJI93ty4OxpGZwIMNlchRaWiiTwCeNk/Y HVqmHi76DIZsofmMF46Bp1w= =gIC7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
Ok, here is the real gdb output. This GDB was configured as i586-mandrake-linux-gnu... Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. ... ... ... Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/cdr_csv.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so #0 0x401519fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Ok .. so what does this mean? Thank you in advance. --- Martin Pycko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk core.6044, sorry On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Here are the core file outputs from gdb: (I have three of them and they produce the same output) (gdb) core core.6044 Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x401519fc in ?? () I have no idea what that means, but if somebody could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thank you for your time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 15:41, jerk face wrote: Ok, here is the real gdb output. This GDB was configured as i586-mandrake-linux-gnu... Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. ... ... ... Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/cdr_csv.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so #0 0x401519fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Ok .. so what does this mean? Thank you in advance. I started experiencing segfaults a while back too. Both after a reload and during startup when loading res_adsi.so. What fixed it for me was changing -O6 in all Makefiles to -O2. I'm using Red Hat 9 and it has been said that Red Hat does some funky stuff with their gcc so that may be causing it to segfault when compiled with -O6. Regards, Patrick ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 08:41, jerk face wrote: Ok, here is the real gdb output. This GDB was configured as i586-mandrake-linux-gnu... Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. ... ... ... Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/cdr_csv.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so #0 0x401519fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Ok .. so what does this mean? Thank you in advance. This is where you type 'bt' and find out how it made it to that frame. --- Martin Pycko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk core.6044, sorry On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Here are the core file outputs from gdb: (I have three of them and they produce the same output) (gdb) core core.6044 Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x401519fc in ?? () I have no idea what that means, but if somebody could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thank you for your time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
I am running Mandrake 9.1 if that makes a difference. --- Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 15:41, jerk face wrote: Ok, here is the real gdb output. This GDB was configured as i586-mandrake-linux-gnu... Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. ... ... ... Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/cdr_csv.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so #0 0x401519fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Ok .. so what does this mean? Thank you in advance. I started experiencing segfaults a while back too. Both after a reload and during startup when loading res_adsi.so. What fixed it for me was changing -O6 in all Makefiles to -O2. I'm using Red Hat 9 and it has been said that Red Hat does some funky stuff with their gcc so that may be causing it to segfault when compiled with -O6. Regards, Patrick ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
Sorry about that: bt gives the following output: #0 0x401519fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #1 0x40150c61 in malloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #2 0x40157dd0 in strdup () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #3 0x0805603b in cfg_process (tmp=0x80ea890, _tmpc=0x47a6a26c, _last=0x47a6a270, buf=0x65747865 Address 0x65747865 out of bounds, lineno=183, configfile=0x458d083d extensions.conf, includelevel=0) at config.c:57 #4 0x08055ac2 in __ast_load (configfile=0x458d083d extensions.conf, tmp=0x80ea890, _tmpc=0x47a6a26c, _last=0x47a6a270, includelevel=0) at config.c:731 #5 0x08055edd in ast_load (configfile=0x8 Address 0x8 out of bounds) at config.c:766 #6 0x458cf815 in pbx_load_module () at pbx_config.c:1543 #7 0x458ccdaf in reload () at pbx_config.c:1683 #8 0x08055372 in ast_module_reload () at loader.c:159 #9 0x0806b8ba in handle_reload (fd=44, argc=1, argv=0x47a6a5fc) at cli.c:105 #10 0x0806b6aa in ast_cli_command (fd=44, s=0x8 Address 0x8 out of bounds) at cli.c:1006 #11 0x08083c80 in netconsole (vconsole=0x80b9c28) at asterisk.c:192 #12 0x40021811 in pthread_start_thread () from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0 I see extensions.conf mentioned a couple of times. Could this be caused by a configuration error? --- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 08:41, jerk face wrote: Ok, here is the real gdb output. This GDB was configured as i586-mandrake-linux-gnu... Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. ... ... ... Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/cdr_csv.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_setcidnum.so #0 0x401519fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Ok .. so what does this mean? Thank you in advance. This is where you type 'bt' and find out how it made it to that frame. --- Martin Pycko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk core.6044, sorry On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Here are the core file outputs from gdb: (I have three of them and they produce the same output) (gdb) core core.6044 Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x401519fc in ?? () I have no idea what that means, but if somebody could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thank you for your time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
