Re: Gentoo Ebuild for aufs-20070205 ~x86
Hi, For Gentoo you can find an ebuild for aufs now on the sunrise overlay :) Dipl. Inf. (FH) Torsten Kockler schrieb: Sorry I've forgotten to give you the link ;o)= http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160065 Cheers, Torsten ;o) Dipl. Inf. (FH) Torsten Kockler schrieb: Hi, I've tried to create an Gentoo ebuild for aufs from the cvs Version 20070205. It worked for me. Please send me feedback so I can improve it. Cheers, Torsten ;o) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
Re: aufs on a 2.4 kernel ?
Flemming Madsen: Is anybody by any chance contemplating a backport of aufs to the 2.4 kernel. Would be much appreciated for use in embedded systems. Unfortunately, I don't have such machine and disk space. If anybody start backporting, I will try answering the questions. I forgot many things in 2.4 since it was years ago when I touched it last time. I guess it is possible to backport aufs if all the features are not necessary. i.e. the limited or basic features only. Junjiro Okajima - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
Re: aufs max branches
Please simply ignore this, I was talking about two different things at once. The problem can be reproduced only during LiveCD startup, using busybox command with 'aufs' parameter. ergh. I was trying to say: The problem can be reproduced only during LiveCD startup, using busybox's mount command withOUT 'aufs' parameter. Tomas M - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
builtin aufs in kernel
Hi, I try to compile aufs with CONFIG_AUFS = y, but nothing happens in my kernel source tree. It's possible compile aufs builtin in the kernel, without modules? Regards, Fernando Gomes - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
NFS branch is not supported on 2.6.15.7
Hello List! I just wanted to start using aufs but mounting an nfs branch failed with kernel 2.6.15.7 and aufs 20070212. So I modified fs/aufs/branch.h with this patch: --- branch.h.orig 2007-02-14 16:03:04.0 +0100 +++ branch.h2007-02-14 10:15:34.0 +0100 @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ /* -- */ #define _AufsNoNfsBranchMsg NFS branch is not supported -#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE == KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,15) +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE == KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,14) #define AufsNoNfsBranch #define AufsNoNfsBranchMsg _AufsNoNfsBranchMsg #elif LINUX_VERSION_CODE = KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,19) \ Then I did on a diskless client where /usr is mounted on /dev/rd/0: mount -t aufs -o br:/usr=rw:/apps/master/usr=ro aufsroot /usr where /apps/master is an nfs mounted copy of an installed server. It looks like it works except: # find /usr /dev/null find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for usr/lib: this may be a bug in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been searched. But I'm not sure if this warning can cause serious problems. Why is it that on 2.6.15 NFS branch is not supported, what test should I run to see if this problems exists on 2.6.15.7? Cheers, Peter - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
Re: aufs on a 2.4 kernel ?
- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
