Re: [ath9k-devel] 'Superchannel'?
On Sunday 28 Aug 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: Guys (and girls, and fuzzy others..) I'll do some poking of my atheros contacts and see what can be found. Alex/Alex/Jerry, please follow up with me privately. Adrian ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel Could I make a request. One of the things that would be useful as a result of doing this work would a standard way for people with licences to extend the range as defined by CRDA. In the case discussed here it is a HAM licence for frequencies below 2.4GHz, in my case the area of interest is what is known as Band C here in the UK at 5.8GHz. You do need a licence (£1 per station per year to a minimum of £50 per year) from Ofcom (our FCC) but it is easy to obtain. The 5.8 band users are also allowed more power than you would be in the normal 802.11a band. Once that standard way (preferably without rebuilding the kernel) has been defined it should be made public with lots of caviats written around it saying that this can only be used if you posess a licence and that you are personally liable for its misuse. David ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
Re: [ath9k-devel] 'Superchannel'?
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 11:04 +0100, David Goodenough wrote: On Sunday 28 Aug 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote: Guys (and girls, and fuzzy others..) I'll do some poking of my atheros contacts and see what can be found. Alex/Alex/Jerry, please follow up with me privately. Adrian ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel Could I make a request. One of the things that would be useful as a result of doing this work would a standard way for people with licences to extend the range as defined by CRDA. In the case discussed here it is a HAM licence for frequencies below 2.4GHz, in my case the area of interest is what is known as Band C here in the UK at 5.8GHz. You do need a licence (£1 per station per year to a minimum of £50 per year) from Ofcom (our FCC) but it is easy to obtain. The 5.8 band users are also allowed more power than you would be in the normal 802.11a band. Once that standard way (preferably without rebuilding the kernel) has been defined it should be made public with lots of caviats written around it saying that this can only be used if you posess a licence and that you are personally liable for its misuse. David ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel David, A standard would be nice but can it be done without opening the Pandora box for misuse. US Amateur also have privileges in the 5cm band which overlaps the the 5 Ghz ISM band. We are secondary users of this band with little power restriction other than not causing interference to other user of this spectrum. It would be nice to see a open source solution without having to buy more expensive commercial gear. Jerry ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
[ath9k-devel] ath9k stalls every 30 seconds unless disable_ani = 1
Hi all, I just read Robert Högberg's thread on this mailing list and just wanted to verify that the exact same problem happens with my wireless NIC too. I compiled ath9k using compat-wireless. My card has the AR5008 chipset and is PCI. The vendor is D-Link, I believe the model is DWA-552. As soon as I echo 1 into disable_ani the problem goes away. Hope this helps development, let me know if any more details are needed. Caleb ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
Re: [ath9k-devel] Maximum Radio Limit?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:27:26AM -0700, Galen wrote: Provided that enough PCIe ports are available, along with sufficient memory and CPU, is there any limit to the number of radios that can be supported by ath9k and mac80211? Are there any design bottlenecks in the software that would be problematic in the context of a system with 100s of ath9k radio modules from being active simultaneously? -Galen Hi Galen! What you trying to build? This is a military or intelligence project? :) Such crazy platform should be expensive, thousands of USD I think. Regards, Alex. ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
