[aur-general] Request for deletion of ecomorph-* packages

[Smartboy]

A new version of ecomorph is out, and the GIT is out of date right now. I
have created a new ecomorph package for these, and the others (which are now
out of date, broken, and were already orphaned) need to be deleted.

Thanks,
Smartboy

Re: [aur-general] aur/libdrm and extra/libdrm

[Evangelos Foutras]

Lyman wrote:

Hi,

I believed that aur/libdrm should be removed.

--
Lyman Li
苦水潭(主站): http://lymanrb.blogspot.com
苦水潭(国内): http://lymanrb.spaces.live.com
  


Thanks for noticing. I've removed the duplicate package from the AUR.

[aur-general] aur/libdrm and extra/libdrm

[Lyman]

Hi,

I believed that aur/libdrm should be removed.

--
Lyman Li
苦水潭(主站): http://lymanrb.blogspot.com
苦水潭(国内): http://lymanrb.spaces.live.com

Re: [aur-general] Official discussion period - Rules governing packages entering [community]

[Aaron Griffin]

On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Ivy Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Including a new, well-publicized (so people know they can turn it
>  off) function in pacman that would (optionally, default=yes)
>  to automagically send in installed/removed pkgs (and I suppose
>  a complete list the first time it's run) to something like Debian's
>  popularity-contest server.

Just because this one keeps coming up, I need to say this again (and
again, and again).

Functionality such as this will never ever make it into pacman. Ever.
I know I'm speaking for Dan here, but I'm confident he feels the same.
Pacman will never ever upload anything such as usage statistics.
Pacman is a package manager. External scripts can and should handle
this.