Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ?
Hello, > From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ? > > IAX1 is probably hardly used anywhere. Chances are that where people > write IAX they mean IAX2 > ok. > > I have a working connection between two Asterisk-Servers (Asterisk > > 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian 3.1) via IAX. > > Does this connection work with IAX or IAX2? > > IAX2 > ok. > > When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message > > The channel name is iax. Yet it provides commands such that begin with > "iax2" and listens on port 4569. > ??? In /usr/lib/asterisk/modules the name of the file ist chan_iax2.so and as far as I understood, I have to enter the file name in modules.conf, right? But if I do this, I get the error chan_iax2.so]Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_iax2.so: undefined symbol: ast_check_signature Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:391 load_modules: Loading module chan_iax2.so failed! during the start. Well, so Asterisk is using IAX2 without an entry in modules.conf ? Stefan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ?
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 02:36:02PM +0200, Stefan-Michael. Guenther (in-put GbR) wrote: > Hello, > > > From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ? > > > > IAX1 is probably hardly used anywhere. Chances are that where people > > write IAX they mean IAX2 > > > ok. > > > > I have a working connection between two Asterisk-Servers (Asterisk > > > 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian 3.1) via IAX. > > > Does this connection work with IAX or IAX2? > > > > IAX2 > > > ok. > > > > When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message > > > > The channel name is iax. Yet it provides commands such that begin with > > "iax2" and listens on port 4569. > > > ??? In /usr/lib/asterisk/modules the name of the file ist chan_iax2.so and as > far as I understood, I have to enter the file name in modules.conf, right? > But if I do this, I get the error > > chan_iax2.so]Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:258 > ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_iax2.so: undefined symbol: > ast_check_signature > Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:391 load_modules: Loading module > chan_iax2.so failed! Are you sure that the file and the main asterisk binary are from the same source (e.g: debian package)? 'apt-get install debsums' to verify checksums of files from debs. > > during the start. > Well, so Asterisk is using IAX2 without an entry in modules.conf ? It is configured by default to load all the modules in that directory. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849755 | | friend ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: Re: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ? [SOLVED]
Hi, > > > > When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message > > > > > > The channel name is iax. Yet it provides commands such that begin with > > > "iax2" and listens on port 4569. > > > > ??? In /usr/lib/asterisk/modules the name of the file ist chan_iax2.so > > and as far as I understood, I have to enter the file name in > > modules.conf, right? But if I do this, I get the error > > > > chan_iax2.so]Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:258 > > ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_iax2.so: undefined > > symbol: ast_check_signature > > Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:391 load_modules: Loading module > > chan_iax2.so failed! > > Are you sure that the file and the main asterisk binary are from the > same source (e.g: debian package)? > Yes, it was the same source and the line load => chan_iax2.so was right. But I had to add load => res_crypto.so before. I used grep -r ast_check_signature /usr/src/asterisk-1.0.9/* to find out which other module might use ast_check_signature and so I found res_crypto. Have a nice weekend, Stefan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
