Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k: add support of HW encryption in management frames

2012-09-03 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 31 August 2012 08:24, Yeoh Chun-Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, Adrian

 Appreciate your testing on this.


Hi,

I don't have time to test ath5k stuff. I'm just an Atheros employee
who hacks on FreeBSD in his spare time. I'm lurking to provide
feedback. :-)

I suggest that you at least wrap this in a run-time configuration item
that defaults to off or something. i'd be really worried about this
stuff having subtle bugs that aren't well documented; it may work for
you but it may induce weird behaviour in other setups.



Adrian
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel


Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k: add support of HW encryption in management frames

2012-09-03 Thread Yeoh Chun-Yeow
Hi, Adrian

I have tested with secured mesh on AR5213A, AR5413 and AR2413/AR2414.
It seems work for me.

 I suggest that you at least wrap this in a run-time configuration item
 that defaults to off or something.
Yes, I do agree on this. But if more peoples are able to test it and
confirm, it would be better.

Thanks

Regards,
Chun-Yeow

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
 On 31 August 2012 08:24, Yeoh Chun-Yeow yeohchuny...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, Adrian

 Appreciate your testing on this.


 Hi,

 I don't have time to test ath5k stuff. I'm just an Atheros employee
 who hacks on FreeBSD in his spare time. I'm lurking to provide
 feedback. :-)

 I suggest that you at least wrap this in a run-time configuration item
 that defaults to off or something. i'd be really worried about this
 stuff having subtle bugs that aren't well documented; it may work for
 you but it may induce weird behaviour in other setups.



 Adrian
___
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel