[aur-general] fceux and gfceux added to [community]
Hi, I've added fceux and gfceux in [community] repo. They will replace the old fceu and gfceu packages. Eric
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check community i686 06-03-2009
2009/3/6 Eric Bélanger : > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:10 PM, wrote: >> >> = >> = Integrity Check i686 of community = >> = >> >> Duplicate PKGBUILDs >> - >> /srv/abs/rsync/i686//extra/libburn vs. >> /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/libburn >> /srv/abs/rsync/i686//extra/libisofs vs. >> /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/libisofs >> > > Fixed. > I'll remove gensplash this weekend.
Re: [aur-general] Integrity Check community i686 06-03-2009
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:10 PM, wrote: > > = > = Integrity Check i686 of community = > = > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > - > /srv/abs/rsync/i686//extra/libburn vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/libburn > /srv/abs/rsync/i686//extra/libisofs vs. > /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/libisofs > Fixed.
[aur-general] Integrity Check community x86_64 06-03-2009
=== = Integrity Check x86_64 of community = === Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib32/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/xfce/CVS Duplicate PKGBUILDs - /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//extra/libburn vs. /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/libburn /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//extra/libisofs vs. /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64//community/lib/libisofs Invalid Archs --- arch-wiki-docs --> any anki --> x86 Missing Dependencies -- eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' flumotion --> 'twisted-web' qc-usb --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' gg2 --> 'arts' shp2svg --> 'perl-math-round' cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 19 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 2 Invalid archs: 2 Missing (make)dependencies:6 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
[aur-general] Integrity Check community i686 06-03-2009
= = Integrity Check i686 of community = = Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing PKGBUILDs --- /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/daemons/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/devel/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/editors/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/emulators/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/games/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/gnome/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/i18n/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/kde/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/modules/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/multimedia/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/network/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/office/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/science/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/system/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/x11/CVS /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/xfce/CVS Duplicate PKGBUILDs - /srv/abs/rsync/i686//extra/libburn vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/libburn /srv/abs/rsync/i686//extra/libisofs vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686//community/lib/libisofs Invalid Archs --- arch-wiki-docs --> any Missing Dependencies -- flumotion --> 'twisted-web' open-vm-tools-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' qc-usb --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' gg2 --> 'arts' shp2svg --> 'perl-math-round' eclipse-ve --> 'eclipse<3.3' cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' virtualbox-ose-additions-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.28' Missing Makedepends - gensplash --> 'klibc-beyond' Summary - Missing PKGBUILDs: 18 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names:0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 2 Invalid archs: 1 Missing (make)dependencies:9 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
2009/3/6, Nezmer : > Hi , > > Can you delete this package : > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24462 > > I uploaded It by mistake . Done! -- Arch Linux Developer (voidnull) AUR & Pacman Italian Translations Microdia Developer http://www.archlinux.it
[aur-general] Removal request
Hi , Can you delete this package : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24462 I uploaded It by mistake .
Re: [aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
> The application is extremely unstable for me. Even on different > distributions, it tends to segfault all the time which makes it utterly > unusable. I talked to two people who share these experiences so I think > it is safe to assume that Firestarter simply is too old to be used in > conjunction with any modern distro. I can only guess that it would still > work on Ubuntu 6.06 but for Arch Linux, I think there is hardly any chance. > As was already pointed out by Grigorios, the project seems dead beyond > hope for maintenance patches that address these issues and since it is > still sometimes suggested as a firewall application, I think it should > be removed and remain removed from the repositories to avoid confusion > and frustration and maybe even possible security issues. That is entirely my fault. The devs already voted firestarter out after I brought the issue up. This package will be gone very soon as I think it just constitutes a giant hazard by disguising itself as a security application. -T
Re: [aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Aaron Griffin >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > Also, please remove/ban the firestarter in extra, it is a very old, now > broken piece of software which hasn't seen any love for quite a long > time. In it's current state, it endangers users more than it helps keep > them secure, therefore I request a removal and ban if possible until the > firestarter project eventually releases a new version. > +1 >>> Huh? It's the same version as the official release. What's wrong with it? >>> >>> >> Its unmaintained for more than 4 years. Last release 29 Jan 2005. >> The ChangeLog hasnt been touched for 7+ years. >> Pesonally I dont have a problem with it if it still works. >> But since someone brought it up.. >> > > Ah, so Sven, is the package actually broken? Or is it still usable for > some people? > > The application is extremely unstable for me. Even on different distributions, it tends to segfault all the time which makes it utterly unusable. I talked to two people who share these experiences so I think it is safe to assume that Firestarter simply is too old to be used in conjunction with any modern distro. I can only guess that it would still work on Ubuntu 6.06 but for Arch Linux, I think there is hardly any chance. As was already pointed out by Grigorios, the project seems dead beyond hope for maintenance patches that address these issues and since it is still sometimes suggested as a firewall application, I think it should be removed and remain removed from the repositories to avoid confusion and frustration and maybe even possible security issues.
Re: [aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase >>> wrote: Also, please remove/ban the firestarter in extra, it is a very old, now broken piece of software which hasn't seen any love for quite a long time. In it's current state, it endangers users more than it helps keep them secure, therefore I request a removal and ban if possible until the firestarter project eventually releases a new version. >>> >>> +1 >> >> Huh? It's the same version as the official release. What's wrong with it? >> > > Its unmaintained for more than 4 years. Last release 29 Jan 2005. > The ChangeLog hasnt been touched for 7+ years. > Pesonally I dont have a problem with it if it still works. > But since someone brought it up.. Ah, so Sven, is the package actually broken? Or is it still usable for some people?
Re: [aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase >> wrote: >>> Also, please remove/ban the firestarter in extra, it is a very old, now >>> broken piece of software which hasn't seen any love for quite a long >>> time. In it's current state, it endangers users more than it helps keep >>> them secure, therefore I request a removal and ban if possible until the >>> firestarter project eventually releases a new version. >> >> +1 > > Huh? It's the same version as the official release. What's wrong with it? > Its unmaintained for more than 4 years. Last release 29 Jan 2005. The ChangeLog hasnt been touched for 7+ years. Pesonally I dont have a problem with it if it still works. But since someone brought it up.. Also interesting: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=491AF581.1030004%40ono.com&forum_name=firestarter-user -- Greg
Re: [aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> Also, please remove/ban the firestarter in extra, it is a very old, now >> broken piece of software which hasn't seen any love for quite a long >> time. In it's current state, it endangers users more than it helps keep >> them secure, therefore I request a removal and ban if possible until the >> firestarter project eventually releases a new version. > > +1 Huh? It's the same version as the official release. What's wrong with it?
Re: [aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > I hereby solemnly swear that I will take care of the > packages like they were my own flesh and blood, I shall shelter them > from fire and certain death. > It would be a nice idea to add an oath like that you have to agree to like it happens with certain licenses. The oath of the AUR packager. > Also, please remove/ban the firestarter in extra, it is a very old, now > broken piece of software which hasn't seen any love for quite a long > time. In it's current state, it endangers users more than it helps keep > them secure, therefore I request a removal and ban if possible until the > firestarter project eventually releases a new version. +1 -- Greg
[aur-general] Package removal/orphan request (stackless-python, clojure-svn, firestarter)
Please remove or ophan stackless-python and clojure-svn and let me take over those packages (My AUR nick is Svenstaro). I've contacted both authors but they didn't answer in two weeks and show no interest in Arch anymore. I think it is safe to assume that they have forgotten they even made those packages. I hereby solemnly swear that I will take care of the packages like they were my own flesh and blood, I shall shelter them from fire and certain death. Also, please remove/ban the firestarter in extra, it is a very old, now broken piece of software which hasn't seen any love for quite a long time. In it's current state, it endangers users more than it helps keep them secure, therefore I request a removal and ban if possible until the firestarter project eventually releases a new version. Sven