gdb /usr/src/asterisk core.6044 then 'bt' Martin On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Here are the core file outputs from gdb: (I have three of them and they produce the same output) (gdb) core core.6044 Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x401519fc in ?? () I have no idea what that means, but if somebody could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thank you for your time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
actually gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk core.6044, sorry On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Here are the core file outputs from gdb: (I have three of them and they produce the same output) (gdb) core core.6044 Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x401519fc in ?? () I have no idea what that means, but if somebody could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thank you for your time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fault on reload (gdb output included)
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 12:04, jerk face wrote: I keep getting segmentation faults when I do a reload. Here are the core file outputs from gdb: (I have three of them and they produce the same output) (gdb) core core.6044 you need to run gdb like follows gdb core.6044 `which asterisk` This lets gdb load the asterisk binary with all the symbols in it to understand the core file. Then if you could issue the command 'bt' inside of gdb it will give a nice listing of functions called to get to the point the crash happened. Core was generated by `asterisk'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x401519fc in ?? () I have no idea what that means, but if somebody could point me in the right direction, that would be great. Thank you for your time. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2
what did the trick for me is: 1. Use codec statements: allow=SOMECODEC) 2. bind * to an IP instead of bind=0.0.0.0 (bind=IP_OF_YOUR_*_BOX) Ta Senad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mattf Sent: 11 September 2003 21:30 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 Hello, Don't know if this is related but I just got a segmentation fault today while trying to register my new SNOM200 phone: *CLI *CLI NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4651 (handle_request): Failed to authenticate user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=3g5l65mbnk for SUBSCRIBE NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4651 (handle_request): Failed to authenticate user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=3g5l65mbnk for SUBSCRIBE Segmentation fault then I started asterisk back up and it registered and then gave me another error: *CLI *CLI -- Registered SIP 'mattf2' at 10.10.10.14 port 5060 expires 3600 *CLI NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' Any idea what causes this? could I have possibly just configured the Snom incorrectly to cause this? Thanks, MATT--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 Is there any chance that you could send a tcpdump of the system tying to make a connection? Open up two terminal sessions to your server. In one, type tcpdump -w foo. In the other session, start asterisk and let it sit there hanging for a few minutes. Stop Ctrl-C in the terminal session running tcpdump and send me the file foo that was created by tcpdump. You might want to gzip it if it's large and send it to me off list. -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 Tim, thanks for your answer. I tried, all of the options you suggested, and still the same... * hangs. It is interesting that it does the same think, when it tries to register my FWD account and there are no problems with registering IAX account with NuFone. I can make iconnect/fwd/iax calls with no major problems. Any other suggestions? Senad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 20:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I assume that from your previous post that you are using iconnect Is your register line in the format: Register = 18005551212:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/18005551212 I've had good luck using the IP address vs. the fully qualified hostname. Remember that the register line goes in the [general] section of sip.conf. Also, are you using the latest CVS release of *? -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I am really desperate to have any help on this problem below as it prevents us from making any further progress. Is there anyone out there who can help? Thanks Senad - Hi, Allowing registration to iconnect by using register = XXX in sip.conf file does not start *, but instead produces segmentation fault and * hangs. Commenting out register = allows * to start with no problems. Anyone know why is this happening
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2
I assume that from your previous post that you are using iconnect Is your register line in the format: Register = 18005551212:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/18005551212 I've had good luck using the IP address vs. the fully qualified hostname. Remember that the register line goes in the [general] section of sip.conf. Also, are you using the latest CVS release of *? -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I am really desperate to have any help on this problem below as it prevents us from making any further progress. Is there anyone out there who can help? Thanks Senad - Hi, Allowing registration to iconnect by using register = XXX in sip.conf file does not start *, but instead produces segmentation fault and * hangs. Commenting out register = allows * to start with no problems. Anyone know why is this happening? -- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2
Tim, thanks for your answer. I tried, all of the options you suggested, and still the same... * hangs. It is interesting that it does the same think, when it tries to register my FWD account and there are no problems with registering IAX account with NuFone. I can make iconnect/fwd/iax calls with no major problems. Any other suggestions? Senad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 20:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I assume that from your previous post that you are using iconnect Is your register line in the format: Register = 18005551212:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/18005551212 I've had good luck using the IP address vs. the fully qualified hostname. Remember that the register line goes in the [general] section of sip.conf. Also, are you using the latest CVS release of *? -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I am really desperate to have any help on this problem below as it prevents us from making any further progress. Is there anyone out there who can help? Thanks Senad - Hi, Allowing registration to iconnect by using register = XXX in sip.conf file does not start *, but instead produces segmentation fault and * hangs. Commenting out register = allows * to start with no problems. Anyone know why is this happening? -- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2
Is there any chance that you could send a tcpdump of the system tying to make a connection? Open up two terminal sessions to your server. In one, type tcpdump -w foo. In the other session, start asterisk and let it sit there hanging for a few minutes. Stop Ctrl-C in the terminal session running tcpdump and send me the file foo that was created by tcpdump. You might want to gzip it if it's large and send it to me off list. -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 Tim, thanks for your answer. I tried, all of the options you suggested, and still the same... * hangs. It is interesting that it does the same think, when it tries to register my FWD account and there are no problems with registering IAX account with NuFone. I can make iconnect/fwd/iax calls with no major problems. Any other suggestions? Senad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 20:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I assume that from your previous post that you are using iconnect Is your register line in the format: Register = 18005551212:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/18005551212 I've had good luck using the IP address vs. the fully qualified hostname. Remember that the register line goes in the [general] section of sip.conf. Also, are you using the latest CVS release of *? -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I am really desperate to have any help on this problem below as it prevents us from making any further progress. Is there anyone out there who can help? Thanks Senad - Hi, Allowing registration to iconnect by using register = XXX in sip.conf file does not start *, but instead produces segmentation fault and * hangs. Commenting out register = allows * to start with no problems. Anyone know why is this happening? -- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration N UMBER 2
Hello, Don't know if this is related but I just got a segmentation fault today while trying to register my new SNOM200 phone: *CLI *CLI NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4651 (handle_request): Failed to authenticate user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=3g5l65mbnk for SUBSCRIBE NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4651 (handle_request): Failed to authenticate user sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=3g5l65mbnk for SUBSCRIBE Segmentation fault then I started asterisk back up and it registered and then gave me another error: *CLI *CLI -- Registered SIP 'mattf2' at 10.10.10.14 port 5060 expires 3600 *CLI NOTICE[1125329600]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4713 (handle_request): Registration from 'Matt Florell sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for '10.10.10.14' Any idea what causes this? could I have possibly just configured the Snom incorrectly to cause this? Thanks, MATT--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 Is there any chance that you could send a tcpdump of the system tying to make a connection? Open up two terminal sessions to your server. In one, type tcpdump -w foo. In the other session, start asterisk and let it sit there hanging for a few minutes. Stop Ctrl-C in the terminal session running tcpdump and send me the file foo that was created by tcpdump. You might want to gzip it if it's large and send it to me off list. -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 Tim, thanks for your answer. I tried, all of the options you suggested, and still the same... * hangs. It is interesting that it does the same think, when it tries to register my FWD account and there are no problems with registering IAX account with NuFone. I can make iconnect/fwd/iax calls with no major problems. Any other suggestions? Senad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 September 2003 20:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I assume that from your previous post that you are using iconnect Is your register line in the format: Register = 18005551212:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/18005551212 I've had good luck using the IP address vs. the fully qualified hostname. Remember that the register line goes in the [general] section of sip.conf. Also, are you using the latest CVS release of *? -Original Message- From: Senad Jordanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault due to SIP registration NUMBER 2 I am really desperate to have any help on this problem below as it prevents us from making any further progress. Is there anyone out there who can help? Thanks Senad - Hi, Allowing registration to iconnect by using register = XXX in sip.conf file does not start *, but instead produces segmentation fault and * hangs. Commenting out register = allows * to start with no problems. Anyone know why is this happening? -- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault with asterisk and OH323
