Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread jfbu

Le 19/11/2015 20:12, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo a écrit :

Jean-François writes:


the idea isn't to implement in LaTeX what org can do, but to share the same 
syntax, so that org can do its things, but then on C-cC-c the table is compiled 
by LaTeX


That is exactly what orgtbl-mode does, see:

(info "(org) A LaTeX example")


It appears I have been injecting lots of entropy
into this thread, I think I got confused at some point.

Best,
Jean-François


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo

Jean-François writes:

the idea isn't to implement in LaTeX what org can do, but to 
share the same syntax, so that org can do its things, but then 
on C-cC-c the table is compiled by LaTeX


That is exactly what orgtbl-mode does, see:

(info "(org) A LaTeX example")

Best,
--
Jorge.


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread jfbu

Le 19 nov. 2015 à 19:52, jfbu  a écrit :

> PS: there is a ... oh... I see on
> 
>http://www.ctan.org/author/tellechea
> 
> very bad news.

I immediately point out this is a bug or hack on CTAN

I am also announced deceased on CTAN at this time

-- as one say, these news are greatly exaggerated...

sorry about the alarm I contributed to spread...

long live anyone

Jean-François


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread jfbu

Le 19 nov. 2015 à 19:22, Marcin Borkowski  a écrit :

> 
> On 2015-11-19, at 19:02, jfbu  wrote:
> 
>> probably the answer is : "yes and no"
>> 
>> no, as it doesn't seem to have implemented in TeX/LaTeX the
>> org syntax for tables: if I am not mistaken tapdoc.pdf seems
>> to indicate that rows start with \B! and end with \E!
>> 
>> (at least it is what I see from the code samples given)
>> 
>> yes, as it seems to have a syntax of its own which appears
>> to be somewhat akin to the org syntax
> 
> Exactly.  It's not really Org-tables in LaTeX, treat it rather as
> a proof of concept.
> 
> Since Org tables are (syntax-wise) fairly simplistic, in principle it
> wouldn't be too difficult to write a (La)TeX package to deal with them
> directly.  Of course, there are tricky things, like the spreadsheet
> (little hope for implementing that), column groups and width/alignment
> cookies.  Those features would probably need two passes - the first one
> would gather the information from the cookies, the second one would
> typeset the table.  Possible, but probably not worth the effort.

Hi Marcin,

the idea isn't to implement in LaTeX what org can do, but to share
the same syntax, so that org can do its things, but then on C-cC-c
the table is compiled by LaTeX

PS: there is a ... oh... I see on

http://www.ctan.org/author/tellechea

very bad news.

His package spreadtab does spreadsheet in LaTeX

best

Jean-François

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread Marcin Borkowski

On 2015-11-19, at 19:02, jfbu  wrote:

> probably the answer is : "yes and no"
>
> no, as it doesn't seem to have implemented in TeX/LaTeX the
> org syntax for tables: if I am not mistaken tapdoc.pdf seems
> to indicate that rows start with \B! and end with \E!
>
> (at least it is what I see from the code samples given)
>
> yes, as it seems to have a syntax of its own which appears
> to be somewhat akin to the org syntax

Exactly.  It's not really Org-tables in LaTeX, treat it rather as
a proof of concept.

Since Org tables are (syntax-wise) fairly simplistic, in principle it
wouldn't be too difficult to write a (La)TeX package to deal with them
directly.  Of course, there are tricky things, like the spreadsheet
(little hope for implementing that), column groups and width/alignment
cookies.  Those features would probably need two passes - the first one
would gather the information from the cookies, the second one would
typeset the table.  Possible, but probably not worth the effort.

