Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Final MQA Round-Up...

2017-11-09 Thread ralphpnj

adamdea wrote: 
> .
> One could go on, but the gist of it is that the level of understanding
> of perceptual science required to see through the entire subjectivist
> canon is about the same as the level of understanding of physics
> required to understanding that cartoon characters do not obey newtonian
> mechanics.

That's all well and good but what about quantum mechanics?

Since we all know that to fully understand the mysteries of high end
audio a full and thorough understanding and knowledge of advanced
quantum mechanics is required. And once one has obtained this knowledge
and understanding one will clearly see that the difference between
objective and subjective is nonexistent. :)



Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. &
sub
Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub
Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1
& Energy sub
Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0
Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar
Garage: SB3-JVC compact system
Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso
Server: LMS 7.9 on dedicated windows 10 computer w/2 Drobos
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)

ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108132

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Final MQA Round-Up...

2017-11-09 Thread Julf

That is a pretty good analysis. I always wonder if audio subjectivists
ever use a measuring tape, spirit level or even a car speedometer -
after all, aren't their senses perfect and absolute?



"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953

Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108132

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Final MQA Round-Up...

2017-11-09 Thread adamdea

Archimago wrote: 
>  Beyond that, I agree, there is no value in much of the subjective
> reviews out there when it comes to adjudicating sound quality.
> 
> I think what is fascinating is how seriously the subjective reviewers
> take themselves and their opinions.
I think that part of the problem is that there is an entire bogus
conceptual scheme built around the audiophile hobby about the nature of
hearing and the listening process. Once it is acquired it is quite
difficult to "un-learn". 

In essence it is based around a set of tacit assumptions that human
beings are a sort of sound quality detection advice and that
fluctuations in one's listening experience must be caused by variations
in the sound pressure waves reaching the ears. On this model thinking
that two things sound different is like thinking you can see someone
else in the room- a perceptually based conclusion which can only be
mistaken as a result of extraordinary disturbance of the  perceptual
system/hallucination etc. The curiosity is that even the most
superficial acquaintance with the basics of perceptual science would
immediately uncover this conceptual error. I have noticed that even some
very smart people in the industry (some of them engineers and scientists
in other disciples) seem to lack any curiosity about how perception
works. 

It is quite difficult to persuade people with so little intellectual
curiosity to rethink their position as to what it may mean to say that
measurements "can't explain" what they hear. 

One could go on, but the gist of it is that the level of understanding
of perceptual science required to see through the entire subjectivist
canon is about the same as the level of understanding of physics
required to understanding that cartoon characters do not obey newtonian
mechanics.



adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108132

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles