On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:53:59PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: > >> > >>I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good > >>shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile > >>there... > > > >probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of > >packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't > >looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they > >will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos. > > That is a fact that I can follow 100%, but there are a number of > packages that has not been available (compiled) for f18. Among them > is gstreamer-plugins-ugly, spamassassin and avidemux.
Yes, that's true - what I meant is that the packages update to f18 should be building fine on f19. There are some important packages that don't build as is on f18, so that's next. There are already some f19 packages on dl.atrpms.net ... :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