> best
> Jean-François

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread jfbu
Le 19/11/2015 16:27, Marcin Borkowski a écrit :
> 
> On 2015-11-19, at 09:36, jfbu  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mosè and Joost,
>>
>> Le 18 nov. 2015 à 23:52, Mosè Giordano  a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Joost,
>>>
>>> 2015-11-17 13:18 GMT+01:00 Joost Kremers :
 If you do decide to take on the challenge, here's a few things to take
 into consideration:
>>>
>>> Well, it was more a dream than a declaration of action, I'm not going
>>> to work on that ;-)   org has its own simple syntax for tables and it
>>> works very well, but editing real LaTeX tables requires much more
>>> attention, for example they can be split over lines (I don't think
>>> it's the case for org).
>>
>> I am going off-topic here, but it could be possible to address this
>> issue at the TeX level: I mean by this define a LaTeX environment for
>> tables which would use org-syntax. Thus you could have the goodies
>> you mention on the Emacs editing side, and the LaTeX compilation would
>> proceed directly.
>>
>> For example TeX allows at the inner core any choice of character for
>> tabulation in alignments, thus we could use | rather than &. Of course
>> higher level structures will perhaps really need a &, but then they
>> can be rewritten to work with |. (use of | as tabulation means one
>> has to address how to use it as standard character elsewhere)
>>
>> (for example the table in the screenshot provided by Joost can definitely
>> be analyzed at TeX macro level, if the goal is to produce simple centered
>> columns; I don't know how org says to use left or right aligned columns)
>>
>> I mention this as a theoretical possibility ! 
> 
> You mean, something like this?
> 
> http://ctan.org/pkg/tap
> 

Hi,

thanks I didn't know that (Plain) package. (although I finally
found it in TeXLive, the tapdoc.tex documentation file needs
to be compiled, and texdoc tap yields many results but seemingly
nothing related to tap ... I found it on my local disk only
after having downloaded it from CTAN and compiled)

probably the answer is : "yes and no"

no, as it doesn't seem to have implemented in TeX/LaTeX the
org syntax for tables: if I am not mistaken tapdoc.pdf seems
to indicate that rows start with \B! and end with \E!

(at least it is what I see from the code samples given)

yes, as it seems to have a syntax of its own which appears
to be somewhat akin to the org syntax

best
Jean-François



___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread Marcin Borkowski

On 2015-11-19, at 09:36, jfbu  wrote:

> Hi Mosè and Joost,
>
> Le 18 nov. 2015 à 23:52, Mosè Giordano  a écrit :
>
>> Hi Joost,
>> 
>> 2015-11-17 13:18 GMT+01:00 Joost Kremers :
>>> If you do decide to take on the challenge, here's a few things to take
>>> into consideration:
>> 
>> Well, it was more a dream than a declaration of action, I'm not going
>> to work on that ;-)   org has its own simple syntax for tables and it
>> works very well, but editing real LaTeX tables requires much more
>> attention, for example they can be split over lines (I don't think
>> it's the case for org).
>
> I am going off-topic here, but it could be possible to address this
> issue at the TeX level: I mean by this define a LaTeX environment for
> tables which would use org-syntax. Thus you could have the goodies
> you mention on the Emacs editing side, and the LaTeX compilation would
> proceed directly.
>
> For example TeX allows at the inner core any choice of character for
> tabulation in alignments, thus we could use | rather than &. Of course
> higher level structures will perhaps really need a &, but then they
> can be rewritten to work with |. (use of | as tabulation means one
> has to address how to use it as standard character elsewhere)
>
> (for example the table in the screenshot provided by Joost can definitely
> be analyzed at TeX macro level, if the goal is to produce simple centered
> columns; I don't know how org says to use left or right aligned columns)
>
> I mention this as a theoretical possibility ! 

You mean, something like this?

http://ctan.org/pkg/tap

> (and now I am going to go and check org documentation for
> its table syntax and realize I posted too hastily this...)

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-19 Thread jfbu
Hi Mosè and Joost,

Le 18 nov. 2015 à 23:52, Mosè Giordano  a écrit :

> Hi Joost,
> 
> 2015-11-17 13:18 GMT+01:00 Joost Kremers :
>> If you do decide to take on the challenge, here's a few things to take
>> into consideration:
> 
> Well, it was more a dream than a declaration of action, I'm not going
> to work on that ;-)   org has its own simple syntax for tables and it
> works very well, but editing real LaTeX tables requires much more
> attention, for example they can be split over lines (I don't think
> it's the case for org).

I am going off-topic here, but it could be possible to address this
issue at the TeX level: I mean by this define a LaTeX environment for
tables which would use org-syntax. Thus you could have the goodies
you mention on the Emacs editing side, and the LaTeX compilation would
proceed directly.

For example TeX allows at the inner core any choice of character for
tabulation in alignments, thus we could use | rather than &. Of course
higher level structures will perhaps really need a &, but then they
can be rewritten to work with |. (use of | as tabulation means one
has to address how to use it as standard character elsewhere)

(for example the table in the screenshot provided by Joost can definitely
be analyzed at TeX macro level, if the goal is to produce simple centered
columns; I don't know how org says to use left or right aligned columns)

I mention this as a theoretical possibility ! 
(and now I am going to go and check org documentation for
its table syntax and realize I posted too hastily this...)

best,
Jean-François
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-18 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Joost,

2015-11-17 13:18 GMT+01:00 Joost Kremers :
> If you do decide to take on the challenge, here's a few things to take
> into consideration:

Well, it was more a dream than a declaration of action, I'm not going
to work on that ;-)   org has its own simple syntax for tables and it
works very well, but editing real LaTeX tables requires much more
attention, for example they can be split over lines (I don't think
it's the case for org).

Bye,
Mosè

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-17 Thread Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo

Mosè Giordano writes:

I like org, and I used it in the past (nowadays much less), and 
its table features are really impressive.  In particular I love 
the possibility to turn Emacs into a full fledged spreadsheet 
combining org and calc.  Nevertheless, I don't like very much 
the final LaTeX output of org tables (I don't know if it changed 
lately, but looking to your screenshot it doesn't seem to be 
so), for example the vertical bars are questionable, but of 
course in Emacs you can customize every detail and the content 
of of the table is more important of its aspect that can be 
easily adjusted.


The vertical lines are not default. But yes, everything can be 
easily configured. For example to use booktabs, you can use 
something like:


#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
 (defun orgtbl-to-latex-booktabs (table params)  
   "Convert the Orgtbl mode TABLE to LaTeX using booktabs 
   package."

   (let* ((alignment (mapconcat (lambda (x) (if x "r" "l"))
org-table-last-alignment ""))
  (params2
   (list
:tstart (concat "\\begin{tabular}{" alignment 
"}\n\\toprule")

:tend "\\bottomrule\n\\end{tabular}"
:lstart "" :lend " " :sep " & "
:efmt "%s\\,(%s)" :hline "\\midrule")))
 (orgtbl-to-generic table (org-combine-plists params2 
 params


 (eval-after-load "org-table"
   '(progn
  (setq orgtbl-radio-table-templates
 (delete-if (lambda (x) (equal (car x) 'latex-mode))
  orgtbl-radio-table-templates))

  (add-to-list 'orgtbl-radio-table-templates
   '(latex-mode "% BEGIN RECEIVE ORGTBL %n\n% END 
   RECEIVE ORGTBL %n\n\\begin{comment}\n#+ORGTBL: 
   SEND %n orgtbl-to-latex-booktabs :splice nil 
   :skip 0 :no-escape t\n| | 
   |\n\\end{comment}\n"
#+END_SRC 



Then orgtbl-insert-radio-table, puts something like:

% BEGIN RECEIVE ORGTBL the-name-of-the-table
% END RECEIVE ORGTBL the-name-of-the-table
\begin{comment}
#+ORGTBL: SEND the-name-of-the-table orgtbl-to-latex-booktabs 
:splice nil :skip 0 :no-escape t

| | |
\end{comment}


and a table like:

| A | B |
|---+---|
| a | b |
| 1 | 2 |

gets translated to:

\begin{tabular}{ll}
\toprule
A & B \\
\midrule
a & b \\
1 & 2 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular} 


--
Jorge.


___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-17 Thread Joost Kremers
Hi Mosè,

On Mo, Nov 16 2015, Mosè Giordano  wrote:
> Thank you!  Indeed I was discussing features entirely AUCTeX-related
> (being this the AUCTeX mailing list ;-), but your experience with
> other Emacs tools that can be used for LaTeX documents is relevant.
>
> I like org, and I used it in the past (nowadays much less), and its
> table features are really impressive.  In particular I love the
> possibility to turn Emacs into a full fledged spreadsheet combining
> org and calc.  Nevertheless, I don't like very much the final LaTeX
> output of org tables (I don't know if it changed lately, but looking
> to your screenshot it doesn't seem to be so), for example the vertical
> bars are questionable, but of course in Emacs you can customize every
> detail and the content of of the table is more important of its aspect
> that can be easily adjusted.

Oh, by default, orgtbl-mode doesn't put bars in the table. I customised
it that way. (Not because I think it looks better, BTW...)

> I must admit that when I was thinking to possible improvements to
> management of tables inside AUCTeX I was really thinking about org:
> moving across cells with TAB and inserting and deleting columns with a
> single key binding are really handy features!  But I'm not sure it's
> worth having those features in AUCTeX, it could be a useless
> duplication of efforts if many users take advantage of org anyway.

Actually, if that sort of table editing would be possible without using
orgtbl-mode, I might be inclined to use it. It would require less
customisation and one could edit the table directly rather than using an
extra comment block.

I don't know if it'd be possbile to tell org's table editing commands to
use & as column separators and \\ as end of row indicatiors. If not, it
might still be possible to take the relevant code, modify it and include
it in AUCTeX.

If you do decide to take on the challenge, here's a few things to take
into consideration:

- I use visual-line-mode in my LaTeX buffers, so anything that works by
  piggybacking on auto-fill-mode won't work for me.

- One clear disadvantage of orgtbl-mode is that its table alignment
  functions aren't aware of folded LaTeX commands. If you have things
  like, \emph or \textsc etc. in the table and they're folded, the
  alignment is messed up. If AUCTeX were to get such table editing
  functionality, it'd be great if it were folding-aware, in that the
  alignment takes the actual visible width of the cell contents into
  account.

- The question is then whether you'd want folding and unfolding to
  realign tables automatically. That seems like a bad idea, because in
  all other respects, folding does not change the actual content of the
  buffer, but there might be users who'd prefer it. (Personally, the
  first thing I do after loading a tex file is to fold the entire
  buffer, so I wouldn't want this.)

Anyway, just a few thoughts. AUCTeX-specific this time. ;-)


-- 
Joost Kremers
Life has its moments

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-16 Thread Mosè Giordano
Hi Joost,

2015-11-16 23:21 GMT+01:00 Joost Kremers :
>>
>> Op 15 nov. 2015 om 18:55 heeft Mosè Giordano  het volgende 
>> geschreven:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> as you all know, editing tables in LaTeX can be quite tedious.
>> Luckily in AUCTeX we got a couple of nice features, auto insertion of
>> the appropriate &s and a good indentation function in tabular-like
>> environments, but there is still much room for improvements.[1]
> [...]
>
>> Note
>> [1]  Suggestions welcome.
>
> Well, IMHO this is one area where Emacs shines, but you need a bit more than 
> just AUCTeX. Using orgmode and preview-latex, there is a solution that is 
> better than anything I've ever seen. This is what I do:
>
> - include in the preamble of my documents the following snippet:
>
> ```
> \usepackage{comment}
> \specialcomment{orgtbl}{}{}
> \excludecomment{orgtbl}
> ```
>
> - customise `orgtbl-radio-table-templates`, so that the LaTeX table is inside 
> an orgtbl environment.
>
> - customise `LaTeX-comment-env-list` and `LaTeX-verbatim-environments` to 
> include `orgtbl`.
>
> - customise `TeX-fold-env-list` to fold the orgtbl environment to "[orgtbl]". 
> (Actually, there's no need to set up a special comment environment. I do it 
> so I can easily distinguish between folded comments and folded org tables.)
>
> - activate `orgtbl-mode` in my LaTeX buffer.
>
> - issue the command `M-x orgtbl-insert-radio-table` where I want my table to 
> be. This inserts an org-mode table template inside an orgtbl environment, 
> plus a receiving location for the LaTeX table right above it.
>
> - edit my table with the full orgmode table editor right inside my LaTeX 
> buffer.
>
> - press C-c C-c when I'm done with the table. This converts the table to 
> LaTeX format and puts the result in the LaTeX buffer at the specified 
> location.
>
> - press C-c C-o C-b to fold the orgtbl environment.
>
> - move the cursor to the LaTeX table and press C-c C-p C-p to preview the 
> table.
>
> The results? This:
>
>
>
>
> allows me to edit the table comfortably (moving from cell to cell with TAB, 
> automatic realignment of columns, quick insertion/deletion of rows and 
> columns with C-M-, etc.) and eventually turns into this:
>
>
>
>
> (Yes, in case you noticed, I do indeed use a proportional font in my LaTeX 
> buffers.)
>
> I think that calls for a big Woohoo! and a big Hail Ye! to all the Emacs 
> priests who help make this possible (which IMO includes the AUCTeX team). Oh, 
> and stop staring at the people quietly slipping out the back door. They're 
> just vi users sneeking to their computers to see whether evil-mode works with 
> AUCTeX.
>
> Ok, I'm going a bit overboard there, but I really think the whole thing is 
> truly amazing and it deserves a mention in a thread entitled "Some hints for 
> editing tables". Even if it's not entirely what you were after when you said 
> suggestions were welcome...

Thank you!  Indeed I was discussing features entirely AUCTeX-related
(being this the AUCTeX mailing list ;-), but your experience with
other Emacs tools that can be used for LaTeX documents is relevant.

I like org, and I used it in the past (nowadays much less), and its
table features are really impressive.  In particular I love the
possibility to turn Emacs into a full fledged spreadsheet combining
org and calc.  Nevertheless, I don't like very much the final LaTeX
output of org tables (I don't know if it changed lately, but looking
to your screenshot it doesn't seem to be so), for example the vertical
bars are questionable, but of course in Emacs you can customize every
detail and the content of of the table is more important of its aspect
that can be easily adjusted.

I must admit that when I was thinking to possible improvements to
management of tables inside AUCTeX I was really thinking about org:
moving across cells with TAB and inserting and deleting columns with a
single key binding are really handy features!  But I'm not sure it's
worth having those features in AUCTeX, it could be a useless
duplication of efforts if many users take advantage of org anyway.

Bye,
Mosè

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


Re: [AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-16 Thread Joost Kremers
> 
> Op 15 nov. 2015 om 18:55 heeft Mosè Giordano  het volgende 
> geschreven:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> as you all know, editing tables in LaTeX can be quite tedious.
> Luckily in AUCTeX we got a couple of nice features, auto insertion of
> the appropriate &s and a good indentation function in tabular-like
> environments, but there is still much room for improvements.[1]
[...]

> Note
> [1]  Suggestions welcome.

Well, IMHO this is one area where Emacs shines, but you need a bit more than 
just AUCTeX. Using orgmode and preview-latex, there is a solution that is 
better than anything I've ever seen. This is what I do:

- include in the preamble of my documents the following snippet:

```
\usepackage{comment}
\specialcomment{orgtbl}{}{}
\excludecomment{orgtbl}
```

- customise `orgtbl-radio-table-templates`, so that the LaTeX table is inside 
an orgtbl environment.

- customise `LaTeX-comment-env-list` and `LaTeX-verbatim-environments` to 
include `orgtbl`.

- customise `TeX-fold-env-list` to fold the orgtbl environment to "[orgtbl]". 
(Actually, there's no need to set up a special comment environment. I do it so 
I can easily distinguish between folded comments and folded org tables.)

- activate `orgtbl-mode` in my LaTeX buffer.

- issue the command `M-x orgtbl-insert-radio-table` where I want my table to 
be. This inserts an org-mode table template inside an orgtbl environment, plus 
a receiving location for the LaTeX table right above it.

- edit my table with the full orgmode table editor right inside my LaTeX buffer.

- press C-c C-c when I'm done with the table. This converts the table to LaTeX 
format and puts the result in the LaTeX buffer at the specified location.

- press C-c C-o C-b to fold the orgtbl environment.

- move the cursor to the LaTeX table and press C-c C-p C-p to preview the table.

The results? This:



allows me to edit the table comfortably (moving from cell to cell with TAB, 
automatic realignment of columns, quick insertion/deletion of rows and columns 
with C-M-, etc.) and eventually turns into this:



(Yes, in case you noticed, I do indeed use a proportional font in my LaTeX 
buffers.)

I think that calls for a big Woohoo! and a big Hail Ye! to all the Emacs 
priests who help make this possible (which IMO includes the AUCTeX team). Oh, 
and stop staring at the people quietly slipping out the back door. They're just 
vi users sneeking to their computers to see whether evil-mode works with AUCTeX.

Ok, I'm going a bit overboard there, but I really think the whole thing is 
truly amazing and it deserves a mention in a thread entitled "Some hints for 
editing tables". Even if it's not entirely what you were after when you said 
suggestions were welcome...

-- 
Joost Kremers
Life has its moments

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex


[AUCTeX] Some hints for editing tables

2015-11-16 Thread Mosè Giordano
Dear all,

as you all know, editing tables in LaTeX can be quite tedious.
Luckily in AUCTeX we got a couple of nice features, auto insertion of
the appropriate &s and a good indentation function in tabular-like
environments, but there is still much room for improvements.[1]

What I often want is to have the table aligned.  Emacs has the great
`align-current' function, by I get tired to manually call it every now
and then, and so I often don't run it all.  In addition, I have
`auto-fill-mode' on, but in order to have the table aligned
auto-filling doesn't really make sense.  So, why don't hack
auto-filling in order to run `align-current'?  Then I came up with
this simple solution:

(defun mg/LaTeX-auto-fill-function ()
  (if (member (LaTeX-current-environment) '("tabular"))
  (align-current)
(do-auto-fill)))

(add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook
  (lambda ()
(setq auto-fill-function 'mg/LaTeX-auto-fill-function)))

So, if current environment is tabular, auto-fill-function, triggered
by SPC, RET, and so on, calls `align-current', otherwise the usual
filling function is used (replace `do-auto-fill' wit your favorite
one).

In addition, in order to have tables really visually aligned (useful
for rectangular selection) you should also truncate lines and make
sup/subscript as large as normal characters, unless you already do so.
For this, take a look at

(defun toggle-LaTeX-rectangular-edit-ready-mode ()
  (interactive)
  (if (equal truncate-lines nil)
  (progn
(set-face-attribute
 'font-latex-subscript-face nil
 :height 1.0)
(set-face-attribute
 'font-latex-superscript-face nil
 :height 1.0)
(setq truncate-lines t)
(message "LaTeX-rectangular-edit-ready-mode has been switched on"))
(progn
  (set-face-attribute
   'font-latex-subscript-face nil
   :height 0.8)
  (set-face-attribute
   'font-latex-superscript-face nil
   :height 0.8)
  (setq truncate-lines nil)
  (message "LaTeX-rectangular-edit-ready-mode has been switched off"

Source: http://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/17207/620

I want to make it clear I'm not going to include in AUCTeX any of this
features, they're just some hints for you, but they can be highly
inefficient, so use them at your own risk ;-)

Happy TeXing,
Mosè


Note
[1]  Suggestions welcome.

___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex