[ATrpms-devel] dovecot spec
Hi Axel,
I noticed that Dovecot had a 2.2.4 release, but with a warning (in 2.2.3) that it needed a new version of Pigeonhole. There is currently no
new release of Pigeonhole, so I wanted to see what would happen if I tried to recompile new Dovecot with old Pigeonhole.
I downloaded your src-rpm, updated the version, and tried to rebuild but ran
into this error:
Processing files: dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i686
error: File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/kim/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.M1htXb
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kim/rpm/BUILD
+ cd dovecot-2.2.4
+
DOCDIR=/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ cp -pr docinstall/documentation.txt docinstall/dovecot-openssl.cnf docinstall/example-config docinstall/mkcert.sh
docinstall/solr-schema.xml docinstall/wiki AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LGPL COPYING.MIT NEWS README
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ exit 0
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
It seems to come from these lines:
%if %{with systemd}
%_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.service
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.socket
%else
But I do not understand why dovecot.conf should go into some temp-dir? nor why I have a problem here, since I have the newest macros? I have
tried to surround it with {}, with no luck. This is on FC17.
Hope you can shed some light...
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot spec
Looking in BUILDROOT:
ls -l BUILDROOT/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x. 5 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59 dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386
drwxr-xr-x. 2 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59
dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386%{_tmpfilesdir}
Does not look like _tmpfilesdir is set :-(
I have remembered that tmpfilesdir should be set to /etc/tmpfiles.d :-)
I have this installed:
atrpms-rpm-config-203-1.noarch
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-06-26 11:19, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
Hi Axel,
I noticed that Dovecot had a 2.2.4 release, but with a warning (in 2.2.3) that it needed a new version of Pigeonhole. There is currently
no new release of Pigeonhole, so I wanted to see what would happen if I tried to recompile new Dovecot with old Pigeonhole.
I downloaded your src-rpm, updated the version, and tried to rebuild but ran
into this error:
Processing files: dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i686
error: File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/kim/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.M1htXb
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kim/rpm/BUILD
+ cd dovecot-2.2.4
+
DOCDIR=/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ cp -pr docinstall/documentation.txt docinstall/dovecot-openssl.cnf docinstall/example-config docinstall/mkcert.sh
docinstall/solr-schema.xml docinstall/wiki AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LGPL COPYING.MIT NEWS README
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ exit 0
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
It seems to come from these lines:
%if %{with systemd}
%_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.service
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.socket
%else
But I do not understand why dovecot.conf should go into some temp-dir? nor why I have a problem here, since I have the newest macros? I
have tried to surround it with {}, with no luck. This is on FC17.
Hope you can shed some light...
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Or alternative you can put it into the bleeding repo, and let somebody adventurous test it... Regards, Kim Den 22-06-2013 13:39, Kim Bisgaard skrev: Hi Axel and Paulo, I have after MANY attempts managed to get avidemux-2.6.4 to compile and build :-) at least on f18 and f19. I assumed all patches was upstreamed, so they are removed. I had to removed all that has to with languages (%find_lang) as it erred out. Many files and directories have changed names ... Paulo could you try to recompile the package, and possibly also test, to see if it is sensible what I have done? http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