It's OK. I change my oh323.conf file and I don't have segmantation fault anymore. Thanks Rattana - Original Message - From: Rattana BIV [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault with asterisk and OH323 By my phone I call H323 client (Netmeeting) I can talk. Everything is OK. But when I hangup I have the segmentation fault. These are the last asterisk log before the segmentation fault: -- Called 192.168.1.200 -- H323:193 answered CAPI[contr1/26]/1 DEBUG[23569]: File channel.c, Line 2145 (ast_channel_bridge): Didn't get a frame from channel: CAPI[contr1/26]/1 DEBUG[23569]: File channel.c, Line 2213 (ast_channel_bridge): Bridge stops bridging channels CAPI[contr1/26]/1 and H323:193 Something strange is, when I call the phone from netmeeting it's work perfectly. What do you think ? (you can see my oh323.conf in attach file) Rattana - Original Message - From: Michael Manousos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:07 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault with asterisk and OH323 Rattana BIV wrote: Hi, I got a segmantation fault When I call to computer (h323) from phone. I use asterisk-oh323 0.5.4 and chan_capi.0.2.2 drivers. More info (config files, screen log, backtrace of core file) is needed. Someone know where the problem ? Regards Rattana Michael. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault with asterisk and OH323
Rattana BIV wrote: Hi, I got a segmantation fault When I call to computer (h323) from phone. I use asterisk-oh323 0.5.4 and chan_capi.0.2.2 drivers. More info (config files, screen log, backtrace of core file) is needed. Someone know where the problem ? Regards Rattana Michael. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault with asterisk and OH323
By my phone I call H323 client (Netmeeting) I can talk. Everything is OK. But when I hangup I have the segmentation fault. These are the last asterisk log before the segmentation fault: -- Called 192.168.1.200 -- H323:193 answered CAPI[contr1/26]/1 DEBUG[23569]: File channel.c, Line 2145 (ast_channel_bridge): Didn't get a frame from channel: CAPI[contr1/26]/1 DEBUG[23569]: File channel.c, Line 2213 (ast_channel_bridge): Bridge stops bridging channels CAPI[contr1/26]/1 and H323:193 Something strange is, when I call the phone from netmeeting it's work perfectly. What do you think ? (you can see my oh323.conf in attach file) Rattana - Original Message - From: Michael Manousos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 3:07 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault with asterisk and OH323 Rattana BIV wrote: Hi, I got a segmantation fault When I call to computer (h323) from phone. I use asterisk-oh323 0.5.4 and chan_capi.0.2.2 drivers. More info (config files, screen log, backtrace of core file) is needed. Someone know where the problem ? Regards Rattana Michael. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users oh323.conf Description: Binary data
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault with chan_oh323
Hi Everybody, I am new to Asterisk. Can anybody suggest me some link where I can find architecture level detail of this system. My aim is to find out how easy it is to port it on a new hardware (T1/E1 and POTS)? Any input is highly appreciated. Regards Arun -Original Message- From: Mark Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 July 2003 13:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault with chan_oh323 This also happened to me when I was using the same codec with both oh323 and SIP, if I forced it to alaw on oh323 and ulaw on SIP the connection worked. I also tried h323 instead of oh323 which works okay but you have to use earlier versions of pwlib and openh323. Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Ulitskiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2003 23:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault with chan_oh323 Hi, I'm trying to interconnect sip and h323 endpoints using asterisk and asterisk crashes with segmentation fault whenever h323 connection needs to be established. It registers with gatekeeper ok though. Here are the symptoms. If the call initiated by SIP device, asterisk replies to it Trying and then silently crashes (it launched as asterisk -cd). In debug log I can see the following: Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File pbx.c, Line 1123 (pbx_extension_helper): Launching 'Dial' Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1393 (oh323_request): In oh323_request. Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1394 (oh323_request): type=oh323, format=4, data=phone number. Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1440 (oh323_request): Created new call structure 0 (2428 bytes). That's it. If the call initiated by H323 device, then I see *CLI WrapH323Connection::WrapH323Connection: WrapH323Connection created. Segmentation fault and debug log shows: Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 2141 (init_h323_connection): In init_h323_connection... Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 2180 (init_h323_connection): Created new call structure 0 (2428 bytes). Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1527 (copy_call_details): --- CALL DETAILS --- Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1528 (copy_call_details): call_token = ip$192.168.0.227:5018/92 Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1529 (copy_call_details): call_source_alias = tnt [192.168.0.227] Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1530 (copy_call_details): call_dest_alias = 12125551234 12125551234 ip$192.168.0.70:1720 Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1531 (copy_call_details): call_source_e164 = phone number Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1532 (copy_call_details): call_dest_e164 = 12125551234 That's it. And gatekeeper log shows that after normal ARQ-ACF exchange originating device immediately sent DRQ. If anybody knows a reason for this (and the way to fix it of course ;)), I'd appreciate if you let me know. If you need any additional info to troubleshoot it, let me know too. Thank a lot. Michael ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault with chan_oh323
Michael Ulitskiy wrote: Hi, I'm trying to interconnect sip and h323 endpoints using asterisk and asterisk crashes with segmentation fault whenever h323 connection needs to be established. It registers with gatekeeper ok though. Here are the symptoms. If the call initiated by SIP device, asterisk replies to it Trying and then silently crashes (it launched as asterisk -cd). In debug log I can see the following: Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File pbx.c, Line 1123 (pbx_extension_helper): Launching 'Dial' Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1393 (oh323_request): In oh323_request. Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1394 (oh323_request): type=oh323, format=4, data=phone number. Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1440 (oh323_request): Created new call structure 0 (2428 bytes). That's it. If the call initiated by H323 device, then I see *CLI WrapH323Connection::WrapH323Connection: WrapH323Connection created. Segmentation fault and debug log shows: Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 2141 (init_h323_connection): In init_h323_connection... Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 2180 (init_h323_connection): Created new call structure 0 (2428 bytes). Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1527 (copy_call_details): --- CALL DETAILS --- Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1528 (copy_call_details): call_token = ip$192.168.0.227:5018/92 Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1529 (copy_call_details): call_source_alias = tnt [192.168.0.227] Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1530 (copy_call_details): call_dest_alias = 12125551234 12125551234 ip$192.168.0.70:1720 Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1531 (copy_call_details): call_source_e164 = phone number Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1532 (copy_call_details): call_dest_e164 = 12125551234 That's it. And gatekeeper log shows that after normal ARQ-ACF exchange originating device immediately sent DRQ. If anybody knows a reason for this (and the way to fix it of course ;)), I'd appreciate if you let me know. If you need any additional info to troubleshoot it, let me know too. First of all, in oh323.conf, set wrapLibTraceLevel=3 libTraceLevel=3 libTraceFile=/tmp/trace.txt Run Asterisk again, with -vvvcd, and make it crash. Then send me (offlist) the trace file, the screen log and a backtrace of the core file dumped. Thank a lot. Michael Michael. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault with chan_oh323
That is another problem I hope the developers would pay attention to. ulaw codec segfaulting when it is used by h323 side of connection for both incoming and outgoing calls. At least with chan_oh323. If I set alaw codec for h323 it works fine regardless of codec on SIP side. Michael On Thursday 17 July 2003 03:36 am, Mark Thompson wrote: This also happened to me when I was using the same codec with both oh323 and SIP, if I forced it to alaw on oh323 and ulaw on SIP the connection worked. I also tried h323 instead of oh323 which works okay but you have to use earlier versions of pwlib and openh323. Mark -Original Message- From: Michael Ulitskiy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 July 2003 23:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault with chan_oh323 Hi, I'm trying to interconnect sip and h323 endpoints using asterisk and asterisk crashes with segmentation fault whenever h323 connection needs to be established. It registers with gatekeeper ok though. Here are the symptoms. If the call initiated by SIP device, asterisk replies to it Trying and then silently crashes (it launched as asterisk -cd). In debug log I can see the following: Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File pbx.c, Line 1123 (pbx_extension_helper): Launching 'Dial' Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1393 (oh323_request): In oh323_request. Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1394 (oh323_request): type=oh323, format=4, data=phone number. Jul 16 18:11:52 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1440 (oh323_request): Created new call structure 0 (2428 bytes). That's it. If the call initiated by H323 device, then I see *CLI WrapH323Connection::WrapH323Connection: WrapH323Connection created. Segmentation fault and debug log shows: Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 2141 (init_h323_connection): In init_h323_connection... Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 2180 (init_h323_connection): Created new call structure 0 (2428 bytes). Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1527 (copy_call_details): --- CALL DETAILS --- Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1528 (copy_call_details): call_token = ip$192.168.0.227:5018/92 Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1529 (copy_call_details): call_source_alias = tnt [192.168.0.227] Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1530 (copy_call_details): call_dest_alias = 12125551234 12125551234 ip$192.168.0.70:1720 Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1531 (copy_call_details): call_source_e164 = phone number Jul 16 18:33:12 DEBUG[196621]: File chan_oh323.c, Line 1532 (copy_call_details): call_dest_e164 = 12125551234 That's it. And gatekeeper log shows that after normal ARQ-ACF exchange originating device immediately sent DRQ. If anybody knows a reason for this (and the way to fix it of course ;)), I'd appreciate if you let me know. If you need any additional info to troubleshoot it, let me know too. Thank a lot. Michael ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault on reload
Can you run with valgrind instead so we can find the true source? install asterisk with make valgrind and then run: valgrind --attach-gdb=yes ./asterisk -vvvg and then asterisk -rx reload and see where it tries to make you attach. Talk to Martin for more info ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) next week if you need it, or find assistance on IRC (irc.freenode.net in #asterisk) Mark On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Derek Beaumont wrote: Whenever I issue the reload command, asterisk crashes. Below is the output I get from (gdb) bt Any help is appreciated. *** *CLI reload == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/enum.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/rtp.conf': Not found (No such file or directory) == RTP Allocating from port range 5000 - 31000 -- Reloading module 'app_voicemail2.so' (Comedian Mail (Voicemail System)) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf': Found -- Reloading module 'chan_local.so' (Local Proxy Channel) -- Reloading module 'chan_iax2.so' (Inter Asterisk eXchange (Ver 2)) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/iax.conf': Found WARNING[16384]: File chan_iax2.c, Line 4980 (set_config): Ignoring port for now -- Reloading module 'cdr_csv.so' (Comma Separated Values CDR Backend) -- Reloading module 'app_queue.so' (True Call Queueing) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/queues.conf': Found -- Reloading module 'pbx_config.so' (Text Extension Configuration) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/extensions.conf': Found Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 2159)] 0x4015b9fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x4015b9fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #1 0x4015ac61 in malloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #2 0x40161dd0 in strdup () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #3 0x08055a2f in cfg_process (tmp=0x80e5950, _tmpc=0xb360, _last=0xb364, buf=0x6c636e69 Address 0x6c636e69 out of bounds, lineno=118, configfile=0x44ceb41d extensions.conf, includelevel=0) at config.c:57 #4 0x08055472 in __ast_load (configfile=0x44ceb41d extensions.conf, tmp=0x80e5950, _tmpc=0xb360, _last=0xb364, includelevel=0) at config.c:731 #5 0x0805588d in ast_load (configfile=0x8 Address 0x8 out of bounds) at config.c:766 #6 0x44ceabd2 in pbx_load_module () at pbx_config.c:1520 #7 0x44ce7c8f in reload () at pbx_config.c:1648 #8 0x08054d22 in ast_module_reload () at loader.c:159 #9 0x08069d6a in handle_reload (fd=1, argc=1, argv=0xb4c0) at cli.c:105 #10 0x08069b5a in ast_cli_command (fd=1, s=0x8 Address 0x8 out of bounds) at cli.c:1006 #11 0x0807b36e in main (argc=135033816, argv=0x80b2d08) at asterisk.c:496 #12 0x400fd7f7 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (gdb) *** ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Segmentation fault on reload
Check the line 118 of extensions.conf ??? Martin On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Derek Beaumont wrote: Whenever I issue the reload command, asterisk crashes. Below is the output I get from (gdb) bt Any help is appreciated. *** *CLI reload == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/enum.conf': Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/rtp.conf': Not found (No such file or directory) == RTP Allocating from port range 5000 - 31000 -- Reloading module 'app_voicemail2.so' (Comedian Mail (Voicemail System)) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf': Found -- Reloading module 'chan_local.so' (Local Proxy Channel) -- Reloading module 'chan_iax2.so' (Inter Asterisk eXchange (Ver 2)) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/iax.conf': Found WARNING[16384]: File chan_iax2.c, Line 4980 (set_config): Ignoring port for now -- Reloading module 'cdr_csv.so' (Comma Separated Values CDR Backend) -- Reloading module 'app_queue.so' (True Call Queueing) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/queues.conf': Found -- Reloading module 'pbx_config.so' (Text Extension Configuration) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/extensions.conf': Found Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 2159)] 0x4015b9fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x4015b9fc in mallopt () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #1 0x4015ac61 in malloc () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #2 0x40161dd0 in strdup () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 #3 0x08055a2f in cfg_process (tmp=0x80e5950, _tmpc=0xb360, _last=0xb364, buf=0x6c636e69 