Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2009-03-23 Thread Cilyan Olowen 
Hello TUs

Could someone orphan openeuclide [1], please ? The package has been
flagged out-of-date since around november 2006 and never updated. The
program is a little old but with the little patch I produced compiles
and runs fine, so I think I could share.

Regards

Cilyan

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6066

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2009-03-23 Thread Daenyth Blank 
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:10, Cilyan Olowen  wrote:
> Hello TUs
>
> Could someone orphan openeuclide [1], please ? The package has been
> flagged out-of-date since around november 2006 and never updated. The
> program is a little old but with the little patch I produced compiles
> and runs fine, so I think I could share.
>
> Regards
>
> Cilyan
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6066
>
Done

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2009-03-23 Thread Cilyan Olowen 
Thanks, the package is up-to-date now :)

2009/3/23 Daenyth Blank :
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:10, Cilyan Olowen  wrote:
>> Hello TUs
>>
>> Could someone orphan openeuclide [1], please ? The package has been
>> flagged out-of-date since around november 2006 and never updated. The
>> program is a little old but with the little patch I produced compiles
>> and runs fine, so I think I could share.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Cilyan
>>
>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6066
>>
> Done
>

Re: [aur-general] TU orphan: pdfjam

2009-03-23 Thread Leonardo Damián Barberón 
On Sunday 22 March 2009 22:00:59 Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Leonardo Damián Barberón
>
>  wrote:
> > Hi, my first email to the list!
> >
> >
> > The maintainer of the pdfjam package hasn't maintained it for more than 3
> > years now. Please orphan the package so that I can maintain it.
> >
> > pdfjam: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2737
> >
> > Dami
>
> Orphaned. Thanks for wanting to contribute. :)


Thanks, the package is up-to-date now.

[aur-general] Package removal request

2009-03-23 Thread Dan Vratil 
Hi,
please could you delete package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17815 
(flashcam). I think this package is already not needed anymore as his function 
is provided by current stable version of flash.
Thanks


-- 
-
Dan Vrátil
prog...@progdansoft.com
ICQ 249163429
Jabber prog...@jabber.cz
Tel. +420 732 326 870


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

2009-03-23 Thread Daenyth Blank 
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:05, Dan Vratil  wrote:
> Hi,
> please could you delete package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17815
> (flashcam). I think this package is already not needed anymore as his function
> is provided by current stable version of flash.
> Thanks

Done

[aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon

2009-03-23 Thread Allan McRae 

Hi TUs,

It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface.  You can refresh 
your memory here: 
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html


Allan

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon

2009-03-23 Thread hollunder 
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:28 +1000
Allan McRae  wrote:

> Hi TUs,
> 
> It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface.  You can
> refresh your memory here: 
> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html
> 
> Allan
> 

How does one vote for someone to become a TU?

Regards, Philipp

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon

2009-03-23 Thread Andrei Thorp 
Well, one has to be a TU to vote, and then it seems that there is a
web interface on AUR that becomes available.

-AT

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM,   wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:28 +1000
> Allan McRae  wrote:
>
>> Hi TUs,
>>
>> It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface.  You can
>> refresh your memory here:
>> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html
>>
>> Allan
>>
>
> How does one vote for someone to become a TU?
>
> Regards, Philipp
>

Re: [aur-general] Voting period: Chris Brannon

2009-03-23 Thread hollunder 
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:19:21 -0700
Andrei Thorp  wrote:

> Well, one has to be a TU to vote, and then it seems that there is a
> web interface on AUR that becomes available.
> 
> -AT
> 
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:08 AM,   wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:28 +1000
> > Allan McRae  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi TUs,
> >>
> >> It is time to vote so head to the AUR voting interface.  You can
> >> refresh your memory here:
> >> http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-March/004104.html
> >>
> >> Allan
> >>
> >
> > How does one vote for someone to become a TU?
> >
> > Regards, Philipp
> >

Ah, thanks for clarification, it just sounded a bit like it was for the
general public.

Philipp

[aur-general] Orphan kerneloops package request

2009-03-23 Thread Leonardo Damián Barberón 
Hi TUs, 

The maintainer of the kerneloops package [0] hasn't maintained it for more 
than 1 years now. Please orphan the package so that I can maintain it.

[0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14668

Regards

Dami

Re: [aur-general] Orphan kerneloops package request

2009-03-23 Thread Kessia 'even' Pinheiro 
Done.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leonardo Damián Barberón
 wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> The maintainer of the kerneloops package [0] hasn't maintained it for more
> than 1 years now. Please orphan the package so that I can maintain it.
>
> [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14668
>
> Regards
>
> Dami
>
>



-- 
Kessia Pinheiro
Computer Science Student - Brazil, UFBa
Linux System Administrator
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux User #389695
http://even.archlinux-br.org
---
X Fórum Internacional Software Livre - fisl10
24 a 27 de junho de 2009
PUCRS - Porto Alegre - Brasil

Re: [aur-general] Orphan kerneloops package request

2009-03-23 Thread Leonardo Damián Barberón 
On Monday 23 March 2009 16:11:33 Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote:
> Done.
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leonardo Damián Barberón
>
>  wrote:
> > Hi TUs,
> >
> > The maintainer of the kerneloops package [0] hasn't maintained it for
> > more than 1 years now. Please orphan the package so that I can maintain
> > it.
> >
> > [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14668
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Dami

Thanks, the package is up-to-date now.

Re: [aur-general] [PATCH] initial support for any architecture.

2009-03-23 Thread Aaron Griffin 
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Abhishek Dasgupta  wrote:
> 2009/3/21 Aaron Griffin :
>> Thanks! Patches pulled into my any-arch branch.
>>
>> I think we're good to merge them into master and push them live... do
>> you see any other issues?
>>
>> Once this is live, I'll updated devtools to support the any arch as well.
>>
>
> There should not be any problems since the changes are backward
> compatible (except db-update, of course). I didn't understand what the
> purpose of setting CARCH in db-move and db-remove is; when we
> use any packages, then CARCH becomes 'any' which isn't really valid.

I don't know either. I think it was a safety net... or maybe it was in
there for a reason once and isn't anymore. It could probably be
removed.

> Also calling db-remove archindeppkg repo i686 (or x86_64) will remove
> the arch independent package only from that particular architecture. I
> don't know whether this should be a bug or a feature :)

That sounds fine to me. It's always possible we have edge cases like this.

[aur-general] Package Removal Request (pywebkitgtk-svn-newest)

2009-03-23 Thread M Rawash 
please remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24546 ,
duplicate of http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18188 , and neither 
actually build!

[aur-general] Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)

2009-03-23 Thread Team Pantheon 
Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)
Its already disowned.

greetings

http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de

Re: [aur-general] Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)

2009-03-23 Thread Daenyth Blank 
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:02, Team Pantheon
 wrote:
> Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)
> Its already disowned.
>
> greetings
>
> http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de
>

What's wrong with the package itself?

Re: [aur-general] Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)

2009-03-23 Thread pantheon 


Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:02, Team 
Pantheon
 wrote:
> Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)
> Its already disowned.
>
> greetings
>
> http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de"; target="_top" 
rel="nofollow">http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de>
What's wrong with the package itself?


Its a wrong name. New package is already on its way.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Package-Removel-Request-%28rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn%29-tp2523429p2523466.html
Sent from the AUR-general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [aur-general] Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)

2009-03-23 Thread Daenyth Blank 
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:07, pantheon  wrote:
>
> 
> Daenyth Blank 
> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:02, 
> Team Pantheon
>  wrote:
> > Package Removel Request (rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn)
> > Its already disowned.
> >
> > greetings
> >
> > http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de"; target="_top" 
> rel="nofollow">http://www.rastullahs-lockenpracht.de>
> What's wrong with the package itself?
> 
> 
> Its a wrong name. New package is already on its way.
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://n2.nabble.com/Package-Removel-Request-%28rastullahs_lockenpracht-svn%29-tp2523429p2523466.html
> Sent from the AUR-general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Aha, ok

[aur-general] Redirection of package

2009-03-23 Thread Cilyan Olowen 
I was wondering if it is possible to redirect one package to another,
and if it was possible in unsupported.

For example, python bindings for poppler are currently, but probably
will stay like this, a bazaar repository. The fact is, as it is the
official way of obtaining the software, the package should be
python-poppler. But, as it is a bzr, it should be python-poppler-bzr
too and so will beneficiate the makepkg functionality to update to the
last repository version.

Another package needs the bindings, but as it is the functionnality
that are needed and not a particular way of obtention, I think it is
better to request python-poppler. So, for the requirement to be
installed automatically, it is better for the package to be named
python-poppler.

Finally, it could be great if the package python-poppler was
redirected to python-poppler-bzr. And if a stable packaged version of
the software arise, the two packages could be dissociated
transparently.

Is it possible ?

Cilyan

Re: [aur-general] Redirection of package

2009-03-23 Thread Allan McRae 

Cilyan Olowen wrote:

I was wondering if it is possible to redirect one package to another,
and if it was possible in unsupported.

For example, python bindings for poppler are currently, but probably
will stay like this, a bazaar repository. The fact is, as it is the
official way of obtaining the software, the package should be
python-poppler. But, as it is a bzr, it should be python-poppler-bzr
too and so will beneficiate the makepkg functionality to update to the
last repository version.

Another package needs the bindings, but as it is the functionnality
that are needed and not a particular way of obtention, I think it is
better to request python-poppler. So, for the requirement to be
installed automatically, it is better for the package to be named
python-poppler.

Finally, it could be great if the package python-poppler was
redirected to python-poppler-bzr. And if a stable packaged version of
the software arise, the two packages could be dissociated
transparently.

Is it possible ?

Cilyan
  


"man PKGBUILD" and look at provides.  Probably want to set conflicts too.

Allan