Re: [Asterisk-Users] simple question...

2004-01-22 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 21:55, Jess Magnaye wrote:
> it just came to my mind, and i haven't done any researches yet if
> somebody tried this one with asterisk.. :) well just in case somebody
> or someone on the list aware, i appreciate any advise.
>  
> in telco world, there's like 64kbps per channel and voice can be
> carried on a 16kbps channel.  is it possible to configure asterisk to
> make 4 extensions (ATAs example), to call out using single FXO port at
> the same time?  if that is possible, then is it also possible to make
> t1-pri to be capable of transmitting 4x23ch simultaneous calls..?

Your problem is needing to have the same software on both sides, and
your 4 into 1 would have to be going to the same destination as the
telco route 64k chunks. 

Of course the question then is if you have the same software at each
end, why are you worring about PRI when you can go full IP and not get
burned on the D channel. 

-- 
Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Simple Question

2008-03-31 Thread sanjay . rajdev
No It does not require.

Regards,
Sanjay.

- Original Message -
From: "Drew Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:17:19 PM (GMT+0530) Asia/Calcutta
Subject: [asterisk-users] Simple Question

Does AMD (answering machine detect) need ztdummy or some other timer to 
function properly?

-- 
Drew Miller
Iowa Democratic Party
Information Technology Director
Office:  (515) 974-1682
Cell:  (515) 451-4509
AIM:  ItsDrewMiller
MSN:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Simple Question

2008-04-01 Thread Jared Smith
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 08:23 -0700, Rizwan Hisham wrote:
> Does anyone know the purpose of "/n" attached at the end of the dial
> command  below
>  
> Dial(Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n)<
> 

The 'n' flag tells chan_local not to optimize itself out of the call
path.  Without the 'n' flag, chan_local will try to remove itself from
the call path after the call has been established.

-- 
Jared Smith
Community Relations Manager
Digium, Inc.


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Simple Question

2008-04-01 Thread Eric Wieling
Rizwan Hisham wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone know the purpose of "/n" attached at the end of the dial
> command  below
> 
> Dial(Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n )<

Yes, and you will too when you read localchannel.txt in your Asterisk 
source code docs directory.

-- 
Consulting for Asterisk, Polycom, Sangoma, Digium, Cisco, LAN, WAN, QoS, 
T-1, PRI, Frame Relay, Linux, and network design.  Based near 
Birmingham, AL.  Now accepting clients worldwide.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Simple Question

2008-04-01 Thread Lenz

Rule of thumb: you first try without the /n; if the new behaviour is  
different from expected, add the /n
:)
Just my $0.02
l.



On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:33:05 +0200, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 08:23 -0700, Rizwan Hisham wrote:
>> Does anyone know the purpose of "/n" attached at the end of the dial
>> command  below
>>
>> Dial(Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n)<
>>
>
> The 'n' flag tells chan_local not to optimize itself out of the call
> path.  Without the 'n' flag, chan_local will try to remove itself from
> the call path after the call has been established.
>



-- 
Loway Research - Home of QueueMetrics
http://queuemetrics.com

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Simple question

2007-01-27 Thread Lee Jenkins

Rizwan Hisham wrote:

Whats the difference between the following statements in extensions.conf

include=>inbound

AND

#include inbound/*.conf



Hi, checkout this page:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+extensions.conf

"With the #include  statement in extensions.conf, other files 
are included. This way you can setup a system where extensions.conf is 
the main file, users.conf contain your local users, services.conf 
contain various services, like conferencing. This way, the dial plan may 
be easier to maintain, depending on the size of your setup. The #include 
 statement is not the same as the include  statement. 
The #include statement works in all Asterisk configuration files. "



I believe that #include syntax works like a include in programming 
languages where the file or files listed are included as part of the 
file that references them.


The include => context syntax is for including on context within 
another.  If context A includes context B then calls going into Context 
A could possibly match extensions in context B.




--

Warm Regards,

Lee

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Simple question

2007-01-27 Thread Alejandro Kauffmann
> Whats the difference between the following statements in extensions.conf
> include=>inbound
> AND
> #include inbound/*.conf 
 
The first one includes a context the second one includes a file(s). 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/654 - Release Date: 1/27/2007
5:02 PM
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Simple question

2007-01-29 Thread john beaman
The first include references another context within extensions.conf.  Contexts 
are defined by words in brackets.  In your example, there would be a context in 
extensions.conf that would look like:

[inbound]

Contexts allow for setting up difference services and difference user 
capabilities all within the extensions.conf file.

The second include is including the contents of multiple *.conf files located 
in a directory called inbound.

JB

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/27/2007 6:50 AM >>>
Whats the difference between the following statements in extensions.conf

include=>inbound

AND

#include inbound/*.conf

-- 
Regards
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
-

This email transmission and any documents, files or previous

email messages attached to it may contain information that is

confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended

recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,

printing, distributing or use of this transmission is strictly

prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,

please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return

email and delete the original transmission and its attachments

without reading or saving in any manner.



The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society.

-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple Question

2004-11-15 Thread Jason Williams
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:44:12 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Is this quite simple to set up and can I attach asterix to my landline via a
> standard modem?
> 


Yes no go to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk

and read learn try and read try agin



Jason
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on sip.conf

2003-12-12 Thread Olle E. Johansson
SW wrote:

Hi folks,

I want to fix hole in my asterisk set up.

I use Vocal as my sip proxy and * for voice mail and the g/w to PSTN,
Iconnect, fwd etc. So from Vocal I redirect sip requests which needs to go
'other' places. This senario works fine.
Now the issue is someone else running a vocal or another SIP proxy can
redirect his calls to my * as well. Those calls two will come through
general section of the sip.conf and could land on the PSTN as well. (do not
ask my *'s IP address folks, I am not going to run a free PSTN g/w :)
So, how do I prevent other than my own proxy to use the general section of
the sip.conf file ? As a mater of fact all calls from fwd and iconnect two
land on the general section.
Hope some one can shead some light.

Cheers

SW

Here is my sip.conf

[general]
;calls arrive from sip lands here
port=5060
context=default-in
Change this to
  context=forbidden
And define "forbidden" context in extensions conf to whatever you like, example
exten => s,1,playback(tt-monkeys)
exten => s,2,hangup
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
allow=g729
maxexpirey=180
defaultexpirey=160
;Connect to Free World Dialup (no NAT)
register=61358:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/61358
This one does not have a defined context.
[fwd.pulver.com] section missing
;Connect to iconnect
register=15108688610:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/15108688610
canreinvite=no
Same here.



[iconnect]
;incoming does not land here, why ? outgoing is fine
type=friend
secret=
username=
host=sipauth.deltathree.com
dtmfmode=inband ; required by iconnect
context=iconnect-in
canreinvite=no
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
allow=g729
[fwd]
;incoming does not land here, why ?  outgoing is fine
type=friend
secret=xxx
username=61358
host=fwd.pulver.com
context=fwd-in
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
[vocal]
;used when dialed in from vocal  not working  
type=friend
host=ip of vocal server
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
port=5060
canreinvite=no
context=vocal-in
[vocal-out]
;used to dial out to vocal
type=friend
host=ip of vocal server
allow=g729
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
port=5065
canreinvite=no
[6300]
type=friend
username=6300
context=intern
;secret=blah
host=dynamic
;defaultip=192.168.254.4
dtmfmode=info
nat=1
[6301]
type=friend
username=6301
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=inband
context=intern
nat=1
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
*** Olle E. Johansson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile +46 70 593 68 51, Edvina AB, http://www.edvina.net
Runbovägen 10, 192 48 Sollentuna, Sweden
Phone: +46 8 594 78 810, Fax: +46 8 594 78 820
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on sip.conf

2003-12-12 Thread David J Carter
Hi

Have you got the context set-up in the sip.conf to say which extension
context to use for incoming calls fro FWD & Iconnect.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Olle E. Johansson
Sent: 12 December 2003 08:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on sip.conf

SW wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I want to fix hole in my asterisk set up.
>
> I use Vocal as my sip proxy and * for voice mail and the g/w to PSTN,
> Iconnect, fwd etc. So from Vocal I redirect sip requests which needs to go
> 'other' places. This senario works fine.
>
> Now the issue is someone else running a vocal or another SIP proxy can
> redirect his calls to my * as well. Those calls two will come through
> general section of the sip.conf and could land on the PSTN as well. (do
not
> ask my *'s IP address folks, I am not going to run a free PSTN g/w :)
>
> So, how do I prevent other than my own proxy to use the general section of
> the sip.conf file ? As a mater of fact all calls from fwd and iconnect two
> land on the general section.
>
> Hope some one can shead some light.
>
> Cheers
>
> SW
>
> Here is my sip.conf
>
> [general]
> ;calls arrive from sip lands here
> port=5060
> context=default-in
Change this to
   context=forbidden
And define "forbidden" context in extensions conf to whatever you like,
example

exten => s,1,playback(tt-monkeys)
exten => s,2,hangup

> disallow=all
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> allow=g729
> maxexpirey=180
> defaultexpirey=160
> ;Connect to Free World Dialup (no NAT)
> register=61358:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/61358
This one does not have a defined context.
[fwd.pulver.com] section missing

> ;Connect to iconnect
> register=15108688610:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/15108688610
> canreinvite=no
Same here.

>
>
>
> [iconnect]
> ;incoming does not land here, why ? outgoing is fine
> type=friend
> secret=
> username=
> host=sipauth.deltathree.com
> dtmfmode=inband ; required by iconnect
> context=iconnect-in
> canreinvite=no
> allow=alaw
> allow=ulaw
> allow=g729
>
>
> [fwd]
> ;incoming does not land here, why ?  outgoing is fine
> type=friend
> secret=xxx
> username=61358
> host=fwd.pulver.com
> context=fwd-in
> allow=alaw
> allow=ulaw
>
> [vocal]
> ;used when dialed in from vocal  not working  
> type=friend
> host=ip of vocal server
> disallow=all
> allow=g729
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> port=5060
> canreinvite=no
> context=vocal-in
>
>
> [vocal-out]
> ;used to dial out to vocal
> type=friend
> host=ip of vocal server
> allow=g729
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> port=5065
> canreinvite=no
>
> [6300]
> type=friend
> username=6300
> context=intern
> ;secret=blah
> host=dynamic
> ;defaultip=192.168.254.4
> dtmfmode=info
> nat=1
>
> [6301]
> type=friend
> username=6301
> host=dynamic
> dtmfmode=inband
> context=intern
> nat=1
>
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


--
*** Olle E. Johansson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mobile +46 70 593 68 51, Edvina AB, http://www.edvina.net
Runbovägen 10, 192 48 Sollentuna, Sweden
Phone: +46 8 594 78 810, Fax: +46 8 594 78 820


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on sip.conf

2003-12-12 Thread David J Carter
Hi all

Disregard my last post I replied to the wrong e-mail, I should have replied
to an off list e-mail.

That will teach me not to put my glasses on.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Olle E. Johansson
Sent: 12 December 2003 08:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on sip.conf

SW wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I want to fix hole in my asterisk set up.
>
> I use Vocal as my sip proxy and * for voice mail and the g/w to PSTN,
> Iconnect, fwd etc. So from Vocal I redirect sip requests which needs to go
> 'other' places. This senario works fine.
>
> Now the issue is someone else running a vocal or another SIP proxy can
> redirect his calls to my * as well. Those calls two will come through
> general section of the sip.conf and could land on the PSTN as well. (do
not
> ask my *'s IP address folks, I am not going to run a free PSTN g/w :)
>
> So, how do I prevent other than my own proxy to use the general section of
> the sip.conf file ? As a mater of fact all calls from fwd and iconnect two
> land on the general section.
>
> Hope some one can shead some light.
>
> Cheers
>
> SW
>
> Here is my sip.conf
>
> [general]
> ;calls arrive from sip lands here
> port=5060
> context=default-in
Change this to
   context=forbidden
And define "forbidden" context in extensions conf to whatever you like,
example

exten => s,1,playback(tt-monkeys)
exten => s,2,hangup

> disallow=all
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> allow=g729
> maxexpirey=180
> defaultexpirey=160
> ;Connect to Free World Dialup (no NAT)
> register=61358:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/61358
This one does not have a defined context.
[fwd.pulver.com] section missing

> ;Connect to iconnect
> register=15108688610:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/15108688610
> canreinvite=no
Same here.

>
>
>
> [iconnect]
> ;incoming does not land here, why ? outgoing is fine
> type=friend
> secret=
> username=
> host=sipauth.deltathree.com
> dtmfmode=inband ; required by iconnect
> context=iconnect-in
> canreinvite=no
> allow=alaw
> allow=ulaw
> allow=g729
>
>
> [fwd]
> ;incoming does not land here, why ?  outgoing is fine
> type=friend
> secret=xxx
> username=61358
> host=fwd.pulver.com
> context=fwd-in
> allow=alaw
> allow=ulaw
>
> [vocal]
> ;used when dialed in from vocal  not working  
> type=friend
> host=ip of vocal server
> disallow=all
> allow=g729
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> port=5060
> canreinvite=no
> context=vocal-in
>
>
> [vocal-out]
> ;used to dial out to vocal
> type=friend
> host=ip of vocal server
> allow=g729
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> port=5065
> canreinvite=no
>
> [6300]
> type=friend
> username=6300
> context=intern
> ;secret=blah
> host=dynamic
> ;defaultip=192.168.254.4
> dtmfmode=info
> nat=1
>
> [6301]
> type=friend
> username=6301
> host=dynamic
> dtmfmode=inband
> context=intern
> nat=1
>
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


--
*** Olle E. Johansson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mobile +46 70 593 68 51, Edvina AB, http://www.edvina.net
Runbovägen 10, 192 48 Sollentuna, Sweden
Phone: +46 8 594 78 810, Fax: +46 8 594 78 820


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on asterisk

2006-03-20 Thread Kerry Garrison
Its all about how you configure your dialplan. Asterisk doesn't know what a
PSTN or VOIP phone number is. If you want all 08444 numbers to go through a
certain trunk, then you set your dialplan up accordingly.
-Kerry
 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Mark Hayward
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 8:21 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] simple question on asterisk
> 
> Hi,
> I am planning to deploy an asterisk installation but I need 
> to convince a few managers that its a good idea.
> Theres something I don't quite understand though, I plan 
> deploy a box on the end of 4 channel BRI ISDN and provide it 
> an ADSL internet connection.
> Should a phone behind the asterisk PBX wish to call a VOIP 
> phone number number, say an 0844 one from www.voip-user.org, 
> would it send this automatically over the PSTN ISDN network 
> or would it know to send the call over the internet.
> Would I need a SIP provider on the internet to forward the 
> calls? I assume I would need some sort of directory service 
> to know where to route the call.
> Thanks in advance,
> Mark
> 
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about SIP community

2004-09-09 Thread Scott Laird
On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Marcello Lupo wrote:
we have a community of people on an * box that use SIP softphones to 
talk each
other. Can you suggest me the quickest and simple way to let someone 
know who
is online without have to call one by one the persons to look if they 
are
present or not?? Something the user list in Microsoft Messenger.
I was thinking on some sort of web page that can check the 
registration of the
sip clients on the asterisk but want to know if already exist to avoid 
to
reinvent the wheel.
thanks,
The generic term for this is 'presence'.  Everyone seems to agree that 
it's important, but I'm not aware of anyone actively working on it for 
Asterisk.

Scott
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about SIP community

2004-09-09 Thread Holger Schurig
> Something the user list in
> Microsoft Messenger. I was thinking on some sort of web page that can
> check the registration of the sip clients on the asterisk but want to
> know if already exist to avoid to reinvent the wheel.

That is actually quite easy and there are some projects that achive this 
using the Manager API of Asterisk.

One is Flash based, but very pretty.

I also added rudimentary support for this in DeStar, it has to made nicer 
and more usable, but that is easy to do.


Maybe you visit the page Software Addons on the www.voip-info.org WIKI.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about SIP community

2004-09-10 Thread Bill Seddon
Have you had chance to look at Jeff Pulver's Communicator?  This is a
soft-phone, currently in beta, that allows you to bring together your
contacts from MSN, ICQ, AOL and, importantly from your point of view, add
contacts that are SIP users.

I've not tried it yet with asterisk, but now you have asked the question,
I'll try it out...  It certainly detects FWD presence so I think it might
work with Asterisk.  If it doesn't I'll ask put it forward as a suggestion.

Bill Seddon

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Laird
Sent: September 09, 2004 8:14 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about SIP community


On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Marcello Lupo wrote:
> we have a community of people on an * box that use SIP softphones to 
> talk each
> other. Can you suggest me the quickest and simple way to let someone 
> know who
> is online without have to call one by one the persons to look if they 
> are
> present or not?? Something the user list in Microsoft Messenger.
> I was thinking on some sort of web page that can check the 
> registration of the
> sip clients on the asterisk but want to know if already exist to avoid 
> to
> reinvent the wheel.
> thanks,

The generic term for this is 'presence'.  Everyone seems to agree that 
it's important, but I'm not aware of anyone actively working on it for 
Asterisk.


Scott

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about SIP community

2004-09-10 Thread Aaron Johnson
Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hi to all,
we have a community of people on an * box that use SIP softphones to talk each 
other. Can you suggest me the quickest and simple way to let someone know who 
is online without have to call one by one the persons to look if they are 
present or not?? Something the user list in Microsoft Messenger.
I was thinking on some sort of web page that can check the registration of the 
sip clients on the asterisk but want to know if already exist to avoid to 
reinvent the wheel.
thanks,
Bye,
MArcello
 

I would suggest you check out the Flash Operator Panel at 
www.asternic.org/ . It gives you an overview of who is on the phone and 
what lines/channels are in use.  If you configure it properly, you can 
even use it to make internal calls.  Just simply click on the person you 
want to talk to, and both of your phones will start ringing.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about ringing multiple phones (extensions)?

2006-01-28 Thread Ronald Wiplinger

Martin Joseph wrote:

Hey Gurus,

I have a very simple asterisk setup that basically lets me share a 
PSTN line from one location to another.  I would like to have the 
phones at both locations ring when the PSTN # is dialed(inbound calls 
from PSTN to asterisk).


I tried something like:

exten => 2020,2,Dial(SIP/2005,25,tr&IAX/2010,25,tr)

I thought this might cause both 2005 and 2010 to ring when 2020 was 
dialed,  but only 2005 rings?



Below works for me:

PHONE_LOCAL=${PHONE_601}&${PHONE_602}&${PHONE_603}
PHONE_601=SIP/601; office 601  Ronald
PHONE_602=SIP/602; office 602  Ronald
PHONE_603=ZAP/1r1; living room 603 cordless

For you this should work too:

exten => 2020,2,Dial(SIP/2005&IAX/2010,25,tr)

bye

Ronald Wiplinger

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about ringing multiple phones(extensions)?

2006-01-28 Thread Henk Dick
Marty,

Just remove the options for each technology.  

Dial(SIP/2005&IAX/2010,25,tr)

This should do the job

Henk

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Joseph
Sent: zaterdag 28 januari 2006 9:27
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about ringing multiple
phones(extensions)?

Hey Gurus,

I have a very simple asterisk setup that basically lets me share a PSTN 
line from one location to another.  I would like to have the phones at 
both locations ring when the PSTN # is dialed(inbound calls from PSTN 
to asterisk).

I tried something like:

exten => 2020,2,Dial(SIP/2005,25,tr&IAX/2010,25,tr)

I thought this might cause both 2005 and 2010 to ring when 2020 was 
dialed,  but only 2005 rings?

Thanks for ideas or suggestions on this.
Marty

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Simple question about ringing multiple phones (extensions)?

2006-01-28 Thread Martin Joseph


On Jan 28, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:


Martin Joseph wrote:

I tried something like:

exten => 2020,2,Dial(SIP/2005,25,tr&IAX/2010,25,tr)

I thought this might cause both 2005 and 2010 to ring when 2020 was 
dialed,  but only 2005 rings?



Below works for me:

PHONE_LOCAL=${PHONE_601}&${PHONE_602}&${PHONE_603}
PHONE_601=SIP/601; office 601  Ronald
PHONE_602=SIP/602; office 602  Ronald
PHONE_603=ZAP/1r1; living room 603 cordless

For you this should work too:

exten => 2020,2,Dial(SIP/2005&IAX/2010,25,tr)


Thanks very much for the help guys!

Marty

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users