Re: unionctl -- unionfs compatibility
Oh, okay. It looks like, although both work in unionfs, putting the branch first is the preferred form. I'll change my scripts. Thanks. --Ryan On Thu, 17 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > > Ryan Jud Hughes: >> It seems that aufs's unionctl wants a command like: >> unionctl /UNION --mode /foo ro >> >> whereas unionfs's wanted a command like: >> unionctl /UNION --mode ro /foo > ::: >> Is there any reason not to do this? > > Because unionctl.c in unionfs-1.4.tar.gz shows us, > > fprintf(stderr, "\tunionctl UNION --mode BRANCH (rw|ro|nfsro)\n"); > > Unionfs-unionctl may accept the both cases. > > > Junjiro Okajima > - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
Re: aufs working on 2.6.21.1 (x86-64)?
Sorry, I can't figure out how to do that. There is something that prints to screen, but I don't have time to read it. However, I notice that the latest Sidux test release for amd64 is using kernel 2.6.21.1 with aufs, so I think that the problem I'm seeing may be somewhere other than aufs. Thanks, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael Creel: Everything seems to go well, but when the CD is booted (actually, I use VMware to boot the image), there is a failure at the point that the aufs filesystem is mounted, leading to a "failure bad /proc/mounts 1" message. > ::: >> I am trying this using VMware, and I can't grab screen output to paste into a >> message, so I've made two screenshots showing what happens when booting. They >> are at http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/pk64-aufs.png and >> http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/pk64-aufs2.png In the first, you see that > > According to pk64-aufs2.png, the message "failure bad /proc/mounts 1" is > unrelated to your problem. > Can you capture the entire message at kernel panic? > Linux Tux is hiding them. :-) > > I want to know whether the aufs debug message was printed or not. > > > Junjiro Okajima - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
Re: aufs working on 2.6.21.1 (x86-64)?
Michael Creel: > >> Everything seems to go well, but when the CD is booted (actually, I use > >> VMware to boot the image), there is a failure at the point that the aufs > >> filesystem is mounted, leading to a "failure bad /proc/mounts 1" message. ::: > I am trying this using VMware, and I can't grab screen output to paste into a > message, so I've made two screenshots showing what happens when booting. They > are at http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/pk64-aufs.png and > http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/pk64-aufs2.png In the first, you see that According to pk64-aufs2.png, the message "failure bad /proc/mounts 1" is unrelated to your problem. Can you capture the entire message at kernel panic? Linux Tux is hiding them. :-) I want to know whether the aufs debug message was printed or not. Junjiro Okajima - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
Re: aufs working on 2.6.21.1 (x86-64)?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > Michael Creel: >> I am attempting to update the kernel of the parallelknoppix64-rc1 live CD >> to use kernel 2.6.21.1 instead of 2.6.19.7. I updated aufs to yesterday's >> CVS and compiled the aufs.ko module as normal (make KDIR=/usr/src/linux -f >> local.mk). > >> Everything seems to go well, but when the CD is booted (actually, I use >> VMware to boot the image), there is a failure at the point that the aufs >> filesystem is mounted, leading to a "failure bad /proc/mounts 1" message. >> So I'm wondering if aufs is supposed to work with 2.6.21.1, x86_64, and I >> am doing something wrong, or if I just need to wait a bit for support to be >> added. Thanks, Michael > > Unfortunately, I don't have 64bit environment, so I didn't test aufs on 64bit > personally. But some users reported to me or this ML that aufs is running > fine. More unfortunately, I cound use 2.6.21(.1) since the sis900 nic driver > is broken. But it seems to be fixed already in git tree. I am waiting for > 2.6.21.2. > > About "failure bad /proc/mounts 1", do you have /proc/mounts when you mounted > aufs? If you don't, try -i option for mount(8). otherwise please send me your > /proc/mounts. > > > Junjiro Okajima > I am trying this using VMware, and I can't grab screen output to paste into a message, so I've made two screenshots showing what happens when booting. They are at http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/pk64-aufs.png and http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/pk64-aufs2.png In the first, you see that /proc/mounts exists. The first shot is right before the attempt to mount the aufs filesystem. The second show the last part of the errors, sorry I don't have any means to capture the first part - it flies by to fast for me to see it. Regards, Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
