Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-25 Thread arnyk

Archimago wrote: 
> Hi Arny,
> Not sure which part in the testing you're referring to with -80dB.
> 

I'm referring to either of the THD+n or IMD+N  measurements shown in the
Audio Rightmark results at
http://archimago.blogspot.com/2016/10/measurements-raspberry-pi-3-hifiberry.html,
either sample rate.

Either THD and IM are commonly called "Spurious Responses". 

In one THD  test the THD is 0.0047% and in the other it is 0.0049%. In
my book, six of one, half dozen of the other or about 0.005%

In one IMD+N test the IM is 0.0077% and in the other it is 0.0066%. In
my book, also about six of one, half dozen of the other or about 0.0075%


0.005%  about the same as  86 dB down, while 0.0075% is more like 82 dB
down. I approximated both quite roughly as -80 dB.

The DAC chip in the Hi Fi Berry has a noise spec that is somewhat better
than its THD+N or IM+N performance. While playing music and other
signals, the THD+N or IMD+N numbers are probably more representative of
its actual performance than the number for background noise.



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-23 Thread Archimago

Wombat wrote: 
> There is a follow up:
> http://archimago.blogspot.de/2016/10/measurements-hifiberry-dac-pro-pcm5122.html
> Nice that you extended the test and have some words about how alone
> "less ringing" in the name of the filter may trigger the audiophile
> brain most certainly more as any technical or even audible benefit.
> Guess Linear Power and alike terms do the same.

Thanks Wombat.

Indeed, we have to be careful I think about the wording people use and
recognize that with these time domain impulse response graphs, there's
always a price to pay in the frequency domain... Advertisers and
magazine writers interestingly almost never point this out. Of course
this is inconvenient for folks who want to show their beautiful
non-ringing impulse images and sweep the fact that the DAC has all kinds
of ultrasonic aliasing products!



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-23 Thread Archimago

arnyk wrote: 
> Interesting data point. As the report  mentions, one possible area of
> concern is the device's approximate -80 dB suppression of spurious
> responses and noise.  This is about 16 dB poorer than CD quality (-96
> dB)  but about 20 dB better than a typical real world threshold of
> audibility (-60 dB). 
> 
> These days true CD quality performance (ca. -96 dB)  is available at the
> analog outputs of an < $100 BD player which usually includes a network
> (LAN+WAN) media player with considerable power and flexibility.
> 
> Not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, but not too far off when all
> costs are included would be the performance of an Intel NUC  micro-PC's 
> the Realtek ALC283 on-board chip audio system:
> 
> http://stn-bc.ru/?q=node/835
> 
> "
> To assess output sound path designed for headphones or external
> speakers, we resorted to the instrumental testing using an external
> sound card Creative E-MU 0204 USB and utility RightMark audio Analyzer
> 6.3.0. Testing was conducted to stereo mode, 24-bit / 44.1 kHz. 
> As a result of testing the audio section in the laptop Acer Aspire
> R7-371T was rated "very good." Full report with the test results in RMAA
> 6.3.0 software on a separate page, the following is a brief report. 
> 
> Frequency response (in the range of 40 Hz - 15 kHz), dB 
> 0.02, -0.09 Excellent 
> 
> Noise level dB (A ) 
> -86.4 good 
> 
> dynamic range, dB (A) 
> 86.2 good 
> 
> THD,% 
> 0.0057 Very good 
> 
> THD + noise, dB (A) 
> -74.2 Mediocre 
> 
> Intermodulation distortion + noise,% 
> 0.030 good 
> 
> Crosstalk dB 
> -85.8 Excellent 
> 
> Intermodulation at 10 kHz,% 
> 0.017 Very good 
> 
> Overall very good 
> "

Hi Arny,
Not sure which part in the testing you're referring to with -80dB. If
it's in reference to the "digital filter composite", I think that's a
result of the limitations of the digital antialiasing filter in handling
that extremely high amplitude wide bandwidth white noise and the
occasional inter-sample over when doing the upsampling.

Overall though from the Rightmark results, the HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro will
*easily* beat that NUC! Plus this device will be able to handle 24-bit
audio with noise floor lower than -105dB in the audible spectrum...



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-23 Thread Archimago

sckramer wrote: 
> The D+PRO is not my daily driver, and I'm more interested in the digi+,
> digi+pro, and i2s-- where I find bypassing power is a fundamental
> improvement. So really can't say if stock USB power vs. 5V/3.3V LPS
> improves on the D+PRO...Buuut I've set this up just in the last few
> days, for another project involving making a good a/b testing platform
> for the Kali FIFO buffer (long story). So maybe I'll listen, then go to
> USB & see if it's diff.
> 
> However, noticed in your testing, you always go through USB (not GPIO)--
> On the digi+ using linear power vs the stock USB power wart *thru the
> USB* didn't audibly change anything... also Hans mentioned this in his
> vid re: (usb/GPIO) whereas thru USB made no change.
> 
> You can see my setup somewhere in the linux section, Kali... there's a
> pic.. I'm borrowing my 4x LPS's (LT3042 based, and cheap) supplies to
> play with this--
> 
> I'm cool if it measures the same, but would really like to see you
> re-run the tests taking it all the way thru GPIO, see my setup -- Then
> maybe play with the digi+/digi+ pro also :D
> 
> Thanks for the great tests as usual!

