Re: [AUCTeX] Autocomplete for BibTeX cite

2015-07-15 Thread Lars Madsen
What excactly do you mean by autocomplete in this context?

I can think of several different descriptions.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@math / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@math



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Florian Lindner 
[mailingli...@xgm.de]
Sent: 15 July 2015 10:15
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: [AUCTeX] Autocomplete for BibTeX cite

Hello,

I have a minimal LaTeX file:

\documentclass{scrartcl}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

\begin{document}

\cite{Zudrop2012}

\bibliography{literatur}
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}

\end{document}

which works perfect and produces a references section. How can I have
autocomplete with the \cite macro?


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Where and how TeX-evince-sync-view is defined?

2015-05-11 Thread Lars Madsen
Something like that. I switched to evince as xpdf wouldn't even start.

Haven't had much problems with it since.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: David Kastrup [d...@gnu.org]
Sent: 11 May 2015 13:17
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Janusz S. Bien; auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Where and how TeX-evince-sync-view is defined?

Lars Madsen  writes:

> I do not recall having problems with Evince on Ubuntu 12.04.

It's been more like 14.04 when they started for me: before that Xpdf was
the troublemaker.  Haven't tried on 15.04 yet.

--
David Kastrup

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Where and how TeX-evince-sync-view is defined?

2015-05-11 Thread Lars Madsen
I do not recall having problems with Evince on Ubuntu 12.04.

Is it possibly to download those files without having to be a member of 
bitbucket?

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=imf.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=imf.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Janusz S. Bien 
[jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl]
Sent: 11 May 2015 11:10
To: auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Where and how TeX-evince-sync-view is defined?

Quote/Cytat - David Kastrup  (Mon 11 May 2015 10:49:10 AM CEST):

> I've stopped using Evince because of that and configured back to Xpdf.
> At one point of time, both Xpdf and Evince will segfault at startup in
> the same version of Ubuntu and then I'm going to have a problem.

I've used xpdf for years, on a new system started to use Evince just
of laziness, as it is the default.
>
> But so far, it's always been one _or_ the other.
>
> Xpdf's crashes were some Poppler library version incompatibility.
> Evince has some Dbus problem I think.  At some point of time, it took
> about 10 starts of Evince to have one succeed.

Up to now I had no problems with Evince on Debian jessie.

In my document I use OCG and it seems that on Linux only Evince is
handling it.

Best regards

Janusz

--
Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bień -  Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra
Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bień - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department)
jsb...@uw.edu.pl, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line

2015-03-03 Thread Lars Madsen
Nice one, thanks, one didn't know (point-marker)

(I've started Emacs macrop programming some 10 years too late ;-)


/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Nicolas Richard [theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: 03 March 2015 16:19
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: out comment every line

Le 03/03/2015 15:57, Lars Madsen a écrit :
> Here is a sample of what happens

Great. One solution is to use markers.
See (info "(elisp) Overview of Markers") for more information about
markers. What we need here is the following property:
|   But the marker's position value can change during the life of
| the marker, and often does.  Insertion and deletion of text in the
| buffer relocate the marker.

Please try the following change

> (defun mytest ()
>   (interactive)
>   (let (
>   beg
>   end
>   (T 0.5)
>   )
> (sit-for T)
> (re-search-forward "{" nil t)
> (sit-for T)
> (goto-char (match-beginning 0))
> (sit-for T)
> (setq beg (point))
> (sit-for T)
> (forward-sexp)
> (sit-for T)
> (setq end (point))

Use (point-marker) here.

> (sit-for T)
> (TeX-comment-region beg end)
> (sit-for T)
> (goto-char end)
> )
> )


HTH,

--
Nicolas.

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line

2015-03-03 Thread Lars Madsen

Here is a sample of what happens

(defun mytest ()
  (interactive)
  (let (
beg
end
(T 0.5)
)
(sit-for T)
(re-search-forward "{" nil t)
(sit-for T)
(goto-char (match-beginning 0))
(sit-for T)
(setq beg (point))
(sit-for T)
(forward-sexp)
(sit-for T)
(setq end (point))
(sit-for T)
(TeX-comment-region beg end)
(sit-for T)
(goto-char end)
)
)

Use it (in LaTeX-mode, and make sure the cursor is before the {)

{The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
  proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural

  reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
  abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of

  these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
  the key to understanding pure logic.

  Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
  understanding stands in need of our disjunctive

  judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic,

  in the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from

  all content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of,
  in accordance with the principles of the employment of the

  paralogisms, time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our
  concepts can be treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal,

  it must not be supposed that the objects in space and time are what
  first give rise to the employment of pure reason.

  The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
  proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural

  reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
  abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of

  these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
  the key to understanding pure logic.

  Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
  understanding stands in need of our disjunctive judgements. As is

  shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in the case of the
  discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all content of
  knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in accordance

  with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms, time. I
  assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be treated

  like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be supposed
  that the objects in space and time are what first give rise to the
  employment of pure reason.

  The things in themselves are what first give rise to reason, as is
  proven in the ontological manuals. By virtue of natural

  reason, let us suppose that the transcendental unity of apperception
  abstracts from all content of knowledge; in view of

  these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
  the key to understanding pure logic.

  Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
  understanding stands in need of our disjunctive

  judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in
  the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all

  content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in
  accordance with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms,

  time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be
  treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be
  these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
  the key to understanding pure logic.

  Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
  understanding stands in need of our disjunctive

  judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in
  the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all

  content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in
  accordance with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms,

  time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be
  treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be
  these considerations, the Ideal of human reason, on the contrary, is
  the key to understanding pure logic.

  Let us suppose that, irrespective of all empirical conditions, our
  understanding stands in need of our disjunctive

  judgements. As is shown in the writings of Aristotle, pure logic, in
  the case of the discipline of natural reason, abstracts from all

  content of knowledge. Our understanding is a representation of, in
  accordance with the principles of the employment of the paralogisms,

  time. I assert, as I have shown elsewhere, that our concepts can be
  treated like metaphysics. By means of the Ideal, it must not be

  supposed that the objects in space and time are what first give rise
  to the employment of pure reason.}






/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More informat

Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line

2015-03-03 Thread Lars Madsen
If I just to

(TeX-comment-region beg end)
(goto-char end)

I'm no longer at the end of the region. '% ' was added, so the region is now 
longer.

I'm surely also missing something a lot easier here.






/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Nicolas Richard [theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: 03 March 2015 13:46
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: out comment every line

Lars Madsen  writes:
> If you run TeX-comment-region it will out comment the lines that are
> not blank. How can I tell it to comment everyline even if it is blank?

Since Tassilo answered this part already, let's look at the story :

> I'm using this in a macro that cleans up some 'strange' syntax into a
> more normal env based stuff. But I'd like to keep the original. So the
> macro detects the material, copies it, outcomments the region

At this point you know where the region ends, don't you ?

>  and has
> to insert the converted stuff after the commented area.
>
> but after TeX-comment-region, the cursor may still be inside the
> commented area, so I need to get out.

So you could use it here.

I know I missed something because this was too obvious, but what did I
miss ?

--
Nicolas Richard

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line

2015-03-03 Thread Lars Madsen
I knew there was a variable somewhere. Works perfectly, thanks

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 03 March 2015 11:41
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] out comment every line

Lars Madsen  writes:

Hi Lars,

> If you run TeX-comment-region it will out comment the lines that are
> not blank. How can I tell it to comment everyline even if it is blank?

That's not special to AUCTeX, i.e., `TeX-comment-region' just defines
the comment characters and then calls `comment-region' which does the
actual commenting.  For the latter, the default is to comment only
non-blank lines but it can be changed using:

,[ C-h v comment-empty-lines RET ]
| comment-empty-lines is a variable defined in `newcomment.el'.
| Its value is nil
|
| Documentation:
| If nil, `comment-region' does not comment out empty lines.
| If t, it always comments out empty lines.
| If `eol' it only comments out empty lines if comments are
| terminated by the end of line (i.e. `comment-end' is empty).
|
| You can customize this variable.
`

Bye,
Tassilo


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


[AUCTeX] out comment every line

2015-03-03 Thread Lars Madsen
If you run TeX-comment-region it will out comment the lines that are not blank. 
How can I tell it to comment everyline even if it is blank?

I'm using this in a macro that cleans up some 'strange' syntax into a more 
normal env based stuff. But I'd like to keep the original. So the macro detects 
the material, copies it, outcomments the region and has to insert the converted 
stuff after the commented area.

but after TeX-comment-region, the cursor may still be inside the commented 
area, so I need to get out. One way is to loop untill I'm not on a commented 
line. But that fails if I end up on a line that is not commented.

Suggestions?



/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

2015-02-16 Thread Lars Madsen
Bad formulation, meant to say

not as a first approximation to a macro. 

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Lars Madsen 
[dal...@math.au.dk]
Sent: 16 February 2015 10:26
To: Tassilo Horn; auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

Not as a first env

I was thinking more on the lines of

\begin{foo}
  \begin{bar}
   cursor
  \end{bar}
\end{foo}

then some macro would transform this into

\begin{foo}
   cursor
\end{foo}

i.e. if the env to be deleted is on lines of their own, then those lines are 
removed.

BTW: I haven't switched to 11.88 yet, was hooks added to 
LaTeX-modify-environment? AFAIR we can add environment hooks to C-c C-e but not 
to C-u C-c C-e (I think someone mentioned at one point that that should be 
added as well.

Why is this needed: I add cleanup hooks to certain envs, so if I mark a region 
and insert an env around it, then it clean up the contents. But at least with 
11.87 no such hook fires if you change an env.

An example of such a cleaner is for a hint env, used in exercises to make sure 
all hints are formatted the same way. Authors often forget this, thus the text 
is often

Hint: Blah blah...

My clean up hook here removes the 'Hint: '







/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 16 February 2015 07:56
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

Igor Sosa Mayor  writes:

>> related, is there a build in feature for deleting a given env?
>>
>> This is sometimes handy when editing other peoples work. (some people
>> are very messy)
>
> this would be a good idea...

I guess doing `C-u C-c C-e' and then deleting the environment name could
do that, i.e., modifying an environment so that is has an empty name.
But there's no good way to delete an environment.  I mean, deleting the
\begin/\end is easy, but you'd probably also want to delete its \items
in case its an enumerate/itemize, etc.

Bye,
Tassilo


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

2015-02-16 Thread Lars Madsen
Not as a first env

I was thinking more on the lines of

\begin{foo}
  \begin{bar}
   cursor
  \end{bar}
\end{foo}

then some macro would transform this into

\begin{foo}
   cursor
\end{foo}

i.e. if the env to be deleted is on lines of their own, then those lines are 
removed.

BTW: I haven't switched to 11.88 yet, was hooks added to 
LaTeX-modify-environment? AFAIR we can add environment hooks to C-c C-e but not 
to C-u C-c C-e (I think someone mentioned at one point that that should be 
added as well.

Why is this needed: I add cleanup hooks to certain envs, so if I mark a region 
and insert an env around it, then it clean up the contents. But at least with 
11.87 no such hook fires if you change an env.

An example of such a cleaner is for a hint env, used in exercises to make sure 
all hints are formatted the same way. Authors often forget this, thus the text 
is often

Hint: Blah blah...

My clean up hook here removes the 'Hint: '







/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 16 February 2015 07:56
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

Igor Sosa Mayor  writes:

>> related, is there a build in feature for deleting a given env?
>>
>> This is sometimes handy when editing other peoples work. (some people
>> are very messy)
>
> this would be a good idea...

I guess doing `C-u C-c C-e' and then deleting the environment name could
do that, i.e., modifying an environment so that is has an empty name.
But there's no good way to delete an environment.  I mean, deleting the
\begin/\end is easy, but you'd probably also want to delete its \items
in case its an enumerate/itemize, etc.

Bye,
Tassilo


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

2015-02-15 Thread Lars Madsen
related, is there a build in feature for deleting a given env?

This is sometimes handy when editing other peoples work. (some people are very 
messy)

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 13 February 2015 09:51
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Modify environments interactively

Roy Crihfield  writes:

> Is there a function that allows quickly renaming, deleting or
> otherwise modifying an enclosing environment? If such a thing is
> built-in I would find it very useful.

When you invoke `LaTeX-environment' with a prefix arg, e.g., `C-u C-c
C-e' you can modify the current enclosing environment.

Bye,
Tassilo


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

2015-02-05 Thread Lars Madsen
The sources are available, so maybe one can get a hint from there.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=imf.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=imf.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Lars Madsen 
[dal...@math.au.dk]
Sent: 05 February 2015 10:55
To: Mosè Giordano
Cc: auctex; Tassilo Horn
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

Interesting, just tested with TS 2.6 on linux. Works there too.

Would you mind doing us all a favor, and figuring out how this works and add it 
to Emacs, preferably Emacs + Evince as that is the compo I use.

Cannot have others having features not present in Emacs :-)

Might be an idea to check what actually is in the synctex file. And what 
exactly is getting back from the previewer (I've never sat down and looked at 
it).


/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Mosè Giordano [m...@gnu.org]
Sent: 05 February 2015 10:45
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Tassilo Horn; auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

Hi Tassilo & Lars,

2015-02-05 8:06 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn :
> Mosè Giordano  writes:
>> When using forward/backward search in TeXstudio with its embedded
>> viewer, you are direct to the exact word selected, not just the line.
>> I wonder if it's possible to implement such a feature also for AUCTeX
>> and pdf-tools.
>
> I just edebugged the relevant function `pdf-sync-correlate-tex', and it
> returns a list (file line column), so the answer is yes.  However,
> column is always -1.  I have the same with the Evince backward search.

I also did the same test and can't understand how TeXstudio can
achieve that level of precision.

> Maybe there's some SyncTeX setting you need to enable to make it record
> column numbers, too?

I don't have a clue, as far as I know SyncTeX only potentially
supports column numbers, but actually always return a
not-really-useful number, as you pointed out.


2015-02-05 9:43 GMT+01:00 Lars Madsen :
> Mosè, exactly which version of TeXStudio has the feature to direct you to the 
> exact word?

I have TeXstudio 2.8.0, but this feature is mentioned already in
ChangeLog for version 2.3:
http://texstudio.sourceforge.net/manual/current/usermanual_en.html#SECTIONNEW23

Bye,
Mosè

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

2015-02-05 Thread Lars Madsen
texstudio is independent of the LaTeX installation so they have no control over 
the generated .synctex file.

Why not just ask the developer?

While you are talking to him, tell him about reftexs label features. TeXStudio 
really need to up their game in relation to labels in multiple file documents.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Tassilo Horn [t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 05 February 2015 11:08
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Mosè Giordano; auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

Lars Madsen  writes:

> Would you mind doing us all a favor, and figuring out how this works
> and add it to Emacs, preferably Emacs + Evince as that is the compo I
> use.

Both the Evince and PDF Tools AUCTeX viewers already support that
provided that SyncTeX would return a sensible column number which it
sadly doesn't.

> Might be an idea to check what actually is in the synctex file.

I've looked at it and didn't understand it.  But even if I did, that
wouldn't help us because we need to use the information provided by the
viewer.  And that's (file line column) where column is always -1.

> And what exactly is getting back from the previewer (I've never sat
> down and looked at it).

See above.  And I'm pretty sure that both Evince and PDF Tools query the
synctex info from the PDF.

So my guess is that either TeXStudio hacked up SyncTeX to supply correct
column numbers, or they use a dirty trick like their previewer returns
not only the line information but also the word at click position which
they then can search after jumping to the right line.

Well, in both cases, we're out of luck since we cannot (nor want to)
provide a better SyncTeX, nor are we able to change what viewers like
Evince supply when backward searching.

Bye,
Tassilo

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

2015-02-05 Thread Lars Madsen
I already noticed that it was not 100% accurate. But it is good enough. Better 
than the "goto first word in paragraph" as seen in TeXMaker, which use very 
long lines in the .tex file.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Tassilo Horn [t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 05 February 2015 11:15
To: Mosè Giordano
Cc: Lars Madsen; auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

Mosè Giordano  writes:

>> Maybe it additionally extracts the word at the click position and
>> then searches forward after having jumped to the synctex-provided
>> line.
>
> That's an interesting guess.

Although it's flaky.  E.g., if the word is "the", then the chances are
high there are multiple occurences in a line.  Maybe taking the current
word at click-position + the next N words (and then searching so that
space also matches \n) might work.  But that will fail in situations
where the click-pos is "hello world" but the actual tex text is "hello
\texttt{world}".

If you want, you can play with those suggestions in TeXStudio to see if
it uses such a trick...

> pdf-tools is able to perform search in the PDF file, so it should
> theoretically possible to implement this also there.

Yes.

Bye,
Tassilo

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

2015-02-05 Thread Lars Madsen
Interesting, just tested with TS 2.6 on linux. Works there too.

Would you mind doing us all a favor, and figuring out how this works and add it 
to Emacs, preferably Emacs + Evince as that is the compo I use.

Cannot have others having features not present in Emacs :-)

Might be an idea to check what actually is in the synctex file. And what 
exactly is getting back from the previewer (I've never sat down and looked at 
it).


/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Mosè Giordano [m...@gnu.org]
Sent: 05 February 2015 10:45
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Tassilo Horn; auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

Hi Tassilo & Lars,

2015-02-05 8:06 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn :
> Mosè Giordano  writes:
>> When using forward/backward search in TeXstudio with its embedded
>> viewer, you are direct to the exact word selected, not just the line.
>> I wonder if it's possible to implement such a feature also for AUCTeX
>> and pdf-tools.
>
> I just edebugged the relevant function `pdf-sync-correlate-tex', and it
> returns a list (file line column), so the answer is yes.  However,
> column is always -1.  I have the same with the Evince backward search.

I also did the same test and can't understand how TeXstudio can
achieve that level of precision.

> Maybe there's some SyncTeX setting you need to enable to make it record
> column numbers, too?

I don't have a clue, as far as I know SyncTeX only potentially
supports column numbers, but actually always return a
not-really-useful number, as you pointed out.


2015-02-05 9:43 GMT+01:00 Lars Madsen :
> Mosè, exactly which version of TeXStudio has the feature to direct you to the 
> exact word?

I have TeXstudio 2.8.0, but this feature is mentioned already in
ChangeLog for version 2.3:
http://texstudio.sourceforge.net/manual/current/usermanual_en.html#SECTIONNEW23

Bye,
Mosè

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

2015-02-05 Thread Lars Madsen
Mosè, exactly which version of TeXStudio has the feature to direct you to the 
exact word?

I'll like to see that. AFAIK pdfsync only looks at line numbers, thus TeXMaker 
and TeXStudio usually have a problem in the backwards sync because they tend to 
use soft line breaks (I think) and not the hard ones Emacs uses. Thus Emacs is 
usually much more precise. So if TeXStudio have upped the ante, I'd like to see 
it.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Mosè Giordano 
[m...@gnu.org]
Sent: 04 February 2015 21:48
To: Tassilo Horn
Cc: auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] OT: Have a look at PDF Tools (new PDF viewer for Emacs)

Hi Tassilo,

2015-02-04 21:00 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn :
> Hi all,
>
> just in case you didn't already know PDF Tools
>
>   https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools
>
> you might want to give it a whirl.  It's a new PDF viewer for Emacs
> which is somehow similar to Emacs' built-in `doc-view-mode', except that
> it is much more advanced.  For example, you can
>
>   - mark and copy text in the PDF
>   - click links in the PDF
>   - have a TOC/outline in the menu bar
>   - isearch with match-highlighting

It looks very promising, thanks!

> and tons of other features.  Oh, and forward/backward search work out of
> the box with AUCTeX/SyncTex.

Well, we only need an appropriate entry in
`TeX-view-program-list-builtin' then ;-)

When using forward/backward search in TeXstudio with its embedded
viewer, you are direct to the exact word selected, not just the line.
I wonder if it's possible to implement such a feature also for AUCTeX
and pdf-tools.

Bye,
Mosè

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Indentation of \if statements

2014-12-19 Thread Lars Madsen
I know

Not having see Olehs patch, it was just a reminder that no all if constructions 
come in the \if ... \fi category

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Tassilo Horn [t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 18 December 2014 16:38
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Oleh; auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Indentation of \if statements

Lars Madsen  writes:

> Just out of interest, would the patch still handle
>
> \IfBooleanTF{#1}{true}{false}

That's usually written as

  \ifBooleanTF{#1}{%
true}{%
false}

and then the indentation is correct out of the box because auctex
indents the contents in braces.

Bye,
Tassilo

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Indentation of \if statements

2014-12-18 Thread Lars Madsen
Just out of interest, would the patch still handle 

\IfBooleanTF{#1}{true}{false}

(xparse package)



/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Oleh 
[ohwoeo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 December 2014 13:29
To: Tassilo Horn
Cc: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Indentation of \if statements

Hi Tassilo,

> I'd welcome a patch that generalizes the idea a bit.  For example, the
> ifplatform package provides macros like
>
>   \ifwindows
> \this
>   \else
> \that
>   \fi
>
> and there are dozens of other \if-variants out there.  So it would be
> good if an AUCTeX style file could specify that it provides a new
> if-then-else-fi macro, and then indentation should just work.

I've added the generalization to anything that starts with "\if".
Should be fine unless people use something like:

\newcommand\iffy{...}

See the attached patch.

regards,
Oleh

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Indentation of \if statements

2014-12-18 Thread Lars Madsen
people can define their own, so there are lots and lots and lots

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Oleh [ohwoeo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 December 2014 14:11
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Tassilo Horn; auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] Indentation of \if statements

Hi Lars,

> Just out of interest, would the patch still handle
>
> \IfBooleanTF{#1}{true}{false}
>
> (xparse package)

It does handle it well, because of capitalization.  It wouldn't handle
"\ifBoolean" though.

As a work-around, I could look for braces on the same line.  But I'm
not really a LaTeX expert, I've used only "\ifdefined" and
"\ifstrequal" in my documents.  And now that I've checked, the patch
works for "\ifdefined" but not for "\ifstrequal" (I'll add a follow-up
patch shortly).

What other commands that start with "\if" come up?

regards,
Oleh

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] toggle environments with and without *

2014-12-02 Thread Lars Madsen
I couldn't even get it to work by just copy'n'pasting it.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Tamas Papp [tkp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 December 2014 14:01
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: auctex
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] toggle environments with and without *

In the current version, it toggles between

\begin{equation*}
  a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\end{equation*}

and

\begin{equation}
  a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\end{equation}

In the "deluxe" version I am trying to write, it would toggle between

\begin{equation*}
  % my fancy equation
  % \label{eq:mylabel}
  a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\end{equation*}

and

\begin{equation}
  % my fancy equation
  \label{eq:mylabel}
  a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\end{equation}

too (note the commented out label, and that only the comments before a
\label are toggled).

I don't know enough about Emacs Lisp/AUCTeX internals to write
this. Also, help with making the current implementation more idiomatic
is welcome (currently it looks like an entry for the "you can write CL
in any language" contest).

Best,

Tamas

On Tue, Dec 02 2014, Lars Madsen  wrote:

> what are the requirements for this macro?
>
> (still using 11.87)
>
>
> /Lars Madsen
> Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
> Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
> Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
> http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf
>
>
> 
> From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
> [auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tamas Papp 
> [tkp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 01 December 2014 19:06
> To: auctex
> Subject: [AUCTeX] toggle environments with and without *
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to come up with a way to quickly switch between environment
> pairs with and without an asterisk (eg equation and equation*). My
> attempt is below, it works, but I was wondering if I am overcomplicating
> this and maybe there is a simpler way.
>
> Also, can someone suggest a way to comment and uncomment lines which
> start with \label?
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (defun LaTeX-toggle-* ()
>   "Toggle between forms of the current environment with or without * at the 
> end."
>   (interactive)
>   (let* ((environment (LaTeX-current-environment)))
> (when environment
>   (let* ((l (length environment))
>  (*-p (and (cl-plusp l)
>(eql (aref environment (1- l)) ?*)))
>  (bare-environment (if *-p
>(subseq environment 0 (1- l))
>  environment)))
> (cl-assert (cl-plusp (length bare-environment)) ()
>"Empty environment ~S" bare-environment)
> (when (or (not LaTeX-toggle-*-environments)
>   (cl-find bare-environment font-latex-math-environments
>:test #'equal))
>   (LaTeX-modify-environment (if *-p
> bare-environment
>   (concat bare-environment "*"
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> Best,
>
> Tamas
>
> ___
> auctex mailing list
> auctex@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] toggle environments with and without *

2014-12-02 Thread Lars Madsen
what are the requirements for this macro?

(still using 11.87)


/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tamas Papp 
[tkp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 December 2014 19:06
To: auctex
Subject: [AUCTeX] toggle environments with and without *

Hi,

I was trying to come up with a way to quickly switch between environment
pairs with and without an asterisk (eg equation and equation*). My
attempt is below, it works, but I was wondering if I am overcomplicating
this and maybe there is a simpler way.

Also, can someone suggest a way to comment and uncomment lines which
start with \label?

--8<---cut here---start->8---
(defun LaTeX-toggle-* ()
  "Toggle between forms of the current environment with or without * at the 
end."
  (interactive)
  (let* ((environment (LaTeX-current-environment)))
(when environment
  (let* ((l (length environment))
 (*-p (and (cl-plusp l)
   (eql (aref environment (1- l)) ?*)))
 (bare-environment (if *-p
   (subseq environment 0 (1- l))
 environment)))
(cl-assert (cl-plusp (length bare-environment)) ()
   "Empty environment ~S" bare-environment)
(when (or (not LaTeX-toggle-*-environments)
  (cl-find bare-environment font-latex-math-environments
   :test #'equal))
  (LaTeX-modify-environment (if *-p
bare-environment
  (concat bare-environment "*"
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Best,

Tamas

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] auto compile for auctex?

2014-10-17 Thread Lars Madsen
Plus, say you type

$a=f(x)$

then you do not what the compilation to start right after the first $ because 
that causes an error.

It would be nice to have to way of tying together latexmk -pvc mode and emacs 
error locating.

But that would mean that we would need a signal from latexmk to inform emacs 
that it should run the error locating.

My best bet for you would be to tie the compilation to when you save the 
document.



/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 17 October 2014 15:59
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] auto compile for auctex?

Thorsten Grothe  writes:

Hi Thorsten,

> But I would be nicer *not to press C-s*, like in ATP or in the Editor
> Gummi. I mean Auctex should recognize automatically if someting
> changed in the buffer and execute this function.

I don't think it would be a good idea to do that.  You type a char thus
the buffer is modified and latexmk starts.  You type another char and
AUCTeX wants to start latexmk again, and since the other process isn't
yet finished you get a query "Kill running latexmk process?"...

> Another approach would be if Auctex automatcally saves the document
> from time to time and executes this function or the other functions
> supposed by you.
>
> Is that possible?

Sure.  Have a look at `run-with-timer' or `run-with-idle-timer'.

Bye,
Tassilo


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] auto compile for auctex?

2014-10-17 Thread Lars Madsen
I tend to run latexmk externally with -pvc mode

Of course then I cannot use C-` to jump to error, but that is usually not that 
much of a problem.

With -pvc you just save, and latexmk takes over.

It can be an idea to reconfigure it with

$pdflatex = "pdflatex -synctex=1  -halt-on-error %O %S";

such that when it detects an error then it stops and it go back to looking for 
file changes.


/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 17 October 2014 11:51
To: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] auto compile for auctex?

Thorsten Grothe  writes:

Hi Thorsten,

> before I started using auctex I used vim with atp-latex plugin see
> here:
>
> http://atp-vim.sourceforge.net/
>
> ATP has a very nice feauture, called auto compile. When you leave vims
> insert mode the document is automatically compiled by latexmk, this is
> very convenient and I loved this feature.  Is something similar
> possible with auctex and for example latexmk?

Flymake can do that, although that's not muli-file-document aware and
will run texify instead of latexmk.  But by overriding its tex hook with
this function

  (defun flymake-get-tex-args (file-name)
(list "latexmk" (list (TeX-master-file file-name

it'll probably work ok, e.g., recompile your document once you've saved
any of its files.

Bye,
Tassilo


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] running C-c C-c very slow

2014-10-15 Thread Lars Madsen
ahh, yes that feature. 

I see the problem it is has to scan the entire texmf tree.

That is one of the reasons I use latexmk, it scans the log and finds all 
dependent files that.

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: Tassilo Horn [t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 15 October 2014 10:49
To: Lars Madsen
Cc: Jannis; auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] running C-c C-c very slow

Lars Madsen  writes:

> Now I'm just wondering.
> What is AucTeX looking up at C-c C-c? And why is that lookup needed.

If any tex/sty file belonging to your document (either directly or in
terms of \usepackage etc.) has been modified, AUCTeX will suggest you to
run LaTeX on your document.  If not but some bib file used by your
document has been modified, it suggests you run BibTeX or Biber.  Same
for index files.  Only if nothing has been modified and thus your
PDF/DVI file is current, it'll suggest to run the View command.

Bye,
Tassilo

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] running C-c C-c very slow

2014-10-15 Thread Lars Madsen
Now I'm just wondering.

What is AucTeX looking up at C-c C-c? And why is that lookup needed.

(I hardly ever use C-c C-c, since I'm running latexmk in pvc mode)

/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information: 
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf



From: auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org 
[auctex-bounces+daleif=math.au...@gnu.org] on behalf of Tassilo Horn 
[t...@gnu.org]
Sent: 14 October 2014 20:50
To: Jannis
Cc: auctex@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] running C-c C-c very slow

Jannis  writes:

Hi Jannis,

> Sorry for beeing insistent,

Sorry, I've had no time to come back to you until now.

> but is there any way to solve this? All files in tex path do not seem
> to be on a nfs mount.

But as you've said below in your last message:

>> See above. Could this also be related to the location of the *.tex
>> file? I mount some remote samba share via VPN to my file system and
>> all the files Latex uses are located there. Maybe the change in speed
>> that i noticed is not due to me updating my system but due to me
>> changing my physical location. Before I worked at a place where these
>> files were located in the local network and were not acessed over the
>> internet.

Well, that means that AUCTeX does more than thousand file-exists-p
checks on files that are accessed via network.  Not astonishing that
this is slow.  (NFS was just an example.  Samba is quite similar.)

> Is this also crucial for the *.tex etc files of the document beeing
> worked on?

No.

Ok, so how to solve the problem?

  1. You could check if there's some optimization/caching option for
 samba that speeds up file existance checks.

  2. Install a TeX distro locally.

Bye,
Tassilo

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

2014-08-09 Thread Lars Madsen
Ernst, do you mind sharing where you saw that adding the path change to 
".bashrc" was the "right" thing to do.

Just so we can get that "advise" removed from the Internet. It is a very common 
problem

-Original Message-
From: Ernst Reissner [rei3...@arcor.de]
Received: søndag, 10 aug. 2014, 1:38
To: Lars Madsen [dal...@imf.au.dk]; m...@gnu.org [m...@gnu.org]; auctex@gnu.org 
[auctex@gnu.org]
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

On 08/10/2014 01:25 AM, Lars Madsen wrote:
See my other answer.

The important thing here is how exactly you start emacs.

>From the command line or via a menu or keyboard shortcut

It will work from the command line but not from a menu. Emacs does not use the 
bash shell when making system calls.

-Original Message-
From: Ernst Reissner [rei3...@arcor.de<mailto:rei3...@arcor.de>]
Received: søndag, 10 aug. 2014, 1:21
To: Mosè Giordano [m...@gnu.org<mailto:m...@gnu.org>]; auctex 
[auctex@gnu.org<mailto:auctex@gnu.org>]
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

On 08/10/2014 01:03 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> 2014-08-10 0:55 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner 
> <mailto:rei3...@arcor.de>:
>> On 08/10/2014 12:41 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>>> 2014-08-10 0:32 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner 
>>> <mailto:rei3...@arcor.de>:
>>>> Hi Mosè,
>>>>> Hi Ernst,
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-08-10 0:04 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner 
>>>>> <mailto:rei3...@arcor.de>:
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> right now i found out,
>>>>>> that auctex does not yet work with newest texlive 2014.
>>>>>> Who can help? Maybe only a tiny problem.
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>> Ernst
>>>>> What do you mean by "auctex does not yet work with newest texlive
>>>>> 2014"?  Did you use other TeX Live versions before switching to 2014?
>>>>> Can you compile your documents from the terminal but not from AUCTeX?
>>>>> Please add more information, I have no problem with AUCTeX and TeX
>>>>> Live 2014.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh sorry, I made a mistake configuring auctex.
>>>> Now i have another problem:
>>>> emacs looks fine with all menus expected for auctex.
>>>> When trying to tex
>>>> ctrl c-l yields
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Running `LaTeX' on `l2r' with ``latex  -interaction=nonstopmode "\input"
>>>> l2r.tex''
>>>> /bin/sh: latex: command not found
>>>>
>>>> LaTeX exited abnormally with code 127 at Sun Aug 10 00:30:04
>>>>
>>>> although switching to directory with l2r.tex and issuing latex
>>>> -interaction=nonstopmode "\input" l2r.tex on the command line, there is
>>>> no problem.
>>>>
>>>> What's wrong here?
>>> Are you sure your *tex binaries are in the PATH environment variable?
>>> Try restarting your system if you have just changed some settings.
>>> Usually you don't need to configure anything inside AUCTeX, if a TeX
>>> distribution is properly installed.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Mosè
>>>
>> To tell you the truth, i am not.
>> I right now added
>>
>> (getenv "PATH")
>>  (setenv "PATH"
>> (concat
>>  "/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux" ":"
>> (getenv "PATH")))
>>
>> to my .emacs-file and it seems to work.
>> "/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux" is the location of my
>> tex-binaries.
>> I wonder about this is necessary, because i also added this to the path
>> of my shell to run latex and pdflatex and others
>> on the command line.
> How do you add that directory to your PATH for your shell (which
> shell?)?  One should use a .profile file or another file which is
> sourced at the system startup.
>
>> Do you think, i found a solution or is it just a hack?
> You found a solution but this should work also without changing the
> PATH within Emacs: if the PATH is properly set in the system, Emacs
> will be able to find latex itself.
>
> Bye,
> Mosè
>
> PS: please keep the AUCTeX mailing list in CC, this may be useful for
> other people out there.
>
Yes, Mosè
I have doubts.

I use bash.
Consequently, in .bashrc I wrote
export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux::$PATH
where  is some other segment of path and
/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux is the location of the tex-binaries.

As i wrote earlier, when trying to latex from within emacs
using auctex, the m

Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

2014-08-09 Thread Lars Madsen
See my other answer.

The important thing here is how exactly you start emacs.

>From the command line or via a menu or keyboard shortcut

It will work from the command line but not from a menu. Emacs does not use the 
bash shell when making system calls.

-Original Message-
From: Ernst Reissner [rei3...@arcor.de]
Received: søndag, 10 aug. 2014, 1:21
To: Mosè Giordano [m...@gnu.org]; auctex [auctex@gnu.org]
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

On 08/10/2014 01:03 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> 2014-08-10 0:55 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner :
>> On 08/10/2014 12:41 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>>> 2014-08-10 0:32 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner :
 Hi Mosè,
> Hi Ernst,
>
> 2014-08-10 0:04 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner :
>> Hi All,
>> right now i found out,
>> that auctex does not yet work with newest texlive 2014.
>> Who can help? Maybe only a tiny problem.
>> Greetings,
>> Ernst
> What do you mean by "auctex does not yet work with newest texlive
> 2014"?  Did you use other TeX Live versions before switching to 2014?
> Can you compile your documents from the terminal but not from AUCTeX?
> Please add more information, I have no problem with AUCTeX and TeX
> Live 2014.
>
 Oh sorry, I made a mistake configuring auctex.
 Now i have another problem:
 emacs looks fine with all menus expected for auctex.
 When trying to tex
 ctrl c-l yields


 Running `LaTeX' on `l2r' with ``latex  -interaction=nonstopmode "\input"
 l2r.tex''
 /bin/sh: latex: command not found

 LaTeX exited abnormally with code 127 at Sun Aug 10 00:30:04

 although switching to directory with l2r.tex and issuing latex
 -interaction=nonstopmode "\input" l2r.tex on the command line, there is
 no problem.

 What's wrong here?
>>> Are you sure your *tex binaries are in the PATH environment variable?
>>> Try restarting your system if you have just changed some settings.
>>> Usually you don't need to configure anything inside AUCTeX, if a TeX
>>> distribution is properly installed.
>>>
>>> Bye,
>>> Mosè
>>>
>> To tell you the truth, i am not.
>> I right now added
>>
>> (getenv "PATH")
>>  (setenv "PATH"
>> (concat
>>  "/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux" ":"
>> (getenv "PATH")))
>>
>> to my .emacs-file and it seems to work.
>> "/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux" is the location of my
>> tex-binaries.
>> I wonder about this is necessary, because i also added this to the path
>> of my shell to run latex and pdflatex and others
>> on the command line.
> How do you add that directory to your PATH for your shell (which
> shell?)?  One should use a .profile file or another file which is
> sourced at the system startup.
>
>> Do you think, i found a solution or is it just a hack?
> You found a solution but this should work also without changing the
> PATH within Emacs: if the PATH is properly set in the system, Emacs
> will be able to find latex itself.
>
> Bye,
> Mosè
>
> PS: please keep the AUCTeX mailing list in CC, this may be useful for
> other people out there.
>
Yes, Mosè
I have doubts.

I use bash.
Consequently, in .bashrc I wrote
export PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux::$PATH
where  is some other segment of path and
/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux is the location of the tex-binaries.

As i wrote earlier, when trying to latex from within emacs
using auctex, the message was:

Running `LaTeX' on `l2r' with ``latex  -interaction=nonstopmode "\input"
l2r.tex''
/bin/sh: latex: command not found

ok then i found, that one can change the shell
and i wondered whether this is the problem.

The result was:

Running `LaTeX' on `l2r' with ``pdflatex  -interaction=nonstopmode "\input" 
l2r.tex''
/bin/bash: pdflatex: command not found

and as you see: i managed to change shell and i also changed to pdflatex.
And I removed the path from my .emacs-file.

Still
pdflatex  -interaction=nonstopmode "\input" l2r.tex
 on the shell works fine.

Whats wrong now?!

Greetings,
Ernst




___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

2014-08-09 Thread Lars Madsen
It souls like one if those cases where a person have added a path change to 
".bashrc" and then started emacs via a menu. That will not work and emacs will 
not find latex. Add it to ".profile" instead and lig out and in again, then it 
works.

That ".bashrc" advise is really annoying

-Original Message-
From: Mosè Giordano [m...@gnu.org]
Received: søndag, 10 aug. 2014, 1:04
To: Ernst Reissner [rei3...@arcor.de]; auctex [auctex@gnu.org]
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] texlive 2014

2014-08-10 0:55 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner :
> On 08/10/2014 12:41 AM, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>> 2014-08-10 0:32 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner :
>>> Hi Mosè,
 Hi Ernst,

 2014-08-10 0:04 GMT+02:00 Ernst Reissner :
> Hi All,
> right now i found out,
> that auctex does not yet work with newest texlive 2014.
> Who can help? Maybe only a tiny problem.
> Greetings,
> Ernst
 What do you mean by "auctex does not yet work with newest texlive
 2014"?  Did you use other TeX Live versions before switching to 2014?
 Can you compile your documents from the terminal but not from AUCTeX?
 Please add more information, I have no problem with AUCTeX and TeX
 Live 2014.

>>> Oh sorry, I made a mistake configuring auctex.
>>> Now i have another problem:
>>> emacs looks fine with all menus expected for auctex.
>>> When trying to tex
>>> ctrl c-l yields
>>>
>>>
>>> Running `LaTeX' on `l2r' with ``latex  -interaction=nonstopmode "\input"
>>> l2r.tex''
>>> /bin/sh: latex: command not found
>>>
>>> LaTeX exited abnormally with code 127 at Sun Aug 10 00:30:04
>>>
>>> although switching to directory with l2r.tex and issuing latex
>>> -interaction=nonstopmode "\input" l2r.tex on the command line, there is
>>> no problem.
>>>
>>> What's wrong here?
>> Are you sure your *tex binaries are in the PATH environment variable?
>> Try restarting your system if you have just changed some settings.
>> Usually you don't need to configure anything inside AUCTeX, if a TeX
>> distribution is properly installed.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Mosè
>>
>
> To tell you the truth, i am not.
> I right now added
>
> (getenv "PATH")
>  (setenv "PATH"
> (concat
>  "/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux" ":"
> (getenv "PATH")))
>
> to my .emacs-file and it seems to work.
> "/usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/x86_64-linux" is the location of my
> tex-binaries.
> I wonder about this is necessary, because i also added this to the path
> of my shell to run latex and pdflatex and others
> on the command line.

How do you add that directory to your PATH for your shell (which
shell?)?  One should use a .profile file or another file which is
sourced at the system startup.

> Do you think, i found a solution or is it just a hack?

You found a solution but this should work also without changing the
PATH within Emacs: if the PATH is properly set in the system, Emacs
will be able to find latex itself.

Bye,
Mosè

PS: please keep the AUCTeX mailing list in CC, this may be useful for
other people out there.

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex