Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 21:03, Loui Chang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: >> > Where are you seeing 'poop'? >> >> I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I >> think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the >> commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all >> comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there. > > And that is fixed in git now. > Comments are displayed and poop is gone. > > You're the best code plumber, loui :P
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
Bahahaha. I'm seriously cracking up, thanks. On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Loui Chang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: > > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I > > think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the > > commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all > > comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there. > > And that is fixed in git now. > Comments are displayed and poop is gone. > >
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I > think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the > commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all > comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there. And that is fixed in git now. Comments are displayed and poop is gone.
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:50:18PM -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I > think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the > commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all > comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there. Ooops that was me. Pardon.
Re: [aur-general] orphan request
-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:58:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] orphan request > From: Ian Taylor > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Could you please orphan autossh so that I may adopt it? > > The package has been out-of-date for quite some time. I tried to > contact the maintainer (kleptophobiac), but never received a > response. > > Thank you, > Ian > done
[aur-general] orphan request
Could you please orphan autossh so that I may adopt it? The package has been out-of-date for quite some time. I tried to contact the maintainer (kleptophobiac), but never received a response. Thank you, Ian
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:50:18 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Daenyth Blank > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang > wrote: > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > > > > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I > think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the > commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all > comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there. > Thank you, at least I am not hallucinating.
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:19, Loui Chang wrote: > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > I was seeing it too, when I used the link from a notification email. I think it happens when the URL is malformed... the name of the commenter was appended to the URL after the package ID, and all comments on the page were gone leaving "poop" there.
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:39:27 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Aaron Griffin > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, stefan-husm...@t-online.de > wrote: > > > From: Loui Chang > > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > > > > > > > The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it.. > > This is the best exchange on this list yet. > > If the button text changed, I imagine someone (wizzo?) was testing > something > Oops, I probably should look up words I do not know before posting them. There may be little children reading this. :)
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: >> From: Loui Chang >> Where are you seeing 'poop'? >> >> > The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it.. This is the best exchange on this list yet. If the button text changed, I imagine someone (wizzo?) was testing something
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
-Original Message- > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:19:36 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Loui Chang > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.de > wrote: > > findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it. > > I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) > > because last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to > > the comments of several users (program was renamed to climm). > > > > For the other packages I left a comment. The > > AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, > > there is the word "poop". > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are > > only small files uploaded. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too. > > Thank you for notification. > > > > I was deleting some of the files. Have a look at the tarballs though. > They're much bigger than your average set of build scripts. > > Where are you seeing 'poop'? > > The poop is gone, sorry, I do not remember where I saw it.. Regards Stefan
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:03:50AM +0100, stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: > findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it. > I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because > last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments > of several users (program was renamed to climm). > > For the other packages I left a comment. The > AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, there > is the word "poop". > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are only > small files uploaded. > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too. > Thank you for notification. I was deleting some of the files. Have a look at the tarballs though. They're much bigger than your average set of build scripts. Where are you seeing 'poop'?
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
-Original Message- > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > > Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries > and some sources. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4011 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17880 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8064 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5338 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14866 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199 > > ...and there are many more. > > I am preparing another list, but much more extensive. But first I have > a question: in unsupported the packages.tar.gz may contain "tarballs" > of the sources?, because I see that there are several that have this? > (some are a mistake of the user that uploaded that and in array of > source download of the homepage) In the AUR Guidelines there is no > reference to this. > > > > -- > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) > http://www.djgera.com.ar > KeyID: 0x1B8C330D > Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D > > Hello, findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it. I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments of several users (program was renamed to climm). For the other packages I left a comment. The AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, there is the word "poop". http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are only small files uploaded. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too. Thank you for notification. Regards Stefan
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Xavier wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Eric Bélanger > wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, wrote: >> >>> Invalid Archs >>> --- >>> arch-wiki-docs --> any >>> anki --> x86 >>> >> >> Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have >> support for it. >> > > Which one did you fix? arch-wiki-docs? > I am curious and confused about the anki one. It appears as > unsupported on AUR : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14403 > It does not show up in the Integrity check 686 which makes me think it > might be a x86_64 only package. But why? And why is it also in > unsupported? > I tried to check the community webcvs, looking in the devel category > and a few others, I couldn't find any traces of that package. Btw > category makes it very painful to browse that tree, it is much better > with core/extra which don't have that directory structure. > I fixed both. anki is in science (searching in /var/abs helps in these cases) . It needs to be built for i686, that's why it appears as unsupported in AUR (AUR only displays what's in community i686). I believe Tim doesn't have an i686 machine and doesn't use a i686 chroot.
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, wrote: > >> Invalid Archs >> --- >> arch-wiki-docs --> any >> anki --> x86 >> > > Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have > support for it. > Which one did you fix? arch-wiki-docs? I am curious and confused about the anki one. It appears as unsupported on AUR : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14403 It does not show up in the Integrity check 686 which makes me think it might be a x86_64 only package. But why? And why is it also in unsupported? I tried to check the community webcvs, looking in the devel category and a few others, I couldn't find any traces of that package. Btw category makes it very painful to browse that tree, it is much better with core/extra which don't have that directory structure.
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, wrote: > Invalid Archs > --- > arch-wiki-docs --> any > anki --> x86 > Fixed in cvs. BTW, don't use the 'any' arch. The repos don't have support for it.
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, wrote: > > = > = Integrity Check i686 of community = > = > > Performing integrity checks... > ==> parsing pkgbuilds > ==> checking mismatches > ==> checking archs > ==> checking dependencies > ==> checking makedepends > ==> checking for circular dependencies > > Missing PKGBUILDs > --- > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/daemons/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/devel/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/editors/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/emulators/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/games/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/gnome/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/i18n/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/kde/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/python-nose/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib32/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/modules/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/denemo/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/network/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/office/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/wxmaxima/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/bashref/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/x11/CVS > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/xfce/CVS > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > - > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//extra/python-numpy vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/python-numpy > fixed.
[aur-general] Integrity Check x86_64 20-02-2009
= = Integrity Check i686 of community = = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/python-nose/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib32/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/denemo/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/wxmaxima/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/bashref/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/xfce/CVS Duplicate PKGBUILDs - /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//extra/python-numpy vs. /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/python-numpy Invalid Archs --- arch-wiki-docs --> any anki --> x86 Missing Dependencies -- eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' flumotion --> 'twisted-web' mmap --> 'lha' qc-usb --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' gg2 --> 'arts' shp2svg --> 'perl-math-round' thunderbird-spell-pl --> 'thunderbird=2.0.0.18' cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 23 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 1 Invalid archs: 2 Missing (make)dependencies:8 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
[aur-general] Integrity Check i686 20-02-2009
= = Integrity Check i686 of community = = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/xfce/CVS Invalid Archs --- arch-wiki-docs --> any Missing Dependencies -- flumotion --> 'twisted-web' open-vm-tools-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' qc-usb --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' gg2 --> 'arts' shp2svg --> 'perl-math-round' eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' virtualbox-ose-additions-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' Missing Makedepends - gensplash --> 'klibc-beyond' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 18 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 1 Missing (make)dependencies:9 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
Re: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
Nope. Just the buildscript and any necessary requirements that cannot be downloaded by the user. You won't be stopping soon, that I can assure you. There are bound to be such packages around..
[aur-general] Bad packages in AUR
Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries and some sources. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4011 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17880 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8064 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5338 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14866 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199 ...and there are many more. I am preparing another list, but much more extensive. But first I have a question: in unsupported the packages.tar.gz may contain "tarballs" of the sources?, because I see that there are several that have this? (some are a mistake of the user that uploaded that and in array of source download of the homepage) In the AUR Guidelines there is no reference to this. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
Re: [aur-general] Taking over abandoned but not orphaned package
Thank you very much :) -AT On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > Andrei Thorp wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to slowly work my way into the Arch Community, and I'm starting >> by taking over some packages on AUR. One that I use myself and would like >> to >> take over is the package for DevTodo. This package has been unmaintained >> for >> at least a few months now, and the maintainer's e-mail bounces. The >> package >> is flagged out of date and doesn't build without modification. I've got an >> updated PKGBUILD and have filed a bug to the author at some point. I also >> run this software on both my 32 and 64 bit machines. Any chance a TU could >> pass on maintainership to me, or at least orphan the package? I've read >> that >> usually there is a warning to the maintainer, but he seems to be >> unreachable. >> >> > > I have orphaned it for you. You have done what is required to attempt to > contact the maintainer. > > Allan > > > >
Re: [aur-general] Orphaning some packages
I could get the kdeicons-crystaldiamond. I love kde.. :p Let me know when you orphan it. ;] --- - °v° Marcelo Cavalcante Rocha / Kalib - /(_)\ Usuário Linux #407564 / Usuário Asterisk #1148 - ^ ^ GNU-Linux - Livre, Poderoso e Seguro - TUX-CE Member - www.tux-ce.org - Archlinux-br Developer Team - http://archlinux-br.org - http://blog.marcelocavalcante.net On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Eric Bélanger wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> >> >>> Hugo Doria wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, I want some more time to work on development, so i am orphaning some packages: >>> I will take these, only if no-one else wants them: >>> >>> >>> libburn libisoburn libisofs >>> Allan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> FYI, libburn and libisofs are in the testing repo. They will need to >> be removed from community once they move out of testing. >> >> > > Great. I was only going to take them as they are optdepends for brasero. > Good to see I won't have to adopt more packages :) > > Allan > > > >