HI screamer. 
I don't have the Digi models so would not be able to speak about that.
Would be very interested of any blind A/B testing results you may have.
Of course for this post, I was just looking at ethernet streaming to the
DAC.

For the most part, I have not used SPDIF of any sort other than as
convenience (like TosLink out from my TV) for years on the audio side.
Objrctively, coax and TosLink have more objective jitter and I find USB
more consistent from a sound quality perspective. This is why I've
measured USB or ethernet more over the last few years and used USB for
playback where available. Of course that's not to say I believe I can
clearly hear a difference...



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-22 Thread Wombat

There is a follow up:
http://archimago.blogspot.de/2016/10/measurements-hifiberry-dac-pro-pcm5122.html
Nice that you extended the test and have some words about how alone
"less ringing" in the name of the filter may trigger the audiophile
brain most certainly more as any technical or even audible benefit.
Guess Linear Power and alike terms do the same.



Transporter (modded) -> RG142 -> Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers

Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-05 Thread arnyk

Archimago wrote: 
> Hey guys. Just posted some measurements on the Pi3 + HiFiBerry DAC
> combo. I suspect many of us here are already doing this kind of thing
> with Pi computers and various other SBC's. Certainly makes an
> inexpensive system for a Squeezebox replacement with piCorePlayer
> installed...
> 
> http://archimago.blogspot.com/2016/10/measurements-raspberry-pi-3-hifiberry.html

Interesting data point. As the report  mentions, one possible area of
concern is the device's approximate -80 dB suppression of spurious
responses and noise.  This is about 16 dB poorer than CD quality (-96
dB)  but about 20 dB better than a typical real world threshold of
audibility (-60 dB). 

These days true CD quality performance (ca. -96 dB)  is available at the
analog outputs of an < $100 BD player which usually includes a network
(LAN+WAN) media player with considerable power and flexibility.

Not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, but not too far off when all
costs are included would be the performance of an Intel NUC  micro-PC's 
the Realtek ALC283 on-board chip audio system:

http://stn-bc.ru/?q=node/835

"
To assess output sound path designed for headphones or external
speakers, we resorted to the instrumental testing using an external
sound card Creative E-MU 0204 USB and utility RightMark audio Analyzer
6.3.0. Testing was conducted to stereo mode, 24-bit / 44.1 kHz. 
As a result of testing the audio section in the laptop Acer Aspire
R7-371T was rated "very good." Full report with the test results in RMAA
6.3.0 software on a separate page, the following is a brief report. 

Frequency response (in the range of 40 Hz - 15 kHz), dB 
0.02, -0.09 Excellent 

Noise level dB (A ) 
-86.4 good 

dynamic range, dB (A) 
86.2 good 

THD,% 
0.0057 Very good 

THD + noise, dB (A) 
-74.2 Mediocre 

Intermodulation distortion + noise,% 
0.030 good 

Crosstalk dB 
-85.8 Excellent 

Intermodulation at 10 kHz,% 
0.017 Very good 

Overall very good 
"



arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-02 Thread sckramer

Archimago wrote: 
> Hey guys. Just posted some measurements on the Pi3 + HiFiBerry DAC
> combo. I suspect many of us here are already doing this kind of thing
> with Pi computers and various other SBC's. Certainly makes an
> inexpensive system for a Squeezebox replacement with piCorePlayer
> installed...
> 
> http://archimago.blogspot.com/2016/10/measurements-raspberry-pi-3-hifiberry.html

The D+PRO is not my daily driver, and I'm more interested in the digi+,
digi+pro, and i2s-- where I find bypassing power is a fundamental
improvement. So really can't say if stock USB power vs. 5V/3.3V LPS
improves on the D+PRO...Buuut I've set this up just in the last few
days, for another project involving making a good a/b testing platform
for the Kali FIFO buffer (long story). So maybe I'll listen, then go to
USB & see if it's diff.

However, I noticed in your testing, you always go through USB (not
GPIO)-- On the digi+ using linear power vs the stock USB power wart
*thru the USB* didn't audibly change anything... also Hans mentioned
this in his vid re: (usb/GPIO) whereas thru USB made no change.

You can see my setup somewhere in the linux section, Kali... there's a
pic.. I'm borrowing my 4x LPS's (LT3042 based, and cheap) supplies to
play with this--

I'm cool if it measures the same, but would really like to see you
re-run the tests taking it all the way thru GPIO, see my setup -- Then
maybe play with the digi+/digi+ pro also :D



'AudioSystem' (http://bit.ly/1ruj0Zw) - 'YouTube'
(http://bit.ly/1ULq4fT) - 'Twitter' (http://bit.ly/1q8dTgc)

sckramer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20311
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] MEASUREMENTS: Raspberry Pi 3 & HiFiBerry DAC+ Pro...

2016-10-02 Thread Archimago

Hey guys. Just posted some measurements on the Pi3 + HiFiBerry DAC
combo. I suspect many of us here are already doing this kind of thing
with Pi computers and various other SBC's. Certainly makes an
inexpensive system for a Squeezebox replacement with piCorePlayer
installed...

http://archimago.blogspot.com/2016/10/measurements-raspberry-pi-3-hifiberry.html



Archimago's Musings: (archimago.blogspot.com) A 'more objective'
audiophile blog.

Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106213

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles