Re: [asterisk-users] skype for asterisk usage in the future
Will you consider alternatives such as siptosis? The uncertainties are really there for SFA CK Lee On 12 Jul, 2011, at 10:48 AM, d tbsky wrote: > hi: > I am a SFA (skype for asterisk) user. I had ask Digium questions > about SFA usage in the future. but they seem too busy to reply. so I > tried at this list. I hope there are SFA users or Digium people can > solve my confusion. > > 1. SFA can not be registered after 26 July. so I want to prepare a > backup machine for our server. I read in the document that I can > re-register my SFA once. so I want to make sure if I can re-register with > my backup server now, and in the same time my production machine still > function correctly. and if my production machine is broken one day, my > backup machine can go on line. in short: can I keep two machines with one > license now? I hope so because I can not re-register later after 26 July. > > 2. I saw SFA will not be supported after two years. my question is: > although it is not supported, can I still use it? I want to buy more > licenses now if I can still use it after two years even without official > support. > > thanks a lot for your kindly help!! > > Regards, > tbskyd > > -- > _ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] skype for asterisk usage in the future
On 07/11/2011 09:48 PM, d tbsky wrote: 1. SFA can not be registered after 26 July. so I want to prepare a backup machine for our server. I read in the document that I can re-register my SFA once. so I want to make sure if I can re-register with my backup server now, and in the same time my production machine still function correctly. and if my production machine is broken one day, my backup machine can go on line. in short: can I keep two machines with one license now? I hope so because I can not re-register later after 26 July. Yes, this is acceptable. 2. I saw SFA will not be supported after two years. my question is: although it is not supported, can I still use it? I want to buy more licenses now if I can still use it after two years even without official support. It is unknown whether it will continue to be usable after that period; Skype has the ability to disable SFA from accessing the Skype network if they feel that is what they want to do. Since it won't get any updates between now and then, it is very likely to be obsolete (from a 'Skype protocol' point of view) in two years and it seems quite likely that they won't want it accessing the network any more. It would be best to plan for it being non-functional after the two year support period is over. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kflem...@digium.com | SIP: kpflem...@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] skype for asterisk usage in the future
On 07/12/2011 08:26 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > It is unknown whether it will continue to be usable after that period; > Skype has the ability to disable SFA from accessing the Skype network > if they feel that is what they want to do. Since it won't get any > updates between now and then, it is very likely to be obsolete (from a > 'Skype protocol' point of view) in two years and it seems quite likely > that they won't want it accessing the network any more. It would be > best to plan for it being non-functional after the two year support > period is over. > Is there a project to replace Skype with a free software? Bob Rawlinson -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] skype for asterisk usage in the future
On Tuesday 12 Jul 2011, d tbsky wrote: > hi: >I am a SFA (skype for asterisk) user. I had ask Digium questions > about SFA usage in the future. but they seem too busy to reply. so I > tried at this list. I hope there are SFA users or Digium people can > solve my confusion. Poor you! To my mind, Skype with its opaque, proprietary protocols is the exact opposite of what telecommunications is supposed to be about. I can make a call, or send an SMS, from my HTC on Vodafone to my friend's Samsung on Tesco without thinking twice about it, and that's the way we all expect it to be. But if it hadn't been for governments enforcing standards, the mobile networks could well have ended up fragmentated; with different handset manufacturers and different network operators all using competing, proprietary standards to lock one another out and their customers in. > 2. I saw SFA will not be supported after two years. my question is: > although it is not supported, can I still use it? I want to buy more > licenses now if I can still use it after two years even without official > support. That depends entirely on whether Skype update their protocols and block out the old ones. Two years is easily long enough for them to do that; especially given the way Skype works. It could even do stealth upgrades in the background. Look at it this way: You've got two years to migrate away from Skype and start using something else -- and this time around, for the love of all that's sane and wholesome, be sure to choose something that supports open standards, so you can never get shafted the same way again. If someone manages successfully to reverse-engineer Skype during that time, you *might* have a little longer; but I wouldn't bet the family farm on that. -- AJS Answers come *after* questions. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] skype for asterisk usage in the future
hi: thanks for all the information. I don't use skype and I ban skype at our network. but there are some people who use skype and want us to use skype to contact them. SFA is my saver because our users can use their phone to talk with skype users and no need to install any skype software. I hope skype die asap. but if it is alive, I must find someway to satisfy these skype customers... 2011/7/12 A J Stiles : > On Tuesday 12 Jul 2011, d tbsky wrote: >> hi: >> I am a SFA (skype for asterisk) user. I had ask Digium questions >> about SFA usage in the future. but they seem too busy to reply. so I >> tried at this list. I hope there are SFA users or Digium people can >> solve my confusion. > > Poor you! > > To my mind, Skype with its opaque, proprietary protocols is the exact opposite > of what telecommunications is supposed to be about. > > I can make a call, or send an SMS, from my HTC on Vodafone to my friend's > Samsung on Tesco without thinking twice about it, and that's the way we all > expect it to be. But if it hadn't been for governments enforcing standards, > the mobile networks could well have ended up fragmentated; with different > handset manufacturers and different network operators all using competing, > proprietary standards to lock one another out and their customers in. > >> 2. I saw SFA will not be supported after two years. my question is: >> although it is not supported, can I still use it? I want to buy more >> licenses now if I can still use it after two years even without official >> support. > > That depends entirely on whether Skype update their protocols and block out > the old ones. Two years is easily long enough for them to do that; > especially given the way Skype works. It could even do stealth upgrades in > the background. > > Look at it this way: You've got two years to migrate away from Skype and > start using something else -- and this time around, for the love of all > that's sane and wholesome, be sure to choose something that supports open > standards, so you can never get shafted the same way again. > > If someone manages successfully to reverse-engineer Skype during that time, > you *might* have a little longer; but I wouldn't bet the family farm on that. > > > -- > AJS > > Answers come *after* questions. > > -- > _ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: > http://www.asterisk.org/hello > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
