Re: The Atomic age
Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul assures me that the remaining IETF process steps will not introduce material technical changes, and so format-10 is appropriate as a basis for implementors to go to work. Excellent! So, implementors... to work. Just to show willing: http://www.ticketswitch.com/cgi-bin/atom_feed.exe Peter
Re: Atom error pages
Bill de hÓra wrote: James M Snell wrote: In that vein, what would an example error entry response look like? just a simple basic entry with no fancy schmancy extension elements required? - james Something that contains nothing a machine might be able to automatically process or use as a control flag, say like, a response code... ;) cheers Bill Ok, ok, I get it... ;-) Not sure I like it tho, but... ah well. - James