Address 0x6c636e69 out of bounds, lineno=118, configfile=0x44ceb41d extensions.conf, includelevel=0) at config.c:57 #4 0x08055472 in __ast_load (configfile=0x44ceb41d extensions.conf, tmp=0x80e5950, _tmpc=0xb360, _last=0xb364, includelevel=0) at config.c:731 #5 0x0805588d in ast_load (configfile=0x8 Address 0x8 out of bounds) at config.c:766 #6 0x44ceabd2 in pbx_load_module () at pbx_config.c:1520 #7 0x44ce7c8f in reload () at pbx_config.c:1648 #8 0x08054d22 in ast_module_reload () at loader.c:159 #9 0x08069d6a in handle_reload (fd=1, argc=1, argv=0xb4c0) at cli.c:105 #10 0x08069b5a in ast_cli_command (fd=1, s=0x8 Address 0x8 out of bounds) at cli.c:1006 #11 0x0807b36e in main (argc=135033816, argv=0x80b2d08) at asterisk.c:496 #12 0x400fd7f7 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (gdb) *** ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault
asterisk -vvvcg (use g option to generate the coredump file) than gdb asterisk core.pid bt Also you might send a log of pri intense debug span number regards Martin On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Alex Zarubin wrote: Configuration: Linux wpbx 2.4.9-13 #1 Tue Oct 30 20:11:04 EST 2001 i686 unknown P4 2.5 GHz, 1 GB RAM T400P with 3 T1s plugged in. A flow of 46 calls (spread out over 3 T1s). Each call gets transferred (Dial) to the SIP platform and stays for 5 min. Case 1. Asterisk built out of CVS Mar. 19. Test was running for 3 days. Segmentation fault. Case 2. Asterisk built out of CVS Apr. 1. Test was running for 12 hours. Segmentation fault. No coredump found. In case 1 there was a significant memory growth: Top at the startup: 15986 root 9 0 6440 6436 2144 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 asterisk 15987 root 8 0 6440 6436 2144 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 asterisk Top in several hours: 15986 root 9 0 9192 9188 2148 S 0.0 0.9 0:00 asterisk 15987 root 9 0 9192 9188 2148 S 0.0 0.9 0:00 asterisk Top after a day: 27441 root 9 0 45980 44M 2156 S 0.0 4.5 0:00 asterisk 27442 root 8 0 45980 44M 2156 S 0.0 4.5 0:16 asterisk Actually, I saw it over 50. There were some warning messages on the way. For example: Apr 1 23:22:33 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 86 failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 1 23:24:54 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 102, retransmitting frame 102 now, updating n_r! Apr 1 23:24:54 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 103, but we have nothing -- resetting! Apr 1 23:28:49 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 29, retransmitting frame 29 now, updating n_r! Apr 1 23:28:49 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 30, but we have nothing -- resetting! Apr 1 23:30:00 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 87 failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 1 23:30:24 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 86 failed: Unknown error 500 Question: What do I do to give you more info? Should I issue 'ulimit -c unlimited' to get a coredump? Are there any flags/modes to set? Thank you. Alex Zarubin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault OK, here it is. On a flow of shorter calls it lasted about an hour. [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# gdb asterisk core.12348 GNU gdb Red Hat Linux 7.x (5.0rh-15) (MI_OUT) Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i386-redhat-linux... Core was generated by `asterisk -dgvvvc'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0...done. warning: Unable to set global thread event mask: generic error [New Thread 1024 (LWP 12342)] Error while reading shared library symbols: Can't attach LWP 12342: No such process Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/i686/libm.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/i686/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/i686/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_modem.so...done. . . . . Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypt.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_pcm_alaw.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_pcm_alaw.so #0 0x08055d86 in ast_queue_frame (chan=0x81cd398, fin=0x42c1991c, lock=1) at channel.c:354 354 cur = chan-pvt-readq; (gdb) bt #0 0x08055d86 in ast_queue_frame (chan=0x81cd398, fin=0x42c1991c, lock=1) at channel.c:354 #1 0x0805a9a0 in ast_queue_hangup (chan=0x81cd398, lock=1) at channel.c:391 #2 0x42412855 in handle_request (p=0x82b6350, req=0x42c1b25c, sin=0x42c1b24c) at chan_sip.c:3762 #3 0x42412e6d in sipsock_read (id=0x80d7850, fd=10, events=1, ignore=0x0) at chan_sip.c:3840 #4 0x08050d9e in ast_io_wait (ioc=0x80d9018, howlong=1000) at io.c:268 #5 0x424131f5 in do_monitor (data="" at chan_sip.c:3928 #6 0x4003ec6f in pthread_start_thread (arg=0x42c1bbe0) at manager.c:284 (gdb) -Original Message- From: Martin Pycko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:38 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault asterisk -vvvcg (use g option to generate the coredump file) than gdb asterisk core.pid bt Also you might send a log of pri intense debug span number regards Martin On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Alex Zarubin wrote: Configuration: Linux wpbx 2.4.9-13 #1 Tue Oct 30 20:11:04 EST 2001 i686 unknown P4 2.5 GHz, 1 GB RAM T400P with 3 T1s plugged in. A flow of 46 calls (spread out over 3 T1s). Each call gets transferred (Dial) to the SIP platform and stays for 5 min. Case 1. Asterisk built out of CVS Mar. 19. Test was running for 3 days. Segmentation fault. Case 2. Asterisk built out of CVS Apr. 1. Test was running for 12 hours. Segmentation fault. No coredump found. In case 1 there was a significant memory growth: Top at the startup: 15986 root 9 0 6440 6436 2144 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 asterisk 15987 root 8 0 6440 6436 2144 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 asterisk Top in several hours: 15986 root 9 0 9192 9188 2148 S 0.0 0.9 0:00 asterisk 15987 root 9 0 9192 9188 2148 S 0.0 0.9 0:00 asterisk Top after a day: 27441 root 9 0 45980 44M 2156 S 0.0 4.5 0:00 asterisk 27442 root 8 0 45980 44M 2156 S 0.0 4.5 0:16 asterisk Actually, I saw it over 50. There were some warning messages on the way. For example: Apr 1 23:22:33 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 86 failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 1 23:24:54 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 102, retransmitting frame 102 now, updating n_r! Apr 1 23:24:54 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 103, but we have nothing -- resetting! Apr 1 23:28:49 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 29, retransmitting frame 29 now, updating n_r! Apr 1 23:28:49 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 30, but we have nothing -- resetting! Apr 1 23:30:00 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 87 failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 1 23:30:24 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 86 failed: Unknown error 500 Question: What do I do to give you more info? Should I issue 'ulimit -c unlimited' to get a coredump? Are there any flags/modes to set? Thank you. Alex Zarubin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing l
RE: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault
Does running it under valgrind produce more useful output? Mark On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Alex Zarubin wrote: OK, here it is. On a flow of shorter calls it lasted about an hour. [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# gdb asterisk core.12348 GNU gdb Red Hat Linux 7.x (5.0rh-15) (MI_OUT) Copyright 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i386-redhat-linux... Core was generated by `asterisk -dgvvvc'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0...done. warning: Unable to set global thread event mask: generic error [New Thread 1024 (LWP 12342)] Error while reading shared library symbols: Can't attach LWP 12342: No such process Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/i686/libm.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/i686/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/i686/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/i686/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_modem.so...done. . . . . Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypt.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_pcm_alaw.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_pcm_alaw.so #0 0x08055d86 in ast_queue_frame (chan=0x81cd398, fin=0x42c1991c, lock=1) at channel.c:354 354 cur = chan-pvt-readq; (gdb) bt #0 0x08055d86 in ast_queue_frame (chan=0x81cd398, fin=0x42c1991c, lock=1) at channel.c:354 #1 0x0805a9a0 in ast_queue_hangup (chan=0x81cd398, lock=1) at channel.c:391 #2 0x42412855 in handle_request (p=0x82b6350, req=0x42c1b25c, sin=0x42c1b24c) at chan_sip.c:3762 #3 0x42412e6d in sipsock_read (id=0x80d7850, fd=10, events=1, ignore=0x0) at chan_sip.c:3840 #4 0x08050d9e in ast_io_wait (ioc=0x80d9018, howlong=1000) at io.c:268 #5 0x424131f5 in do_monitor (data=0x0) at chan_sip.c:3928 #6 0x4003ec6f in pthread_start_thread (arg=0x42c1bbe0) at manager.c:284 (gdb) -Original Message- From: Martin Pycko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:38 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] segmentation fault asterisk -vvvcg (use g option to generate the coredump file) than gdb asterisk core.pid bt Also you might send a log of pri intense debug span number regards Martin On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Alex Zarubin wrote: Configuration: Linux wpbx 2.4.9-13 #1 Tue Oct 30 20:11:04 EST 2001 i686 unknown P4 2.5 GHz, 1 GB RAM T400P with 3 T1s plugged in. A flow of 46 calls (spread out over 3 T1s). Each call gets transferred (Dial) to the SIP platform and stays for 5 min. Case 1. Asterisk built out of CVS Mar. 19. Test was running for 3 days. Segmentation fault. Case 2. Asterisk built out of CVS Apr. 1. Test was running for 12 hours. Segmentation fault. No coredump found. In case 1 there was a significant memory growth: Top at the startup: 15986 root 9 0 6440 6436 2144 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 asterisk 15987 root 8 0 6440 6436 2144 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 asterisk Top in several hours: 15986 root 9 0 9192 9188 2148 S 0.0 0.9 0:00 asterisk 15987 root 9 0 9192 9188 2148 S 0.0 0.9 0:00 asterisk Top after a day: 27441 root 9 0 45980 44M 2156 S 0.0 4.5 0:00 asterisk 27442 root 8 0 45980 44M 2156 S 0.0 4.5 0:16 asterisk Actually, I saw it over 50. There were some warning messages on the way. For example: Apr 1 23:22:33 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 86 failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 1 23:24:54 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 102, retransmitting frame 102 now, updating n_r! Apr 1 23:24:54 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 103, but we have nothing -- resetting! Apr 1 23:28:49 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 29, retransmitting frame 29 now, updating n_r! Apr 1 23:28:49 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: !! Got reject for frame 30, but we have nothing -- resetting! Apr 1 23:30:00 WARNING[11276]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error): PRI: Read on 87 failed: Unknown error 500 Apr 1 23:30:24 WARNING[10251]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5248 (zt_pri_error
